The lordosis distribution index (LDI) describes distribution of lumbar lordosis, measured as the % of lower lumbar lordosis (L4-S1) compared to global lordosis (L1-S1) with normal value 50–50%. Maldistributed LDI is associated with higher revision in short lumbar fusions, 4 vertebrae1. We hypothesise maldistributed LDI is also associated with mechanical failure in longer fusions. Retrospective review of 29 consecutive ASD patients, aged 55+, undergoing long lumbar fusion, 4 levels, with >3-years follow-up. LDI, pelvic incidence (PI) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured on pre- and post-op whole spine standing X-rays (Fig A and B). Patients were categorized according to their pelvic incidence (PI) and postoperative LDI: Normal (LDI 50 80), Hypolordotic (LDI < 50), or Hyperlordotic (LDI > 80) and assessed for failure rate compared to normal LDI and PI <60. Mean follow-up 4.5 years. 19 patients had mechanical failures including junctional failure and metalware fracture. PI >60o was associated with higher mechanical failure rates (Chi^2 p<0.05). Hypolordotic LDI was associated with 82% mechanical failure (Chi^2 p<0.001), Hyperlordotic 88% mechanical failure (Chi^2 p<0.001) and Normal 8% mechanical failure (Table 1). Maldistributed LDI, whether Hyperlordotic or Hypolordotic, correlated with 10× greater mechanical failure rate compared to Normal LDI in long fusions. LDI is a useful measurement that should be considered, especially in high PI patients

7–20 % of the patients with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are dissatisfied without an indication for revision. Therapeutic options for this patient population with mostly a lack of quadriceps strength are limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of six weeks low load resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) on the clinical outcome in these unhappy TKA patients. Thirty-one unhappy TKA patients (of the scheduled fifty patients) without mechanical failure were included in this prospective study since 2022. The patients participate in a supervised resistance training combined with BFR, two times a week during nine weeks. Patients were evaluated by the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Score: satisfaction (KSSs) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Functionality was tested using the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and the 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30CST). Follow-up took place at six weeks, three months and six months after the start. Six weeks training with BFR provided statistically significant improvements in all the KOOS subscales compared to the baseline, especially for symptoms (55.1 (±15.4) versus 48.0 (±16.5); p<0.001), activities in daily living (50.3 (±21.1) versus 43.7 (±17.2); p<0.00) and quality of life (24.6 (±18.5) versus 17.3 (±13.0); p<0.001). The PCS reduced from 27.4 (±11.0) to 23.2 (±11.4) at six weeks (p<0.01), whereas the KSSs increased from 11.8 (±6.5) to 14.9 (±7.6) (p=0.021). Both the 6MWT and the 30CST improved statistically significant from respectively 319.7 (±15.0) to 341.6m (±106.5) (p<0.01) and 8.6 (±3.9) to 9.3 times (±4.5) (p<0.01). Blood flow restriction appears to enhance the quality of life and functional performance of unhappy TKA patients. Based on these preliminary results, BFR seems to be a promising and valuable alternative for these TKA patients with limited therapeutic options

