Aims. We introduced a self-care pathway for minimally displaced distal radius fractures, which involved the patient being discharged from a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) without a physical review and being provided with written instructions on how to remove their own cast or splint at home, plus advice on exercises and return to function. Methods. All patients managed via this protocol between March and October 2020 were contacted by a medical secretary at a minimum of six months post-injury. The patients were asked to complete the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), a satisfaction questionnaire, advise if they had required surgery and/or contacted any health professional, and were also asked for any recommendations on how to improve the service. A review with a hand surgeon was organized if required, and a cost analysis was also conducted. Results. Overall 71/101 patients completed the telephone consultation; no patients required surgery, and the mean and median PRWE scores were 23.9/100 (SD 24.9) and 17.0/100 (interquartile range (IQR) 0 to 40), respectively. Mean patient satisfaction with treatment was 34.3/40 (SD 9.2), and 65 patients (92%) were satisfied or highly satisfied. In total there were 16 contact calls, 12 requests for a consultant review, no formal complaints, and 15 minor adjustment suggestions to improve patient experience. A relationship was found between intra-articular injuries and lower patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.025), however no relationship was found between PRWE scores and the nature of the fracture. Also, no relationship was found between the type of immobilization and the functional outcome or patient satisfaction. Cost analysis of the self-care pathway V traditional pathway showed a cost savings of over £13,500 per year with the new self-care model compared to the traditional model. Conclusion. Our study supports a VFC self-care pathway for patients with minimally displaced distal radius fractures. The pathway provides a good level of patient satisfaction and function. To improve the service, we will make minor amendments to our patient information sheet. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):726–732

In the field of hand surgery, physicians are working to improve patient satisfaction by offering several minor procedures in the physician's office via the WALANT method. We seek to investigate the degree of patient satisfaction, out of pocket cost, convenience and comfort experienced with in-office hand procedures. A ten question survey consisting of a ten-point Likert scale of agreement and questions asking for a numerical answer was administered via phone call to 33 patients treated with minor hand operations in the office setting in the United States. There were 18 male and 15 female respondents with an average age of 65.59±12.64 years. Respondents underwent procedures including trigger finger release (18), needle aponeurotomy (7), and other minor hand operations. Survey responses indicated strong agreement with questions 1-3 and 6–8, with responses averaging 9.60±0.23 in these positive metrics. Questions 4 and 5, which asked whether the surgery and recovery period were painful, respectively, averaged 2.65±0.49, indicating a mild level of disagreement that either was “painful”. Additionally, most patients responded that they did not take time off work (12) or are not currently employed (11). Other respondents (3) reported taking between one to five days off work post-operatively. 27 respondents also reported an out of pocket cost averaging $382±$976, depending on insurance coverage. Patients reported a small degree of pain in the operative and post-operative period, a high degree of comfort and convenience and a high degree of satisfaction. Likewise, the patient-reported out of pocket cost was far lower than comparable surgical costs in alternate settings. These results support the use of in-office procedures for minor hand surgeries from a patient perspective and indicate a nearly universal intent to repeat any future hand operations in the office setting

Ten to twenty percent of patients are dissatisfied with the clinical result after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Aim of this study was to investigate the impact of personality traits on patient satisfaction and subjective outcome of TKA. We investigated 80 patients with 86 computer navigated TKAs (Emotion®, B Braun Aesculap) and asked for patient satisfaction. We divided patients into two groups (satisfied or dissatisfied). 12 personality traits were tested by an independent psychologist, using the Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI-R). Postoperative examination included Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Radiologic investigation was done in all patients. 84% of our patients were satisfied, while 16% were not satisfied with clinical outcome. The FPI-R showed statistically significant influence of four personality traits on patient satisfaction: life satisfaction (ρ = 0.006), performance orientation (ρ =0.015), somatic distress (ρ = 0.001), and emotional stability (ρ = 0.002). All clinical scores (VAS, WOMAC, and KSS) showed significant better results in the satisfied patient group. Radiological examination showed optimal alignment of all TKAs. There were no complications requiring revision surgery in both groups. The results of our study show that personality traits may influence patient satisfaction and clinical outcome after TKA. Thus, patients personality traits may be a useful predictive factor for postoperative satisfaction after TKA

Complications such as implant loosening, infection, periprosthetic fracture or instability may lead to revision arthroplasty procedures. There is limited literature comparing single-stage and two-stage revision shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and cost benefit between single-stage and two-stage revision procedures. Thirty-one revision procedures (mean age 72+/-7, 15 males and 16 females) performed between 2016 and 2021 were included (27 revision RSA, 2 revision TSA, 2 failed ORIFs). Two-stage procedures were carried out 4-6 weeks apart. Single-stage procedures included debridement, implant removal and washout, followed by re-prep, re-drape and reconstruction with new instrumentations. Clinical parameters including length of stay, VAS, patient satisfaction was recorded preoperatively and at mean 12-months follow up. Cost benefit analysis were performed. Seven revisions were two-stage procedures and 24 were single-stage procedures. There were 5 infections in the two-stage group vs 14 in the single-stage group. We noted two cases of unstable RSA and 8 other causes for single-stage revision. Majority of the revisions were complex procedures requiring significant glenoid and/or humeral allografts and tendon transfers to compensate for soft tissue loss. No custom implants were used in our series. Hospital stay was reduced from 41+/-29 days for 2-stage procedures to 16+/-13 days for single-stage (p<0.05). VAS improved from 9+/-1 to 2+/-4 for two-stage procedures and from 5+/-3 to 1+/-2 for single-stages. The average total cost of hospital and patient was reduced by two-thirds. Patient satisfaction in the single-stage group was 43% which was comparable to the two-stage group. All infections were successfully treated with no recurrence of infection in our cohort of 31 patients. There was no instability postoperatively. 3 patients had postoperative neural symptoms which resolved within 6 months. Single-stage procedures for revision shoulder arthroplasty significantly decrease hospital stay, improve patients’ satisfaction, and reduced surgical costs

