Introduction: Patients can vary widely in their illness perceptions and subsequently, the manner in which they respond and adapt to health threats. A patient’s perception about his/her hand injury may explain their health behaviours such as adherence to post-operative therapy, coping, emotional response and eventual clinical outcome. Aims: To examine illness beliefs in patients with hand injuries in the acute trauma setting. Methods: The disability and severity of injury were determined using the DASH questionnaire and HISS score. The revised Illness Perception Questionnaire(IPQR) was used to explore the patient’s illness perception. Results: Fifty seven patients were recruited. There was no correlation between the DASH and HISS scores, or their correlation with the different components of the IPQ-R scores. The cohort was optimistic about their treatment and duration of recovery. There was some evidence to suggest that patients with more severe injury were over-optimistic about recovery. Beliefs of negative consequences, chronic, cyclical duration and low illness coherence were linked with negative emotional response. Female patients and dominant hand injuries reported higher subjective disability. Conclusions: The lack of correlations suggests that illness perceptions were not influenced by the severity of the injury. Patients in this cohort were optimistic about recovery, particularly in those with more severe injury (over-optimistic). These findings suggest that there could be a role for psychological intervention in hand injury. Longitudinal research is needed to evaluate illness beliefs in hand injury during the post-operative period

Aims. The aims of this study were to describe the epidemiology of metacarpal shaft fractures (MSFs), assess variation in treatment and complications following standard care, document hospital resource use, and explore factors associated with treatment modality. Methods. A multicentre, cross-sectional retrospective study of MSFs at six centres in the UK. We collected and analyzed healthcare records, operative notes, and radiographs of adults presenting within ten days of a MSF affecting the second to fifth metacarpal between 1 August 2016 and 31 July 2017. Total emergency department (ED) attendances were used to estimate prevalence. Results. A total of 793 patients (75% male, 25% female) with 897 MSFs were included, comprising 0.1% of 837,212 ED attendances. The annual incidence of MSF was 40 per 100,000. The median age was 27 years (IQR 21 to 41); the highest incidence was in men aged 16 to 24 years. Transverse fractures were the most common. Over 80% of all fractures were treated non-surgically, with variation across centres. Overall, 12 types of non-surgical and six types of surgical treatment were used. Fracture pattern, complexity, displacement, and age determined choice of treatment. Patients who were treated surgically required more radiographs and longer radiological and outpatient follow-up, and were more likely to be referred for therapy. Complications occurred in 5% of patients (39/793). Most patients attended planned follow-up, with 20% (160/783) failing to attend at least one or more clinic appointments. Conclusion. MSFs are common hand injuries among young, working (economically active) men, but there is considerable heterogeneity in treatment, rehabilitation, and resource use. They are a burden on healthcare resources and society, thus further research is needed to optimize treatment. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):652–661

We conducted a prospective review of patients treated specifically for phalangeal fractures over a period of 6 months. Data was sourced from patient records, Emergency Dept records and theatre records. X-rays were reviewed by the senior authors using the AGFA IMPAX Web1000 v5.1 System.

A total of 654 patients presented to our hospital during the study. Of these, 257 (39%) patients were referred to the plastics and hand surgical team on-call. Remaining 397 (61%) patients were seen and treated at the local accident and emergency. Our review identified a patient group of 75 out of 654 (11.5%) patients who required operation.

Mechanism of injury: Direct impact: n=60 (80%), Hyperextension n=11 (15%), Hyper-flexion injury n=4 (5%).

The average patient age for a phalangeal fracture was 37.3 years. 47 (63%) patients were in the age group 20–40 years. The mean age for a phalangeal fracture in males was 35.9 (16–75) years and 42.2 (23–70) years in females. The gender distribution of these patients reveals that 58/75 (77%) patients were males. This indicates that males were at an increased relative risk of 3.4 for sustaining a hand fractures than females.

The fractures were studied with respect to their complexity, digit(s) involved, phalanx and the site on the phalanx, pattern of fracture and finally the involvement of the MCP or the IP joints.