Purpose: Massive endoprostheses have become the mainstay of treatment for reconstruction after resection of primary bone tumours. The Kotz Modular Femoral Tibial Replacement (KMFTR, Kotz prosthesis, Stryker Inc.) system has been one of the most widely utilized uncemented modular systems. Although this prosthesis has excellent bone ingrowth characteristics and a low aseptic loosening rate, we have identified a significant incidence of mechanical failure and breakage of the prosthesis. The purpose of this investigation is to review the outcomes after prosthetic revision for a broken Kotz prosthesis. Method: A retrospective review was undertaken of our institutional database from the years 1989, when we first utilized the Kotz prosthesis, until present. We identified all patients who had undergone a revision of the prosthesis for mechanical failure or prosthetic breakage. Periprosthetic fractures and revisions for polyethylene bushing wear were excluded. Results: 119 distal femoral, 55 proximal tibial and 47 proximal femoral Kotz endoprostheses (221 in total) have been implanted in our center since 1989. There were 21 revisions (9.5% of total prostheses) for mechanical failure. Of these, 16 were in the distal femur, four in the proximal tibia and one in the proximal femur. Mechanical failures occurred at a mean of 77 months (range 24–170). Of the 21 metal failures, 8 stems broke at the junction of the stem and body, 8 fractured through screw holes in the stem, 3 fractured the derotation lug, one fractured the tibial housing and one lateral side-plate failed. Of these failures only three implants had associated definite loosening and two of these three were cemented. Broken stems initially required extraction whilst preserving as much of the longitudinal and transverse bone stock as possible in order to facilitate osseo-mechanical integration of the revision prosthesis. This was accomplished using trephines to core the ingrown broken stem out of the bone. Over the last 20 years, the 16 broken stems have been revised in 5 patients to larger Kotz uncemented stems, 2 to cemented GMRS stems with an adaptor to the KMFTR system, 3 to Restoration uncemented revision hip stems with a custom adaptor to the KMFTR system, 2 to custom GMRS uncemented stems with an adaptor to the KMFTR system, and 4 to total femurs. All except one patient was alive with no evidence of disease. Post-revision, 14 patients had TESS, MSTS87, MSTS93 scores of 80.5, 25.5 and 70 respectively. Conclusion: Despite very low aseptic loosening rates, mechanical failure of the Kotz prosthesis continues to be a significant clinical problem even several years after implantation. Fatigue failure often leads to the difficult scenario of removing a well-ingrown uncemented stem. Our data illustrates that these prostheses can often be successfully revised by trephining out the broken stem and inserting new uncemented stems. Functional outcome continues to be good and is comparable to pre-revision levels

Background. The Kotz Modular Femoral Tibial Replacement system has been one of the most widely utilised uncemented modular systems for bone and joint reconstruction after tumour resection. We have identified a significant incidence of mechanical failure and breakage of the prosthesis. The purpose of this investigation is to review the modes of implant failure and the outcomes after prosthetic revision for a broken Kotz prosthesis. Methods. Over 20 years there were 121 distal femoral, 55 proximal tibial, 47 proximal femoral and 12 total femoral replacements performed. Results. Out of 180 currently living patients there were 27 implant fractures in 23 patients (13%) with 22 distal femoral and five proximal tibial implant failures. Mechanical failures occurred at a mean of 77 months (range 24-170). There were 21 stem fractures. Five fractured at the derotation lug and one fractured the tibial housing. Lug fracture is an unreported mode of failure of these implants. The implant design selected for revision was very much dependent on when the fractured implant was revised. Eleven patients had new KMFTR stems inserted; 4 Restoration stems (one of which was cemented), 3 GMRS stems (one of which was cemented), two total femora and one Compress (Biomet) implants have been utilised, all with custom adaptors between the stem and the KMFTR system. There were 12 complications (44%), seven infections, three implant re-fractures, one vascular insufficiency necessitating amputation and one per-prosthetic fracture. The mean pre-implant fracture and post-revision TESS scores were 80.9 (Range 54.2-98.3) and 79.1 (50-96.7). The MSTS87 pre- and post- scores were 26.8 (14-33) and 26.1 (15-33) respectively. The MSTS93 also demonstrated no differences in the pre-fracture and post-revision scores with 75.4 (50-93) and 74.8 (40-100). Conclusion. Our data illustrate that these prostheses can often be successfully revised by trephining out the broken stem and inserting new uncemented stems. Functional outcome continues to be good and is comparable to pre-revision levels, despite a 44% complication rate

Aims. The risk of mechanical failure of modular revision hip stems is frequently mentioned in the literature, but little is currently known about the actual clinical failure rates of this type of prosthesis. The current retrospective long-term analysis examines the distal and modular failure patterns of the Prevision hip stem from 18 years of clinical use. A design improvement of the modular taper was introduced in 2008, and the data could also be used to compare the original and the current design of the modular connection. Methods. We performed an analysis of the Prevision modular hip stem using the manufacturer’s vigilance database and investigated different mechanical failure patterns of the hip stem from January 2004 to December 2022. Results. Two mechanical failure patterns were identified: fractures in the area of the distal fluted profile (distal stem fracture) and failure of the modular taper (modular fracture). A failure rate of 0.07% was observed for distal stem fracture, and modular fracture rates of 1.74% for the original and 0.013% for the current taper design. Conclusion. A low risk of mechanical failure for both fracture types was observed compared to other known complications in revision hip arthroplasty. In addition, the data show that a design change did significantly reduce the risk of a modular fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(2):151–157

