The patient-reported Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), with 3 dimensions (Walking/standing(W/S), Pain, Social interaction(SI)) has previously been validated in patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery. A preliminary cross-sectional evaluation of its measurement properties relating to surgery on different regions of the foot and ankle is presented here. Within 4 weeks prior to foot or ankle surgery, 671of 764 consecutive eligible patients (87.8% response rate) were assessed with the: (i) MOXFQ questionnaire, (ii) SF-36 general health survey (iii) American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scales. Sample characteristics: mean age 53 years 427 (63.6%) female. Patients were booked for (main) surgery on Hallux (210, 31.3%), Lesser Toes (119, 17.7%), Mid foot (22, 3.3%), Ankle/Hind foot (311, 46.3%) and whole foot/multiple regions (9, 1.3%). MOXFQ item response rates were high (<2% missing on any one item) with responses generally well distributed across response categories. Item-total correlations within each dimension were generally above recommended levels. Internal consistency, as assessed by Cronbach's alpha, were 0.93, 0.84 and 0.71 for the W/S, Pain and SI dimensions, respectively. Within Hallux, Lesser toes and Ankle/hind foot surgical subgroups (low numbers precluded mid foot and whole/multiple region analyses), alphas for these subscales were similar. Convergent validity of MOXFQ was demonstrated by correlations between the 3 dimensions (W/S, Pain, SI) with similar dimensions of the SF-36 and relevant AOFAS scales. A priori hypotheses were generally supported. The MOXFQ demonstrates good baseline measurement properties in patients undergoing a range of foot and ankle surgery, suggesting its suitability as an outcome measure for clinical trials of foot and ankle surgery in general. The SI dimension, concerned with cosmesis and social participation has somewhat weaker properties but remains useful. Evidence for the MOXFQ's responsiveness across the range of foot and ankle surgery is yet to be assessed

Objectives. The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is a validated 16-item, patient-reported outcome measure for evaluating outcomes of foot or ankle surgery. The original development of the instrument identified three domains. This present study examined whether the three domains could legitimately be summed to provide a single summary index score. . Methods. The MOXFQ and Short-Form (SF)-36 were administered to 671 patients before surgery of the foot or ankle. Data from the three domains of the MOXFQ (pain, walking/standing and social interaction) were subjected to higher order factor analysis. Reliability and validity of the summary index score was assessed. Results. The mean age of the participants was 52.8 years (. sd. 15.68; 18 to 89). Higher order principle components factor analysis produced one factor, accounting for 74.7% of the variance. The newly derived single index score was found to be internally reliable (α = 0.93) and valid, achieving at least moderate correlations (r ≥ 0.5, p < 0.001) with related (pain/function) domains of the SF-36. Conclusions. Analyses indicated that data from the MOXFQ can be presented in summary form. The MOXFQ summary index score (MOXFQ-Index) provides an overall indication of the outcomes of foot and ankle surgery. Furthermore, the single index reduces the number of statistical comparisons, and hence the role of chance, when exploring MOXFQ data

Aims

The Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) entered mainstream use in the management of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthritis following the positive results of large trials in 2016. Limited information is available on the longer-term outcomes of this implant within the literature, particularly when independent from the originator. This single-centre cohort study investigates the efficacy of the Cartiva SCI at up to five years.

Background. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) is a condition specific patient reported outcome measure (PROM) for foot and ankle surgery. It consists of 16 items across three subscales measuring distinct, but related traits: walking/standing ability, pain, and social interaction. Although it is the most used foot and ankle PROM in the UK, initial MOxFQ validation involved analysis of only 100 individuals undergoing hallux valgus surgery. This project aimed to establish whether an individual's response to the MOxFQ varies with anatomical region of disease (measurement invariance), and to explore structural validity of the factor structure (subscale items) of the MOxFQ. Methods. This was a single-centre, prospective cohort study involving 6640 patients (mean age 52, range 10–90 years) presenting with a wide range of foot and ankle pathologies between 2013 and 2021. Firstly, to assess whether the MOxFQ responses vary by anatomical region of foot and ankle disease, we performed multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Secondly, to assess the structural validity of the subscale items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Results. Measurement invariance by pathology was confirmed suggesting the same model can be used across all foot and ankle anatomical regions. Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a 2–3 factor model, and suggested that item 13 (inability to carry out my work/everyday activities) and item 14 (inability to undertake social/recreational activities) loaded more positively onto the walking/standing subscale than their original social interaction subscale. Conclusions. This large-cohort study supports the current widespread use of the MOxFQ across a broad range of foot and ankle pathologies. Items 13 and 14 might be better moved from the “social interaction” to the “walking/standing” subscale and this may have future implications for deriving/analysing subscale scores

