Introduction: Fractures of the neck of femur has a considaerable impact on the NHS and due to the elderly group of population it involves morbidity can be very costly. We assesed the outcome of trauma patients with these fractures after providing orthogeriatric care in our hospital. Aim: 179 patients had been studied who had been managed in our hospital over a period of 18 months with hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fracture of the neck of femur. 104 patients had routine orthopaedic care and 75 patients had regular orthogeriatric care. All the complication were noted, analysed and compared with the national averages. Methodology: This was a retrospective study-clincal notes of all patients who had hemiarthroplasty during the 18 month period were reviewed and a performa was completed. Result: Total sample size was 179 patients(104 before and 75 after the introduction of orthogeriatric service) who had hemiartroplasty for the displaced intracapsular fracture of the neck of femur. The median length of stay being 16.5 days before and 20 days after. The medical complications before and after the introduction of this service were-Cardiac complication 4% before and 1% after, Chest infection 2% before and 1% after, DVT 2% before and 1% after. The Overall complication rate has been reduced from 41% to 18% and the one year mortality reduced from 16.34% to 12 with the introduction of orthogeriatric service. Conclusion: We believe that the weekly ward round and a continued supervision by the orthogeriatric team is one of the factors in improving the outcome of geriatric trauma patients in terms of reduced morbidity and mortality

Introduction. In the orthogeriatric model of care, orthopaedic surgeons, geriatricians, anesthesiologists, physiotherapists and the nursing staff work together with the aim to optimize the outcomes of vulnerable older patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. It is recommended that the orthogeriatric care of hip fracture patients should be based on systematic treatment guidelines. We describe here how operative and perioperative management of hip fracture patients changed between the first and the second year after initiation of orthogeriatric collaboration. Method. Data on all patients aged 65 years or over and experiencing a hip fracture between September 1st 2007 and August 31st 2009 were prospectively collected in a Finnish hospital district with a total of 200,000 inhabitants. The patients were evaluated 4–6 months postoperatively at the geriatric outpatient clinic. Starting from the second year, geriatrician's rounds 2–3 times a week at the orthopaedic ward were provided. In addition, a systematic treatment protocol agreed by orthopaedic surgeons, geriatricians and anesthesiologists was introduced to the hospital staff responsible for the care of hip fracture patients. Results. Data were available on 177 patients in the first and 232 patients in the second year (87 % and 95 % of eligible patients, respectively). There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics in regard with age, sex distribution, prefracture mobility level, living arrangements, number of medication used, body mass index, anesthesiological risk score or the type of the fracture between the two years. Compared to the first year, the patients were more likely to be operated by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon (74 % vs. 49 %, p<0.001) and to undergo hemiarthroplasty (64 % vs. 53 %, p=0.013) during the second year. Urinary catheters were also removed before discharge from the orthopaedic ward more frequently (28 % vs. 14 %, p=0.001). There was a trend towards shorter delay to operation (<24 hours in 40 % vs. 32 %, p=0.140) and more frequent use of blood transfusions (39 % vs. 32 %, p=0.128). There was no difference in the mean length of stay at the orthopaedic ward between the two years (6 days in the first vs. 7 days in the second year, p=0.081). The 4-month mortality was 20 % in the first and 17 % in the second year (p=0.436). Conclusions. The treatment practices showed changes towards guideline recommendations after initiation of orthogeriatric collaboration in the care of hip fracture patients without increasing the length of stay at the orthopaedic ward. Further follow-up is required to show how these improvements translate into longer-term outcomes and mortality