Background. NHS improvement advocates same day emergency care (SDEC) for patients requiring additional specialism than can be provided in an Emergency Department. A novel physiotherapist-led spinal SDEC unit was established in January 2020, integrated within the on-call spinal service. The aim of this paper was to evaluate patient and peer satisfaction with the spinal SDEC. Methods. Patient satisfaction questionnaires and/or friends and family tests were collected from patients over a six-month period. Questionnaires evaluated satisfaction with recommendations given, service given, staff friendliness. Anonymous, completed questionnaires were uploaded onto a spreadsheet. Peer satisfaction was assessed using a google sheets document emailed to interface, primary care and community services. The questionnaire captured the respondents’ role, how many patients they had referred to the SDEC, reasons for referral, ease of referral, and compared this new pathway with the previous pathway. All patient's satisfaction responses recommended the service to family and friends (n=110 extremely likely, 8 likely) (6% total seen). All respondents were satisfied with the service they received (n=80 very satisfied, n=12 satisfied) and recommendations made (n=86 very satisfied, n=6 satisfied). Of peer satisfaction, 26 respondents (n=12 (46%) physiotherapists, n=6 (23%) first contact practitioners, n=6 (23%) advanced practice physiotherapists, n=1 (4%) GP, n=1 (4%) nurse) reported the SDEC delivered a better pathway and outcomes (n=25, 96%), and 20 (77%) respondents reported favourable comments of the service and its impact on patients and referrers. Conclusion. Peer and patient satisfaction data support the use of a physiotherapist-led spinal SDEC in emergency and urgent spinal care pathways. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of Interest. Sources of interest: No sources of funding

Introduction. Mechanical axis limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated excellent long-term survivorship; however, patient satisfaction continues to demand improvement. Alternative emerging alignment concepts including kinematic and tibial constitutional varus have been introduced but remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and patient satisfaction following TKA with tibial components placed in constitutional varus alignment. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort analysis from a total joint registry of 114 patients with preoperative varus deformity who underwent primary TKA with tibial component placed in 1–3 degrees of constitutional varus. The group included 59 males (52%) and 55 (48%) females with a mean age of 67 years (range 43 – 85) and mean BMI of 32.0 kg/m. 2. (range 21 – 51 kg/m. 2. ) with a minimum 1 year follow-up. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the preoperative varus alignment: Group A between 1°- 5° varus (43 knees), Group B between 6°- 10° (56 knees), and Group C greater than 10° (16 knees). The target constitutional tibial varus alignment was selected based on the extent of the patient's deformity. Results. The average overall patient satisfaction was 4.7 on a 5-point Likert scale with 93% being either very satisfied or satisfied. Group A had the highest overall patient satisfaction of 95% followed by Group B (93%) and Group C (88%). Mean Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) for the combined groups was 86, mean KOOS Jr. score 72, mean WOMAC score 90, mean Knee Society (KS) Knee Score 93 and mean KS Function Score was 85. Conclusion. The push for more patient centered outcome measures drives the pursuit of improving patient satisfaction in addition to traditional outcome measures. Tibial components placed in constitutional varus in this study demonstrated excellent patient satisfaction and improvement in knee function following TKA

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered as one of the most successful and cost-effective medical interventions yet it is consistently reported that up to 20% of patients are dissatisfied with their outcomes. Patient satisfaction is correlated with the fulfillment of expectations and an important aspect of this involves good surgeon-patient communication, which itself is a contributor to TKA satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a checklist intended to enhance the quality of surgeon-patient communication by optimizing the surgeon's role in helping patients set (or reset) and manage post-TKA expectations that are realistic, achievable, and most importantly, patient-specific. In this prospective mixed methods study, a communication checklist was developed from the analysis of interviews with patients who were between six weeks and six months post-TKA. Four orthopaedic surgeons then used the checklist to guide discussions with patients about post-operative expectations and outcomes during follow-up visits between six weeks and six months. A visual analogue scale was used to survey two groups of patients on five measures of satisfaction: the standard of care communication group and the intervention group who had received the checklist. The mean scores of the two groups were compared using independent t-tests. The duration of follow-up visits was also tracked to determine if the checklist took significantly more time in practice. Themes from the qualitative analysis of eight patient interviews incorporated into the checklist included pain management, medication, physiotherapy, and general concerns and questions. The quantitative study comprised 127 participants, 67 in the standard of care communication group and 60 in the checklist group. There were no significant group differences in gender, BMI, comorbidities, post-operative complications, marital or occupational status, however the standard of care group was older by six years (p < .001). The checklist group reported significantly greater satisfaction on four of the five measures of satisfaction: TKA satisfaction and expectations met (p = .017), care and concern shown by the surgeons (p = .011), surgeons' communication ability (p = .008), and satisfaction with time surgeons spent with patients during follow-up visits (p < .001). Satisfaction with the TKA for relieving pain and restoring function was not significant (p = .064). Although the checklist increased the average clinic visit time by only 1 minute, 51 seconds, it was significantly greater (p = .001). The impact of age and gender on satisfaction was explored using a two-way analysis of variance. No significant effects or interactions were observed. Checklists have been shown to decrease medical errors and improve overall standards of patient care but no published research to date has used a communication checklist to enhance orthopaedic surgeon-patient communication. The present findings indicate that this simple tool can significantly increase patient satisfaction. This has practical significance because patient satisfaction is a metric that is increasingly used as a key performance indicator for surgeons and health care institutions alike. Increased TKA satisfaction will benefit patients, surgeons, and the health care system overall

