We developed a novel silorane-based biomaterial (SBB) for use as an orthopedic cement. SBB is comprised of non-toxic silicon-based monomers, undergoes non-exothermic polymerization, and has weight-bearing strength required of orthopedic cements. We sought to compare the antibiotic release kinetics of this new cement to that of commercially available
Aims. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-based bone cements are the industry standard in orthopaedics.
Introduction Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been widely used in orthopaedic procedures for fixation of joint replacements or enhancing the fixation of implants. However, the use of
Thermal damage to bone related to the exothermic polymerisation of bone cement (PMMA) remains a concern. A series of studies were conducted to examine
Introduction. Temporary use of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement spacers in two-stage revisions is considered to be standard of care for patients with a chronic infection of a joint replacement. Spacers should be wear resistant and load-bearing to avoid prolonged immobilisation of the patient and to reduce morbidity. Most cement spacers contain barium sulphate or zirconium dioxide as radio-opaque substrate. Both are quite hard materials that may negatively influence the wear behaviour of the spacer. Calcium carbonate is another radio-opaque substrate with lower hardness potentially increasing the wear resistance of the spacer materials. The purpose of the study was to compare a prototype
Introduction and Aims: Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been widely used in orthopaedic surgery including more recently vertebroplasty. The reported rate of complications following vertebroplasty is low and mainly related to
Aims:
Antibiotic-loaded
Introduction. Antibiotic loaded polymethyle methacrylate spacers are commonly used in the management of septic hip replacements. Aim. The aim of this study was to determine wear patterns on the articulating surfaces of these spacers, as well as to determine the extent of
Two-stage exchange revision is the gold standard in treating an infected total hip arthroplasty. The new emerging gold standard appears to be using an antibiotic impregnated spacer made from polymethylmeta-crylate (PMMA) bone cement between two stages. However, a consensus has not been reached on the antibiotic to use in the cement and its dose. Vancomycin an aminoglycoside is widely used for this purpose in the
Study Design: Comparative, prospective follow-up study. Objective: Comparison of outcome between patients treated with Percutaneous VertebroPlasty (PVP) using low viscosity PolyMethylMetAcrylate (PMMA) bone cement and patients treated with PVP using medium viscosity
Introduction: Patients with spinal metastases often have patterns of disease requiring both an anterior and posterior surgical decompression and stabilisation. Subtotal spondylectomy and circumferential stabilisation can be safely performed via a single posterior transpedicular approach. Polymethyl-methacrylate bone cement (PMMA) has been widely used in spinal column reconstruction with mixed results.
Purpose: This study investigates the synergistic use of fusidic acid with vancomycin, and linezolid in poly-methylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement for the treatment of orthopedic MRSA and MRSE infections. Alone, Vancomycin is typically eluted in limited quantities from cement. The purpose of this study was to. combine FA and Vancomycin, and Linezolid alone in
Introduction: morcelized defatted bone-Bank graft (MOD-B) has been employed in 249 patients for different diseases in Rizzoli Institute from 1998 to 2002. 82 hip revisions, 51 spine fusions, 50 osteolitic bone cavities, 47 non-unions). Good results obtained with MOD-B have been the reason for different researches of his properties like an antibiotic carrier and, in the same time, a particular new bone graft. Material and Methods:. MOD-B with antibiotic powder and
Pain is the main symptom of acetabular osteolysis and is frequently associated with pathologic fractures. Surgical procedures requiring an aggressive approach, and as a consequence high morbidity, are rarely indicated. The minimally invasive approach may be effective in treating tumours and is capable of reducing the mechanical pain.
The use of
Two-stage exchange revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed in case of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been considered for many years as being the gold standard for the treatment of chronic infection. However, over the past decade, there have been concerns about its safety and its effectiveness. The purposes of our study were to investigate our practice, collecting the overall spacer complications, and then to analyze their risk factors. We retrospectively included 125 patients with chronic hip PJI who underwent a staged THA revision performed between January 2013 and December 2019. All spacer complications were systematically collected, and risk factors were analyzed. Statistical evaluations were performed using the Student's Aims
Methods
Knee sepsis following TKR can have devastating consequences for patient as well as surgeon. A two stage revision is a well accepted technique in TKR sepsis with the introduction of a temporary antibiotic cement spacer being the most popular procedure although irrigation techniques are popular in SA. From a total of 111 revisions TKR from my practice 26 (23%) were 2 stage revisions for joint sepsis following TKR. 3 cases were early, 10 intermediate and 13 late onset sepsis cases. Most common organism was S. Aureus (7/26) and S. Epidermidis (7/26) although numerous other organisms were seen. In all cases a two stage revision with a Palacos R cements spacer plus parenteral antibiotics were used. Prosthesis used for revision was primary knee prosthesis in 8 cases and revision (stemmed) prosthesis in 18 cases. Follow up range from 13 years to 6 months (average 6.8 years) with only one case of recurrent sepsis (3.8%) which went on to an arthrodesis. Time from debridement and spacer placement to revision TKR varied from 3 weeks to 10 months (average 2.1 months). This paper shows that meticulous debridement followed by standard antibiotic cement spacer technique with additional parenteral antibiotics is indeed the gold standard approach without necessitating additional irrigation techniques.
To evaluate and compare the stability of an anterior cement construct following total spondylectomy for meta-static disease against alternative stabilization techniques. After intact analysis of ten cadaveric spines (T9–L3), a T12 spondylectomy was performed. Three reconstruction techniques were tested for their ability to restore stiffness to the specimen using non-destructive tests: 1) multilevel posterior pedicle screw instrumentation (PPSI) from T10–L2 {MPI}, 2) anterior instrumentation from T11–L1 with PPSI {AMPI}, and 3) anterior cement and pins construct (T12) with PPSI {CMPI}. Circumferential stabilization {AMPI, CMPI} restored stiffness to a level of the intact spine. CMPI provided more stability to the specimen than AMPI. MPI alone did not restore stiffness to the intact level. Circumferential reconstruction using an anterior cement construct following total spondylectomy is biomechanically superior to posterior stabilisation alone.