Objectives: To determine the effect of an Orthogeriatric team (OGT) upon patient management pre-operatively after its incorporation into a regional trauma centre of a district general hospital in the UK. Design: Prospective audit covering all patients admitted with a fractured hip for surgery one year before and one year after the establishment of an OGT. Method: A total of 288 fractured hips were operated on during February 2004 to February 2005. From February 2005 the OGT was created, consisting of a Staff Grade and 2 Senior House Officers (junior residents), assisted part-time by a consultant. Patients were medically managed and optimised for theatre; 301 patients underwent surgery in the 1st year from Feb 2005 to 2006. The data was collected prospectively from admission, and entered onto a database. Results: Before the set up of the OGT only one-quarter (25%) of patients were operated on within 24hours compared to almost one-half of patients (44%) under the care of the OGT. Of the patients waiting more than 24hours, delay while waiting for special tests was similar but there was a significant difference in the percentages of patients delayed due to lack of theatre time and poor medical condition. Only 5% of patients under the care of the OGT were delayed due to medical co-morbidity compared with 44% when solely under orthopaedic care. Conclusion: Focused high-quality medical input provided by a specialist Orthogeriatric team resulted in significantly reduced delays to theatre for patients admitted with a fractured hip. This is in the context of our hip fracture population becoming increasingly frail with increasing medical problems and continuing pressures on operating time. In the environment of financial constraint, this study confirms that reduction in time to theatre, effective, appropriate investigation and lower complication rates are likely offset the cost of the team. This may provide a model for other units

Abstract

In aged trauma patients the basic prerequisite is early mobilization and full weight-bearing, as immobilization can trigger various complications such as pressure ulcers, pneumonia, urinary tract infections and others. Mortality of elderly patients increases significantly in fracture patients with partial weight-bearing compared to populations with total weight-bearing. Besides the limited physical strength in these patients, partial-weight bearing is however frequently used for the aftercare of hip fracture patients. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate mobility of aged hip fracture patients with regards to weight-bearing and postoperative mobility.

Aims

National hip fracture registries audit similar aspects of care but there is variation in the actual data collected; these differences restrict international comparison, benchmarking, and research. The Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) published a revised minimum common dataset (MCD) in 2022 to improve consistency and interoperability. Our aim was to assess compatibility of existing registries with the MCD.

Introduction: Fracture of the osteoporotic hip is more common in people over the age of 74.

Purpose: To describe the co-operation between traumatologists and geriatric physicians in treating hip fractures among the elderly.

Materials and methods: Prospective study covering the number of referrals from Traumatology to Geriatrics in one year. We obtained data on age, sex, type of fracture and surgery, geriatric assessment and repercussion of this activity on the hospital.

Results: Over a period of 7 months in 2004, 120 patients were referred to Geriatrics, with a predominance of women and most with hip fractures. The intervention of the Geriatric Department consisted of detecting and compensating prior pathologies, adjusting medication, studying the fall, assessing the surgical risk and preparation for surgery, pain treatment, management of post-surgical complications (anaemia, malnutrition, pressure ulcers, infections, heart failure, etc.), early weight-bearing, detecting social risk and planning release from hospital. The repercussion of this work on the hospital translated into greater satisfaction among traumatologists, nursing staff and patients, more conditions diagnosed and treated and more complete release reports, thus improving ongoing care and shortening hospital stays.

Conclusions: Collaboration between the Traumatology and Geriatric Departments in treating geriatric patients admitted to Traumatology is cost-effective because it prevents complications, rationalises treatment, improves the patients’ functional status and shortens hospitalisation stays.

There has been extensive research into neck of femur fractures in the elderly. Fragility non-hip femoral fractures share many of the same challenges [1]. Surgical management is complex, patients are frail and mortality rates have been reported as high as 38% [2]. Despite this, relatively little data is available evaluating the level of MDT care provided to non-hip femoral fractures. This audit aimed to evaluate the standard of MDT care provided for patients with non-hip femoral fractures according to the NHFD key performance indicators. The following fractures were included in the dataset: distal femoral, femoral shaft and peri-prosthetic femoral. Patients under 65 were excluded. Data was retrospectively collected using post-operative and medical documentation. Performance was assessed according to five key performance indicators:. Did orthogeriatrics review the patient within 72-hours?. Was surgery performed within 36-hours?. Was the patient weight bearing post-operatively?. Was a confusion assessment completed?. Was the patient discharged home?. 38 patients met the inclusion criteria. 84% of patients were seen by orthogeriatrics within 72 hours of admission. 32% of patients were operated on within 36-hours of admission, with time to theatre exceeding 36-hours in 92% of peri-prosthetic fractures. 37% of patients were not advised to full weight bear post operatively. 84% of patients received a confusion assessment whilst 61% of patients were discharged to their prior place of living. Our results suggest that non-hip femoral fractures do not receive the same standard of MDT care as neck of femur fractures. Greater prioritisation of resources should be given to this patient subset so that care is equivalent to hip-fracture patients. Time to surgery is a particular area for improvement, particularly in peri-prosthetic fractures, a trend that is mirrored nationally. Greater emphasis should be placed on encouraging full-weight bearing post-operatively to prevent post-surgical complications