Introduction. Chronic ankle instability is a common condition that can be effectively treated with arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament reconstruction to restore ankle stability and function. The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcomes of arthroscopic lateral ligament reconstruction using the MOXFQ, VAS, and EQ5D patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods. This prospective series included 38 patients who underwent arthroscopic lateral ligament reconstruction for chronic ankle instability between December 2019 and April 2022. All patients completed the MOXFQ, VAS, and EQ5D PROMs preoperatively, as well as at6, and 12 months postoperatively. The MOXFQ is a disease-specific PROM that assesses foot and ankle function, while the VAS measures pain and the EQ5D evaluates health-related quality of life. Results. At the 12-month follow-up, the mean MOXFQ Index score had improved significantly from 53.3 ± 23.1 preoperatively to 16.0 ±21.1 (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean VAS score had improved from 36.2 ± 22.4 preoperatively to 14.7 ± 15.0 (p < 0.001), and the meanEQ5D score had improved from 0.55 ± 0.26 preoperatively to 0.87 ± 0.12 (p < 0.001). No major complications were observed. Conclusion. Arthroscopic lateral ligament reconstruction is an effective treatment for chronic ankle instability, with significant improvements in clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is the most reliable surgical option, for hallux rigidus from end-stage osteoarthritis. The aim of the study was to compare the functional outcomes of memory nickel-titanium staples versus a compression plate with a cross screw construct for first MTPJ arthrodesis using the Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Patients who underwent MTPJ arthrodesis using either memory nickel-titanium staples or a compression plate with a cross screw construct were identified from the surgical lists of two orthopaedic consultants. Pre and post-operative MOXFQ questionnaire, a validated patient-reported outcome measure, was administered, and responses were analysed to derive the MOXFQ summary index. The study included 38 patients (staple group N=12 and plate and cross screw group N=26). 23 patients were female and 15 were male. Mean age was 64.8 years (SD 9.02; 40 to 82). Initial analysis showed no significant difference in preoperative MOXFQ scores between the groups (p = 0.04). Postoperatively, the staple group exhibited a mean improvement of 36.17, surpassing the plate group's mean improvement of 23. Paired t-test analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (t-score= 2.5, p = 0.008), favouring the use of staples. The findings indicate that the use of staples in MTPJ arthrodesis resulted in a significantly greater improvement in MOXFQ scores compared to plates. Further research is needed to explore the underlying factors contributing to this difference and to evaluate long-term effects on patient outcomes

Background. Hallux rigidus is a common condition characterised by first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) degeneration, pain and limited range of motion (ROM). The gold standard surgical treatment is arthrodesis, providing good pain relief but sacrifices ROM. Recently the Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) has been utilised as an interpositional arthroplasty, aiming to reduce pain whilst preserving range of motion. Current evidence for Cartiva SCI is largely based on a single cohort with mixed outcomes. We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Cartiva SCI compared to arthrodesis undertaken in our centre. Methods. Retrospective review of patients undergoing Cartiva SCI or arthrodesis for treating hallux rigidus was conducted. Preoperative arthritis was radiographically graded using the Vanore classification. Patient reported outcomes (PROMs) were assessed using EuroQol 5-dimension score (EQ-5D-5L) and Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Results. Between 2017 and 2020 there were 33 cases (17 Cartiva, 16 arthrodesis, mean age 59.0±9.9 years) with a mean follow up of 2.3 years. For the first MTPJ arthrodesis cohort, the MOXFQ domain scores were: Index 3.9±5.8, Walking/Standing 5.1±7.6, Pain 3.2±5.0, and Social Interaction 2.6±4.0. EQ-5D-5L Index score was 0.828±0.270 and the EQ-VAS was 72.5±23.3. For the Cartiva cohort, the MOXFQ domain scores were: Index 7.7±6.0, Walking/Standing 8.9±7.9, Pain 7.1±5.0, and Social Interaction 6.4±5.4. EQ-5D-5L Index score was 0.631±0.234 and the EQ-VAS was 74.8±20.8. There was no statistically significant difference between any MOXFQ domain or EQ-5D-5L scores. However, a negative trend in MOXFQ domains was identified for the Cartiva group, as well as a reoperation rate of 23.5%. Conclusions. The Cartiva SCI demonstrated no advantage over arthrodesis in PROMs, despite the presumed benefit of preserved ROM. A significant reoperation rate was also observed. Surgeons should be cautious in the use of this novel implant

