Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 286
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 2, Issue 10 | Pages 220 - 226
1 Oct 2013
Chang Y Tai C Hsieh P Ueng SWN

Objectives . The objective of this study is to determine an optimal antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) for infection prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Methods. We evaluated the antibacterial effects of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cements loaded with vancomycin, teicoplanin, ceftazidime, imipenem, piperacillin, gentamicin, and tobramycin against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staph. aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Standardised cement specimens made from 40 g PMMA loaded with 1 g antibiotics were tested for elution characteristics, antibacterial activities, and compressive strength in vitro. . Results. The ALBC containing gentamicin provided a much longer duration of antibiotic release than those containing other antibiotic. Imipenem-loading on the cement had a significant adverse effect on the compressive strength of the ALBC, which made it insufficient for use in prosthesis fixation. All of the tested antibiotics maintained their antibacterial properties after being mixed with PMMA. The gentamicin-loaded ALBC provided a broad antibacterial spectrum against all the test organisms and had the greatest duration of antibacterial activity against MSSA, CoNS, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. . Conclusion. When considering the use of ALBC as infection prophylaxis in TJA, gentamicin-loaded ALBC may be a very effective choice. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:220–6


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 9 | Pages 427 - 435
1 Sep 2016
Stravinskas M Horstmann P Ferguson J Hettwer W Nilsson M Tarasevicius S Petersen MM McNally MA Lidgren L

Objectives. Deep bone and joint infections (DBJI) are directly intertwined with health, demographic change towards an elderly population, and wellbeing. The elderly human population is more prone to acquire infections, and the consequences such as pain, reduced quality of life, morbidity, absence from work and premature retirement due to disability place significant burdens on already strained healthcare systems and societal budgets. DBJIs are less responsive to systemic antibiotics because of poor vascular perfusion in necrotic bone, large bone defects and persistent biofilm-based infection. Emerging bacterial resistance poses a major threat and new innovative treatment modalities are urgently needed to curb its current trajectory. Materials and Methods. We present a new biphasic ceramic bone substitute consisting of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate for local antibiotic delivery in combination with bone regeneration. Gentamicin release was measured in four setups: 1) in vitro elution in Ringer’s solution; 2) local elution in patients treated for trochanteric hip fractures or uncemented hip revisions; 3) local elution in patients treated with a bone tumour resection; and 4) local elution in patients treated surgically for chronic corticomedullary osteomyelitis. Results. The release pattern in vitro was comparable with the obtained release in the patient studies. No recurrence was detected in the osteomyelitis group at latest follow-up (minimum 1.5 years). Conclusions. This new biphasic bone substitute containing antibiotics provides safe prevention of bone infections in a range of clinical situations. The in vitro test method predicts the in vivo performance and makes it a reliable tool in the development of future antibiotic-eluting bone-regenerating materials. Cite this article: M. Stravinskas, P. Horstmann, J. Ferguson, W. Hettwer, M. Nilsson, S. Tarasevicius, M. M. Petersen, M. A. McNally, L. Lidgren. Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin eluted from a regenerating bone graft substitute: In vitro and clinical release studies. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:427–435. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0108.R1


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 13, Issue 8 | Pages 383 - 391
2 Aug 2024
Mannala GK Rupp M Walter N Youf R Bärtl S Riool M Alt V

Aims. Bacteriophages infect, replicate inside bacteria, and are released from the host through lysis. Here, we evaluate the effects of repetitive doses of the Staphylococcus aureus phage 191219 and gentamicin against haematogenous and early-stage biofilm implant-related infections in Galleria mellonella. Methods. For the haematogenous infection, G. mellonella larvae were implanted with a Kirschner wire (K-wire), infected with S. aureus, and subsequently phages and/or gentamicin were administered. For the early-stage biofilm implant infection, the K-wires were pre-incubated with S. aureus suspension before implantation. After 24 hours, the larvae received phages and/or gentamicin. In both models, the larvae also received daily doses of phages and/or gentamicin for up to five days. The effect was determined by survival analysis for five days and quantitative culture of bacteria after two days of repetitive doses. Results. In the haematogenous infection, a single combined dose of phages and gentamicin, and repetitive injections with gentamicin or in combination with phages, resulted in significantly improved survival rates. In the early-stage biofilm infection, only repetitive combined administration of phages and gentamicin led to a significantly increased survival. Additionally, a significant reduction in number of bacteria was observed in the larvae after receiving repetitive doses of phages and/or gentamicin in both infection models. Conclusion. Based on our results, a single dose of the combination of phages and gentamicin is sufficient to prevent a haematogenous S. aureus implant-related infection, whereas gentamicin needs to be administered daily for the same effect. To treat early-stage S. aureus implant-related infection, repetitive doses of the combination of phages and gentamicin are required. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(8):383–391


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 28 - 28
1 Oct 2022
Mannala G Rupp M Alt V
Full Access