Aims. This study aimed to identify risk factors (patient, healthcare system, and socioeconomic) for mortality after hip fractures and estimate their relative importance. Further, we aimed to elucidate mortality and survival patterns following fractures and the duration of excess mortality. Methods. Data on 37,394 hip fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from January 2014 to December 2018 were linked to data from the Norwegian Patient Registry, Statistics Norway, and characteristics of acute care hospitals. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate risk factors associated with mortality. The Wald statistic was used to estimate and illustrate relative importance of risk factors, which were categorized in modifiable (healthcare-related) and non-modifiable (patient-related and socioeconomic). We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) comparing deaths among hip fracture patients to expected deaths in a standardized reference population. Results. Mean age was 80.2 years (SD 11.4) and 67.5% (n = 25,251) were female. Patient factors (male sex, increasing comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and Charlson Comorbidity Index)), socioeconomic factors (low income, low education level, living in a healthcare facility), and healthcare factors (hip fracture volume, availability of orthogeriatric services) were associated with increased mortality. Non-modifiable risk factors were more strongly associated with mortality than modifiable risk factors. The SMR analysis suggested that cumulative excess mortality among hip fracture patients was 16% in the first year and 41% at six years. SMR was 2.48 for the six-year observation period, most pronounced in the first year, and fell from 10.92 in the first month to 3.53 after 12 months and 2.48 after six years. Substantial differences in median survival time were found, particularly for patient-related factors. Conclusion. Socioeconomic, patient-, and healthcare-related factors all contributed to excess mortality, and non-modifiable factors had stronger association than modifiable ones. Hip fractures contributed to substantial excess mortality. Apparently small survival differences translate into substantial disparity in median survival time in this elderly population. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):884–893

Aims. The aim of this study was to describe the current pathways of care for patients with a fracture of the hip in five low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in South Asia (Nepal and Sri Lanka) and Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines). Methods. The World Health Organization Service Availability and Readiness Assessment tool was used to collect data on the care of hip fractures in Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. Respondents were asked to provide details about the current pathway of care for patients with hip fracture, including pre-hospital transport, time to admission, time to surgery, and time to weightbearing, along with healthcare professionals involved at different stages of care, information on discharge, and patient follow-up. Results. Responses were received from 98 representative hospitals across the five countries. Most hospitals were publicly funded. There was consistency in clinical pathways of care within country, but considerable variation between countries. Patients mostly travel to hospital via ambulance (both publicly- and privately-funded) or private transport, with only half arriving at hospital within 12 hours of their injury. Access to surgery was variable and time to surgery ranged between one day and more than five days. The majority of hospitals mobilized patients on the first or second day after surgery, but there was notable variation in postoperative weightbearing protocols. Senior medical input was variable and specialist orthogeriatric expertise was unavailable in most hospitals. Conclusion. This study provides the first step in mapping care pathways for patients with hip fracture in LMIC in South Asia. The previous lack of data in these countries hampers efforts to identify quality standards (key performance indicators) that are relevant to each different healthcare system. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):676–681

Background. Polypharmacy of elderly trauma patients entails further difficulties in addition to the fracture treatment. Impaired renal function, altered metabolism and drugs that are potentially delirious or inhibit ossification, are only a few examples which must be carefully considered for the medication in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to investigate, if medication errors could be prevented by orthogeriatric comanagement compared to conventional trauma treatment. Material and methods. In a superregional traumacenter based on two locations in Munich, all patients ≥ 70 years with proximal femur fracture were consecutively recorded in a period of 3 months. After the end of the treatment the medical records of each patient were analyzed. At the hospital location 1 the treatment was carried out without orthogeriatric comanagement, at the hospital location 2 with this concept (DGU-certified orthogeriatric center). In addition to the basic medication all newly added drugs were recorded as well as changes in the medication plan and also wether treatment was carried out by the geriatrician or the trauma surgeon. Based on the START / STOPP criteria for the medication of geriatric patients, we defined “no-go” drugs with the geriatrician of the orthogeriatric center which should be avoided in the orthogeriatric patient (including benzodiazepines, gyrase inhibitors, NSAID like Ibuprofen with impaired GFR). The statistical analysis was done with the chi-square-test (IBM SPSS Statistics 24). Results and conclusion. A total of 46 patients were included, 37 of them female and 9 male with an average age of 84,5 years (SD±6.8). At the location without a geriatrician (18 patients), a prescription of one or more “no-go” drugs was found in 9 patients, whereas in location 2 (28 patients) only in 3 patients (p=0.003). Besides that, at the location with the geriatrician, a change in the medication was made for 17 patients during their stay in hospital. This shows that with the fixed integration of the geriatrician into the trauma surgical team, errors in the medication of the patients could be significantly more frequent avoided or faster detected and corrected. Although this should not limit the responsibility of the rest of the team, there is no doubt about the importance of the interdisciplinary treatment of elderly trauma patients