Introduction. When ankle arthroplasty fails the options are revision to arthrodesis or revision to arthroplasty. We report early outcomes of revision procedures for failed total replacement. Methods. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data including post-operative complications, union, survivorship and PROMS scores to compare revision to arthrodesis and revision to arthroplasty. Results. 31 revision procedures (10 revision to arthrodesis and 21 revision to arthroplasty) were performed for failed primary ankle arthroplasty (30 patients) between January 2012 and June 2019. 23 males: 8 females, average age of 68. Indications for revisions were aseptic loosening (13), cysts/lysis (6), pain (5), periprosthetic infection (3), fracture (2), fibula erosion (1), polyethylene dislocation (1). Union rate following arthrodesis was 77.9% after primary revision procedure. Impaction bone grafting technique was utilised in seven patients with a union rate of 83%. Survivorship following revision to arthroplasty was 100% at two years; 87.5% at three years and 75% at four years Failed revision arthroplasty was revised to arthrodesis successfully. Median MOxFQ was 73.5 for the arthrodesis group versus 17 in the arthroplasty group (p=0.02). Median AOS was 87 for the arthrodesis group versus 12 for the arthroplasty group (p=0.04). Discussion. This study demonstrated the potential advantages in the short term of revision arthroplasty over conversion to arthrodesis with statistically significant improvements in MOxFQ and AOS within the first two years following revision

Background. Optimal management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures remains controversial. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus non-operative treatment in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture up to 2-years. Methods. All displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures between August 2014 and January 2019 that presented to a level 1 trauma centre were considered for inclusion. The decision to treat was made by a multidisciplinary meeting. Operative treatment protocol involved sinus tarsi approach or percutaneous reduction & internal fixation. Non-operative protocol involved symptomatic management with no attempt at closed reduction. All fractures were classified, and the MOXFQ/EQ-5D-5L scores were used to assess foot and ankle and general health-related quality of life outcomes respectively. Results. 101 patients were recruited at a level 1 major trauma centre, between August 2014 and January 2019. Our propensity score matched 44 patients in the surgical cohort to 44 patients in the non-surgical cohort. At 24 months, there was no significant difference in the MOXFQ Index score (p<0.05) however the patients in the surgical cohort had a significantly higher EQ-5D-5L Index score (p<0.05). There was also a higher return to work (91% vs 72%, p<0.05) and physical activity rate (46 vs. 35%, p<0.05) in the surgical cohort despite a higher proportion of more complex fractures in the surgical cohort. The wound complication rate following surgery was 16%. 14% of patients in the non-operative cohort subsequently underwent arthrodesis compared to none of the patients in the surgical cohort. Conclusion. In this study, we found operative treatments were associated with low rates of surgical complication at 2-years and long term pain improvement, facilitating earlier and better functional outcomes for complex injury patterns compared to nonoperative treatment

Introduction. Primary ankle arthroplasty (TAR) is increasingly used to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. Reported revision rates of TAR vary from 8.5% to 11.1% at 9 years. Revision surgery remains technically challenging with options ranging from simple joint debridement to tibio-talar-calcaneal fusion. The efficacy of these procedures remains unclear and there is no consensus on optimal revision options. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients undergoing surgery for a failed primary TAR at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (2004–2021). TAR failure was determined by clinical assessment, serial radiographs and CT scans. Primary outcome measures included type and time of index surgery post TAR. Secondary outcomes included frequency of re-operations, post-operative complications, patient reported outcomes and union rate (for revision arthrodesis procedures). Results. 70 failed TARs in 69 patients (35M:34F, mean 65.7 years, s.d.=11.6) underwent re-operation a mean of 6.24 years (range 1–30) post primary. In total, 107 operations were performed including revision fusion (n=50), revision arthroplasty (n=14), bearing exchange (n=9) and joint clearance (n=9). The overall revision fusion union rate was 73.5% over a mean of 12.5 months (s.d.=7.6). 16/23 (69.6%) Tibio-Talo-Calcaneal and 9/12 (75%) ankle fusions (previous subtalar/triple fusion) using a hindfoot nail united over a mean 11.4 months (s.d.=6.0) and 15 months (s.d.=9.48) respectively. Only 64% of ankle fusions using screws alone united (mean=10.6 months, s.d.=8.14). The average post-operative MOXFQ score was 28.3 (s.d.=19.3). 73% said the operation improved their function and would recommend it to a friend/family member. Conclusion. Despite low post-operative MOXFQ scores, over 70% of patients were satisfied with re-operation for a failed TAR. Over 26% of all TAR revision fusions fail to unite with the highest non-union rates observed post ankle arthrodesis with screws alone (36.4%)