Aim. Galleria mellonella larvae is a well-known insect infection model that has been used to test the virulence of bacterial and fungal strains as well as for the high throughput screening of antimicrobial compounds against infections. Recently, we have developed insect infection model G. mellonella larvae to study implant associated biofilm infections using small K-wire as implant material. Here, we aimed to further expand the use of G. mellonella to test other materials such as bone cement with combination of gentamicin to treat implant-associated infections. Method. The poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) with and without gentamicin and liquid methyl methacrylate (MMA) were kindly provided by Heraeus Medical GmbH, Wehrheim. To make the bone cement implants as cubes, Teflon plate (Karl Lettenbauer, Erlangen) with specified well size was used. The Radiopaque polymer and monomer were mixed well in a bowl, applied over on to the Teflon plate and pressed with spatula to form fine and uniform cubes. After polymerization, the bone cement implants were taken out of the Teflon well plate with the help of pin. For the infection process, bone cement cubes were pre-incubated with S. aureus EDCC 5055 culture at 5×10. 6. CFU/ml for 30 min at 150 rpm shaking conditions. Later, these implants were washed with 10ml PBS and implanted in the larvae as mentioned. Survival of the larvae were observed at 37°C in an incubator. To analyze the susceptibility of the bacterial infections towards gentamicin, survival of the larvae compared with control group implanted only with bone cement. The effect of gentamicin was also measured in terms of S. aureus load in larvae on 2. nd. day. SEM analysis was performed to see the effect of gentamicin on biofilm formation on bone cement. Results. Our experiments established the G. mellonella as an excellent model to screen bone cement with antimicrobial compounds against bacterial infections. The gentamicin bone cement samples showed excellent S. aureus bacterial load reduction after the implantation in G. mellonella model. The bone cement with gentamicin showed better survival of larvae infected with S. aureus compared to control. Finally, the gentamicin also affected the biofilm formation on the bone cement surface with S. aureus. Conclusions. Thus, our work showed G. mellonella is a rapid, cheap economical pre-clinical model to study the bone cement associate bacterial infections as well as screening of the various antimicrobial compounds


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 22 - 22
1 Dec 2015
Pastor JM Frada T Bori G Tornero E Segur J Bosch J García S
Full Access

Two-stage revision surgery is the current gold standard for treating prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Between the first and the second stage gentamicin-loaded (G) spacers are widely used but the rate of gentamicin resistant staphylococci is increasing. The potential benefit of vancomycin + gentamicin-loaded (V/G) spacers has not yet been evaluated. The aim of our study was to compare the microbiological eradication and infection control rates in PJI treated with G- or V/G-spacers. 147 PJIs treated in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. From 2003 to 2009 G-spacers (Tecres®) were used (group G) and from 2010 to 2013 V/G-spacers (Group V/G). Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, ASA score, type of infection, microorganisms isolated in the first and second stages, time between stages, infection outcome at last visit were collected. The 2 main outcome variables were microbiological eradication in the second stage (≤1 positive culture out of 6) and infection control after the second stage. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using SPSS®. There were 83 patients in group G and 63 in group V/G. The mean (SD) age was 71.5 (10.3) years and 54% were female. Groups were similar in gender, age, BMI, ASA score, time with spacer, microorganism isolated in the first stage, or type of infection (acute or chronic) (p>0.05). The presence of ≥2 positive cultures in the second stage was significantly higher in group G (23.2%) than in group V/G (6.7%, P<0.05). Logistic regression model identified polymicrobial infections (OR: 4.26, CI95%: 1.44–12.64) and the use of G-spacers (OR: 5.88, CI95%: 1.60–21.74) as independent predictors of failure in microbiological eradication. The global rate of infection control was 75% after a mean (SD) follow-up of 56 (32) months. Infection control was higher in chronic than acute PJI (83.6% vs 59.6%, P<0.05), when cultures during second stage were negative (81.5%) vs positive (61%, P<0.05), and there was a trend towards a higher control rate when V/G-spacers (82%) vs G-spacers (69.5%) were used (P=0.09). Multivariate analysis identified chronic PJI (OR: 5.43, CI95%: 2.20–13.51) and, at the limit of significance, the use of V/G spacers (OR: 2.36, CI95%: 0.97–5.71) as predictors of infection control. Vancomycin loaded spacers were significantly associated with a higher microbiological eradication and there was a trend towards a higher infection control than gentamicin loaded spacers


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 11 - 11
19 Aug 2024
Hamilton JL Gianotti S Impergre A AbuAlia M Markovics A Jacobs JJ Valle CJD Wimmer MA
Full Access