Osteoporosis is a disease when bone mass and tissue is lost, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and increase susceptibility to develop fracture. The osteoporosis prevalence increases markedly with age, from 2% at 50 years to more than 25% at 80 years. 1. in women. The vast majority of distal radius fractures (DRFs) can be considered fragility fractures. The DRF is usually the first medical presentation of these fractures. With an aging population, all fracture clinics should have embedded screening for bone health and falls risk. DRF is the commonest type of fracture in perimenopausal women and is associated with an increased risk of later non-wrist fracture of up to one in five in the subsequent decade. 2. . According to the national guidelines in managing the fragility fractures of distal radius with regards the bone health review, we, as orthopedic surgeons, are responsible to detect the risky patients, refer them to the responsible team to perform the required investigations and offer the treatment. We reviewed our local database (E-trauma) all cases of fracture distal radius retrospectively during the period from 01/08/2019 to 29/09/2019. We included total of 45 patients who have been managed conservatively and followed up in fracture clinic. Our inclusion criteria was: women aged 65 years and over, men aged 75 years and over with risk factors, patients who are more than 50 years old and sustained low energy trauma whatever the sex is or any patient who has major risk factor (current or frequent recent use of oral or systemic glucocorticoids, untreated premature menopause or previous fragility fracture). We found that 96% of patients were 50 years old or more and 84% of the patients were females. 71% of patients were not referred to Osteoporosis clinic and 11% were already under the orthogeriatric care and 18% only were referred. Out of the 8 referred patients, 3 were referred on 1st appointment, 1 on the 3rd appointment, 1 on discharge from fracture clinic to GP again and 3 were without clear documentation of the time of referral. We concluded that we as trust are not compliant to the national guidelines with regards the osteoporosis review for the DRF as one of the first common presentations of fragility fractures. We also found that the reason for that is that there is no definitive clear pathway for the referral in our local guidelines. We recommended that the Osteoporosis clinic referral form needs to be available in the fracture clinic in an accessible place and needs to be filled by the doctor reviewing the patient in the fracture clinic in the 1st appointment. A liaison nurse also needs to ensure these forms have been filled and sent to the orthogeriatric team. Alternatively, we added a portal on our online database (e-trauma), therefore the patient who fulfils the criteria for bone health review should be referred to the orthogeriatric team to review

Abstract. Introduction. The management of hip fractures has advanced on all aspects from prevention, specialised hip fracture units, early operative intervention and rehabilitation in line with increasing incidence in an aging population. Accurate data analysis on the incidence and trends of hip fractures is imperative to guide future management planning. Methods. A review of all articles published on mortality after hip fracture over a twenty year period (1999–2018) was undertaken to determine any changes that had occurred in the demographics and mortality over this period. This article complements and expands upon the findings of a previous article by the authors assessing a four decade period (1959 – 1998) and attempts to present trends and geographical variations over sixty years. Results. The mean age of patients sustaining hip fractures has increased from 73 years (1960s) to 81 years (2000s) to 82 years (2010s). Over the six decade period one-year mortality has reduced from 27% (1960s) to 20% (2010s). The proportion of female hip fractures has decreased from 84% (1960s) to 70% in 2010s. Intracapsular fractures have drecreased from 54% (1970s) to 49% (2000s) and 48% (2010s). Conclusion. Our study indicates that progress has been made with preventative planning, medical management, specialised orthogeriatric units and surgical expediency all playing a role in the improvements in mean age of hip fracture and reduction in mortality rates. While geographical variations do still exist there has been an increase in the study of hip fractures globally indicating increased attention and commitment to an

