Proximal hamstring tendon avulsion from the ischial tuberosity is a significant injury, with surgical repair shown to have superior functional outcomes compared to non-surgical treatment. However, limited data exists regarding the optimal rehabilitation regime following surgical repair. The aim of this study was to investigate patient outcomes following repair of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions between a conservative (CR) versus an accelerated rehabilitation (AR) regimen. This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomised 50 patients undergoing proximal hamstring tendon repair to either a braced, partial weight-bearing rehabilitation regime (CR=25) or an accelerated, unbraced regime, that permitted full weight-bearing as tolerated (AR=25). Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 3 and 6 months post-surgery, via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Primary analysis was per protocol and based on linear mixed models. Both groups were matched at baseline with respect to patient characteristics. All PROMs improved (p>0.05) and, while the AR group reported a significantly better Physical Component Score for the SF-12 at 3 months (p=0.022), there were no other group differences. Peak isometric hamstrings strength and peak isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings torque symmetry were all comparable between groups (p>0.05). Three re-injuries have been observed (CR=2, AR=1). After proximal hamstring repair surgery, post-operative outcomes following an accelerated rehabilitation regimen demonstrate comparable outcomes to a traditionally conservative rehabilitation pathway, albeit demonstrating better early physical health-related quality of life scores, without an increased incidence of early re-injury

Purpose. The authors have used the Edinburgh Visual Gait Score (VGS) in the management of diplegic cerebral palsy patients treated with Botulinum toxoid injections into their hamstrings muscles. Video-filmed gait episodes were recorded before and after Botox injections over a treatment period of 6 years from 2007 to 2012. Method. The video-recordings of 32 patients were available for VGS analysis. Ages ranged from 5 to 22 years, with 17 patients under the age of 12 years, and 15 over 12 years. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFSC) levels were accorded to: 8 patients level 1, 10 patients level 2, and 14 patients level 3; 15 were boys and 17 girls. The indication for hamstring injections were a GMFCS level of 1 to 3, age five years or older, no previous hamstring surgery, and a patient keen to have the Botox treatment. Video-recordings were taken with a Sony and a Canon Digital camera in a back-front-back view and a lateral left-right view; walking distance ap was 10 metres, lateral camera distance 5 metres. All injections of Botox were done by the senior author without anaesthetic or sedation. All assessments were done by the junior authors; they did not know the patients, the status before or after injections or repeat injections, or the dates of injections and filming of the episodes. Results. After the Botox injections into the hamstrings bilaterally, no patient changed GMFCS level status, nobody deteriorated; all could be classified in the GMFCS. Conclusion. The Edinburgh VGS is a reliable analysis method for classifying GMF levels in diplegic walking cerebral palsy patients. Video-recordings are permanent and can repeatedly be re-assessed in future; different visual parameters may be chosen for assessment. ONE DISCLOSURE