We created TiO. 2. nanotubes (TNTs) on the surface of titanium (Ti) implants with subsequential loading with gentamicin and chitosan, acting as a control release agent, by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). We hypothesized femoral implants with TNTs loaded with gentamicin and chitosan would localize antibiotic to the implant and surgical site and prevent PJI in a mouse model. Ti-6Al-4V ELI wires underwent TNT surface modification by two-step anodization. EPD was then used to load gentamicin and chitosan onto the Ti wire with surface TNTs. Control Ti wires contained TNTs with EPD of chitosan only. 12-week-old male C57BL/6J mice underwent received a right femoral intramedullary implant followed by inoculation at the surgical site with 1×10. 3. CFUs of bioluminescent Xen36 Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Mice were randomly divided into two implant groups: 1) Gentamicin + Chitosan Group (n=7; experimental group); 2) Chitosan Group (n=7; control group). Outcomes included: 1) Relative S. aureus abundance by bioluminescence imaging; 2) Quantification of S. aureus at the implant and surrounding tissue by colony forming unit (CFU) analysis; 3) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for implant bacterial biofilm; 4) Radiographic signs of PJI. Over 14 days assessment following wire implantation and inoculation with S. aureus, the experimental group had no evidence of infection based on i) no increased Xen36 S. aureus bioluminescence signal and ii) no CFUs present. All control had increased bioluminescence signal, above baseline, at all time-points and presence of CFUs. Ti femoral implants modified with surface TNTs and coated with gentamicin and chitosan through EPD prevented PJI in all mice through 14 days. In comparison, all control mice demonstrated evidence of PJI over 14 days. Implants with TNTs and EPD of gentamicin were highly effective in this mouse PJI model


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 1 | Pages 66 - 71
27 Jan 2020
Moriarty P Kayani B Wallace C Chang J Plastow R Haddad FS

Aims. Graft infection following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may lead to septic arthritis requiring multiple irrigation and debridement procedures, staged revision operations, and prolonged courses of antibiotics. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies reporting on how gentamicin pre-soaking of hamstring grafts influences infection rates following ACLR. We set out to examine this in our study accordingly. Methods. This retrospective study included 2,000 patients (1,156 males and 844 females) who underwent primary ACLR with hamstring autografts between 2007 to 2017. This included 1,063 patients who received pre-soaked saline hamstring grafts for ACLR followed by 937 patients who received pre-soaked gentamicin hamstring grafts for ACLR. All operative procedures were completed by a single surgeon using a standardized surgical technique. Medical notes were reviewed and data relating to the following outcomes recorded: postoperative infection, clinical progress, causative organisms, management received, and outcomes. Results. Superficial wound infection developed in 14 patients (1.31 %) receiving pre-saline soaked hamstring grafts compared to 13 patients (1.38 %) receiving pre-gentamicin soaked hamstring grafts, and this finding was not statistically significant (p = 0.692). All superficial wound infections were treated with oral antibiotics with no further complications. There were no recorded cases of septic arthritis in patients receiving pre-gentamicin soaked grafts compared to nine patients (0.85%) receiving pre-saline soaked grafts, which was statistically significant (p = 0.004). Conclusion. Pre-soaking hamstring autographs in gentamicin does not affect superficial infection rates but does reduce deep intra-articular infection rates compared to pre-soaking hamstring grafts in saline alone. These findings suggest that pre-soaking hamstring autografts in gentamicin provides an effective surgical technique for reducing intra-articular infection rates following ACLR. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):66–71


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 71 - 71
1 Dec 2021
Muir R Birnie C Hyder-Wilson R Ferguson J McNally M
Full Access

Aim. Chronic bone infections and infected fractures are often treated with excision of the dead bone and implantation of biomaterials which elute antibiotics. Gentamicin has been a preferred drug for local delivery, but this could induce renal dysfunction due to systemic toxicity. This is a particular concern in patients with pre-existing chronic renal disease treated with new antibiotic carriers which achieve very high peak levels of gentamicin in the first few days after surgery. Method. 163 patients (109 males; average age 51.6 years) with Cierny-Mader Type 3 or 4 chronic osteomyelitis had a single-stage operation with excision of the dead bone, filling of the osseous defect with a calcium sulphate-hydroxyapatite carrier, containing gentamicin and immediate soft tissue closure. 2. No patient was given systemic gentamicin or other renal toxic antibiotics. Mean carrier volume was 10.9mls (range 1–30mls) and mean gentamicin dosing was 190.75mg (maximum 525mg). Seven patients had pre-existing renal disease (4 diabetic nephropathy, 1 nephrotic syndrome, 1 renal transplant and 1 previous acute kidney injury). Serum creatinine levels were collected pre-operatively and during the first seven days post-operatively. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the CKD-epi creatinine equation. Renal function was defined using the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Staging system. Results. 155 cases had adequate data to allow calculation of pre- and post-operative GFR. Pre-operative CKD staging demonstrated 118 Class I (normal renal function), 30 Class II, 3 Class IIIa, 3 Class IIIb, and 1 Class V disease. Mean pre-operative GFR (99.7ml/min/1.73m. 2. , SD 21.0) was no different to post-operative GFR (103.2ml/min/1.73m. 2. , SD 21.3), p= 0.0861. Four cases had a >10% decline in GFR below normal, with only one case dropping a CKD stage, from I (normal) to II (mildly decreased). Only 1/7 cases with pre-existing renal disease had a GFR drop of >10% (from 11ml/min/1.73m. 2. to 8ml/min/1.73m. 2. ). 70/155 (45.2%) had a temporary GFR drop post-operatively, with the biggest drop occurring a mean 3.06 days following surgery (SD 2.1). No patient had clinical signs of new acute renal impairment post-operatively. Conclusions. Renal function is not significantly affected by local implantation of gentamicin up to 525mg. The presence of pre-existing renal disease is not a contraindication to local gentamicin therapy