Arthrodesis of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is a common procedure used for the treatment of end stage arthritis. We studied a cohort of patients who underwent an isolated 1st MTPJ Fusion for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Here we report the 10-year clinical outcomes, complication rate, requirement for further surgery and patient experience. All patients, who underwent an isolated 1st MTPJ Fusion for osteoarthritis from June 2008 until November 2011 were included. Demographics, clinical outcome data and subsequent procedures performed were collected from a departmental database (Bluespier). Patients were contacted and asked to complete the MOxFQ questionnaire and rate their satisfaction using pain, function and if they would undergo the surgery again. Mean follow up was 10.85 (range 9–12) years. A total of 161 patients (183 feet) underwent an isolated 1st MTPJ fusion during this time period. 156 of the feet showed a successful arthrodesis (85.2% fusion rate); 27 patients required revision surgery, 19 (10.4%) for a symptomatic non-union and 8 (4.4%) for mal-union. Those patients with co-morbidities (diabetes and gout) required revision earlier than those without (p<0.01). Average MOxFQ score was 16.6 (0–64) and 28 out of the 38 (73.6%) said they would have the operation again. Overall, the long-term results of the 1st MTPJ fusion had good outcomes with a successful fusion rate and minimal complications, both in line with the corresponding literature. In this series, fusion provided high patient satisfaction with the majority of patients opting to undergo fusion with the gift of hindsight

Abstract. Background. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion is indicated for severe arthritis, failed ankle arthroplasty, avascular necrosis of talus and as a salvage after failed ankle fixation. Patients in our study had complex deformities with 25 ankles having valgus deformities (range 50–8 degrees mean 27 degrees). 12 had varus deformities (range 50–10 degrees mean 26 degrees) 5 ankles an accurate measurement was not possible on retrospective images. 10 out of 42 procedures were done after failed previous surgeries and 8 out of 42 had talus AVN. Methods. Retrospective case series of patients with hindfoot nails performed in our centre identified using NHS codes. Total of 41 patients with 42 nails identified with mean age of 64 years. Time to union noted from X-rays and any complications noted from the follow-up letters. Patients contacted via telephone to complete MOXFQ and VAS scores and asked if they would recommend the procedure to patients suffering similar conditions. 17 patients unable to fill scores (5 deceased, 4 nails removed, 2 cognitive impairment and 6 uncontactable). Results. In our cohort 33/38 of hindfoot nails achieved both subtalar and ankle fusion in a mean time of 7 months. 25 patients with 26 nails had mean follow up with post op scores of 4 years. Their Mean MOXFQ scores were (Pain: 12.8 Walking: 12 Social: 8) and visual analogue pain score was 3. 85% of patients wound recommend this surgery for a similar condition. 20 complications with 15 requiring surgery(5 screw removals, 1 percutaneous drilling, 1 fusion site injection, 8 nail revisions). Conclusion. In our experience hindfoot nail TTC fusion reliably improves the function of patients with severe symptoms in a variety of pathophysiological conditions and complex deformities. Most of our patients would recommend this procedure. There is a lack of studies with long-term follow-up

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with trans-articular screws or dorsal plating is the standard surgical technique for displaced Lisfranc injuries. This aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous reduction and internal fixation (PRIF) of low energy Lisfranc injuries with a matched, control group of patients treated with ORIF. Over a seven-year period (2012–2019), 16 consecutive patients with a low energy Myerson B2-type injury were treated with PRIF. Patient demographics were recorded within a prospectively maintained database at the institution. This study sample was matched for age, sex and mechanism of injury to a control group of 16 patients with similar Myerson B2-type injuries treated with ORIF. Clinical outcome was compared using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). At a mean follow up of 43.0 months (95% CI 35.6 – 50.4), both the AOFAS and MOXFQ scores were significantly higher in the PRIF group compared to the control ORIF group (AOFAS 89.1vs 76.4, p=0.03; MOXFQ 10.0 vs 27.6, p=0.03). There were no immediate postoperative complications in either group. At final follow up, there was no radiological evidence of midfoot osteoarthritis in any patient in the PRIF group. Three patients in the ORIF group developed midfoot osteoarthritis, one of whom required midfoot fusion. PRIF is a technically simple, less invasive method of operative stabilisation of low energy Lisfranc injures which also appears to be associated with better mid-term clinical outcomes compared to ORIF