Introduction. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used as quality benchmarks in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The objective of this study was to investigate whether PROMs correlate with patient satisfaction, which is arguably the most important and desired outcome. Methods. An institutional joint database was queried for patients who underwent primary, elective, unilateral TJA. Eligible patients were asked to complete a satisfaction survey at final follow-up. Correlation coefficients (R) were calculated to quantify the relationship between patient satisfaction and prospectively collected PROMs. We explored a wide range of PROMs including Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); Short Form-12 (SF-12), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Knee Society Clinical Rating Score (KSCRS), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and University of California Los Angeles activity level rating (UCLA). Results. In general, there was only weak to moderate correlation between patient satisfaction and PROMs. Querying the absolute postoperative scores had higher correlation with patient satisfaction compared to either preoperative scores or net changes in scores. The correlation was higher with disease-specific PROMs (WOMAC, OHS, KSCRS) compared to general health (SF-12), activity level (UCLA), or perception of normalcy (SANE). Within disease-specific PROMs, the pain domain consistently carried the highest correlation with patient satisfaction (WOMAC pain subscale, R = 0.45, p <0.001; KSCRS pain subscale, R = 0.49, p <0.001). Conclusion. There is only weak to moderate correlation between PROMs and patient satisfaction. PROMs alone are not the optimal way to evaluate patient satisfaction. We recommend directly querying patients about satisfaction and using shorter PROMs, particularly disease-specific PROMs that assess pain perception to better gauge patient satisfaction. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Overall, hip and knee total joint replacement (TJR) patients experience marked benefit, with reported satisfaction rates of greater than 80% with regard to pain relief and improved function. However, many patients experience ‘nuisance’ symptoms, an annoyance which may cause discomfort, which can negatively impact postoperative satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of nuisance symptoms among TJR patients and impact on overall patient satisfaction. A prospective survey study to assess type and prevalence of primary hip/knee TJR related nuisance symptoms, and impact on patient satisfaction at six-months to one-year post-TJR was conducted. The survey was administered over a one-year period at one academic arthroplasty centre. Survey questions tapped occurrence of commonly reported nuisance symptoms (e.g. localized pain, swelling, stability, incision appearance/numbness, stiffness, clicking/noise, ability to perform activities of daily living), and impact of the symptom on overall hip/knee satisfaction rated on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), (0=no impact, 10=to a great extent). Overall VAS satisfaction with TJR was also assessed (0=not at all satisfied, 10=extremely satisfied). Survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. The sample comprised of 974 primary TJR patients, including 590 knees (61%) and 384 hips 39%) who underwent surgery over a one-year period. Among knees, the most commonly reported nuisance symptoms and associated impact to satisfaction per mean VAS scores included: difficulty kneeling (78.2%, mean VAS 4.3, ±3.3), limited ability to run or jump (71.6%, VAS 3.3, ±3.3), numbness around incision (46.3%, VAS 3.8, ±3.3), clicking/noise from the knee (44.2%, VAS 2.7, ±2.7) and stiffness (43.3%, 3.3, ±2.7) following knee arthroplasty. Overall, 88.1% of knee patients surveyed experienced at least one self-reported nuisance symptom at one-year postoperative. Mean overall VAS satisfaction with knee TJR was reported as 9/10 (±1.7). Among hip TJR patients, the most commonly reported nuisance symptoms and associated impact to satisfaction per VAS scores were: limited ability to run or jump (68.6%, VAS 3.4, ±3.4), muscular pain in the thigh (44.8%, VAS 3 ±2.7), limp when walking (37.6%, VAS 4.1, ±3.2), hip stiffness (31%, VAS 3.1, ±2.4), and new or worsening low back pain (24.3%, VAS 2.9, ±2.5). Overall, 93.7% of patients experienced at least one self-reported nuisance symptom at one-year postoperative. Mean overall VAS satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty at one year was reported as 8.9/10 (±1.7). Nuisance symptoms following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty are very common. Despite the high prevalence of such symptoms, impact of individual symptoms to overall TJR satisfaction is minimal and overall TJR patient satisfaction remains high. Careful preoperative counselling regarding the prevalence of such symptoms is prudent and will help establish realistic expectations following primary hip and knee TJR

