Abstract. Introduction. Minimising postoperative complications and mortality in COVID-19 patients who were undergoing trauma and orthopaedic surgeries is an international priority. Aim was to develop a predictive nomogram for 30-day morbidity/mortality of COVID-19 infection in patients who underwent orthopaedic and trauma surgery during the coronavirus pandemic in the UK in 2020 compared to a similar period in 2019. Secondary objective was to compare between patients with positive PCR test and those with negative test. Methods. Retrospective multi-center study including 50 hospitals. Patients with suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection who had underwent orthopaedic or trauma surgery for any indication during the 2020 pandemic were enrolled in the study (2525 patients). We analysed cases performed on orthopaedic and trauma operative lists in 2019 for comparison (4417). Multivariable Logistic Regression analysis was performed to assess the possible predictors of a fatal outcome. A nomogram was developed with the possible predictors and total point were calculated. Results. Of the 2525 patients admitted for suspicion of COVID-19, 658 patients had negative preoperative test, 151 with positive test and 1716 with unknown preoperative COVID-19 status. Preoperative COVID-19 status, sex, ASA grade, urgency and indication of surgery, use of torniquet, grade of operating surgeon and some comorbidities were independent risk factors associated with 30-day complications/mortality. The 2020 nomogram model exhibited moderate prediction ability. In contrast, the prediction ability of total points of 2019 nomogram model was excellent. Conclusions. Nomograms can be used by orthopaedic and trauma surgeons as a practical and effective tool in postoperative complications and mortality risk estimation

Objectives. To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice. Methods. A questionnaire was piloted with six orthopaedic surgeons using a ‘think aloud’ process. The final questionnaire contained 29 items and was distributed online to surgeon members of the British Orthopaedic Association and British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Descriptive statistics summarised the sample characteristics and fracture treatment of respondents overall, and grouped them by whether they changed practice based on PROFHER trial findings. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively for emerging themes using Framework Analysis principles. Results. There were complete responses from 265 orthopaedic and trauma surgeons who treat patients with proximal humeral fractures. Around half (137) had changed practice to various extents because of PROFHER, by operating on fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures. A third (43) of the 128 respondents who had not changed practice were already managing patients non-operatively. Those who changed practice were more likely to be younger, work in a trauma unit rather than a major trauma centre, be specialist shoulder surgeons and treat fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures surgically. This group gave higher scores when assessing validity and applicability of PROFHER. In contrast, a quarter of the non-changers were critical, sometimes emphatically, of PROFHER. The strongest theme that emerged overall was the endorsement of evidence-based practice. Conclusion. PROFHER has had an impact on surgeons’ clinical practice, both through changing it, and through underpinning existing non-operative practice. Although some respondents expressed reservations about the trial, evidence from such trials was found to be the most important influence on surgeons’ decisions to change practice. Cite this article: L. Jefferson, S. Brealey, H. Handoll, A. Keding, L. Kottam, I. Sbizzera, A. Rangan. Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:590–599. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170

While the Cochrane Collaboration have been busy over the last four months, only a handful of their published reviews have been of any relevance to orthopaedic and trauma surgeons. Those that are provide the reader with an overview of work on imaging modalities, antibiotic therapy, changes to the surgical site dressing and practices surrounding post-operative wound management, including post-op bathing and negative pressure wound therapy for use in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds.

Introduction. Orthopaedic and trauma surgeons not infrequently encounter the hallucal interphalangeal joint sesamoid (HIPJS) in irreducible traumatic dislocations. However, patients with the classic triad of plantar keratoma beneath a hyperextended interphalangeal (IP) joint associated with stiffness of the first metatarsophalangeal joint tend to present to podiatrists rather than orthopaedic surgeons. Methods. We present our experience with the HIPJS following first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP1) arthrodesis in 18 feet of 16 women, aged 42 to 70 years old. Where CT scan was available, volume of the HIPJS was determined using Vitrea Software. Results. Two groups of patients were identified. Group 1 consisted of 12 feet in 11 women, who developed a painful keratoma beneath a gradually hyperextending IP joint of the great toe, at varying intervals (range 6 to 75 months) following MTP1 arthrodesis. Group 2 comprised 6 feet in 5 women who had undergone MTP1 arthrodesis but reported no symptoms in relation to an undetected and/or recognized, but unexcised HIPJS (range 15 to 97 months). We found no difference in average size of the HIPJS between Groups 1 and 2 (190.42 mm. 3. and 196.47 mm. 3. , respectively). Clinically, all toes had been fused in good position and no difference existed in the post-operative angle subtended by the proximal phalanx of the arthrodesed big toe with the first metatarsal between the 2 groups. A good outcome followed removal of metalwork and excision of the HIPJS in the symptomatic patients. Conclusion. Think of a HIPJS in the patient who presents with a painful plantar keratoma beneath a hyperextended interphalangeal joint following MTP1 arthrodesis. Do not rush into a Moberg osteotomy as this will only push the big toe higher against the toe-box. Consider prophylactic excision of a HIPJS prior to MTP1 arthrodesis

