The Ilizarov frame is a circular external fixator, invented by Professor Ilizarov in Siberia during the 1950’s. It uses the principle of distraction osteogenesis to form new bone in a variety of clinical situations where bone lengthening or realignment is needed. The Ilizarov frame began to be used in western medicine during the 1980’s and by 1993 over 6000 cases had been performed in Europe. Plain x-ray is one of the methods used to monitor the progress of patients fitted with an ilizarov frame. The aim of this study is establish a pattern of healing over time in patients with the Ilizarov frame using plain x-ray films. This will improve understanding of the procedure, aid clinicians in deciding when frame removal is appropriate and provide a method of early detection should healing not be progressing appropriately. This is a retrospective study looking at a series of 58 digitised anterior-posterior x-ray films of the tibia and fibula, taken at set time points post-operatively, from 17 patients fitted with an ilizarov frame (19 separate legs with ilizarov frames in total). Image J, an image analysis system, was used to measure pixel density from vertical slices down the centre of each fracture gap and at set intervals horizontally across the fracture gap. A mean pixel density value for each fracture gap was also calculated. The x-rays were standardised using a standard step wedge. Promising preliminary results show pixel density to be greater towards the medial aspect of the tibia, but this difference in pixel value decreases with time. This suggests that calcification of the new bone occurs medially to laterally across the tibia. Full results will be available in April and aim to build a picture of the fracture gap at set time points post-operatively, showing a pattern of calcification in patients with the Ilizarov frame that will become a useful clinical tool for deciding time of frame removal as well as affording early knowledge of problems with the healing process

Background:. Charcot arthropathy is a condition related to the loss of protective sensation of a joint. It normally presents in its early inflammatory phase, followed by bone destruction. Recognised treatment for this is total contact casting (TCC). However, in a small group this may be unsuccessful in preventing deformity progression. TCC can also be difficult in the presence of recalcitrant ulceration and deformed feet. Method:. 40 patients, with a diagnosis of Charcot foot, were followed from presentation in our unit over 3 years. An Ilizarov frame was used for two groups: those in the early phase who showed progressive deformity despite TCC (5 patients) and those with chronic ulceration (4 patients). Frames were modified to allow weight-bearing on the frame (with no foot contact). All other patents were treated with TCC. Results:. There were no amputations or cases of osteomyelitis. The Ilizarov frame successfully prevented further deformity when applied in the inflammatory phase. In patients with ulceration, deformity correction with a modified frame maintained correction and allowed the ulcers to heal rapidly whilst weight bearing. Conclusion:. Our series shows the Ilizarov frame can be used in the management of Charcot to prevent deformity progression and allow recalcitrant ulcers to heal following deformity correction

Background. It is an accepted fact that Ilizarov frames are difficult to live with. Professionals advise patients that things get easier over time, but, there is little evidence to support this. This study examined the course of patient's self-reported anxiety and depression during treatment with an Ilizarov frame. Method. Over 12 months, 66 trauma and elective patients were prospectively recruited to the study. Patients completed validated questionnaires measuring anxiety and depression (GAD-7 and PHQ-9) at set time points through their treatment ranging from before the frame was fitted through to after it was removed. Results. Complete data sets were collected for sixty patients. Two patients were unable to be included and four have yet to complete treatment. There is a trend towards decreasing anxiety and depression throughout the period evaluated. However, of seven patients who scored within the ‘severe’ range (PHQ/GAD = 15+) before the Ilizarov frame was applied, four remained in the ‘severe’ range at the treatment end. Conclusion. We have shown that psychological screening can be easily incorporated into standard practise, and found that early screening of psychological distress can identify the small but significant group of patients who go on to have prolonged adverse psychological reactions