Introduction. Patient satisfaction is an important outcome measure after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is the ultimate goal of surgery. However, patient satisfaction reflects a complex construct of the patient's personal expectations and preferences in addition to subjective evaluation of outcome after TKA. Multiple studies have found a patient dissatisfaction rate of approximately 20% at 1 year after TKA. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is an association between a single-item validated TKA satisfaction score and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 3 time points (1, 2, and 5 years after TKA) and to determine if dissatisfaction rate after TKA varies over time. Methods. A multi-center, prospective cohort of 12,952 patients (8,078 patients were assessed at 1-year, 702 patients at 2-year, and 4,172 patients at 5-year) undergoing primary TKA were enrolled by 230 surgeons in 28 states between 2012–2015. Surgeons practices varied in size, reimbursement models, and geographic setting ensuring that the cohort included diverse patient populations and delivery models. Surgeons agreed to invite all TKA patients to participate and sporadic audits of surgical logs validated that all patients were invited and > 90% of patients were included. Demographic and clinical data [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and modified Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI)] were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected pre-op and post-op at 1, 2, and 5 years using an internet-based platform including the KOOS (total score, and pain, ADL, QoL sub scores), KOOS Jr, SF-36 (PCS and MCS). We used the single-item satisfaction scale which was tested and validated by the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. The patients' responses were made on 5-point Likert scale (very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, neutral, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied). Patients were classified into 2 categories: satisfied group for patients who answered satisfied or very satisfied and dissatisfied group for patients answered neutral, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. Univariate analysis of the difference between the satisfied and dissatisfied patients' groups was performed using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Logistic regression model was performed to study the correlation between the satisfaction and PROMs with 95% confidence interval. Results. Mean age was 66.6 years, 62.7% were female, and mean BMI was 31.6. The CCI was 0 in 55.1%, 1 in 22%, 2–5 in 12.6% and ≥ 6 in 10.3%. Cumulative revision rate was 1.29% at 2 years. The 30-day adverse events incidence was 2.5% while the 90-day adverse events incidence was 4.7%. The dissatisfaction rate was 18.1% at 1-year, 11.5% at 2-year, and 8.5% at 5-year (P<0.001, Chi-square). Dissatisfaction significantly affects younger patients (<55 years) (P=0.04, Chi-square) and patients with high Charlson comorbidity index >1 (P=0.001, Chi-square). Low post-operative KOOS Pain, KOOS ADL, KOOS total score, KOOS JR, SF-36 PCS, and SP-36 MCS scores were significantly associated with dissatisfaction (P<0.001). At 5 years follow-up, in patients with KOOS scores greater than 70, 1.3% of patients were dissatisfied; with KOOS 50–70, 16.3% were dissatisfied and when KOOS < 50, 62.2% are dissatisfied. Logistic regression showed significant correlation of satisfaction with postoperative KOOS pain, KOOS ADL, KOOS QoL, KOOS total score, KOOS JR, and SF-36 PCS (P< 0.001) at 1-year, 2-year, and at 5-year. The MCS was correlated with patient satisfaction only at 1-year (P< 0.001). Conclusion. The patient dissatisfaction rate 5 years after TKA is 8.1% in FORCE-TJR patients which is significantly lower than 18.1% at 1-year. Less improvement of PROM scores after TKA are significantly associated with patient dissatisfaction. Postoperative PROM scores are associated with patient satisfaction at 1-year, 2-years, and 5-years. When the 5-year post- op KOOS total score is >70, 98.7% of patients are satisfied and only 1.3% are dissatisfied. Patient satisfaction is an important outcome measure after TKA that can be determined by asking a single question. However, in order to understand why a patient is dissatisfied, KOOS scores (KOOS pain, KOOS ADL, KOOS QoL) that assess specific postoperative outcomes can assist in determining the reason for patient dissatisfaction after TKA