Introduction. One of the major concerns in the use of modular hip prostheses is the structural failure of one or more components of the prosthesis, with total mechanical failure. In literature there are sporadic cases of breakage of the prosthetic neck in patients with high functional demand. Material and methods. In our experience we have implanted a model of modular hip prostheses in 38 patients. In 17 of these patients it was implanted a neck made of titanium alloy, while in the remaining 21 was utilised a CrCo neck. In 5 of the 17 patients with neck titanium it has been a spontaneous rupture of the neck in a time ranging from 12 to 24 months. We proceeded with the replacement of the titanium neck with similar neck made of CrCo alloy in 5 patients with failed neck, and we decided to call the remaining 12 patients with titanium neck, offering them the revision of the system. All patients accepted the revision surgery. Results. implants explanted and subject to breakage of the neck were analyzed by an independent metallurgical laboratory which has produced a document in which were found the main signs of wear which led to the deterioration of metal involved. Conclusions. The rupture of the modular hip prostheses is a possible event both because of the high functional loads required by some types of patients, that of the building materials and design of the modular components. In this study we are presented the results of the laboratory tests that allow us to pose hypotheses about the causes and failure mechanisms of modular hip prostheses

Between January 1998 and December 2002, 418 hip revisions were performed. Of these, 45 hips were diagnosed as infected and two-stage revisions were done six weeks apart. These were excluded from the study, leaving 373 revisions for mechanical failure. In 310 cases both components were exchanged, in 59 the acetabular prostheses only and in three the stem only. One permanent resection arthroplasty was done for bone loss. Where necessary bone graft was used liberally. In 83 patients (22%) specimens taken at surgery cultured positive. A first generation cephalosporin was given as systemic prophylaxis. Routine usage of Gentamycin was reinforced by Vancomycin or fucidic acid in the cement and bone grafts. Double lumen irrigation was inserted in only 5% of cases on the basis of operative findings. Gram stains done intraoperatively in suspected cases were non-contributory. Seventy-six percent of cultures were gram positive, with a preponderance of coagulase negative staphylococcus. Twelve percent were gram negative and 12% were mixed cultures of gram positive and gram negative organisms. One methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and one fungus were identified. As most of these patients were referred from elsewhere, we did not know whether or not Gentamycin had been used in the cement during previous surgery. Implant failure due to low-grade infection was under-diagnosed in this series. Because of the relatively low number of failures caused by infection in this group, we recommend, with some improvements, the revision protocol presented. The expense of more detailed preoperative evaluation should be weighed against the success of the protocol

Aims. The timing of when to remove a circular frame is crucial; early removal results in refracture or deformity, while late removal increases the patient morbidity and delay in return to work. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of a staged reloading protocol. We report the incidence of mechanical failure following both single-stage and two stage reloading protocols and analyze the associated risk factors. Methods. We identified consecutive patients from our departmental database. Both trauma and elective cases were included, of all ages, frame types, and pathologies who underwent circular frame treatment. Our protocol is either a single-stage or two-stage process implemented by defunctioning the frame, in order to progressively increase the weightbearing load through the bone, and promote full loading prior to frame removal. Before progression, through the process we monitor patients for any increase in pain and assess radiographs for deformity or refracture. Results. There were 244 frames (230 patients) included in the analyses, of which 90 were Ilizarov type frames and 154 were hexapods. There were 149 frames which underwent single-stage reloading and 95 frames which underwent a two-stage reloading protocol. Mechanical failure occurred after frame removal in 13 frames (5%), which suffered refracture. There were no cases of change in alignment. There was no difference between refracture patients who underwent single-stage or two-stage reloading protocols (p = 0.772). In all, 14 patients had failure prevented through identification with the reloading protocol. Conclusion. Our reloading protocol is a simple and effective way to confirm the timing of frame removal and minimize the rate of mechanical failure. Similar failure rates occurred between patients undergoing single-stage and two-stage reloading protocols. If the surgeon is confident with clinical and radiological assessment, it may be possible to progress directly to stage two and decrease frame time and patient morbidity. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(5):359–366

The relative advantages and disadvantages of two-stage versus one-stage management of infected total hip arthroplasties are the current subject of intense debate. To understand the merits of each approach detailed information on the short and, importantly, longer-term outcomes of each must be known. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term results of two-stage exchange arthroplasty for THAs in one of the largest series to date.