Much has been written about the use of different treatment modalities in the management of distal femoral fractures. These articles, however, do not include the use of the Ilizarov frame amongst the modalities described. We have experience in the use of the Ilizarov frame in the definitive treatment of both non-union and acute fracture of the distal femur. We report our experience and conclusions. The medical records of all patients who had undergone Ilizarov frame management for acute distal femoral fracture or established non-union were reviewed. Demographic data, the complications of surgery, duration of treatment with the frame and recorded outcome were noted. All patients were further assessed (either in clinic or by telephone interview) and completed a Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Form. We have treated 17 patients (11 male, 6 female), 8 were acute compound fractures and 9 non union/infected ORIF’s of the distal femur. All patients have had their frames removed and were united. The mean age at the time of frame application was 36.6 years (range 18.7–58.7). The mean time from frame application to union was 230 days (range 81–514). Noted major complications included refracture in two patients, persisting infection in one, chronic regional pain syndrome in one and limited range of movement in all (mean knee movement of 62 ranging from 2–100). Two patients have had above knee amputations and a further patient has requested above knee amputation. Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Form shows significant dysfunction with a mean score of 42.9/100 (range 8.15–82.85). Treatment of distal femoral fractures is notoriously difficult. Other treatment modalities (i.e. Intra Medullary (IM) supracondylar nail) offer many advantages over Ilizarov frame use

Purpose. Pilon fracture is a severe injury which has a great impact on the patients' lives, but in what extend is not clear yet in the literature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the gait alternations after treatment of patients who had pilon fractures. Materials & Methods. We have evaluated the gait pattern of patients who were treated with circular Ilizarov frame following pilon fractures in our department. The gait was tested by using a force plate in a walking platform. Ground Reaction Forces (GRF) and timing of gait phases data were collected during level walking at self-selected speeds. The patients performed two walking tasks for each limb and the collected data were averaged for each limb. Demographic, clinical, radiological, trauma outcome (COST) and quality of life questionnaire (SF-12) data were also collected. Results. We have analysed the gait through the GRF of twelve patients (aged 44.9 ±12.4 years), who had undergone treatment with circular Ilizarov frame following pilon fractures (67% were male). The tests were performed at an average of 10.5 months after the initial treatment. SF-12 Mental scores have returned to normal (mean 56.4 ±11.6) but physical scores remained impaired (mean 41.8 ±8.4). COST questionnaire scores reached average levels (47.1 ±15) in all dimensions (Symptoms: 51.4 ±16, Function: 44 ±14 and Mental Status: 56.6 ±16). During the push-off phase all the plantar flexor muscles are activated and the ankle plantar flexes to achieve the push off. It seems that this motion, is not achieved adequately with the affected limb and the patients are using their normal limb earlier (pre-swing is the start of the double support of the gait) in order to progress in their gait circle. Conclusions. Ten months following treatment with circular ilizarov frame for pilon fracture the patients still have impaired gait pattern. The differences can be explained by the lack of plantar flexion of the ankle which results to poorer push-off of the affected limb

The pelvic ring unstable disruptions are by itself life threatening and its stabilization is one of the priorities. On the other hand the surgical approach and internal fixation of this type of injuries represent a long and aggressive intervention, with high blood loss and complications. By these reasons a methodology that not only allows a precocious and less aggressive intervention with the possibility of stabilization of the posterior and anterior elements of the pelvic ring, and also the possibility to introduce postoperative corrections is indicated. In January 1999 we introduce in our Unit the treatment of pelvic ring fractures and disruptions with the association of Ilizarov frame and minimal invasive internal fixation. It is our intention to present the preliminary protocol of treatment and its results. Until 2002 we have treated 97 cases of pelvic ring disruptions. We have treated surgically 26 patients. From those, 10 cases were of open book and closed book injury type (2 pubic platting, 4 static external fixator and 4 dynamic Ilizarov frame) and 7 cases were of vertical shear injury type (4 pubic plating and sacro-iliac bar/ screw, 3 dynamic Ilizarov frame). Results were evaluated with our own protocol. Infection rate compromised final results of the cases treated by ORIF (4:6) and reduction was poorer with the static external fixator (2:4). Treatment with Ilizarov frame revealed 5 good results and 2 fair results. The authors conclude that even with a limited number of patients and follow-up, the use of the dynamic Ilizarov frame with a minimal invasive approach, showed to be a simple, fast and efficient method for the handling of serious fractures and disruptions of the pelvic ring, allowing a good stabilization of the anterior and posterior components, permitting the “fine tuning” in the postoperative period, without major complications