Introduction. Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a proven successful and cost-effective method to relieve pain and improve joint function and quality of life in patients with advanced knee arthritis. However, after a TKA, only 75 to 89% of patients are satisfied. Since patient satisfaction is one of the main objectives of elective orthopaedic surgery, it is important to investigate the reasons for dissatisfaction and develop remedial strategies. Objectives. The aims of the current project are to investigate patient satisfaction after TKA and establish physical, mental and social determinants of patient satisfaction and overall socio-economic costs associated with unsatisfactory outcome. The global objective is to identify patients most likely to benefit from primary TKA, establish optimal evidence-based indications and timing for TKA, and address the necessity to educate patients preoperatively towards realistic expectations or propose alternative therapies. Based on the results, a composite score for patient selection will be developed using objective and subjective parameters. Cut-off values for acceptable indications for TKA will be proposed. Methods. General determinants of patient satisfaction are first investigated in a retrospective and prospective survey of TKA. Expectations regarding the global benefit of TKA, postoperative pain and difficulties are evaluated. Psychological tests assessing the ability of patients to cope with pain are performed. Objective clinical and radiographic parameters, patient reported outcomes and satisfaction are compared between subgroups based on (1) patient intrinsic factors such as gender and age, BMI, co-morbidities, general physical and mental health, activity, level of education and socio-economic situation, (2) implant factors, (3) surgery and surgical experience related factors. Subsequently, a randomized controlled trial of 330 consecutive primary TKAs using 3 contemporary implants of different design concepts will be carried out. Evaluation will be double-blinded (immediately preoperative randomisation, patient blinded, postoperative observer blinded). In addition, a surgeon's assessment of subjective technical difficulty will be performed. A university/teaching hospital setting will be compared with a private hospital and the influence of the surgeon on the level of patient satisfaction will be assessed. Results. Intermediate evaluation of the study revealed extensive logistic difficulties in setting up such a large scale trial and in motivating patients, nursing and medical staff to participate and sustain the necessary commitment and discipline to collect all necessary data at all follow-up intervals. Patients often felt overwhelmed by a multitude of clinical scores and technical assessments leading to a decrease in study compliance and rapid loss to follow-up. Motivation proved easier in a smaller private hospital environment. At the university hospital, patient involvement was enhanced by a personalized approach with information sessions in small groups. The introduction of a new software system with direct patient input via touch screens or remote online completion of scores reduced the data input burden. Scores are examined for simultaneous digital answering of overlapping questions. Conclusions. A large scale trial to investigate longer term patient satisfaction after TKA and establish its determinants involves continuous motivation and sustained discipline of patients and staff. A personalized approach and digital patient reported outcomes prove to maximize data acquisition

Background. The posterior slope of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported to vary widely even with computer assisted surgery. In the present study, we analyzed the influence of posterior tibial slope on one-year postoperative clinical outcome after posterior-stabilized (PS) -TKA to find out the optimal posterior slope of tibial component. Materials and Method. Seventy-three patients with varus type osteoarthritic (OA) knees underwent PS-TKA (Persona PS. R. ) were involved in this study. The mean age was 76.6 years old and preoperative HKA angle was 14.3 degrees in varus. Tibial bone cut was performed using standard extra-medullary guide with 7 degrees of posterior slope. The tibial slopes were radiographically measured by post-operative lateral radiograph with posterior inclination in plus value. The angle between the perpendicular line of the proximal fibular shaft axis and the line drawn along the superior margin of the proximal tibia represented the tibial slope angle. We assessed one-year postoperative clinical outcomes including active range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction and symptoms scores using 2011 Knee Society Score (2011 KSS). The influences of posterior tibial slope on one-year postoperative parameters were analyzed using simple linear regression analysis (p<0.05). Results. The average posterior tibial slope was 6.4 ± 2.0 °. The average active ROM were −2.4 ± 6.6 ° in extension and 113.5± 12.6 ° in flexion. The mean one-year postoperative patient satisfaction and symptom scores were 29.3 ± 6.4 and 19.6 ± 3.9 points respectively. The active knee extension, satisfaction and symptom scores were significantly negatively correlated to the posterior tibial slope (r = −0.25, −0.31, −0.23). Discussion. In the present study, we have found significant influence of the posterior tibial slope on the one-year postoperative clinical outcomes in PS-TKA. The higher posterior slope would induce flexion contracture and deteriorate patient satisfaction and symptom. We had reported that the higher tibial posterior slope increased flexion gap and the component gap change during knee flexion in PS-TKA. Furthermore, another study reported that increase of the posterior tibia slope reduced the tension in the collateral ligaments and resulted in the knee laxity at flexion. The excessive posterior slope of tibial component would result in flexion instability, and adversely affected the clinical results including patient satisfaction and symptom. Conclusion. In the PS-TKA for varus type OA knees, excessive tibial posterior slope was found to adversely affect one-year postoperative knee extension and clinical outcome including patient satisfaction and symptom. Surgeons should aware of the importance of tibial slope on one-year postoperative clinical results and pay more attentions to the posterior tibial slope angle not to be excessive

Introduction. Circular frames for ankle fusion are usually reserved for complex clinical scenarios. Current literature is heterogenous and difficult to interpret. We aimed to study the indications and outcomes of this procedure in detail. Materials & Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed based on a prospective database of frame surgeries performed in a tertiary institution. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing complex ankle fusion with circular frames between 2005 and 2020, with a minimum 12-month follow up. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical indications, comorbidities, surgical procedures, external fixator time (EFT), length of stay (LOS), radiological and clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Factors influencing radiological and clinical outcomes were analysed. Results. 47 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of three years. The mean age at time of surgery was 63.6 years. Patients had a median of two previous surgeries. The median LOS was 8.5 days, and median EFT was 237 days. Where simultaneous limb lengthening was performed, the average lengthening was 2.9cm, increasing the EFT by an average of 4 months. Primary and final union rates were 91.5% and 95.7% respectively. At last follow-up, ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good in 87.2%. ASAMI functional scores were good in 79.1%. Patient satisfaction was 83.7%. 97.7% of patients experienced adverse events, most commonly pin-site related, with major complications in 30.2% and re-operations in 60.5%. There were 3 amputations. Adverse events were associated with increased age, poor soft tissue condition, severe deformities, subtalar fusions, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and prolonged EFT. Conclusions. Complex ankle fusion using circular frames can achieve good outcomes in complicated clinical scenarios, however patients can expect a prolonged time in the frame and high rates of adverse events. Multiple risk factors were identified for poorer outcomes, which should be considered in patient counselling and prognostication