Our study revealed that fifty-two (69%) of the fractures were closed while twenty-three (31%) were open. Injuries to the distal phalanges accounted for the most of the open fractures (15/23, 67%). The little finger and the ring finger were the common fingers to be involved.

The fractures were treated with various standard techniques of operative fixation. Postoperatively patients were mobilised as soon as possible and fitted with a removable thermoplastic splint to allow daily active and passive exercises. Hand therapists followed unit protocol including at least one visit per week, with follow up for four to six weeks. Final review was undertaken by a clinician in a dedicated Hand clinic six weeks post fixation.

Our work provides data on incidence and demographic distribution of phalangeal injuries presenting acutely to an NHS Trust covering a population area of 500,000. In our trust it is standard protocol for all such injuries to be reviewed by the Hand team to institute optimal hand therapy for patients. The study enabled us to develop a patient care pathway which will improve both patient and resource management

Aims

COVID-19 remains the major focus of healthcare provision. Managing orthopaedic emergencies effectively, while at the same time protecting patients and staff, remains a challenge. We explore how the UK lockdown affected the rate, distribution, and type of orthopaedic emergency department (ED) presentations, using the same period in 2019 as reference. This article discusses considerations for the ED and trauma wards to help to maintain the safety of patients and healthcare providers with an emphasis on more remote geography.

Aims. Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK. Methods. Any patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed. Results. In total, 1,175 patients (median age 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 65), 61.0% male (n = 717)) were admitted across 51 sites. A total of 546 patients (47.1%) were employed, 5.4% (n = 63) were diabetic, and 28.8% (n = 335) were smokers. In total, 29.0% of patients (n = 341) had more than one injury and 4.8% (n = 56) had two or more open fractures, while 51.3% of fractures (n = 637) occurred in the lower leg. Fractures sustained in vehicle incidents and collisions are common (38.8%; n = 455) and typically seen in younger patients. A simple fall (35.0%; n = 410) is common in older people. Overall, 69.8% (n = 786) of patients were admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre, 23.0% (n = 259) were transferred to an orthoplastic centre after initial management elsewhere, and 7.2% were managed outwith specialist units (n = 81). Conclusion. This study describes the epidemiology of open fractures in the UK. For a decade, orthopaedic surgeons have been practicing in a guideline-driven, network system without understanding the patient features, injury characteristics, or dispersal processes of the wider population. This work will inform care pathways as the UK looks to the future of trauma networks and guidelines, and how to optimize care for patients with open fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):746–752

The aim of this study was to determine the floor and ceiling effects for both the QuickDASH and PRWE following a fracture of the distal radius. Secondary aims were to determine the degree to which patients with a floor or ceiling effect felt that their wrist was ‘normal’, and if there were patient factors associated with achieving a floor or ceiling effect. A retrospective cohort study of patients sustaining a distal radius fracture and managed at the study centre during a single year was undertaken. Outcome measures included the QuickDASH, the PRWE, EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), and the normal wrist score. There were 526 patients with a mean age of 65yrs (20–95) and 421 (77%) were female. Most patients were managed non-operatively (73%, n=385). The mean follow-up was 4.8yrs (4.3–5.5). A ceiling effect was observed for both the QuickDASH (22.3%) and PRWE (28.5%). When defined to be within the minimum clinical important difference of the best available score, the ceiling effect increased to 62.8% for the QuickDASH and 60% for the PRWE. Patients that achieved a ceiling score for the QuickDASH and PRWE subjectively felt their wrist was only 91% and 92% normal, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, a dominant hand injury and better health-related quality of life were the common factors associated with achieving a ceiling score for both the QuickDASH and PRWE (all p<0.05). The QuickDASH and PRWE demonstrate ceiling effects when used to assess the outcome of fractures of the distal radius. Patients achieving ceiling scores did not consider their wrist to be ‘normal’. Future patient-reported outcome assessment tools for fractures of the distal radius should aim to limit the ceiling effect, especially for individuals or groups that are more likely to achieve a ceiling score