Purpose. Tibia plateau fractures are severe knee injuries which have a great impact on the patients' lives, but in what extend is not clear yet in the literature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the gait alternations after treatment of patients who had severe tibia plateau fractures which were treated with circular ilizarov frame. Materials & Methods. We have evaluated the gait pattern of patients who were treated with circular Ilizarov frame after severe tibia plateau fractures (Schatzker IV-VI) in our department. The gait was tested by using a force plate in a walking platform. Ground Reaction Forces (GRF) data were collected during level walking at self-selected speeds. The patients performed two walking tasks for each limb and the collected data were averaged for each limb. Demographic, clinical, radiological and quality of life questionnaire (SF-12) data were also collected. Results. We have analysed the gait through the GRF of fifteen patients (aged 50.8 ±17.3 years), who had undergone treatment with circular Ilizarov frame following severe tibia plateau fractures (Schatzker IV-VI). Nine were male and six were female. The tests were performed at an average of 13.2 months after the initial treatment. SF-12 Mental scores have returned to normal (mean 54.6 ±12.3) but physical scores remained impaired (mean 40.6 ±10.8). A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to compare the GRFs and gait timing data of the affected limb with the normal one. Single limb support interval was significantly reduced to the affected limb (p=0.001) and terminal stance phase was prolonged for the normal limb (p=0.035). During this phase of the gait circle the knee is on its maximum flexion and the quadriceps contracts to bring the femur above the tibia. It seems that these patients during the gait circle reduce the flexion of their affected knee to make their single stance shorter. To the normal limb the patients manage to reduce more the GRFs during the mid-stance phase (F2 force), this difference do not reach significance, but illuminates the tendency of reduced knee flexion in that phase. The rest of the GRF and gait timing data did not had significant differences. Conclusions. One year after severe tibia plateau fracture treated with circular ilizarov frame the patients manage to return to almost normal gait pattern. Reduce single limb stance and terminal stance phase to the affected knee can be explained by the tendency of not flexing their deficient knee as much during that gait phase

Background:. Developing a successful outpatient service for Ilizarov frame removal provides both patient and cost benefits. Misinformation and patient trepidation can be detrimental to recovery and influence choices. Education may play an important role in tailoring an efficacious service. Objective:. Review Belfast Regional Limb Reconstruction frame removal practice, introduce changes aimed at improving care and evaluate effects. Methods:. 1 year retrospective review of Ilizarov frame removal. Evaluation of service prior to and following provision of a new patient information leaflet, alongside a test wire removal technique. Subsequent service evaluation supplemented via patient reported feedback questionnaire. Results:. Retrospectively 85% Ilizarov frames removed in clinic, 54% required Entonox. Annual cost £19000. 46% patients unaware of process, gathering information from unprofessional sources. General anaesthetic and analgesic requirements related to psychosocial influences; no correlation between fracture configuration, elective reconstructive cases and operative techniques. Prospectively 96% patients found information leaflet educational and beneficial. 87% Ilizarov frames removed in clinic. 100% patients who had outpatient removal recommend this method. Entonox use reduced to 15% with average pain score 4.6/10 without analgesia. Patients felt happier. Projected annual cost savings £3000. 100% rated service excellent. Discussion:. Professional education and a standardised outpatient removal process for Ilizarov frames, delivered by a dedicated specialist team, reduces morbidity and positively impacts service provision

Background: Closed reduction of intra-articular calcaneal fractures sometimes lack the accuracy desired for restoring the normal anatomy of the articular surface of the calcaneus. In this study, we evaluate the preliminary results of closed reduction of the intra-articular calcaneal fractures with an Ilizarov frame. Patients and Method: Forty patients (25 males and 15 females) with 50 intra-articular fracture calcaneal fractures were treated with closed reduction and an Ilizarov frame. The mean age was 25.4 years (range from 19 to 65). Union was achieved after two months. The results were evaluated on the basis of combined clinical and radiological examination at the latest follow-up. Results were classified according to the protocol and scoring system used by Paley and Hall 1993. Results: The mean follow up period was 1.9 years (range 6 months to 4 years). At final follow up there were 15 excellent feet, 26 were good, 6 fair and 3 poor. The mean Bohler angle postoperatively was 260 (range 17 to 35). Superficial infection occurred in seven feet and was controlled. Skin pressure necrosis of the posterior aspect of the heel occurred in three feet. One needed a skin graft. Conclusion: This method is a minimally invasive technique. The technique has the ability to restore the normal anatomy, shape and length of the calcaneal body, especially in Sander’s type III and type IV fractures. It is particularly useful for osteoprotic bone as it provides rigid fixation