Introduction. Large osteochondral defects (OCD) of the talus present a difficult management conundrum. We present a series of Maioregen xenograft patches applied through an open approach, early lessons from the technique and good early outcomes, in patients who are otherwise looking at ankle salvage techniques. Results. 16 patients underwent open patch procedures, performed by a single surgeon, over a 30 month period. 12 males, and 4 females with age at presentation from 21–48. The majority were young, male, in physical employment with active sporting interest. MoxFQ, and E5QD were collected preop, 3, 6, 12 month postoperatively. There were significant improvements in ROM, pain, and scores in the cohort. 3 cases returned to Theatre, 1 for a concern about late infection, which settled with good outcome, and a further 2 with metalwork / adhesions. Conclusion. Early results suggest that this patch technique may be useful in prolonging the longevity of the TTJ, where micro fracture has failed, or the lesion is so large that it would likely be futile. Patients rescoped demonstrated good integration of the patch material, with stability and functional improvement. There may be a place for this technique in the management of large lesions, particularly in young patients where preservation is desired over joint salvage

Background. The literature on the outcome of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) remains limited. We aim to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of revision TAA at a high-volume centre in the UK. Methods. Retrospective review of 28 patients that underwent 29 revision TAA procedures using INBONE II prosthesis. Demographic, radiological, and patient reported outcome measures data were analysed. Results. The mean (range) duration from primary TAA to revision was 87.5 (16–223) months. The main indication for the revision was aseptic loosening of the primary TAA (82.8%). Additional procedures were required in 75.9% of patients. At mean (range) follow-up of 40 (24- 60) months, the infection, re-operation, and implant survival rates were 6.9%, 6.9% and 96.5% respectively. A significant postoperative improvement in the component alignment radiographic measures was observed. Osteolysis, subsidence, loosening and heterotopic ossification rates were comparable to other reports and did not influence the clinical outcome. A significant improvement was observed in the MOXFQ (all domains) and the EQ-5D (three domains) at 24 months postoperatively. Conclusions. Revision TAA using INBONE II was associated with good short-term survival and improvement in the postoperative scores at 2 years. Maintenance of the postoperatively improved alignment was documented at follow up. The relatively high survival rate in this series supports the notion that revision TAA is a satisfactory option for failed primary TAA

Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of revision ankle replacements, using the Invision implant and impaction allograft for massive talar dome defects following primary ankle replacement failure. Outcomes were assessed in terms of bone graft incorporation; improvement in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); and survivorship of the revision ankle arthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified eleven patients who had massive bone cysts and underwent revision of a failed primary total ankle replacement to the Invision revision system, combined with impaction grafting using morselized femoral head allograft. These revisions occurred at a single high volume ankle arthroplasty centre. Computed tomography (CT) scans were used to assess bone graft incorporation and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and EQ-5D scores were used pre and post operatively to assess PROMs. Results. The mean follow up was 18 months (12–48months). In all eleven patients, improvement was reported in the post-operative MOXFQ and EQ-5D scores. CT scans showed bone graft incorporation in all cases. None of the patients have required further surgery and are continue to do well clinically at latest follow up. Conclusions. In the short term, this study confirms revision ankle replacements with the Invision prosthesis and impaction with morselized femoral head allograft is a suitable revision option for primary ankle replacement failure with massive talar bone loss. Long term follow up continues of these complex patients

Background. Patients who undergo either primary or revision total ankle replacement (TAR) expect improvements in pain, function and quality of life. The goal of this study was to measure the functional outcome improvements and the difference in patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing primary total ankle replacements compared to revision TAR. Methods. A single-center prospective cohort study was undertaken between 2016 and 2022. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Patients undertook the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MoxFQ) and EQ-5D health quality questionnaires pre-operatively, at 6 months and yearly for life. The Mann Whitney test was undertaken for statistical analysis. Results. A total of 165 primary and 71 revision ankle replacements were performed between 2016 and 2022. The mean age was 71 years for primary replacements and 69 years for revisions. The INFINITY was utilized in the majority of primary total ankle replacements. Revision replacements were either the INBONE II or INVISION and they were most often revising the MOBILITY implant. The main indication for revision was aseptic loosening (83%). Other causes included infection, malalignment and insert wear. The overall MoxFQ improved by a mean of 46.5 for primaries and 40.2 for revisions. The EQ-5D score also showed overall improvements with the mean difference in mobility increasing by 1.6. Conclusion. Both primary and revision ankle replacements result in improved functional scores at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. In this cohort with the implants used, both primary and revision ankle replacements demonstrate similar improvements in functional scores