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the need for hand trauma services during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, specifically related to surgical requirements. This will provide useful information for planning and resource allocation in the event of any further lockdown. Methods. A prospective analsysis of all patients attending our hand trauma unit throughout the UK COVID-19 lockdown period (24 March to 10 May 2020) was carried out. Prospectively collected departmental data from the same period in 2019 was obtained and reviewed for comparison. The number of patients attending clinic, undergoing surgery, the type of surgical procedure, and rate of surgery was compared. Results. In all, 463 patients attended hand trauma services during the lockdown period compared to 793 in 2019 (32% reduction); 190 surgical procedures were carried out during lockdown compared to 236 in 2019 (20% reduction). Intervention rate was higher during the lockdown period (41% compared to 30%). There was no difference in the type of cases. In the first half of lockdown, 47% fewer procedures were performed than in 2019, but in the second half of lockdown 13% more procedures were carried out than the same period in 2019. Conclusion. Requirements for hand trauma surgery remain high during a pandemic lockdown. Attendances and surgical requirements can be expected to steadily return to normal levels during a prolonged lockdown period. Throughout any future lockdown period adequate surgical provision must be maintained for patients with hand injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-10:639–643

Aims. The current global pandemic due to COVID-19 is generating significant burden on the health service in the UK. On 23 March 2020, the UK government issued requirements for a national lockdown. The aim of this multicentre study is to gain a greater understanding of the impact lockdown has had on the rates, mechanisms and types of injuries together with their management across a regional trauma service. Methods. Data was collected from an adult major trauma centre, paediatric major trauma centre, district general hospital, and a regional hand trauma unit. Data collection included patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury type and treatment required. Time periods studied corresponded with the two weeks leading up to lockdown in the UK, two weeks during lockdown, and the same two-week period in 2019. Results. There was a 55.7% (12,935 vs 5,733) reduction in total accident and emergency (A&E) attendances with a 53.7% (354 vs 164) reduction in trauma admissions during lockdown compared to 2019. The number of patients with fragility fractures requiring admission remained constant (32 patients in 2019 vs 31 patients during lockdown; p > 0.05). Road traffic collisions (57.1%, n = 8) were the commonest cause of major trauma admissions during lockdown. There was a significant increase in DIY related-hand injuries (26% (n = 13)) lockdown vs 8% (n = 11 in 2019, p = 0.006) during lockdown, which resulted in an increase in nerve injuries (12% (n = 6 in lockdown) vs 2.5% (n = 3 in 2019, p = 0.015) and hand infections (24% (n = 12) in lockdown vs 6.2% (n = 8) in 2019, p = 0.002). Conclusion. The national lockdown has dramatically reduced orthopaedic trauma admissions. The incidence of fragility fractures requiring surgery has not changed. Appropriate provision in theatres should remain in place to ensure these patients can be managed as a surgical priority. DIY-related hand injuries have increased which has led to an increased in nerve injuries requiring intervention

Hand injuries are common in military personnel deployed on Operations. We present an analysis of 6 years of isolated hand injuries from Afghanistan or Iraq. The AEROMED database was interrogated for all casualties with isolated hand injuries requiring repatriation between April 2003 and 2009. We excluded cases not returned to Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM). Of the 414 identified in the study period, 207 were not transferred to RCDM, 12 were incorrectly coded and 41 notes were unavailable. The remaining 154 notes were reviewed. 69% were from Iraq; only 14 % were battle injuries. 35% were crush injuries, 20% falls, 17% lacerations, 6% sport, 5% gun-shot wounds and 4% blast. Injuries sustained were closed fractures (43%), open fractures (10%), simple wounds (17%), closed soft tissue injuries (8%) tendon division (7%), nerve division (3%), nerve/tendon division (3%) complex hand injuries (4%). 112 (73%) of the casualties required surgery. Of these 44 (40%) had surgery only in RCDM, 32 (28%) were operated on only in deployed medical facilities and 36 (32%) required surgery before and after repatriation. All 4 isolated nerve injuries were repaired at RCDM; 2 of the 4 cases with tendon and nerve transection were repaired before repatriation. Of the 10 tendon repairs performed prior to repatriation 5 were subsequently revised at RCDM. This description of 6 years of isolated hand injuries in military personnel allows future planning to be focused on likely injuries and raises the issue of poor outcomes in tendon repairs performed on deployment