Introduction: Some centres in the UK have recently seen a shift away from internal fixation and free tissue transfer (Fix and Flap), towards temporary monolateral external fixation, soft tissue coverage and definitive Ilizarov frame fixation (Flap and Frame). Methods: Patients sustaining open fractures were identified prospectively and followed up beyond frame removal. After open wound debridement a monolateral ex-fix was applied. Soft tissue coverage was then achieved by our plastic surgeons. As the soft tissues settled, the temporary ex-fix was exchanged to an Ilizarov frame for definitive fixation. Open fractures with bone loss were similarly treated, with either acute shortening or bone transport, depending on the extent of bone loss and state of soft tissues. Results: Between July 2002 and June 2004, 21 grade 3 open fractures in 18 patients were treated by Flap and Frame. There were 15 male and 3 female patients, with mean age 36. Segment involved was 19 tibias and 2 femurs. There was associated bone loss (mean 9cm) in 6 fractures. 8 had other associated injuries. Gustilo grade, 3A/3B/3C = 6/13/2. Both 3C fractures required early amputation. Wound closure, 5/6 fractures with bone loss required free tissue transfer (FTT); however only 3/15 fractures without bone loss required FTT to achieve soft tissue cover, most requiring fasciocutaneous flap or split skin graft only. Median time in Ilizarov frame was 160 days for patients without bone loss. For those fractures with bone loss frame time ranged from 180–540 days, with some patients still requiring ongoing Ilizarov treatment. All fractures without bone loss united. At mean 14 month follow up only one fracture of 21 had clinical evidence of deep sepsis. 1 tibial fracture showed a 12 degree malunion, while 7/18 patients had a superficial pinsite infection requiring a course of oral antibiotics. One free tissue transfer failed in a grade 3C fracture, leading to early amputation (in conjunction with the recognised vascular injury). Conclusions: Grade 3 open fractures remain a significant treatment challenge. This was particularly true of those with associated bone loss, where without exception the treatment time in an Ilizarov frame was prolonged. A deep sepsis rate of 1/21 fractures treated by Flap and Frame compares favourably with other published series. In the 15 fractures without bone loss, times to union also compared very favourably. Unlike in previous series, many fractures did not require free tissue transfer, as there was no internal fixation device present at the fracture site requiring coverage. Flap and Frame appears to be a very satisfactory method of treating grade 3 open fractures, with low deep sepsis rate, high union rate, satisfactory times to union, and reduced requirement for free tissue transfer to obtain soft tissue coverage

Introduction. Our unit has extensive experience with the use of Ilizarov circular frames for acute fracture and nonunion surgery. We have observed and analysed fracture healing patterns which question the role of relative stability in fracture healing and we offer limb mechanical axis restoration as a more important determinant. Aim. To assess for the presence of external callus, when only relative stability has been achieved but with anatomical restoration of the mechanical axis (ARMA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed diametaphyseal proximal and distal tibial fractures treated with Ilizarov frame fixation in our unit between 2009 and 2017. We also reviewed cases where the Ilizarov frame technique had been used for complex femoral and humeral non-unions. Radiographs in 4 views were reviewed to assess bone healing, the presence of external callus and correction of lower limb mechanical axis. Results. 45 tibial plateau fractures, 42 distal tibial fractures and 20 humeral and 3 femoral non-unions were reviewed. Where ARMA was achieved, bone healing was observed to occur without external callus. ARMA proved more challenging in the distal tibia and where ARMA was not achieved external callus was visible during fracture healing. Conclusion. ARMA bone healing is reliable and occurs without formation of external callus, despite relative stability. This would suggest that external callus is produced not in response to just the magnitude of strain but also the direction of strain. Restoration of the mechanical axis is an important step in achieving union and needs to be considered when fixing fractures or treating non-unions