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 36 - 36
1 Oct 2019
Muratoglu OK Gil D Atici A Connolly R Hugard S Oral E
Full Access

Introduction. Infection remains as one of the major challenges of total joint surgery. One-stage irrigation, debridement and reimplantation, or two-stage revision surgery with a temporary implantation of antibiotic eluting bone cement spacer followed by reimplantation are two methods often used to treat infected patients with mixed outcomes. Like bone cement, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) can also be used as a carrier for antibiotics. Recently, we demonstrated that vancomycin and rifampin can be delivered from UHMWPE implants at therapeutic levels to eradicate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in a lupine animal model. There are regulatory challenges in translating these types of combination devices to clinical use. Last year, at this meeting, we presented the preliminary pre-clinical testing for a temporary UHMWPE spacer containing gentamicin sulfate as a first step towards clinical use. Since then, we carried out a survey among the Knee Society membership about their preference for spacer use in two-stage revision surgery and found that 43% prefer to use a CoCr femoral component on an all-poly cemented tibial insert, 22% prefer bone cement spacers molded in the OR, 20% prefer static bone cement spacers, and 14% prefer pre-formed bone cement spacers. We modified our implant design based on the majority's preference for a total knee system, rather than bone cement spacers, in the temporary two-stage approach. In this study, we explored the effect of gentamicin sulfate (GS) elution from UHMWPE/GS tibial inserts on bacterial colonization on CoCr surfaces. Methods. We characterized the gentamicin sulfate (GS) particles with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We molded UHMWPE/GS powder blends and characterized the morphology using SEM and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS). We submerged samples of molded UHMWPE/GS in buffered phosphate solution (PBS) at 37°C and quantified the extent of GS elution into PBS with a method described by Gubernator et al. using o-phthaladehyde (OPA) [1]. Under basic conditions, OPA reacts with primary amino groups to form fluorescent complexes. Since gentamicin is the only source of such amino acids in our elution samples, the number of fluorescent complexes formed is directly proportional to the amount of gentamicin in the sample. Using this method, we could quantify gentamicin elution by measuring sample fluorescence post OPA-reaction. We used a plate reader to excite the fluorescent complexes formed in the OPA reaction and measured the resulting emission at wavelengths of 340 nm and 455 nm, respectively. We also quantified the effect of the standard cleaning protocol (heated sonication in alkaline water and alcohol) used to clean UHMWPE implants on subsequent GS elution from UHMWPE/GS samples using the OPA method. We used agar diffusion tests to characterize antibacterial properties of UHMWPE/GS samples after cleaning. For these tests, we collected eluents collected from UHMWPE/GS and gentamicin-impregnated bone cement (BC/GS) following 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of elution, and tested against S. aureus (ATCC 12600). We used the “daughter cells” method developed by Bechert et al. to assess anticolonizing properties of UHMWPE/GS [2,3]. We also characterized the colonization of bacteria on CoCr surfaces in the presence of GS eluting from UHMWPE/GS test samples. For this we modified a Pin-on-Disc (PoD) wear tester: An UHMWPE/GS pin and UHMWPE pin (control) articulated against an implant-finish CoCr disc with Tryptic Soy Broth containing S. Aureus as the lubricant. After 18 hrs, we rinsed the articular surfaces of the pin and disc and stamped them onto Agar gel to transfer any adherent bacteria. We incubated the Agar plate overnight such that adherent bacteria proliferated and became visible. Results. SEM characterized the GS particles as hollow spheres (Fig 1a). These formed small groups of agglomerated domains at the virgin resin boundaries of UHMWPE after molding (Fig 1b). Sulfur signature from the EDS analysis identified the agglomerated domains as GS particles (Fig 2). Elution of GS started with an initial burst and was followed by steady elution up to 12 weeks (Fig 3). Cleaning reduced the initial burst GS elution; and the elution remained unchanged after 2 days (Fig 4). The agar diffusion test showed simmilar inhibition zones for the eluents collected from UHMWPE/GS and BC/GS, suggesting that these samples yield similar antibacterial activity against S. aureus (Fig 5). UHMWPE/GS demonstrated pronounced anticolonizing properties, effectively mitigating the proliferation of S. aureus “daughter” cells. Anticolonizing activity of Palacos R+G was not significantly different when compared with UHMWPE/GS. The PoD test showed little-to-no colonization of CoCr surfaces in the presence of UHMWPE/GS pins, indicative of excellent antibacterial properties of UHMWPE/GS against S. aureus. Conclusion. SEM and EDS has allowed us to visualize domains of gentamicin sulfate particles in UHMWPE. Our OPA method has greater precision than traditional agar-well diffusion methods of measuring gentamicin concentration and showed that gentamicin sulfate-loaded UHMWPE elutes at the same rate as Palacos R+G. Pin-on-disc experiments and the daughter cell method both confirmed that these two materials have similar anticolonization abilities. We also found that using the standard cleaning protocol for UHMWPE orthopedic implants decreased the burst of gentamicin eluting from UHMWPE, but after 2 days, it had no effect compared to uncleaned UHMWPE/GS. Finally, we found that UHMWPE/GS can reduce the colonization of bacteria on CoCr. UHMWPE/GS continues to be a promising material for treating PJI. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 60 - 60
1 Oct 2018
Muratoglu OK Oral E Gil D Atici A Connolly R
Full Access