We identified 331 infected THAs treated with a two-stage exchange arthroplasty between 1993 and 2021 at a single institution. Patients were excluded if they had prior treatment for infection. Mean age at reimplantation was 66 years, 38% were female, and mean BMI was 30 kg/m². PJI diagnosis was based on the 2011 MSIS criteria. A competing risk model accounting for death was utilized. Mean follow up was 8 years.

The cumulative incidence of reinfection was 7% at 1 year and 11% at 5 and 10 years. Factors predictive of reinfection included BMI>30 kg/m² (HR 2; p=0.049), and need for a spacer exchange (HR 3.2; p=0.006). The cumulative incidence of any revision was 13% at 5 and 10 years. The cumulative incidence of aseptic revision was 3% at 1 year, 7% at 5 years, and 8% at 10 years. Dislocation occurred in 33 hips (11% at 10 years; 45% required revision). Factors predictive of dislocation were female sex (HR 2; p=0.047) and BMI<30 kg/m² (HR 3; p=0.02). The mean HHS improved from 54 to 75 at 10 years.

In this series of 331 two-stage exchange arthroplasties performed for infected hips, we found a low aseptic revision rate (8%) and a low rate of reinfection (11%) at 10 years. These long-term mechanical and infection data must be kept in mind when considering a paradigm shift to one-stage exchanges.

Level of Evidence: Level III

Aims. Endoprosthetic reconstruction with a distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA) can be used to treat distal femoral bone loss from oncological and non-oncological causes. This study reports the short-term implant survivorship, complications, and risk factors for patients who underwent DFA for non-neoplastic indications. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 75 patients from a single institution who underwent DFA for non-neoplastic indications, including aseptic loosening or mechanical failure of a previous prosthesis (n = 25), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 23), and native or periprosthetic distal femur fracture or nonunion (n = 27). Patients with less than 24 months’ follow-up were excluded. We collected patient demographic data, complications, and reoperations. Reoperation for implant failure was used to calculate implant survivorship. Results. Overall one- and five-year implant survivorship was 87% and 76%, respectively. By indication for DFA, mechanical failure had one- and five-year implant survivorship of 92% and 68%, PJI of 91% and 72%, and distal femur fracture/nonunion of 78% and 70% (p = 0.618). A total of 37 patients (49%) experienced complications and 27 patients (36%) required one or more reoperation. PJI (n = 16, 21%), aseptic loosening (n = 9, 12%), and wound complications (n = 8, 11%) were the most common complications. Component revision (n = 10, 13.3%) and single-stage exchange for PJI (n = 9, 12.0 %) were the most common reoperations. Only younger age was significantly associated with increased complications (mean 67 years (SD 9.1)) with complication vs 71 years (SD 9.9) without complication; p = 0.048). Conclusion. DFA is a viable option for distal femoral bone loss from a range of non-oncological causes, demonstrating acceptable short-term survivorship but with high overall complication rates. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):173–181

Introduction

Cementless acetabular fixation in total hip replacement (THA) is reliable and has been the fixation method of choice in the United States for decades. While revision for failure of osseointegration or early loosening is relatively rare, recurrent dislocation remains a leading cause of early revision. Novel acetabular implants and those offered by smaller companies often lack constrained or dual mobility liners, which may result in revision of well-fixed, well-positioned cups in cases of recurrent dislocation.

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of THA with three different acetabular cups with differing fixation surfaces. One hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cup (Trident, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) offered dual mobility or constrained liner options. The other cups were a novel highly porous cup (Restoris PST, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and a Calcium Phosphate (CaP)-coated cup (Trinity, Corin, Cirincester, UK), neither of which offered dual mobility or constrained options at the time of investigation. Endpoints of interest were: clinical and radiographic outcomes including evidence of osseointegration, overall reoperations, reoperations for acetabular fixation failure, and reoperations to address dislocation in which a well-positioned shell was revised due to the lack of dual mobility or constrained options.