Background:. The aim of this study was to review the surgical complications and clinical outcomes of patients with Pilon fractures treated with Ilizarov frames. Methods:. Data collected included surgical complications, grade of initial injury using the Ruedi-Allgower classification and quality of reduction according to the Teeny and Wiss criteria. Outcome scores were collected retrospectively using the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI). Results:. A total of 97 consecutive patients were identified. All patients were treated with indirect reduction by capsuloligamentotaxis and stabilisation using an ankle-spanning Ilizarov external fixator. The mean time to union was 6 months. Data was available for 70 patients. 35 patients developed a pin site infection. There were no cases of osteomyelitis. 4 patients developed a DVT and 1 patient a PE, 4 patients required ankle fusions. Quality of reduction according to the criteria of Teeny and Wiss was anatomic in 40 patients, good in 23 patients, fair in 6 patients, poor in 3 patients. Conclusion:. This is one of the larger series of Pilon factures on literature review. Ilizarov frame fixation achieves stable reduction of the fractured fragments without additional trauma to soft tissues with minimal complications and good functional results

Introduction and Aims: Recurrence of clubfoot deformity occurs in up to 25% of cases following surgery. The Ilizarov fixator has theoretical advantages over conventional revision surgery in feet with scarred tissue planes, abnormal anatomy and impairment of local blood supply. In addition, limb-length discrepancy can be addressed simultaneously. The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of treatment of recurrent clubfoot deformity using the Ilizarov frame. Method: There were 39 feet in 31 patients with at least 12 months follow-up. All patients completed questionnaires documenting pain, function and shoe-size before and after the frame. Twenty-six feet were reviewed clinically. Patient notes and radiographs of all patients were examined. The average period of follow-up was 48 months (14–131 months). Results: Pain scores improved in 69%, with similar improvement in activity level, walking distance and walking surface. In 20 feet there was improvement in the type of shoes worn. Twenty patients felt their feet were stiffer after the frame. Patient satisfaction with outcome was 74%. A plantigrade foot was achieved initially in all, but deteriorated with time, so that at clinical review only 46% had plantigrade feet. A straight medial border was seen in 81%. The range of movement of ankle and sub-talar joints decreased after the frame. Recurrent deformity was present in 38%, being more likely in younger patients, but in only a few, has further surgery been necessary to date. Complications included minor pin-site infections, flexion contractures of the toes, revision of the frame and revision of one osteotomy. Conclusion: Treatment of relapsed clubfoot with the Ilizarov frame improves the appearance of the foot, correlating with improvement in pain, function and shoewear. This must be balanced against an increase in stiffness of the ankle, which has implications for future surgery, and the risk of complications inherent in the technique

Background. Humerus fracture non-union is a challenge for which a wide range of treatments exist. We present our experience of managing these by hybrid Ilizarov frame fixation, without bone graft or debridement of the non-union site. Methods. Case notes review of a consecutive series of 20 patients treated for aseptic humeral non-union between 2004 and 2016. Eighteen patients had previous plate or intramedullary nail fixations, and 2 had no prior surgery. During Ilizarov application, any existing metalwork preventing dynamisation of the fracture site was removed through minimal incisions before compression of the fracture site was then achieved. Only 3 patients had open debridement or osteotomy of the non-union site, otherwise all other patients had no debridement of their non-union. Results. Bony union was achieved in 17 patients (85%), with a further 2 achieving a functional fibrous union. The remaining patient subsequently had successful open surgery. Union rates were 66% (2/3) and 88% (15/17) for the debridement/osteotomy and non-debridement groups respectively. Mean frame duration was 193 days. One patient was treated for pin-site infection. The Chertsey Outcome Score for Trauma was used to assess patient reported outcomes. Conclusions. Simple changes to the physical properties acting upon a humeral non-union, such as adequate control of its strain environment and restoration of the mechanical axis, are enough on their own to initiate healing. In our practice, this eliminates any morbidity associated with extensive fracture debridements or donor harvest sites