Infection remains as one of the major challenges of total joint surgery. One-stage irrigation, debridement and reimplantation or two-stage revision surgery with a temporary implantation of antibiotic eluting bone cement spacer followed by reimplantation are two methods often used to treat infected patients with mixed outcomes. Like bone cement, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) can also be used as a carrier for antibiotics. Recently, we demonstrated that vancomycin and rifampin can be successfully delivered from UHMWPE implants at therapeutic levels to eradicate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in a lupine animal model. There are regulatory challenges in translating these types of combination devices in to clinical use. One approach is to follow a stepwise strategy, with the first step of seeking clearance for a temporary UHMWPE spacer containing gentamicin sulfate. In this study, we explored the effect of gentamicin sulfate (GS) content in UHMWPE on GS elution rate and antimicrobial activity against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus(MSSA). We also assessed the effect of spacer fabrication on the activity of gentamicin sulfate. We prepared and consolidated UHMWPE/GS blends in varying concentrations. After consolidation, we fabricated test samples with surface area (350mm2) to volume (300mm3) ratio of 1.2 for elution in 1.5ml phosphate buffered saline at body temperature for up to six months and quantified eluted GS content using liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry (LCMS). We assessed the antibacterial activity of the obtained samples in vitro against various concentrations of MSSA (103–106 CFU/ml). Furthermore, we quantified the probability of bacterial colonization of UHMWPE impregnated with GS compared to GS containing bone cement. We assessed any detectable changes in activity of eluted GS caused by spacer fabrication by screening m/z peaks of GS isomers in mass spectra obtained from LC-MS. Gentamicin sulfate activity was not compromised by the elevated temperature and pressure used during spacer fabrication. Elution rate of GS increased with increasing GS content in the blends studied. At comparable elution rates, the GS-loaded UHMWPE was either equivalent or better in terms of antibacterial and anticolonization properties when compared with gentamicin containing bone cement. GS-impregnated UHMWPE is a promising material for temporary spacers


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 53 - 53
1 May 2021
Muir R Birnie C Hyder-Wilson R Ferguson J McNally M
Full Access

Introduction. The treatment of chronic bone infection often involves excision of dead bone and implantation of biomaterials which elute antibiotics. Gentamicin is a preferred drug for local delivery, but its systemic use carries a well-established risk of nephrotoxicity. We aim to establish the risk of renal injury with local delivery in a ceramic carrier. Materials and Methods. 163 consecutive patients with Cierny-Mader Type 3 or 4 chronic osteomyelitis were treated with a single-stage operation which included filling of the osseous defect with a calcium sulphate-hydroxyapatite carrier containing gentamicin. The mean carrier volume used was 10.9mls, leading to a mean implanted gentamicin dose of 191.3mg (maximum 525mg). Serum creatinine levels were collected pre-operatively and during the first seven days post-operatively. Renal impairment was graded using the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Staging system, and AKI was assessed using the RIFLE criteria. Results. 155 cases had adequate data to allow calculation of pre- and post-operative GFR. 7 patients had pre-existing renal disease. 70 patients (45.2%) had a temporary eGFR drop post-operatively, with the greatest decrease occurring a mean 3.06 days following surgery. Twenty cases had a >10% decline in eGFR, but 12 resolved within 7 days. 7 patients transiently fell into the “Risk” category according to RIFLE criteria, but no patient had a change consistent with “Injury”, “Failure” or “Loss” of renal function and none had clinical signs of new acute renal impairment post-operatively. Conclusions. The implantation of up to 525mg of gentamicin contained within Cerament G, as part of the surgical treatment of osteomyelitis, is safe and carries minimal risk of significant acute kidney injury. A small, transient increase in serum creatinine may be observed in the early post-operative period, and attention should be paid to limit patients exposure to other nephrotoxic agents. The majority of patients will return to their baseline renal function within 7 days following the operation. The presence of pre-existing renal disease is not a contraindication to local gentamicin therapy


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 11 | Pages 787 - 802
1 Nov 2022
Sebastian S Tandberg F Liu Y Raina DB Tägil M Collin M Lidgren L