Fractures of the neck of femur are common in the older adult with significant morbidity and mortality rates. This patient cohort is associated with frailty and multiple complex medical and social needs requiring a multidisciplinary team to provide optimal care. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes at 5 years following implementation of a collaborative service between the Orthopaedic and Geriatric departments of Southland Hospital in 2012. Retrospective data was collected for patients aged 65 years and older who were admitted with a fragility hip fracture. Data was collated for 2011 (pre-implementation) and 2017 (post-implementation). Demographics and ASA scores were recorded. We assessed 30-day and 1-year mortality, surgical data, length of stay and complications. There were 74 patient admissions in 2011 and 107 in 2017. Mean age at surgery was 84.2 years in 2011 and 82.6 years in 2017 (p>0.05). Between the 2011 and 2017 groups there has been a non-significant reduction in length of stay on the orthopaedic ward (9.8 days vs 7.5 days, p=0.138) but a significant reduction in length of stay on the rehabilitation ward (19.9 vs 9 days, p<0.001). There was a significant decrease in frequency of patients with a complication (71.6% vs 57%, p=0.045) and a marginal reduction in number of complications (p=0.057). Through logistic regression controlling for age, sex and ASA score, there was a reduction in the odds of having a complication by 12% between 2011 and 2017 (p<0.001). There was no difference in mortality between the groups. The orthogeriatric model of care at Southland Hospital appears to have reduced both the frequency of complications and length of stay on the rehabilitation ward 5 years after its implementation. This is the first study in New Zealand demonstrating medium-term post-implementation follow-up of what is currently a nationally accepted standard model of care

Introduction. Aged trauma patients with proximal femur fractures are prone to various complications. They may be associated with their comorbidities which also need to be adressed. These complications limit the patient”s postoperative health status and subsequently their activity and independency. As an attempt to improve the postoperative management of aged hip fracture patients a better understanding of the postoperative condition in these patients is necessary. Therefore, this meta-analysis is intended to provide an overview of postoperative complications in the elderly hip fracture patients and to improve the understanding of an adequate postoperative management. Material and method. Medline was used to screen for studies reporting on the complication rates of hip fracture patients > 65 years. The search criteria were: “proximal femur fracture, elderly, complication”. In addition to surgical studies, internal medicine and geriatric studies were also included. Randomized studies, retrospective studies as well as observation studies were included. Furthermore, reoperation rates as well as treatment-related complications were recorded. The 1-year mortality was calculated as outcome parameter. Results. Overall 54 studies were enrolled, published between 2011 and 2016. The mean age of the 9812 patients was 81 years (65–99 years). Follow-up was at least one year. The reoperation rate after osteosynthesis of pertrochanteric femur fractures was 8.7%. The reoperation rate was dependent on the type of fracture and the surgical method. Pneumonia (9,5%) and urinary tract infections (27%) were the most common postoperative infections. With 23%, delirium was one of the most common medical complications. The 1-year mortality rate was 18.7%. Conclusion. Orthogeriatric patients represent a complex patient population. Addressing the special needs of elderly patients reduces postoperative complications. Establishing comanagement or orthogeriatric wards can also be helpful to manage comorbidities and postoperative complications. It is important to not only choose the proper surgical procedure but to monitor orthogeriatric patients closely during their hospitalization

