The purpose of this study is to compare functional results of
Introduction and aims. After
Presentation of two cases of pelvic periacetabular sarcoma, which were treated with wide resection of the tumor, pelvic reconstruction and lower limb salvage. Two patients, one male 23 y.o. with chondrosarcoma and one female 75 y.o. with chondroblastic osteosarcoma, were treated in our clinic. Both tumors were stage II according to Enneking’s classification. Both tumors were treated with Enneking type II
A rare case of malignant transformation of fibrous dysplasia to chondrosarcoma involving the pelvis, treated by hemipelvectomy, was described by our team in a published case report. Twenty-four years later, the patient remains recurrence-free, with a good functional outcome that allows him to be independent in everyday activities and work in full time employment. Functional outcome following hemipelvectomy for pelvic malignancy is an evolving topic, as improved imaging and surgical techniques result in earlier diagnosis and a better overall prognosis. Sarcomas involving the pelvis still represent a challenging topic for surgeons. During the last twenty-four years, there have been some advances in the limb- salvage treatment of pelvic tumours. An
Purpose: We report a series of patients with malignant tumours of the pelvis that had a tissue expander inserted in the pelvis to facilitate radical radiotherapy, and report functional outcomes following treatment. Introduction: Surgery for malignant tumours affecting the pelvis is challenging. Some tumours are suitable for
Introduction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional and oncological outcome of extracorporeally irradiated autografts as a method of pelvic reconstruction after
Adequate resection of malignant osseous tumors of the pelvis within wide margins is demanding surgery. To avoid disabling hemipelvectomies, during the seventies of the last century
Reconstruction following
Introduction: Pelvic and acetabular reconstruction following tumor resections are often difficult and fraught with complications. This is the first report of a reconstruction utilizing sacral implantation of an acetabular component, a relatively simple procedure. Materials and Methods: A 74 year-old man developed recurrent low-grade chondrosarcoma in his ilium. Prior resections had included total hip reconstruction with massive cemented acetabular components. A combined Type I and II
Introduction: Infection following major orthopaedic oncological surgery is a serious complication and every precaution should be taken to avoid it. One potential source of infection is the biopsy procedure, particularly when is carried out of a referring centre. In fact up to 30 per cent of patients with soft tissues problems following a biopsy is reported. As an infected biopsy may make subsequent limb preservation surgery impractical, the greatest care should be taken in carrying out the biopsy. The implantation of foreign materials (prostheses, grafts, acrilic cement, metallic devices, etc) as the duration of the surgical procedure, intraoperative bleeding, possible deep haematomas, presence of drains, increase the risk of infection. Also the importance of haematogenous spread from other sites of infection to joint pros-thesis is well estabilished. Materials and methods: In this paper the Authors present their experience regarding septic complications after orthopaedic oncologie surgery. From 1988 to 2002, 143 patients underwent a major surgery for the treatment of skeletal neoplasms (wide resection and reconstruction employing modular or composite prostheses, osteoarticular or intercalary allografts, acrylic cement and osteosynthesis devices, major spinal surgery,
Nowadays 80% of patients with bone sarcomas can benefit from limb salvage. Their disease-free life expectancy is not jeopardised by conservative surgery as long as safe margins are obtained. For this reason, the oncological result relies on the accuracy of pre-operative and per-operative surgical measurements. Pre-operative evaluation of tumours is now quite accurate with digital margins (computed tomography, MNR, digital angiography). However, surgeons are still using centimeters or conventional radiographs with their own technical limitations for per-operative evaluation. A more accurate technique is needed. The system is composed of three components: 1) a color, graphic computer workstation with software to calculate and present the location of the surgical instrument on a three-dimensional, reconstructed bone image, 2) a complete set of hand-held instruments containing infrared emitters, 3) an infrared receiver linked to the work station. This measuring system enables determination of the position and incidence of a surgical instrument in real time during surgery, with an accuracy of less than one mm. The system requires four steps: 1) recording data with C.T., N.M.R. or angiography, 2) creating a three-dimensional image displayed on the computer screen for preoperative simulation of a virtual operation, 3) recording the very important anatomical points of the patient and optimal incidences of the surgical instruments, 4) preoperative location of surgical instruments and control of their location on bone. This system is very useful for resection of bone tumours when the conventional location is uncertain (innonimate bone, rib), when very sharp accuracy is needed to preserve the growth plate of the distal femur in young children, and to avoid medullary damage in a spinal tumour. The frameless stereotactic device is also very accurate in the reconstructive phase of limb salvage. After an
Nowadays 80% of patients with bone sarcomas can benefit from limb salvage. Their disease-free life expectancy is not jeopardised by conservative surgery as long as safe margins are obtained. For this reason, the oncological result relies on the accuracy of pre-operative and per-operative surgical measurements. Pre-operative evaluation of tumours is now quite accurate with digital margins (computed tomography, MNR, digital angiography). However, surgeons are still using centimeters or conventional radiographs with their own technical limitations for per-operative evaluation. A more accurate technique is needed. The system is composed of three components: 1) a color, graphic computer workstation with software to calculate and present the location of the surgical instrument on a three-dimensional, reconstructed bone image, 2) a complete set of hand-held instruments containing infrared emitters, 3) an infrared receiver linked to the work station. This measuring system enables determination of the position and incidence of a surgical instrument in real time during surgery, with an accuracy of less than one mm. The system requires four steps: 1) recording data with C.T., N.M.R. or angiography, 2) creating a three-dimensional image displayed on the computer screen for preoperative simulation of a virtual operation, 3) recording the very important anatomical points of the patient and optimal incidences of the surgical instruments, 4) preoperative location of surgical instruments and control of their location on bone. This system is very useful for resection of bone tumours when the conventional location is uncertain (innonimate bone, rib), when very sharp accuracy is needed to preserve the growth plate of the distal femur in young children, and to avoid medullary damage in a spinal tumour. The frameless stereotactic device is also very accurate in the reconstructive phase of limb salvage. After an
Custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) play an important role in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery, particularly in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and pelvic tumour resection procedures. Accurate CTAC positioning is essential to successful surgical outcomes. While prior studies have explored CTAC positioning in rTHA, research focusing on tumour cases and implant flange positioning precision remains limited. Additionally, the impact of intraoperative navigation on positioning accuracy warrants further investigation. This study assesses CTAC positioning accuracy in tumour resection and rTHA cases, focusing on the differences between preoperative planning and postoperative implant positions. A multicentre observational cohort study in Australia between February 2017 and March 2021 included consecutive patients undergoing acetabular reconstruction with CTACs in rTHA (Paprosky 3A/3B defects) or tumour resection (including Enneking P2 peri-acetabular area). Of 103 eligible patients (104 hips), 34 patients (35 hips) were analyzed.Aims
Methods