Aims. There is a lack of biomaterial-based carriers for the local delivery of rifampicin (RIF), one of the cornerstone second defence antibiotics for bone infections. RIF is also known for causing rapid development of antibiotic resistance when given as monotherapy. This in vitro study evaluated a clinically used biphasic calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite (CaS/HA) biomaterial as a carrier for dual delivery of RIF with vancomycin (VAN) or gentamicin (GEN). Methods. The CaS/HA composites containing RIF/GEN/VAN, either alone or in combination, were first prepared and their injectability, setting time, and antibiotic elution profiles were assessed. Using a continuous disk diffusion assay, the antibacterial behaviour of the material was tested on both planktonic and biofilm-embedded forms of standard and clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus for 28 days. Development of bacterial resistance to RIF was determined by exposing the biofilm-embedded bacteria continuously to released fractions of antibiotics from CaS/HA-antibiotic composites. Results. Following the addition of RIF to CaS/HA-VAN/GEN, adequate injectability and setting of the CaS/HA composites were noted. Sustained release of RIF above the minimum inhibitory concentrations of S. aureus was observed until study endpoint (day 35). Only combinations of CaS/HA-VAN/GEN + RIF exhibited antibacterial and antibiofilm effects yielding no viable bacteria at study endpoint. The S. aureus strains developed resistance to RIF when biofilms were subjected to CaS/HA-RIF alone but not with CaS/HA-VAN/GEN + RIF. Conclusion. Our in vitro results indicate that biphasic CaS/HA loaded with VAN or GEN could be used as a carrier for RIF for local delivery in clinically demanding bone infections. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(11):787–802


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 17 - 17
1 Dec 2019
Wang L Luca MD Tkhilaishvili T Gonzalez-Moreno M Trampuz A
Full Access

Aim. Ciprofloxacin is recommended as anti-biofilm therapy for gram-negative periprosthetic joint infection. With ciprofloxacin monotherapy, resistance in gram-negative bacteria was observed. Therefore, we evaluated in vitro synergistic activity of fosfomycin, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin combinations against biofilms formed by E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains. Method. E. coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and 15 clinical isolates were used for this study. MIC values were determined by Etest. Biofilms were formed on porous sintered glass beads for 24h and exposed to antibiotics for further 24h. Viability of bacteria on the glass beads after antibiotic treatment was detected by cfu counting of the sonicated beads. The minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic required to kill biofilm cells. Synergistic activity against biofilm was evaluated by calculation of the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). Results. Table 1 summarizes the antimicrobial susceptibility of planktonic (MIC), biofilm bacteria (MBEC) and synergism. Among 9 E. coli isolates, the synergism was observed in 78% of isolates treated with fosfomycin/gentamicin, 44% treated with gentamicin/ciprofloxacin and 22% treated with fosfomycin/ciprofloxacin. Among 8 P. aeruginosa isolates, the synergism was observed 75% of isolates treated with gentamicin/ciprofloxacin, 63% treated with fosfomycin/gentamicin and 50% treated with fosfomycin/ciprofloxacin. Conclusions. Based on our results, fosfomycin in combination with gentamicin seems to be a promising therapeutic approach against E. coli biofilm related infections. Combination of gentamicin with ciprofloxacin represent the most optimal treatment option for P. aeruginosa biofilm. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 80 - 80
1 Dec 2019
Thomassen M Hanberg PE Stilling M Kjær K S⊘balle K Krag L H⊘jskov C Bue M
Full Access

Aim. Local treatment with gentamicin may be an important tool in the prevention and treatment of surgical site infections in high-risk procedures and patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of gentamicin in bone and surrounding tissue, released from a controlled application of a GentaColl sponge in a porcine model. Method. In 8 female pigs, a GentaColl sponge of 10×10 cm (1.3 mg gentamicin/cm. 2. ) was placed in a cancellous bone cavity in the proximal tibia. Microdialysis was used for sampling of gentamicin concentrations over 48 hours from the cavity with the implanted GentaColl sponge, cancellous bone parallel to the cavity over and under the epiphyseal plate, cortical bone, the intramedullary canal, subcutaneous tissue, and the joint cavity of the knee. Venous blood samples were obtained as reference. Results. The main finding was a mean peak drug concentration (95-CI) of gentamicin in the cancellous bone cavity containing the implanted GentaColl sponge of 11,315 (9,049–13,581) μg/ml, persisting above 1000 μg/ml until approximately 40 hours after application. Moreover, the concentrations were low (< 1 μg/ml) in the surrounding tissues as well as in plasma. Conclusions. The mean peak gentamicin concentration from the cancellous bone cavity after a controlled application of a GentaColl sponge was high and may be adequate for the prevention of biofilm formation. However, high MIC strains and uncontrolled application of the GentaColl sponge may jeopardize this conclusion


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 12 - 12
1 Dec 2015
Torkington M Davison M Wheelwright E Jenkins P Lovering A Blyth M Jones B
Full Access