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to identify the true incidence, pattern, and location of the injury and nature of fracture following hand injuries in different paediatric age groups attending a hand unit. Three hundred and sixty children (237 boys and 123 girls) under 16 years of age who presented with hand injuries between 1st April 2000 and 30th September 2000 were included in the study. Bony injuries accounted for 65.5% (236 injuries), 33.3% (120 injuries) were soft tissue injuries. The projected annual incidence rate for skeletal injuries was 418/100,000 children/year. Incidence was low in toddlers (34/100,000), more than doubled in pre-school children (73/100,000) and steeply increased to around 20 fold after the 10th year (663/100,000). Girls had a higher incidence of hand injuries among toddlers and pre-school children. Crushing was the most common cause of hand injury (64%) and most injuries were sustained at home (45%). Toddlers sustained soft tissue injuries predominantly (86%) and older children sustained more bony injuries (77%). Sport was the cause of injures commonly in the older children. There was a higher incidence of fracture in little finger (52%) followed by the thumb (23%). The proximal phalanx was the most frequently fractured bone (67%) among the phalanges. Diaphyseal fractures (46%) were more common in the metacarpal and basal fractures (51%) were common in the phalanges. At discharge more than 80% of the patients felt that they were cured or significantly better. This paper highlights the changing pattern and the different varieties of hand injuries in different paediatric age groups

Introduction A prospective study of consecutive hand injuries treated at a British Field Hospital revealed a distinctive pattern of injury. This is a unique review of hand injuries in a recent military deployment. Method Patients presenting to the field hospital with hand injuries over a two-month period were entered into a database. The parameters studied included mechanism of injury, timing and nature of treatment and ultimate disposal. An anatomical comparison of pattern of injury with six months retrospective data and a literature search was performed. Results Of nine hundred and thirty one patients attending the hospital in this period, fifty-three had injuries to the hand. Only seven cases resulted from battle injuries. Of the remainder, thirty-three were work related and the 13 were due to sport. Twenty-eight of the patients required a surgical procedure; the mean time to surgery was 1.7 hours. Twelve patients were subsequently aero medically evacuated. Conclusion Wounds of conflict account for a small proportion of hand injuries seen in the operational environment. The injury pattern seen reflects Daily Non-Battle Injury (DNBI) – the hazards encountered by deployed troops on a daily basis

Background. Patients with hand injuries frequently present to Emergency Departments. The ability of junior doctors to perform an accurate clinical assessment is crucial in initiating appropriate management. Objectives. To assess the adequacy of junior doctor hand examination skills and to establish whether further training and education is required. Methods. A double-centre study was conducted using an anonymous survey assessing hand examination completed by junior doctors (Foundation year 1 and Senior House Officer grades) working in Trauma & Orthopaedics or Emergency Departments. The survey covered all aspects of hand examination including assessment of: Flexor and Extensor tendons, Nerves (motor and sensory) and Vascular status. Surveys were marked against answers pre-agreed with a Consultant hand surgeon. Results. 32 doctors completed the survey. Tendons: 59% could accurately examine extensor digitorum, 41% extensor pollicis longus, 38% flexor digitorum profundus and 28% flexor digitorum superficialis. Nerves – Motor: 53% could accurately examine the radial nerve, 37% the ulnar nerve, 22% the median nerve and 9% the anterior interosseous nerve. Nerves – Sensory: 88% could accurately examine the radial nerve, 81% the ulnar nerve, 84% the median nerve and 18.8% digital nerves. Vascular: 93% could describe 3 methods of assessing vascularity. Conclusions. Tendon and neurological aspects of hand clinical examination were poorly executed at junior doctor level in this pragmatic survey. This highlights the need for targeted education and training to improve the accuracy of junior doctor hand injury assessment and subsequent improving patient treatment and safety. Recommendations include dedicated hand examination teaching early in Orthopaedic/A&E placements and introduction of an illustrated Hand Trauma Examination Proforma. Level of evidence. III - Evidence from case, correlation, and comparative studies