The goal of this paper is to compare the results and complication namely infection rates, of the techniques of Standard Ilizarov lengthening, lengthening over nail (LON) and lengthening then nailing (LTN) utilizing a standard nail (STD) and a special nail with a core of cement releasing antibiotics (SAFE). In a first study done between 1993 and 2008, we have compared 25 patients treated with lengthening with a Ilizarov frame (LIF) with 26 patients where a standard nail was used to do a lengthening over nail technique (LON). From 2009 and 2012 we have utilized the SAFE nail in 17 patients to perform lengthening over nail (SAFE-LON) and lengthening then nailing (SAFE-LTN) techniques. 7 patients had a pseudarthrosis, 5 a malconsolidation with shortening and or axial deviation and 5 a bone loss after infection of total knee replacements. We used a lengthening over nail in 4 cases, a lengthening and axial correction then nailing in three, acute compression and proximal lengthening then nailing in five patients and knee arthrodesis and femoral or tibial lengthening then nailing in another 5 cases. We have used a Ilizarov frame in all cases. We found that with LON technique, the external fixation time was 3 times lower, promoting the recovery of full range of knee mobility in half the time, comparatively with LIF technique, with statistically very significant differences. We found a rate of 30% of intercurrences on the LON group and 24% in the Ilizarov, difference that was not statistically significant. 3 patients got bone infection after LON technique, a rate of 11.5%. Late consolidation and fracture of regenerate appeared only in the Ilizarov technique group, whereas in the LON technique we had 3 cases of premature consolidation of the regenerate. In the SAFE-LON and SAFE-LTN techniques utilizing the SAFE nail with antibiotics, we found a decrease of the overall intercurrence rate from 30% to 12% and namely, bone infection was cured or didn't appeared after nailing with this new device in all cases. LON and LTN techniques are somehow more demanding, but much more comfortable for the patient, which need to carry the frame for less time, It permits an earlier return to activity, about half the time, it controls better delayed regenerate and its fracture does not increase complication rate and costs of treatment and prevents infection when converting from external to internal fixation

Aim. Simultaneous application of Ilizarov frames and free muscle flaps to treat osteomyelitis or infected non-unions is currently not standard practice in the UK, in part related to logistical issues, surgical duration and challenging access for microvascular anastomosis. We present the outcomes for 56 such patients. Methods. Retrospective single centre consecutive series between 2005–2017. We recorded comorbidities, Cierny-Mader and Weber-Cech classification, the Ilizarov method used, flap and anastomosis used, follow-up duration, time to union and complications. Results. 56 patients (55 tibiae and 1 forearm) were included (mean age 48 years). Thirty-four cases had osteomyelitis (20/34 Cierny-Mader Stage IV) and 22 had an infected non-union (14/22 Weber-Cech Type E or F). Forty-six patients had a segmental defect after resection. Monofocal compression was used in 14, monofocal distraction in 15, bifocal compression/distraction in 8, bone transport in 9 and a protective frame in 10. 8/56 had an ankle fusion, 7/56 had an angular deformity corrected at the same time and 32 also had local antibiotic carrier inserted. Forty-six gracilis, 9 latissimus dorsi and 1 rectus abdominus flaps were used. Six cases required urgent flap re-exploration (5 anastomotic revisions and 1 haematoma washout) with 4/6 successfully salvaged. Two cases suffered total flap failure (3.6%). Both had successful revision free muscle flaps with the frame in situ at 10 and 16 days respectively. There were no partial flap failures and no failures in bone transport frames. Mean follow-up was 22 months (4–89). Excluding three cases that still have a frame on, 42/43 (97.7%) achieved bony union. Recurrence of infection occurred in 8.9%. All were infection free at final follow-up after further surgery. Conclusions. With the right expertise, simultaneous Ilizarov frame and free muscle flap is safe and effective in treating complex limb infection, and is not associated with an increased flap failure rate. Level of evidence. III