Abstract. Background. Multiple devices can stabilise the MTP joint for arthrodesis. The ideal implant should be easy to use, provide reproducible and high quality results, and ideally enable early rehabilitation to enable faster return to function, whilst lessening soft tissue irritation. We prospectively evaluated the combination of the IO-Fix (Extremity Medical, NJ, USA) device which consists of an intra-osseous post and lag screw that offers these features with full bearing of weight after surgery. Methods. 67 feet in 65 patients were treated over 31 months. After excluding patients lost to follow-up, undergoing revision arthrodesis, or concomitant first ray procedures, there were 54 feet in 52 patients available with a minimum 12 month follow-up with clinical and radiographic outcomes. All patients were treated using a similar operative technique with immediate bearing of weight in a rigid soled shoe. Results. The mean MOXFQ score improved from 46.4 (range 18 – 64) before surgery to 30.2 (range 0 – 54) at 6 months after surgery (p=0.02), and 18.4 (range 0 – 36) (p< 0.001) at latest follow-up. Arthrodesis across the MTP joint was achieved in 52 feet (96%), at a mean of 61 days (range 39–201). Non-union was observed in two feet; superficial wound infections in two feet; and metalwork impingement in three feet. Conclusions. In the largest reported series to date, the IO-Fix device achieved a union rate of 96% across the MTP joint when coupled with immediate bearing of weight. Significant improvements were seen in patient reported outcomes with low complication rates

Aim. Surgical options for management of a failed ankle arthroplasty are currently limited; typically conversion to fusion is recommended with only a few patients being considered for revision replacement surgery. This paper presents our experience of revision ankle replacements in a cohort of patients with failed primary replacements. Method. A total of 18 revision TAR in 17 patients were performed in patients with aseptic loosening. The technique was performed by a single surgeon (CSK) over a 4 year period between July 2014 and August 2018 using the Inbone total ankle replacement system. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected retrospectively using - MOXFQ, EQ5D, VAS pain score and patient satisfaction questionnaires. Results. 12 right and 6 left ankle replacements were revised in 17 patients (11 male/ 6 female). The mean age at revision was 69.1 years (range 56–81 years) with a mean BMI of 31. The mean surgical time was 171 minutes with 22% of cases requiring bone grafting. 6 patients had early wound complications, all superficial and settled with dressings. There were no deep infections, 2 patients had further surgery for exploration for possible nerve injuries. At a mean follow up of 20.6 months, 4 patients had mild/moderate ongoing pain with the majority of patients being satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Conclusion. This study represents one of the largest group of patients reported to have undergone revision total ankle arthroplasty. Our experience shows that this results in acceptable level of complications and provides satisfactory function in most patients. We feel revision TAR is a viable option in patients with failed primary arthroplasty who wish to continue to maintain mobility at the ankle joint

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients who had sustained an unstable ankle fracture with a posterior malleolus fracture (PMF) and without (N-PMF). Adult patients presenting to a single academic trauma centre in Edinburgh, UK, between 2009 and 2012 with an unstable ankle fracture requiring surgery were identified. The primary outcome measure was the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary measures included Euroqol-5D-3L Index (Eq5D3L), Euroqol-5D-VAS and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). There were 304 patients in the study cohort. The mean age was 49.6 years (16.3–78.3) and 33% (n=100) male and 67% (n=204) female. Of these, 67% (n=204) had a PMF and 33% did not (n=100). No patient received a computed tomography (CT) scan pre-operatively. Only 10% of PMFs (22/204) were managed with internal fixation. At a mean of 13.8 years (11.3 – 15.3) the median OMAS score was 85 (Interquartile Range 60 – 100). There was no difference in OMAS between the N-PMF and PMF groups (85 [56.25 – 100] vs 85 [61.25 – 100]; p = 0.580). There was also no difference for MOXFQ (N-PMF 7 [0 – 36.75] vs PMF 8 [0–38.75]; p = 0.643), the EQ5D Index (N-PMF 0.8 [0.7 – 1] vs PMF 0.8 [0.7 – 1]; p = 0.720) and EQ5D VAS (N-PMF 80 [70 – 90] vs PMF 80 [60 – 90]; p = 0.224). The presence of a PMF does not affect the long-term patient reported outcomes in patients with a surgically managed unstable ankle fracture