Purpose: We report results of management of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our aim was to analyse the different therapeutic options and identify factors predictive of cure.

Material and methods: This retrospective multicentric analysis included a consecutive series of 179 cases of infected TKA. Revision TKA was performed for 77 knees in two operative times, 30 in one operative time. Synovecetomy was performed for 26 knees, arthrodesis for 36 and amputation for nine. Minimum follow-up was two years. For each case, we assessed cure of infection and functional outcome. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to compare outcome.

Results: Mean follow-up was 41.2 months. There was a 17% death rate during the first two years after management of infected TKA. Cure was achieved in two-thirds of the revised cases (in one or two operative times) and in 54% of the synovectomy cases. Arthrodesis yielded cure in 50%. Staphylococci was identified in 65%. The functional outcomes of revised prostheses (two times) was less satisfactory if the anterior tibial tubercle was removed, if the extensor system was involved, or if a flap cover was necessary (p< 0.05). There was no significant difference in functional outcome for one-time and two-time operations. Cure was achieved in 95% of the synovectomies performed before 16 days. Relapse occurred in 95% of those performed after 56 days. Arthrodesis performed in patients with major bone loss failed. Among the arthrodesis failures, 50% were related to mechanical failure and the other 50% to recurrent infection.

Discussion: We discuss these results and indications for different treatments of infected total knee arthroplasty. For each therapeutic option, we analysed factors allowing hope for cure and good functional outcome.

Conclusion: The objective of treatment of an infected TKA is to achieve cure and maintain satisfactory function, often a difficult goal to reach. Major mutilating surgery can be avoided by early adapted care.

Introduction

Treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may guided by PJI classification, taking into account infection duration and potential for biofilm formation. Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is recommended for ‘post-operative’ and ‘acute’ haematogenous PJI. However, the time cut-off for ‘post-operative’ PJI varies across classification systems. Furthermore, poor DAIR success rates have been reported in acute haematogenous PJIs. This study aimed to determine the success of DAIR in a large cohort of PJIs, and assess the utility of current classification systems for predicting DAIR outcomes.

Infection in total knee replacement is a devastating complication. Current literature supports two-stage revision as the gold standard treatment. The alternative single stage procedure has been reported to have favourable results. We assessed the early clinical results of single stage revision for infected total knee replacement.

Between February 2005 and August 2007, 12 patients had revision total knee replacement for infection by the senior authors at two centres. In the majority of the patients, the infective organism was isolated by arthroscopic synovial biopsy prior to revision. Standard single stage procedure included the explantation, debridement and re-implantation of the prosthesis. All the patients received intravenous antibiotics for six weeks and oral antibiotics were continued for further 6 weeks. All the patients had the inflammatory markers monitored during follow-up.

Significant improvement was noted in the SF-12 PCS, WOMAC pain and stiffness scores at the latest follow-up. None of these patients required re-revision. Radiological evaluation was done using the Knee Society system. None of the knees showed evidence of progressive loosening. Radio-opaque lines were found around the stems and were present on immediate post-operative radiographs; this did not indicate loosening or infection at a mean follow-up of two years.

Early clinical and radiological results of the single stage revision for infected total knee replacement appear to be promising. One operation, one anaesthetic and quicker recovery are the advantages for the patient and with the reduced hospital stay it is cost-effective. The problems of stiffness in the knee and muscle wasting with cement spacer are avoided.

Purpose: 2–5 years results in the treatment of deep infection of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after two-stage reimplantation are presented. An articulating antibiotic spacer prosthesis and a standardized antibiotic therapy were used.

Material and Methods: In a prospective study 33 consecutive patients were treated with the articulating spacer, which was made on the table by cleaning and autoclaving removed parts of the infected TKA. A parenteral double antibiotic therapy in combination with rifampin was given for 10 days, followed by oral therapy for 4 weeks.

Results: At a mean follow-up period of 47 months (31 to 67) three patients had reinfection (success rate 91 %). We could increase the average Hospital for Special Surgery knee score from 67 points (44 to 84) to 87 points (53 to 97) after reimplantation.

Based on these results, 25 knees (76 %) were rated excellent, 5 knees (15 %) were rated good, 2 knees (6 %) were rated fair and one patient (3 %) had a poor result. Complications were one temporary peroneal palsy, one luxation of the spacer due to insufficient extensor mechanism and one fracture of the tibia due to substantial primary metaphyseal bone loss.

Conclusion: Using articulating spacer prosthesis disadvantages of joint fixation between the two stages could be reduced. There is no difference in the reinfection rate compared to procedures using fixed spacer blocks. It facilitates the reimplantation and gives good functionel results.

Aim: To review our practice of performing two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty by using articulating interval prosthesis and short course parenteral antibiotic therapy

Patients and Methods: We included 70 patients treated by a single surgeon using a uniform protocol since 2001. All patients were planned to have two- stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty with an articulating interval prosthesis made up of cruciate retaining femur and all poly tibia at stage one. All patients were given short course parenteral antibiotic therapy (5 days IV) followed by and 6 weeks dual oral therapy.

Results: The average age was 68 yrs at the time of first stage. Five patients required repeat of 1st stage procedure because of persistent infection. Twenty six (40%) patients opted not to have a 2nd stage procedure because of eradication of infection after 1st stage and good functional result with interval prosthesis. We had recurrence of infection in 6 patients after two-stage procedure at a mean follow up of 42 months. Four patients out of these six had multiple surgeries for infection before our two-stage protocol

Conclusion: Articulating interval prosthesis gives excellent function and also makes subsequent revision easier with well preserved soft tissue balance. It also takes pressure off on the time constraint for the 2nd stage and good number of them may not require a 2nd stage at all. Our results of recurrence are comparable with published literature evidence and we don’t think that prolonged parenteral antibiotics therapy is required provided adequate surgical debridement has been performed.