Patient satisfaction is not uniform or consistent following revision total knee arthroplasty. This study evaluates ninety-nine patients with a self-administered patient satisfaction questionnaire at a minimum of two years following the revision procedure (1997–99) to determine differences between satisfied (sixty-six patients) and dissatisfied patients (thirty-three patients). Univariate analysis revealed that patients satisfied with their results were significantly different (p< .05) than dissatisfied patients with regards to post op scores including those of the WOMAC pain and function, oxford, and SF-12. Patients were not different with regards to (p> .05) age, comorbidity score, surgical approach, or sepsis as a reason for the revision procedure. Regression analysis demonstrated that gender, post-op WOMAC score, and pre-op arc of motion were significant determinants of satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate determinants of patient satisfaction following revision total knee arthroplasty. Patient satisfaction with revision knee surgery is most strongly associated with both pre and post-operative descriptors of knee function as well as gender. Understanding the variables associated with satisfaction/dissatisfaction following revision knee arthroplasty may further assist ongoing research efforts to improve the outcomes of this procedure. Univariate analysis revealed that patients satisfied with their results were significantly different (p< .05) than dissatisfied patients with regards to WOMAC pain and function score, oxford knee score, and SF-12. Patients were not different with regards to (p> .05) age, comorbidity score, surgical approach, or presence of sepsis as a reason for the revision procedure. Regression analysis demonstrated that gender, post-op WOMAC score, and pre-op arc of motion were significant determinants of satisfaction (p< .05). A self-administered patient satisfaction survey was completed by ninety-nine patients at a minimum of two years following revision total knee arthroplasty. Fifty-nine patients were females and forty were males. Sixty-six patients were satisfied and thirty-three patients were dissatisfied with the outcome of their surgery at two years post-op. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression suggest that pre and post-operative joint function and gender are the most significant determinants of patient satisfaction

Background. In recent literatures, medial instability after TKA was reported to deteriorate early postoperative pain relief and have negative effects on functional outcome. Furthermore, lateral laxity of the knee is physiological, necessary for medial pivot knee kinematics, and important for postoperative knee flexion angle after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA). However, the influences of knee stability and laxity on postoperative patient satisfaction after CR-TKA are not clearly described. We hypothesized that postoperative knee stability and ligament balance affected patient satisfaction after CR-TKA. In this study, we investigated the effect of early postoperative ligament balance at extension on one-year postoperative patient satisfaction and ambulatory function in CR-TKAs. Materials & Methods. Sixty patients with varus osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee underwent CR-TKAs were included in this study. The mean age was 73.6 years old. Preoperative average varus deformity (HKA angle) was 12.5 degrees with long leg standing radiographs. The knee stability and laxity at extension were assessed by stress radiographies; varus-valgus stress X-ray at one-month after operation. We measured joint separation distance (mm) at medial compartment with valgus stress as medial joint opening (MJO), and distance at lateral compartment with varus stress as lateral joint opening (LJO) at knee extension position. To analyze ligament balance; relative lateral laxity comparing to the medial, varus angle was calculated. New Knee Society Score (NKSS) was used to evaluate the patient satisfaction at one-year after TKA. We measured basic ambulatory functions using 3m timed up and go test (TUG) at one-year after surgery. The influences of stability and laxity parameters (MJO, LJO and varus angle at extension) on one-year patient satisfaction and ambulatory function (TUG) was analyzed using single linear regression analysis (p<0.01). Results. MJOs at knee extension one-month after TKA negatively correlated to patient satisfaction (r=−0.37, p<0.01) and positively correlated to TUG time (r=0.38, p<0.01). LJOs at knee extension had no statistically significant correlations to patient satisfaction and TUG. The extension varus angle had significant positive correlation with patient satisfaction (r=0.40, p<0.01). Discussions. In our study, we have found significant correlations of the early postoperative MJOs at extension to postoperative patient satisfaction and TUG one-year after CR-TKA. Our results suggested that early postoperative medial knee stabilities at extension were important for one-year postoperative patient satisfaction and ambulatory function in CR-TKA. Other interest finding was that postoperative patient satisfaction was positively correlated with extension varus angle. This finding suggested that varus ligament balance; relative lateral laxity to medial stability, was beneficial for postoperative patient satisfaction after CR-TKA. Intra-operative soft tissue balance had been reported to significantly affect postoperative knee stabilities. Therefore, with our findings, surgeons might be better to manage intra-operative soft tissue balance to preserve medial stability at extension with permitting lateral laxity, which would enhance patient satisfaction and ambulatory function after CR-TKA for varus type OA knee. Conclusion. Early postoperative medial knee stability and relative lateral laxity would be beneficial for patient satisfaction and function after CR-TKA