Introduction. Open fragility ankle fractures involve complex decision making. There is no consensus on the method of surgical management. Our aim in this study was to analyse current management of these patients in a major trauma centre (MTC). Materials & Methods. This cohort study evaluates the management of geriatric (≥65years) open ankle fractures in a MTC (November 2020–November 2022). The method, timing(s) and personnel involved in surgical care were assessed. Weightbearing status over the treatment course was monitored. Patient frailty was measured using the clinical frailty score (CFS). Results. There were 35 patients, mean age 77 years (range 65–97 years), 86% female. Mean length of admission in the MTC was 26.4 days (range 3–78). Most (94%) had a low-energy mechanism of injury. Only 57% of patients underwent one-stage surgery (ORIF n=15, hindfoot nail n=1, external frame n=4) with 45% being permitted to fully weightbear (FWB). Eleven (31.4%) underwent two-stage surgery (external fixator; ORIF), with 18% permitted to FWB. Of those patients with pre-injury mobility, 12 (66%) patients were able to FWB following definitive fixation. Delay in weightbearing ranged from 2–8weeks post-operatively. Seven patients (20%) underwent an initial Orthoplastic wound debridement. Ten patients (28.6%) required plastic surgery input (split-skin grafts n=9, local or free flaps n=3), whereby four patients (40%) underwent one stage Orthoplastic surgery. Eighteen (51.4%) patients had a CFS ≥5. Patients with a CFS of ≥7 had 60% 90-day mortality. Only 17% patients had orthogeriatrician input during admission. Conclusions. These patients have high frailty scores, utilise a relatively large portion of resources with multiple theatre attendances and protracted ward occupancy in an MTC. Early FWB status needs to be the goal of treatment, ideally in a single-staged procedure. Poor access to orthogeriatric care for these frail patients may represent healthcare inequality

Background: Recognising the need for orthogeriatric input for fractured neck of femur patients, as evident from recent studies, has been established fact for some time now. Although, most studies suggest a healthcare model involving an orthogeriatric service of some degree, usually a visiting physician or a post-operative rehabilitation setup, we highlight an innovative strategy involving a dedicated in-house orthogeriatric team providing a high-level of care based in a stabilisation unit. Since the realisation back in 2004 that the Relative Risk for Mortality in patients with fractured neck of femurs was 164.6, CI (130.5–204.8) compared to the expected level of 100, a series of changes were introduced to combat this. Methods: Within the orthopaedic department a trauma stabilisation unit (TSU) was setup with a dedicated orthogeriatric service and the early warning score (EWS) system was implemented. This was used to identify patients requiring higher levels of care and thus transfer to TSU. Results: The 2007 Relative Risk for Mortality for hip fractures stands at 92.4, CI (66–125.9) suggesting a reduction of 44% in mortality. Furthermore, there has been no significant change in age, co-morbidity or delay to surgery over this period. Discussion: The presence of an orthogeriatric service which dedicates itself to patient optimisation pre-operatively and post-operative recovery has immensely improved the outlook on this frail population. The increase level of nursing care with a ratio of 1:2 and implementation of the EWS system again adds to improved patient care and outcome. Thus we strongly advocate that the development of such a care model within trauma & orthopaedics is essential in improving the service our patients receive

Literature suggests that joint orthopaedic and geriatric care, and geriatric orthopaedic rehabilitation units, would provide best care for fractured neck of femur (NOF) patients. These are often elderly frail patients with concurrent illnesses and co-morbidities who also have a fracture. There is to date no quantitative data. This completed audit quantifies the care provided on the orthopaedic wards in the first phase solely by orthopaedic team, and in the repeat phase with additional regular geriatric input from an orthogeriatric senior house officer (SHO) and consultant geriatrician ward rounds. A retrospective audit of fractured NOF patients admitted to acute orthopaedic wards under orthopaedics and treated operatively. The first phase analysed 72 patients with sole orthopaedic care. The repeat phase analysed 25 patients after the introduction of an orthogeriatric SHO and geriatric ward rounds. The first audit phase of orthopaedic care alone found that 50% of patients were reviewed each day of the first post op seven-day week. The mean number of reviews in the post-op week was three. A total of 58% patients were operated on the next day. A minority never had post-op bloods or x-rays prior to discharge from the acute bed. Ad hoc medical input by referral occurred in 50% of patients. The repeat audit of combined orthogeriatric care found that 75% of patients were reviewed each day in the post-op week. The mean number of reviews in the post-op week rose to five. Similar to the first phase, 59% proceeded to next day surgery with combined care. All patients had timely bloods and x-rays before discharge from the acute bed. Medical input rose to 80% due to regular ward rounds, and ad hoc referrals decreased in quantity whilst increased in quality. Length of stay and mortality were reduced. The clinical risk of fractured NOF patients was reduced on the appointment of an orthogeriatric SHO in combination with formal reviews by consultant geriatrician. Further models of care are being evaluated. This audit adds evidence that joint care is better for these usually elderly and co-morbid patients