Aims: To evaluate the results of a novel modular press-þt acetabular cup in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthrosis (OA) and inßammatory arthritis (IA). Methods: From February 1996 to June 1999 in 324 patients (249 women, 75 men) 355 THA using a novel cup has been carried out. The shell is non-hemispherical on cross-section and has a hydroxyapatite coating on porous titanium for osseointegration. Diagnosis was: osteoarthrosis (OA) 236, developmental dysplasia (DDH) 21, post-traumatic arthrosis 27, avascular necrosis 6, IA 65 Ð mainly rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Average age at operation was 65.8 years. The patients were studied prospectively using Harris Hip Score (HHS), by measuring any radiolucency around the cup and by looking for signs of migration. Results: Median follow-up was 4.5 years. At follow-up, 21 patients had deceased. Revision for deep infection was carried out in 5 hips (3 low-grade infections). No septic loosening occurred with low-grade infection. Recurrent dislocations required revision of 1 cup and exchange of 2 inserts. Only 1 cup in a RA patient with severe superior bone loss became unstable after a fall 4 months postoperatively. Survival with aseptic loosening of the cup as endpoint was 1 in OA and 0.98 in IA. In all 290 patients with 318 THA in follow-up the cup was functioning well, both clinically and radiographically. HHS increased from 44.5 to 90.3. Conclusion: Press-þt þxation using a modern acetabular component is an excellent treatment option in primary total hip arthroplasty for all diagnostic groups.

Purpose

Two-stage re-implantation after infection of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), remains the gold standard to which other forms of treatment should be compared. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the rates of failure and functional outcome of two stage revision TKA for treatment of infection comparing cemented posterior stabilized compared to constrained condylar implants.

Subtrochanteric femoral fractures are a subset of hip fractures generally treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation\[1\]. Single lag screw devices are most commonly-used, but integrated dual screw constructs have become increasingly popular\[2,3\]. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) with a dual screw device (InterTAN nail, IN). The primary outcome was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out, back-out, nail breakage or peri-implant fracture. Consecutive adult patients (18yrs) with subtrochanteric femoral fracture treated in a single centre were retrospectively identified using electronic records. Patients that underwent surgical fixation using either a long GN (2010–2017) or IN (2017–2022) were included. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to identify complications of fixation. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the risk of mechanical failure and secondary outcomes by implant design. Multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of mechanical failure. The study included 622 patients, 354 in the GN group (median age 82yrs, 72% female) and 268 in the IN group (median age 82yrs, 69% female). The risk of any mechanical failure was increased two-fold in the GN group (HR 2.44 \[95%CI 1.13 to 5.26\]; _p=0.024_). Mechanical failure comprising screw cut-out (_p=0.032_), back-out (_p=0.032_) and nail breakage (_p=0.26_) was only observed in the GN group. Technical predictors of failure included varus >5° for cut-out (OR 19.98 \[2.06 to 193.88\]; _p=0.01_), TAD;25mm for back-out (8.96 \[1.36 to 58.86\]; p=0.022) and shortening 1cm for peri-implant fracture (7.81 \[2.92 to 20.91\]; _p=<0.001_). Our results demonstrate that an intercalated screw construct is associated with a lower risk of mechanical failure compared with the a single lag screw device. Intercalated screw designs may reduce the risk of mechanical complications for patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures

This study compares outcomes of fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) with a dual lag screw device (InterTAN nail, IN). The primary outcome was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out, back-out, nail breakage or peri-implant fracture. Technical factors associated with mechanical failure were also identified. All adult patients (>18yrs) with a subtrochanteric femoral fracture treated in a single centre were retrospectively identified using electronic records. Included patients underwent surgical fixation using either a long GN (2010–2017) or IN (2017–2022). Cox regression analysis was used to determine the risk of mechanical failure and technical predictors of failure. The study included 587 patients, 336 in the GN group (median age 82yrs, 73% female) and 251 in the IN group (median age 82yrs, 71% female). The IN group exhibited a higher prevalence of osteoporosis (p=0.002) and CKD□3 (p=0.007). There were no other baseline differences between groups. The risk of any mechanical failure was increased two-fold in the GN group (HR 2.51, p=0.020). Mechanical failure comprising screw cut-out (p=0.040), back-out (p=0.040) and nail breakage (p=0.51) was only observed in the GN group. The risk of peri-implant fracture was similar between the groups (HR 1.10, p=0.84). Technical predictors of mechanical included varus >5° for cut-out (HR 15.61, p=0.016), TAD>25mm for back-out (HR 9.41, p=0.020) and shortening >1cm for peri-implant fracture (HR 6.50, p=<0.001). Dual lag screw designs may reduce the risk of mechanical complications for patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures

Abstract. INTRODUCTION. The most frequent mode of aseptic failure of primary total knee replacements is tibial baseplate loosening. This is influenced by stresses across the implant-bone interface which can be increased in obese patients leading to potentially higher rates of early failure. The evidence is mixed as to the true effect of elevated BMI (body mass index) on revision rates. We present the experience of early tibial failures in our department and how our implant choices have evolved. METHODOLOGY. We retrospectively reviewed our unit's arthroplasty database and identified all patients who had sustained mechanical tibial failure. Data were collected on patient demographics, operative details of primary and revision operations, components used, alignment pre and post operatively and indication. Complications and further surgery performed were recorded. RESULTS. 12 patients were identified who had been revised for mechanical tibial failure. All were female, mean age 60 years (46–76). Mean BMI was 11/12 had significant comorbidities and 6/12 had risk factors for reduced bone density (inflammatory arthritis, diabetes, hypothyroid). CONCLUSION. In our consecutive series of 12 patients who presented with tibial mechanical failure, all were female and had a high BMI with the majority over 40. We recommend that a stemmed tibia construct should be used in female patients with an elevated BMI, particularly if it is over 40

Mechanical failure of spine posterior fixation in the lumbar region Is suspected to occur more frequently when the sagittal balance is not properly restored. While failures at the proximal extremity have been studied in the literature, the lumbar distal junctional pathology has received less attention. The aim of this work was to investigate if the spinopelvic parameters, which characterize the sagittal balance, could predict the mechanical failure of the posterior fixation in the distal lumbar region. All the spine surgeries performed in 2017-2019 at Rizzoli Institute were retrospectively analysed to extract all cases of lumbar distal junctional pathology. All the revision surgeries performed due to the pedicle screws pull-out, or the breakage of rods or screws, or the vertebral fracture, or the degenerative disc disease, in the distal extremity, were included in the junctional (JUNCT) group. A total of 83 cases were identified as JUNCT group. All the 241 fixation surgeries which to date have not failed were included in the control (CONTROL) group. Clinical data were extracted from both groups, and the main spinopelvic parameters were assessed from sagittal standing preoperative (pre-op) and postoperative (post-op) radiographs with the software Surgimap (Nemaris). In particular, pelvic incidence (PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), sacral slope (SS) and lumbar lordosis (LL) have been measured. In JUNCT, the main failure cause was the screws pull-out (45%). Spine fixation with 7 or more levels were the most common in JUNCT (52%) in contrast to CONTROL (14%). In CONTROL, PT, TPA, SS and PI-LL were inside the recommended ranges of good sagittal balance. For these parameters, statistically significant differences were observed between pre-op and post-op (p<0.0001, p=0.01, p<0.0001, p=0.004, respectively, Wilcoxon test). In JUNCT, the spinopelvic parameters were out of the ranges of the good sagittal balance and the worsening of the balance was confirmed by the increase in PT, TPA, SVA, PI-LL and by the decrease of LL (p=0.002, p=0.003, p<0.0001, p=0.001, p=0.001, respectively, paired t-test) before the revision surgery. TPA (p=0.003, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and SS (p=0.03, unpaired t-test) differed significantly in pre-op between JUNCT and CONTROL. In post-op, PI-LL was significantly different between JUNCT and CONTROL (p=0.04, unpaired t-test). The regression model of PT vs PI was significantly different between JUNCT and CONTROL in pre-op (p=0.01, Z-test). These results showed that failure is most common in long fused segments, likely due to long lever arms leading to implant failure. If the sagittal balance is not properly restored, after the surgery the balance is expected to worsen, eventually leading to failure: this effect was confirmed by the worsening of all the spinopelvic parameters before the revision surgery in JUNCT. Conversely, a good sagittal balance seems to avoid a revision surgery, as it is visible is CONTROL. The mismatch PI-LL after the fixation seems to confirm a good sagittal balance and predict a good correction. The linear regression of PT vs PI suggests that the spine deformity and pelvic conformation could be a predictor for the failure after a fixation