Complex hand injuries are those which involve more than one functionally significant anatomic structure of the hand (i.e vessels, nerves, tendons, bones). The epidemiologic and management characteristics of these injuries, encountered in a specialized center covering an urban and agricultural population, were recorded and studied. Between 1997 and 2002 the Orthopaedic Department of the University of Ioannina surgically treated 211 complex hand injuries in 190 patients with a mean age of 35 year (range 2.5–73). The majority of patients were male (89%). The incidence of these injuries was low at the extremes of the age distribution (children and adults over 60 years old). The greatest incidence was in the 15–30 year old age group. The mechanism of the injury was found to be clean cut trauma in 31% and avulsion or crushing in 69%; with the later being frequent agricultural injuries. Fifty-nine per cent of the injuries were viable, while 41% where non-viable (complete amputation in 63% and incomplete in 37%). Of the non viable injuries 66% eventually underwent stump configuration. Primary repair of only one anatomical structure was performed in 58%, most commonly osteosynthesis and tendon suturing. In 42% primary repair of more than one structure was performed, most commonly osteosynthesis and tendonorrhaphy in avulsion injuries and neuroraphy combined with tendonorrhaphy in clean cut injuries. Complex hand injuries are frequently seen in young male adults and the most common mechanism of injury is avulsion-crushing. Most of them are work-related accidents, so prevention should focus on adherence to safety guidelines. Management of such injuries requires special surgical techniques and expertise, necessary for staged reconstruction

The June 2012 Wrist & Hand Roundup. 360. looks at; radial osteotomy and advanced Kienböck's disease; fixing the Bennett fracture; PEEK plates and four-corner arthrodesis,;carpal tunnel release and haemodialysis; degloved digits and the reverse radial forearm flap; occupational hand injuries; trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis; fixing the fractured metacarpal neck and pyrocarbon implants for the destroyed PIPJ

Aims

The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set of what to measure in all future clinical research on hand fractures and joint injuries in adults.

Aims

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather epidemiological information on selected musculoskeletal injuries and to provide pooled injury-specific incidence rates.

Introduction:. During the Christmas period a number of patients are admitted to the Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH) Hand Unit with explosive injuries to their hands caused by firecrackers. South African legislation restricts the sale and use of fireworks to adults, with a limitation being placed on the size of explosive and type of commercial outlet. Despite this an inordinate amount of explosive hand injuries are admitted over the festive season. Aim:. To evaluate the epidemiological pattern of firecracker injuries to the hand during the Christmas festive period and assess contributing factors. Comparison to a previous study in 2008 will also be evaluated. Method:. Patients with firecracker injuries to the hand were interviewed. Demographic information, events surrounding the incident including alcohol use, and origin of the explosive were recorded. Injuries were classified into minor, moderate and severe based on the amount of soft tissue and bony damage. Treatment and complications was recorded. The data is also compared to previous data obtained in 2008. Results:. 26 patients were admitted. 2 patients were injured with explosives from a legal source. Alcohol use was implicated in 10 of the injuries. 17 amputations were performed at various levels, 9 fractures and 2 dislocations were stabilised with K-wires. Sepsis was more common in severe injuries. The majority of patients were injured from mis-use with several patients suffering injuries following removal of explosives from children or from other people throwing explosives at them or their family. These results are similar to those obtained in 2008. Conclusion:. A large number of patients are injured by firecrackers during the festive period. Injuries are severe. Lack of law enforcement, alcohol and misuse are contributing factors in these injuries. No significant change has occurred in the pattern of injury between 2008 and 2011

