Various studies have demonstrated that the necessity for reversal of Warfarin through the use of Vitamin K (Vit K) in neck of femur fracture patients introduces increased duration of stay and poorer outcomes as measured by operative complications and mortality rate. One reason for this delay may be the time latency between admission and the clinicians decision to investigate the INR. In this study we aim to explore the different causes of latency which contribute to a delay to theatre and ascertain whether point of care testing may negate this. We carried out an audit of a cohort of neck of femur fracture patients between 2012 and 2015. Between September 2011 and September 2013, paper notes of 25 patients who were on warfarin at the time of sustaining a Neck of femur fracture (NOF) was obtained within Addenbrookes hospital archives. An additional 80 patients records from the year 2015 were retrieved from EPIC digital records. Time intervals were recorded as follows (from time of A&E assessment by Medical doctor); Interval to orthopaedic specialist assessment, Interval to first INR order, Interval to first INR result seen by specialist, Interval to first Vit K prescribed, Interval to first Vit K given, Interval to Second INR ordered, Interval to second INR seen by specialist, Interval to operation time (as determined by time of team briefing). Analysis of the time intervals as a proportion of total time elapsed between A&E assessment and Time to theatre was performed. Point of care (POC) testing of INR on admission to A&E was introduced and a symmetrical time period was analysed for the same intervals. The latency generated by time taken for a NOF to be assessed by an orthopaedic specialist occupied 8.60% of the total time, the interval between ordering and recording an INR value accounted for 7.96% of time to theatre, the interval between an INR being recorded and subsequently seen by a clinician accounted for 13.4% of time to theatre, the time between orthopaedic specialist assessment and prescription of Vit K took up 7.83% of the total time and the percentage time between Vit K prescription and administration was 12.3%. The time between the first dose of Vit K prescription and arriving at theatre accounted for 76.1% of latency and the time between viewing a second INR and time to theatre occupied 33% of the total time. Following introduction of POC INR testing, there was a statistically significant decrease in time taken for warfarin reversal and consequently a reduction between time of admission to time to theatres. NOF patients who are on warfarin at time of injury introduces complexity to surgical management and planning for theatre. In our audit we demonstrate that causes of delay are distributed throughout the pathway of care and there are several stages. POC INR testing represents an effective method of reducing this latency and improves patient outcome

Introduction. In the last couple of years, several synovial biomarkers have been introduced in the diagnostic algorithm for a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Alpha defensin-1 proved to be one of the most promising, with a high sensitivity and specificity. However, a major disadvantage of this biomarker is the high costs. Calprotectin is a protein that is present in the cytoplasm of neutrophils, and is released upon neutrophil activation. Its value has been established for decades as a (fecal) marker for inflammatory bowel disease. Aim. To determine the efficacy of synovial calprotectin in the diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection. Methods. We prospectively collected synovial fluid (from hip, knee and shoulder) from patients with a proven PJI (n=15) and from patients that underwent a revision surgery without signs of a PJI (n=19). Patients with an active rheumatoid arthritis and/or gout were excluded from the study. Synovial fluid was centrifuged and the supernatant was used to measure calprotectin, by using a rapid, point of care test. This test was validated for synovial fluid analysis of calprotectin using an ELISA. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to calculate the difference between both patient groups. Results. The median calprotectin level was 899 mg/L (range 28–2120) for PJI versus 22 mg/L (range 0–202) for controls (p < 0.0001). With a cut-off value of 50 mg/L, synovial calprotectin has a high sensitivity of 93%, and a specificity of 84%. The positive and negative predictive values are 82% and 94%, respectively. Conclusions. Synovial calprotectin is a potentially valuable biomarker in the diagnosis of a PJI. With a point of care test, a rapid quantative diagnosis can be made within the operating room (results are obtained within 20 minutes), and could help in the decision making process to re-implant a prosthesis in a one stage procedure. In comparison to the currently available test (to measure alpha defensin-1), the measurement of calprotectin test is much cheaper (500 euro versus 20 euro per sample) and easily to implement in hospitals where this test is already available. Its diagnostic efficacy for exclusively low-grade PJI should be further elaborated