Aim. To delineate which of four common and easily constructed Ilizarov frame configurations is best at resisting shear displacement. Methods. Four Ilizarov frames were constructed on Sawbones™ Tibiae taking into account soft tissue and neuro-vascular limitations in frame design. The designs consisted of a standard all wire frame, an opposing olive wire standard frame, a perpendicular trans-fracture opposing olive wire frame and a perpendicular half pin frame. These were tested over three cycles in compression on a load-testing machine with movement in the plane of the fracture measured using a clip gauge. Each frame was tested to the maximum displacement of the clip gauge or a total single cycle compressive load of 700N, whichever limit occurred first. Results. The perpendicular trans-fracture olive wire frame showed the least displacement in shear. The half pin frame, followed by the opposing olive standard frame and finally the all wire frame were least stable to shear displacement. Conclusion. For this fracture pattern, this study recommends the use of the perpendicular trans-fracture olive wire frame. Further investigation of immediate post-operative limb loading in patients will allow practical application of this data. Further frame motion analysis and bending analysis will allow validation of these results and allow for future frame design. The next steps in this project involve validation against FE Analysis in order to create a design software to allow mechanical templating of frame designs pre-operatively

We present the results of treatment for relapsed infantile Blounts disease using a technique of hemiplateau elevation with the Ilizarov frame. 7 patients with a mean age of 10 years 6 months were reviewed at 30 months following hemiplateau elevation with/without ipsilateral tibial lengthening. Preoperatively clinical photographs, long leg standing radiographs and 3D computed tomography images were acquired. The patients were evaluated clinically (presence of knee pain, range of knee motion, knee stability and leg length discrepancy) and radiologically. Schoeneckers objective assessment was undertaken. The results were analysed statistically. Clinically all the patients improved significantly. No patient had knee pain and the range of knee motion was from 0° to more than 100° of knee flexion. The radiological results and Schoeneckers grading are depicted below. The improvement in radiological measurements were statistically significant. Pin site infection was present in all but settled with antibiotics. The results of hemiplateau elevation for relapsed infantile Blounts disease are encouraging

Perthes disease in children above 8 years old, generally has a worst prognosis. On this age group it is common that hinge abduction appears in a descentered and uncontained hip, situation that has a difficult solution with the standard surgical procedures. On those cases arthrodiastasis as described, can be a valuable treatment option. The rationale of arthrodiastasis on Perthes is that it permits to reduce the hip, protect it during the fragmentation stage, and creating a vacuum phenomenon inside the acetabulum it “insufflate” the collapsed plastic head, permitting the reconstruction of a spherical head. Our actual protocol to treat Perthes disease in a more than 5 years old child, include a transphyseal tunneling made as soon as possible on the necrotic stage and protection of the hip in a abduction-flexion brace. If at any time a hinge hip develops then arthrodiastasis is applied. The procedure is simple, fast and low traumatic, including the positioning in a traction table, application of a Ilizarov frame with hinges centered on the center of rotation of the head, with the limb in a position of abduction and slight flexion, which permits the reduction and containment of the hip, and then a progressive arthrodiastasis to 1 1.5 cm. The frame was used for 3–5 months and during this period one could assist to the progressive growth of the collapsed femoral head. After arthrodiastasis the hip is protected with an abductionflexion brace for a mean of 8 months. The Authors present the 5 first cases where this methodology was applied, standing out the good results obtained, without complications, mentioning the faster evolution to reconstruction stage in the cases where transphyseal tunneling was done, permitting a shorter period of arthrodiastasis

We performed a retrospective study of treatment of 50 patients above the age of 65 years with Tibial metaphyseal and diaphyseal fractures. We studied the outcome by evaluation of all medical records and radiographs. The mean duration of follow-up was 11 months. The average hospital stay was 19 days and the mean time in frame was 112 days. There were 2 non unions,3 significant malunions,2 refractures and 1 patient underwent an amputation. Tibial fractures in the elderly are common and result in prolonged immobility and hospital admission. Fracture stabilization with an Ilizarov circular frame is an effective way of improving mobility with minimal additional morbidity, shorten hospitalisation time and achieve an excellent outcome