Fractures of metacarpals and phalanges are common in hand injuries. The goal of treatment is the immediate mobilization of the fingers and restoration of the hand anatomy thus avoiding contractures of the metacarpo-phalangeal and phalangophalangeal joints and hand dysfunction. The aim of this study is the comparison between two methods of fixation of these fractures. Between 2000–2007, 74 patients who suffered meta-carpophalangeal fractures were treated by K-wires and 62 patients were treated by mini external fixation. Parameters recorded were the operating time, postoperative range of motion, cost and complications. The surgical time was lesser with the use of K-wires, the operative technique much simple and the cost minimum as compared to mini external fixators. The postoperative range of motion was inferior with the external fixation. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups. 2 patients with the external fixation and 1 patient with K-wires developed pin-track infection. There were 3 failures of fixation in the external fixator group but no failure occurred with the use of K-wires. The majority of the fractures healed within 6 weeks. K-wires seem to be the ideal method of treatment considering the fractures of metacarpals and phalanges. The use of mini external fixation presents many disadvantages and probably is restricted to the treatment of the open and comminuted hand fractures

The purpose of this study was to determine the normal angle of rotation of the axis of each finger using digital image analysis, whether the rotation of the digits is symmetrical in the two hands of an individual, and the reliability of this method. Standardised digital photographic images were taken of thirty healthy volunteers. The palm of each hand was placed on a flat bench top with their fingers held in extension and adducted, to give an end-on image of all four fingers. Three independent observers analysed the images using Adobe Photoshop software. The rotational angle of each finger was defined as the angle created by a straight line connecting the radial and ulnar border of the nail plate and the bench top horizon. The three observers showed Inter-Rater Reliability of 92%. The mean angles of rotation were: Index 13°, Middle 10°, Ring 5°, Little 12°. The differences in angle of rotation of the index and middle finger between the left and right hand were statistically significant (p=0.003, and p=0.002 respectively), demonstrating asymmetry between the two sides. The differences in angle of rotation of the ring and little finger of the left and right hand were not significantly significant (p= 0.312 and p=0.716 respectively). In conclusion, symmetry was seen in the little and ring but not in the index and middle fingers. Digital image analysis provides a non-invasive and reproducible method of quantifying the rotation of normal fingers and may be of use as a diagnostic tool in the assessment and management of hand injuries

Historically human and animal bites to the hand have resulted in significant morbidity in relation to the high risk of contamination and subsequent infection. Our study aimed to assess the outcomes following such injuries in terms of infection requiring further intervention through specialist referral to the hand surgery team at our hospital. 124 consecutive patients attending the A&E department over a three month period in 2011 were included in this retrospective study which provided 126 separate cases due to bilateral injuries (110 animal: 16 human). Data was obtained from the electronic patient management system. The demographics of each patient were recorded followed by type of bite sustained including number and size of lacerations. 79% of patients presented within 24 hours and the majority before 6 hours from injury. The majority of the forearm bites were documented as superficial abrasions and none of these went on to develop problems with infection, so the study concentrated on bite injuries to the hand of which there were 99 cases. Most hand injuries were a single puncture or laceration (64%) but in 9 cases there were greater than 3 separate wounds. 5 cases were directly referred to the Hand surgery team with 4 requiring admission and of these 3 required washout and debdridement in theatres. The remaining 94 cases were managed solely by A&E. Of these 94 cases 87 pts received Abx and 78 pts had a lavage. Overall 68% received both Abx and lavage. Subsequent to discharge from A&E only 3 developed problems with infection later (2 requiring specialist input) they were all dog bites and in keeping with the ‘typical’ bite pattern seen in other pts. The study concluded that bites not involving joint, tendon or bone have only a small chance of causing infection provided good initial treatment