Cephalasporin antibiotics have been commonly used for prophylaxis against surgical site infection. To prevent Clostridium difficile, the preferential use of agents such as flucloxacillin and gentamicin has been recommended. The aim of this study was to investigate the bone penetration of these antibiotics during hip and knee arthroplasty, and their efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis. Bone samples were collected from 21 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 18 patients undergoing total hip replacement (THA). The concentration of both antibiotics was analysed using high performance liquid chromatography. Penetration was expressed as a percentage of venous blood concentration. The efficacy against common infecting organisms was measured using the epidemiological cut-off value for resistance (ECOFF). The bone penetration of gentamicin was higher than flucloxacillin. The concentration of both antibiotics was higher in the acetabulum than the femoral head or neck (p=0.007 flucloxacillin; p=0.021 gentamicin). Flucloxacillin concentrations were effective against S. aureus and S. epidermis in all THAs and 20 (95%) TKAs. Gentamicin concentrations were effective against S.epidermis in all bone samples. Gentamicin was effective against S. aureus in 11 (89%) femoral samples. Effective concentrations of gentamicin against S. aureus were only achieved in 4 (19%) femoral and 6 (29%) tibial samples in TKA. Flucloxacillin and gentamicin was found to effectively penetrate bone during arthroplasty. Gentamicin was effective against S. epidermidis in both THA and TKA, while it was found to be less effective against S. aureus during TKA. Bone penetration of both antibiotics was less in TKA than THA


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 2 - 2
1 Mar 2014
Mihok P Hassaballa M Robinson J Porteous A Bowker K Lovering A Murray J
Full Access

It has been reported that some of the local anaesthetic agents possess antimicrobial activity against clinically-significant bacteria. Although bupivacaine exhibits a bacteriostatic effect at concentrations above 0.25% there are concerns that it might interact with some of the other antibiotics administered to patients. Whilst these interactions may be potentially benign, the risk is that they are antagonistic and that local bupivacaine might predispose the patient to a higher risk of infection. Bupivacaine is commonly administered as a local anaesthetic following knee arthroplasy; the purpose of this study was to assess its potential interactions with gentamicin eluting from the cement used to fix the device. A strain of Saphylococcus aureus (29213) with established susceptible Minimal Inhibition Concentration (MIC) and Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) for gentamicin was used. This organism was inoculated into four types of broth; Mueller-Hinton broth (MH), MH with different concentrations of gentamicin, MH with 0.25% and 0.125% bupivacaine and MH with various combinations of gentamicin and bupivacaine. The broths were incubated at 37C and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6 and 24 hours post inoculation the number of bacteria remaining were counted. From these data kill-curves were generated describing the absolute and individual rates of killing seen with bupivacaine and gentamicin alone and when in combination. Bupivacaine showed a bacteriostatic effect only at concentrations of 0.25% and higher. All concentrations of gentamicin above or equal to the expected MBC showed bactericidal effect. However, in combination with both strengths of Bupivacaine (0.25 and 0.125%) the bacteriocidal effect of gentamicin was seen at a lower concentration and the rate of killing of bacteria was enhanced. Bupivacaine has bacteriostatic effect at concentrations above 0.25% in line with published data. In these experiments we have shown that the use of bupivacaine together with gentamicin does not reduce the bactericidal property of the antibiotic and that the bactericidal effect of gentamicin appears to be enhanced by bupivacaine. This would suggest that the local use of bupivacaine is unlikely to increase the risk of infection in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty and may actually be beneficial


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 21 - 22
1 Jan 2011
Ng A Lee K To BS
Full Access

Gentamicin is one of the most widely used antibiotics in Orthopaedic practice. It is commonly used as prophylaxis either through intravenous route, incorporated into bone cement or topical intraoperative irrigation. The former two are well studied. However, there is limited study on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of topical Gentamicin irrigation. To assess the safety and infection rate of joint replacement surgery when topical gentamicin irrigation was used. This is a non-randomised, prospective study whereby patients undergoing joint replacement surgery were treated with gentamicin irrigation intra-operatively. A total of 138 patients were divided into two groups in this study. Group A (98 patients) were patients with Total Joint Replacement and group B (40 patients) were patients with hemi arthroplasty of the hips and shoulders. Patients with pre-existing renal impairment were excluded. Two ampoules of Gentamicin (160mg) were irrigated into the wound before implants insertion and wound closure respectively. Intravenous Cefuroxime was also given prophylactically to all patients but none of them had intravenous gentamicin. Plasma Gentamicin level was assayed 4 hours and 24 hours post-operatively. There were 16 patients in group A (16%; p< 0.001) and 12 patients in group B (30%; p< 0.001)) found to have plasma Gentamicin level > 2mcg/ml. All but 6 had plasma gentamicin level dropped to < 2mcg/ml at 24 hours. Although none of them developed systemic complications, the raise in plasma gentamicin was alarming. The incidence of infection was 6.1% (6 patients) in group A. These were superficial wound infection responded to antibiotics. No infection was reported in group B. This study did not show apparent reduction in infection rate as compared to the reported literatures. Nevertheless, there was significant systemic absorption of topical gentamicin irrigation. Therefore, monitoring of post-operative plasma gentamicin levels is mandatory to avoid unforseen toxicity


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 400 - 400
1 Jul 2010
Ng A Lee K Se To B
Full Access