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second most common complication and pulmonary embolism (PE) is the fourth most common cause of death after a hip fracture. Despite thromboprophylaxis, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is detected in up to 45% of hip fracture patients. Thrombelastography (TEG) is a whole-blood, point of care test capable of providing clinicians with a global assessment of the clotting process, from fibrin formation to clot lysis. Maximal amplitude (mA) from TEG analysis is a measure of clot strength. Elevated admission mA values of >65mm and >72mm have been determined to be independent predictors of in-hospital PE. The coagulation index (CI) is calculated based on TEG parameters and defines hypercoagulable state as CI >3. This study aimed to use serial TEG analysis to determine the duration of hypercoagulable state after hip fracture. A prospective cohort of hip fracture patients >50 years of age amenable to surgical treatment (AO 31A1–A3 & 31B1–B3) were enrolled at a Level I trauma centre. Serial TEG analysis (TEG 6S) was performed every 24-hours from admission until 5-days post-operatively and at 2- and 6-week follow-up visits. All patients received a minimum of 28 days of thromboprophylaxis. Descriptive statistics and single sample t-tests were used for comparison of mA to the 65mm threshold. Thirty-five patients (26 female) with a median age of 83 (range = 71–86) years were included. On admission, 31.4% and 82.9% of patients were hypercoagulable based on mA >65mm and CI, respectively. At 2 weeks, all patients remained hypercoagulable, however, mA >72mm showed that 16 patients (47.1%) were at even higher risk for VTE. At 6-weeks, 65.7% and 97.1% of patients were hypercoagulable based on mA >65mm and CI, respectively. When compared with the mA >65mm threshold, patients were hypocoagulable at the time of admission (mA = 62.2 (±6.3), p = 0.011), but became significantly more hypercoagulable at 2-weeks (mA = 71.6 (±2.6), p < 0 .001), followed by continued hypercoagulability at 6-weeks, however not significantly elevated above the 65mm threshold (mA = 66.2 (±3.8), p = 0.058). One patient developed a symptomatic DVT at 2-weeks and had a mA = 72.9 and a CI of 5.9. This is the first study to demonstrate that >50% of hip fracture patients remain hypercoagulable 6 weeks post fracture despite thromboprophylaxis, and there are individual hypercoagulable responses. This is critical, as guidelines only recommend 28 to 35 days of thromboprophylaxis in this high-risk population. Previously determined mA thresholds may be a more sensitive test for risk-stratifying patients' VTE risk than the CI threshold. Additionally, assessing ΔmA using serial TEG may better predict VTE risk

Aim. Several options to standardize the definition of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been created including the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), 2018 Intentional Consensus Meeting (ICM), and the 2019 proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Synovial fluid biomarkers have been investigated in an effort to simplify and improve the diagnosis of PJI. The aim of this study was to test the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values (PPV and NPV, respectively) of a calprotectin point of care (POC) test for diagnosing PJI in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients comparing different sets of criteria (2013 MSIS, 2018 ICM, and 2019 EBJIS criteria) used to define patients as with or without infection. Method. From October 2018 to January 2020 and under IRB approval 123 intraoperative samples of synovial fluid were prospectively collected at two academic hospitals in the same institution from revision TKA patients. All patients underwent standard clinical and laboratory evaluation for PJI at our institution, allowing for categorization using the 3 criteria. Patients were adjudicated by 2 blinded and independent reviewers for the 3 sets of criteria. The 3 criteria agreed 91.8% of the time. Four likely cases by the 2019 proposed EBJIS were considered unlikely and 1 inconclusive case by the 2018 ICM was considered not infected for the purposes of analysis. Calprotectin POC testing followed manufacturer's instructions using a threshold of >50 mg/L to indicate PJI. Sensitivities, specificities, PPV, NPV, and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated for the 3 sets of criteria. Results. Using 2013 MSIS criteria the calprotectin POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV AUC of 98.1%, 95.7%, 94.5%, 98.5%, and 0.969, respectively. Using 2018 ICM the POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and (AUC) of 98.2%, 98.5%, 98.2%, 98.5%, and 0.984, respectively. Using the 2019 proposed EBJIS criteria the POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and area under the curve (AUC) of 93.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 94.2%, and 0.966, respectively. Conclusions. The calprotectin lateral flow POC test has an excellent sensitivity and specificity regardless of the set of criteria used to define PJI. These results are promising and suggest that the calprotectin lateral flow test may be used as a rule out test in a cost-conscious health care model or when conventional diagnostic tools may not be available. Further investigations of the calprotectin PCO test must be completed to validate these results

Diagnosis of chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is often challenging. Painful prosthesis is frequently due to an infection but to diagnose it is somethimes difficult. All recent guidelines stress the central role of joint punction in diagnosis of PJI if the infection is not demonstrated. However which test on synovial fluid must be carried out is not so clearly defined. Total white blood cell count and differential leukocite count are usually considered useful in diagnosis but cut offs reported by different studies are quite different. Moreover this test needs a relatively large amount of fluid and blood contamination of it largely affects the result. What's more the synovial fluid WBC count may be unreliable in the setting of a metal-on-metal bearing or corrosion reaction. Routine cultures should be maintained between 5 and 14 days, their sensitivity appears low in chronic infection even if witholding antimicrobial therapy before the collection of the fluid can increase the likelihood of recovery an organism. Synovial leukocyte esterase can be performed as a rapid office or intraoperative point of care test using urinalysis strips. It is cheap and easy to perform, but the presence of blood in the sample can affect the result and it needs centrifugation. Recently a new test has been proposed to detect alfa-defensine in synovial fluid. It shows a high sensitivity and an exellent specificity. We performed 25 joint punctions on 25 patients with suspected PJI (enrollment is going on). Synovial fluid collected was tested for: leukocite esterase, WBC count and differential, colture in blood colture bottle for anerobe and aerobes (BacT/ALERT Biomerieux, inc) and detection of alfa-defensine level (Synovasure – Zimmer). In patients who underwent surgery at least 5 samples of periprotesic tissue were collected for microbiologic analysis and the removed implant was sonicated according with the methodic. Furthermore samples for frozen section were sent and a histologic examination was made according to the Moriewitz – Kerr classification. The MSIS criteria was utilized to classify the case as infected or not