For some years, there has been vast international interest in creating models for joint efforts between geriatricians and orthopedic surgeons. We present data from two such models. For the first time in Denmark, the Department of Orthopedics Bispebjerg University Hospital (BUP) recruited two full-time geriatricians in September 2009. They were assigned an independent unit meant for severely ill orthopaedic patients with high comorbidity and polypharmacy. These two geriatricians had, during the previous two years, consulted another orthopaedic department at Gentofte University Hospital (GUH) in a neighbouring community three times a week. The aim of their intervention was then to optimize treatment for comorbidity, to clarify indication of acute fall-assessment, osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment, presence of delirium and dementia. Methods. A total of 1344 hip fracture patients (age 70 years) divided into three populations were included in this study. Mortality data were collected from the Danish Civil Registry. Population 1 (P1), n = 645 was included at GUH from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007. During the entire period, the patients had access to a senior consultant in geriatric medicine three times a week. In this population, the majority of patients were assessed for dementia (n = 636), delirium (n = 627) and Barthel Index (Barthel100) at admission (n = 394). Population 2 (P2), n = 381 included at BUH from September 1, 2009 until July 8, 2010 with orthogeriatric access. Population 3 (P3), n = 318 were included at BUH from September 28, 2008 until August 31, 2009 with no orthogeriatric access. Age mean (SD): P1 84.7 (6.8), P2 85.5 (7.3), P3 85.3 (14.3) P = 0.1(ANOVA) Sex ratio: females/males: P1 0.73/0.27, P2 0.80/0.20, P3 0.75/0.25 P = 0.09 Chi square). Results. In-hospital mortality rate: P1 4.8%, P2 6.3%, P3 9.1% P = 0.03 (Chi square). Three month mortality: In P1 dementia, delirium and Barthel Index (below 50 versus above 50) were all strong predictors: No dementia: 53/383 (13.8%) versus dementia present 68/253 (26.9%) died, P = 0001 (log-rank test). No delirium 69/456 (15.1%) versus delirium present 47/171 (27.5%) died F = 0.0004 (log-rank test) Barthel Index 50 38/372 (10.2%) versus Barthel<50 7/22 (31.8%) died P = 0.0004. Conclusion. This paper reports data from two different models with orthogeriatric service. Our data present delirium, dementia and Barthel Index to be very strong predictors for three month mortality (P1). Despite the time needed to implement a new orthogeriatric unit and the fact that the geriatricians only assessed a proportion of hip fracture patients, in-hospital mortality was reduced significantly for the total hip-fracture population (P2) within the first 10 months

The August 2015 Trauma Roundup. 360 . looks at: Thromboprophylaxis not required in lower limb fractures; Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and fracture risk: moving the boundaries in fracture; Posterior wall fractures refined; Neurological injury and acetabular fracture surgery; Posterior tibial plateau fixation; Tibial plateau fractures in the longer term; Comprehensive orthogeriatric care and hip fracture; Compartment syndrome: in the eye of the beholder?

Osteoporosis is common in elderly patients admitted to orthopaedic units with fractures. Fragility fractures place a large burden on health expenditure. Orthopaedic units are in a position to identify patients who require bone density assessment and possible treatment of osteoporosis. Previous surveys of orthopaedic surgeons have shown a wide variance in their perceived role in this. This study was a retrospective note review of 305 patients aged over 55 years with a fragility fracture, who were admitted under the orthopaedic service of eight New Zealand hospitals. Notes from any subsequent rehabilitation unit admission were also reviewed, if available. The mean age was 80.6 years (range 55–104). Seventy seven percent were female. The most common fracture was of the hip (61.6%). Two hundred and thirty-six patients (77.4%) were not taking osteoporosis medication at time of admission, 2.5% of these had a bone mineral density assessment ordered and 11.9% had osteoporosis treatment started, giving a combined intervention rate (investigation or treatment) of 14.4%. A visiting orthogeriatric service initiated treatment in 82.1% of cases. Osteoporosis was listed on the discharge summary in 31.8% of patients who were taking osteoporosis treatment on admission and in 10.7% of patients who had treatment started. Management of osteoporosis is mostly neglected by New Zealand orthopaedic units. This is similar to published data from other countries. Hospitals with the highest rates of osteoporosis intervention had an orthogeriatric service initiating the majority of treatment. Treatment started by the orthopaedic staff was not optimal. Osteoporosis is not identified in most documentation generated by the orthopaedic units