Introduction: Gentamicin is one of the most commonly used antibiotics in orthopaedic practice. It is mostly used as prophylaxis either through intravenous route, incorporated into bone cement or as local irrigation intra-operatively. The former two have been well studied. However, the literature on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of gentamicin irrigation is sparse. The objective of this study is to assess the safety of gentamicin irrigation in joint replacement surgery and associated infection rate. Methods: This is a non-randomized, prospective study whereby patients undergoing joint replacement surgery were treated with gentamicin irrigation intra-operatively. Patients with pre-existing renal impairment were excluded. Two ampoules of Gentamicin (160mg) were irrigated into the wound before implants insertion and wound closure respectively. Cefuroxime was given pro-phylactically for all patients but none of them had intravenous gentamicin. Gentamicin level in the blood was assayed at 4 hours and 24 hours post-operation. Results: A total of 138 patients were divided into two groups in this study. Group A (98 patients) consisted of patients with Total Joint Replacement and group B (40 patients) consisted of patients with hemi- arthroplasty of the hips and shoulders. There were 16 patients in group A (16%) and 12 patients in group B (30%) found to have plasma gentamicin level above 2mcg/ml. All but 6 of them had their gentamicin level dropped to below 2mcg/ml after 24 hours. The incidence of superficial wound infection was 6.1% (6 patients) in group A. No infection was reported for group B. Discussion: Although none of them developed systemic complications, the plasma gentamicin level is high enough to raise an alarm. In this study, there was no apparent reduction in infection rate as compared to literatures reported. However, there was significant systemic blood gentamicin absorption


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 305 - 305
1 May 2009
Anagnostidis K Sarris I Giannakou A Pavlitou A Kirkos J Kapetanos G
Full Access

The use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement loaded with antibiotics has become increasingly common in orthopaedic surgery. However, bacterial resistance in antibiotics is an increasing and emerging problem. PMMA bone cements containing different antibiotics, such as gentamicin plus vancomycin may be effective in prevention and treatment of infections (particularly from MRSA and MRSE). The purpose of this study was to determine the in vitro elution characteristics of gentamicin and vancomycin when combined in acrylic cement. Three groups of ten cement disks were prepared. Group I (control group) contained 0.5g of gentamicin per 40-g packet of Palacos-R+G powder. Group II contained 0.5g of gentamicin and 1g of powdered vancomycin and group III contained 0.5g of gentamicin and aqueous solution of vancomycin. Each cement disc (25mm x 20mm) was immersed in a 50-mL bath of normal saline at 37oC. Samples were taken at specific sampling intervals (1, 3, 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 days). Antibiotic concentrations were measured using fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. With regards to gentamicin release, high but rapidly decreasing antibiotic levels were detected within the first week and low concentration after the first month. Samples from Group II eluted significantly more gentamicin (120%–20% during the first month). The influence on the gentamicin release was significant but minor when aqueous solution of vancomycin (Group III) was added. With regards to vancomycin release, high antibiotic levels were detected within the first 3 days and low concentrations after the first week. Cement samples from Group II eluted significantly more antibiotic in comparison with samples from Group III. Bone cements loaded with combinations of gentamicin and vancomycin are more effective in releasing gentamicin than bone cements with gentamicin as a single drug. Powdered vancomycin in cement samples has better elution characteristics in comparison with aqueous solution of vancomycin


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 156 - 156
1 Feb 2004
Varvarïussis A Zagoreos N Ligeros A Varvarïussis D Papadopoulis G Petratos D
Full Access

From 1970, when Buchholz started incorporating antibiotics in bone cements, until now, many studies have been published supporting the beneficial effects of Palacos R with gentamicin in prevention and therapy of infections in orthopaedic surgery. Despite the continuously increasing rates of genta-micin-resistant strains, the empirical use of gentamicin was reduced only as far as its systemic administration is concerned, while its local use in addition to bone cements has increased. The latter is justified by the gradual release of the antibiotic and its low toxicity. We studied during the period of August 2000 to August 2001, 668 operations which were performed with P-G in 6 orthopaedic clinics of KAT hospital (129 total hip arthroplasties, 258 total knee arthroplasties, 29 hip revisions, 11 knee revisions and 241 hip hemiarthroplasties) and 137 operations with simple cement, out of total 1346 operations. All the above surgeries were performed either in 5 classical operational fields or in 2 controlled ventilation ones. The rate of infection was 1,02% in total, and does not differ from the infection rate of the 3rd orthopaedic department of the same hospital that performs the same operations in the same operating rooms without the usage of P-G, with the exception of revisions that P-G was used. We believe that the high gentamicin-resistant rates of nosocomial microorganisms in combination with the non-complete inhibition of biofilm formation, the negative effect that gentamicin has on bone regeneration and the entailed risk of emergence of resistant organisms to gentamicin because of the continuous and long lasting release of the antibiotic in subtherapeutic concentrations, does not justify the use of Palacos R with gentamicin as prevention of infections. Perhaps the development of other bone-loaded antibiotics, that do not affect the strength of the cement, would be better accepted than gentamicin in the future