Introduction. W. ide . A. wake . L. ocal . A. naesthetic . N. o . T. ourniquet (WALANT) is a well- established day case procedure for carpal tunnel release with several advantages and enhanced post-operative recovery. Use of Local anaesthesia with Adrenaline using a 27G needle allows a bloodless field and distraction techniques achieve patient comfort during the procedure. Objectives. This retrospective, observational cohort study assesses patient satisfaction and undertakes functional evaluation using the validated Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) following WALANT technique for carpal tunnel release (CTR). The BCTQ has a symptom severity scale based on 11 items and a functional status scale of 8 elements. Further we compare surgical outcomes between techniques of WALANT and traditional CTR. Patient and Methods. We included 30 consecutive patients, 15 in each arm who either underwent traditional CTR with the use of Tourniquet or with the WALANTtechnique. Data was collected from Electronic Patient Records and hand therapy assessments. A satisfaction questionnaire and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was utilized to evaluate subjective outcomes. Functional outcomes was assessed by BCTQ scoring system and clinical review. Microsoft Excel was used for analysis. Results. 100% of patients in the WALANT group stated they were satisfied with the operation. Relief from night pain and sleep disturbance were the most improved symptoms. BCTQ and clinical assessment evaluation between both groups revealed comparable results with no significant difference. Conclusion. With advantages of no tourniquet related pain, increased patient satisfaction and functional outcomes on the BCTQ scores, WALANT technique has the potential to be the standard technique for CTR

Introduction. Patients-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been reported as the important methods to evaluate clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The patient satisfaction score in Knee Society Score (KSS-2011) has been used in the recent literatures. Patient satisfaction was subjective parameter, and would be affected by multiple factors including psychological factors and physical conditions at not only affected joint but also elsewhere in the body. The question was raised regarding the consistency of patient satisfaction score in KSS-2011 to other PROMs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of patient satisfaction in KSS-2011 to other categories in KSS-2011 and to other PROMs including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and 25-questions in Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25). Material & Method. 83 patients over 65 years old with osteoarthritic knees were involved in this study. All patients underwent CR-TKAs (Persona CR. R. ). The means and ranges of demographics were as follows: age; 74.5 years old (65–89), Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle; 12.4 (−6.2–22.5) in varus. We asked patients to fulfill the questionnaire including KSS-2011, FJS-12, EQ-5D and GLFS-25 at 1-year postoperative follow-up visit. KSS-2011 consisted of 4 categories of questions; patient satisfaction (PS), symptoms, patient expectations (PE), functional activities (FA). We evaluated the correlation of PS to other PROMs using simple linear regression analyses (p<0.001). Results. The means and standard deviations of 1-year postoperative scores were as follows: PS; 28.5 ± 7.0, symptoms; 19.1 ± 4.3, PE; 11.2 ± 2.9, FA; 71.5 ± 16.6, FJS-12; 51.5 ± 18.6, EQ5D; 0.69 ± 0.10, GLFS-25; 25.7 ± 16.9. PSs were moderately positively correlated to other categories in KSS-2011(correlation coefficient (r): symptoms; 0.69, PE; 0.73, FA; 0.69). PSs were positively correlated to both FJS-12 and EQ5D (r: FJS-12; 0.72, EQ-5D; 0.67) and negatively correlated to GLFS-25(r; −0.74). Discussions. Patient satisfaction score positively correlated to the symptoms, patient expectation and functional activities in KSS-2011 with moderately high correlation coefficient. This meant the better pain relief and functional outcome improved patient satisfaction. Although there had be reported preoperative higher expectation would lead to poor patient satisfaction postoperatively, we interestingly found positive correlation between patient satisfaction and expectation at 1 year after TKA. Patient with the higher satisfaction tended to expect more in the future, on the other hand, unsatisfied patient with residual pain and/or poor function would resign themselves to the present status and reduced their expectation in our patient population. We have found patient satisfaction score in KSS-2011 significantly correlated to FJS-12 and GLFS-25 with strong correlation coefficient. This meant patient satisfaction could be considered consist to other PROMS in relatively younger patient with better functional status in this study. Conclusion. The patient satisfaction score in KSS-2011 was found to be consistent with moderately high correlations coefficient to other categories in KSS-2011 and other PROMs including FJS-12, EQ-5D, GLFS-25 at 1 year after (CR)-TKA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction: Patient satisfaction with the outcome of elective surgery is increasingly used as a measure of the patient’s perception of the success of an operation. Satisfaction is an individualistic complex of factors and measuring satisfaction can add another valuable dimension to outcomes assessment after arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to explore patient satisfaction after lower limb arthroplasty. Patients and Methods: All patients who had a primary joint replacement at the Avon Orthopaedic Centre over a 3-year period were invited to participate in the study. Participants completed a questionnaire which consisted of the WOMAC, the Joint-Related Quality of Life Scale from the KOOS/HOOS, SF-12 and a validated satisfaction scale. The satisfaction questionnaire measures patient satisfaction with four domains of outcome: overall outcome, pain relief, ability to perform ADLs and ability to participate in leisure activites. Responses are on a 4-point Likert scale which ranges from very satisfied to very dissatisfied. A global satisfaction score was calculated from these responses and then transformed onto a 0–100 scale (100 being best). Results: Completed questionnaires were received from 2085/3125 patients (67% response rate). 911 respondents had a THR, 866 had a TKR, 157 had a hip resurfacing, 100 had a UKR and 51 had a patellar resurfacing. The mean age of respondents was 70 years and 58% were female. The mean length of follow-up was 28 months. The median satisfaction score was 100 (interquartile range 75–100). However, within the individual outcome domains dissatisfaction rates were: 9% for pain; 12% for overall outcome; 14% for ADLs; and 17% for leisure activities. To explore differences in satisfaction with age, patients were divided into 3 age groups: < 60 years, 60–80 years and > 80 years. The respective rates of dissatisfaction among the age groups were 13%, 11% and 14%, which were not significantly different (p=0.33). In an analysis of gender and satisfaction, significantly more females were dissatisfied than men (14% vs 10%, p=0.01). When pain, function, quality of life, mental health and physical health were compared between patients who were satisfied (n=1834) and dissatisfied (n=251) with their overall outcome, all outcomes were significantly worse in the dis-satisfied patient group (p< 0.001 for all outcomes). Discussion: Although the median satisfaction score in this study was 100, there was a group of patients who were not satisfied with their outcome. As well as having worse joint pain and function, dissatisfied patients also have significantly worse quality of life, physical health and mental health compared to satisfied patients. In conclusion, patient satisfaction is one of the key outcomes that should be strived for after an elective intervention, and these results indicate that joint replacement is failing to fully satisfy a proportion of patients