Vitamin E-doped cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE) has encouraged the use of larger heads in thinner liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there are concerns about wear and mechanical failure of the thin liner, especially when metal heads are used. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate if the use of a large metal head in a thin VEPE liner would increase polyethylene wear compared with a standard 32-mm metal head and to compare periacetabular radiolucencies and patient-reported outcomes in THA. 96 candidates for uncemented THA were randomly allocated to either the largest possible metal head (36–44 mm) that could be fitted in the thinnest available VEPE liner (intervention group) or a standard 32-mm metal head (control group). The primary outcome was proximal head penetration (PHP) measured with model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Secondary outcomes were periacetabular radiolucencies and patient-reported outcomes. The mid-term results of the trial at 5 years are presented. Median total PHP (interquartile range) was -0.04 mm (−0.12 to 0.02) in the intervention group and -0.03 mm (=0.14 to 0.05) in the control group (p=0.691). The rates of periacetabular radiolucencies were 1/44 and 4/42 (p=0.197), respectively. Patient-reported hip function and health-related quality of life did not differ between the groups, but participants in the intervention group reported a higher level of activity (median UCLA rank 7 vs 6, p=0.020). There were 5 revisions caused by dislocations (2), periprosthetic fracture (1), stem subsidence (1), or iliopsoas impingement (1). Large metal heads in thin VEPE liners did not increase liner wear and were not associated with liner failure 5 years after THA

Mechanical failure due to dislocation, fracture and acetabular wear as well as persistence of infection are the main complications associated with the use of hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). We have developed a novel, custom-made spacer as part of two-stage septic hip replacement and present the two- to five-year results after reimplantation. We prospectively examined a total of 73 patients over our study period in whom our new spacer technique was used. The technique includes a dual mobility inlay and a cemented straight stem in combination with antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement which allows full weight bearing meanwhile the interim period. The follow-up ranged between 24 and 60 months after reimplantation as second stage of a two-stage approach. The patients were contacted as part of the follow-up using a questionnaire concerning reoperation, reinfection as well as hip function by using the Harris Hip Score. 72 patients (98,6%) could be reimplanted, one patient is still using the spacer prothesis for 45 months because of excellent functional results with a Harris Hip Score of 95, nevertheless reimplantation is planned. The reinfection rate was less than 7% after reimplantation. The dislocation rate was 5%, and in total there was an overall complication rate of less than 10%. The Harris Hip Score was significantly improved. The ENDO spacer surgical technique is a promising option in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) for two-stage septic exchange with a low dislocation rate and good infection control after reimplantation. In addition, it enables early mobilization with the possibility of full weight-bearing in the interval between spacer implantation and reimplantation

Pelvic discontinuity (PD) is a detrimental complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological results of patients with PD who were revised using a custom-made triflange acetabular component (CTAC). This is a single centre prospective study of patients with PD following THA who were treated with a CTAC. The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS), EurQol five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) utility, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), including visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, were gathered at baseline, and at one- and two-year follow-up. Clinical and radiological complications, including reasons for revisions were registered. Trends over time are described and tested for significance and clinical relevance. 18 females with 22 CTACs were included with a mean age of 73.5 years (SD 7.7). There were significant improvements between baseline and final follow-up in HOOS (p<0.01), mOHS (p<0.01), EQ-5D-3L utility (p<0.01), EQ-5D-3L NRS (p<0.01), VAS pain rest (p<0.01), and VAS pain activity (p<0.01). A minimal clinically important improvement in mOHS and the HOOS was observed in 16 patients (73%) and 14 patients (64%), respectively. Definite healing of the PD was observed in 19 hips (86%). Complications included six cases with broken screws (27%), four cases (18%) with bony fractures, and one case (4.5%) with sciatic nerve paresthesia. One patient with concurrent bilateral PD had revision surgery due to recurrent dislocations. No revision surgery was performed for screw failure or implant breakage. This is the first prospective assessment in clinical outcome of patients with PD who were treated with a CTAC. We have demonstrated that CTAC in patients with THA acetabular loosening and PD can result in stable constructs with no mechanical failures. Moreover, clinically relevant improvements in health-related quality of life at two years’ follow-up was observed