Objectives. Accurate characterisation of fractures is essential in fracture management trials. However, this is often hampered by poor inter-observer agreement. This article describes the practicalities of defining the fracture population, based on the Neer classification, within a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial in which surgical treatment was compared with non-surgical treatment in adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck. Methods. The trial manual illustrated the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures. However, in addition to surgical neck displacement, surgeons assessing patient eligibility reported on whether either or both of the tuberosities were involved. Anonymised electronic versions of baseline radiographs were sought for all 250 trial participants. A protocol, data collection tool and training presentation were developed and tested in a pilot study. These were then used in a formal assessment and classification of the trial fractures by two independent senior orthopaedic shoulder trauma surgeons. Results. Two or more baseline radiographic views were obtained for each participant. The independent raters confirmed that all fractures would have been considered for surgery in contemporaneous practice. A full description of the fracture population based on the Neer classification was obtained. The agreement between the categorisation at baseline (tuberosity involvement) and Neer classification as assessed by the two raters was only fair (kappa 0.29). However, this disparity did not appear to affect trial findings, specifically in terms of influencing the effect of treatment on the primary outcome of the trial. Conclusions. A key reporting requirement, namely the description of the fracture population, was achieved within the context of a pragmatic multicentre randomised clinical trial. This article provides important guidance for researchers designing similar trials on fracture management. Cite this article: H. H. G. Handoll, S. D. Brealey, L. Jefferson, A. Keding, A. J. Brooksbank, A. J. Johnstone, J. J. Candal-Couto, A. Rangan. Defining the fracture population in a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROFHER and the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures.Bone Joint Res 2016;5:481–489. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0132.R1

Surgical treatment of infected bones with vascularised bone grafts is well established as an efficient strategy since several years. Nevertheless orthopaedic and trauma surgeons seem to apply vascularised bone grafts as the last treatment option only. Two strategies exist for treatment of chronically infected bones with vascularised bone grafts. First: Complete resection of the infected, often non-united part of the bones and reconstruction with large vascularised bone grafts, mostly fibular grafts. Second: Augmentation of the kept and intact parts of the bones with vascularised bone grafts. Two small series of patients are presented to illustrate both techniques and to show the results and outcome. Resection of big parts of the tibia and reconstruction with mostly ipsilateral fibular grafts – single barrel in children and double barrel in adults – led to uneventful healing in all cases. Augmentation of radius, femur and calcaneus with vascularised grafts from the iliac crest or the scapula was followed by primary healing, too. All patients were disburdened from infection up to now and regained full extremity function. The presented vascularized bone grafts did not only salvage the extremities but also could maintain their functionality. The procedure is demanding, but reliable and safe at a low rate of complications. Thus vascularised bone grafts should not only be used as ultimative salvage procedures, but as early as possible whenever standard treatments for osteomyelitis fail

While the demand for orthopaedic surgical expertise in the developing world is in critically short supply, short-term remedy from visiting doctors cannot solve this long-term healthcare problem. Capacity building by senior and training orthopaedic surgeons from established Western training programmes can offer a significant contribution to the orthopaedic patient in the developing world and the gains for those visiting are extremely valuable. We report on several visits by a UK orthopaedic team to a hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan and discuss the operative and non-operative case mix and the benefits in terms of local capacity building and the unique experience of those visiting.

The April 2014 Oncology Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Eyeball as good as microscope for tumour margins; when is best to stabilise femoral metastases?; fluorine does not cause bone tumours; whether giant cell tumour of the proximal femur ever successfully managed; extraskeletal osteosarcoma; modular lower limb tumour reconstruction; and observational studies the basis for most bone tumour treatment.

The October 2012 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: magnetic growing rods and scoliosis correction; maintaining alignment after manipulation of a radial shaft fracture; Glaswegian children and swellings of obscure origin; long-term outcome of femoral derotation osteotomy in cerebral palsy; lower-leg fractures and compartment syndrome in children; fractures of the radial neck in children; management of the paediatric Monteggia fracture; and missing the dislocated hip in Western Australia.