Background. Kinematic patterns in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can vary considerably from the native knee. No study has shown a relation between a given kinematic pattern and patient satisfaction yet. Questions. The purpose of this study was to test whether the kinematical pattern, and more specifically the anteroposterior translation during (1) open kinetic chain flexion-extension, (2) closed kinetic chain chair rising and (3) squatting, is related to the level of patient satisfaction after TKA. Methods. Thirty TKA patients were tested using single plane fluoroscopy. Tibiofemoral kinematics were analyzed for 3 activities of daily living (open chain flexion-extension (FE) and closed chain chair rising (CH) and squatting(SQ)). A two- step cluster analysis was performed which resulted in two clusters of patients based on the KOOS and KSS questionnaires. Cluster 1 (CL1) contained patients with good PROMs, cluster 2 (CL2) contained patients with poorer PROMs. Tibiofemoral kinematics were compared between and within both clusters. Results. Significant worse PROMs were found in cluster 2 for all KOOS and KSS subscores (P<0.001). Open chain movement: Concerning the open chain flexion extension no significant difference was found between the two clusters. Closed chain movements: On the medial side, an initial anterior translation (femur relative to tibia) was found in cluster 1 during early flexion but in cluster 2 this translation was steeper and ran more anteriorly. In mid-flexion a stable medial compartment was found in cluster 1 where cluster 2 started moving posteriorly already. In deep flexion a posterior translation was evaluated in both clusters. Concerning the lateral side, a small initial anterior translation in early flexion was found followed by a posterior translation in mid flexion which continued in deep flexion Cluster 1 moved significantly more posterior in deep flexion. Conclusion. This is one of the first studies to evaluate the influence of total knee kinematics on patient reported outcomes. We found that patients with poorer PROMs experience (1) a more pronounced paradoxical anterior motion on the medial side followed by (2) a less stable medial compartment in mid flexion and (3) less posterior translation in deep flexion on the lateral side

Purpose of the study: Patient satisfaction is an important element for patient claims. What is the correlation between patient satisfaction and clinical scores?. Material and methods: An independent investigator reviewed the files of patients who underwent exclusive Chopart arthodesis from 1990 to 2000 and who had at least one-year follow-up. Nineteen patients were reviewed using the AOFAS scale. Patient satisfaction as assessed with two scales, a numerical scale from 1 to 10 and a verbal scale noted 1 to 4. Correlations were made with the perception of the disability due to the operation. Results: Fourteen patients exhibited good correlation between the clinical outcome and their level of satisfaction. Five displayed clear divergence: three poor clinical scores with a high level of satisfaction and two good clinical scores in unsatisfied patients. Discussion: The mean scores were around 6/10. Clinical assessment and satisfaction noted on a scale of 10 gave good agreement: the way satisfaction is approached and the patient’s expression of satisfaction may have an important impact. A visual scale with no semantic connotation would be les subject to interpretation since the assessment is made on a numerical scale independently of psychological implications. Conversely, the disability/satisfaction relationship was scored on a four-point scale and demonstrated rather good agreement as did the relationship between disability and clinical score. Five patients exhibited significant divergence showing that the cultural element and collateral factors (comorbid conditions) could be involved. Conclusion: Establishing a pertinent satisfaction scale is a difficult task because the correlation with the clinical outcome is imperfect. This analysis demonstrated that less than satisfactory objective results can be associated with an acceptable level of satisfaction (three patients in this series). This situation is observed in patients aged over 60 years who grew up in an environment where the physician was to be respected and where complaining was not acceptable. This is a cultural factor. Poor appreciations which contrast with a rather average clinical result are related to collateral conditions which explain such behavior. Patient satisfaction is a multifactorial phenomenon. Reliable information collection before the operation should be helpful in allowing the patient to fine-tune expectations concerning the surgical outcome and the reservations to be expressed