Aims. To describe the epidemiology of acetabular fractures including patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, fracture patterns, treatment, and mortality. Methods. We retrieved information from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) on all patients with acetabular fractures, of the native hip joint in the adult skeleton, sustained between 2014 and 2020. Study variables included patient age, sex, injury date, injury mechanism, fracture classification, treatment, and mortality. Results. In total, 2,132 patients with acetabular fractures from the SFR were included in the study. The majority of the patients were male (62%) and aged over 70 years old (62%). For patients aged > 70 years, the 30-day mortality was 8% and one-year mortality 24%. For patients aged ≤ 70 years, the 30-day mortality was 0.2% and one-year mortality 2%. Low-energy injuries (63%) and anterior wall fractures (20%) were most common. Treatment was most often non-surgical (75%). Conclusion. The majority of patients who sustain an acetabular fracture are elderly (> 70 years), of male sex, and the fracture most commonly occurs after a simple, low-energy fall. Non-surgical treatment is chosen in the majority of acetabular fracture patients. The one-year mortality for elderly patients with acetabular fracture is similar to the mortality after hip fracture, and a similar multidisciplinary approach to care for these patients should be considered. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):652–658

Background: Annually about 9,000 patients in Norway are operated because of hip fractures. From January 2005 all these fractures should be reported to The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, founded by the Norwegian Orthopaedic Association and operated by The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1. January 2005. Patients and methods: We have established contacts at every hospital in Norway that perform surgery for hip fractures. Immediately after the surgery the surgeon fills in a standardized form which is sent to the register once a month. On the form there are both patient- and procedure-related questions. Four and twelve months postoperatively we send a questionnaire to the patients, including the Norwegian translation of the EuroQol-5D. Patient information is linked to the Norwegian Death Register using the unique identification number assigned for each resident of Norway. We have so far included 5,668 primary hip fractures operations and 607 revision procedures including revisions to hemiprosthesis and total hip replacements (THR). Results: After 1 year of registration 100 % of the hospitals are reporting to the register. Approximately 50 % of the patients have answered the questionnaire. Of the primary operated patients the mean age was 80.5 years and 73 % were females. 59 % of the fractures were intracapsular femoral neck fractures and approximately 2/3 of those were dislocated. 35 % of the fractures were intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric. Intracapsular dislocated fractures: Screw fixation was used in 48 % of the hips while 46 % of the hips were operated with a hemiarthroplasty, and 4.1 % were operated with a THR. We could not find any difference in mortality between screw fixated patients and patients operated with a hemiarthroplasty. Intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric fractures: The hip compression screw osteosynthesis was used in 88 % of the patients, 6.3 % of these had a lateral support plate. An intramedullary nail was used in 8.9 % of the patients. Conclusion: After only one year, the reports from the surgeons were good. Taking the age and general status into consideration, also the response from the patients is satisfactory. With longer follow-up we will be able to give more information on the outcomes of hip fractures and of the different treatment. Updated analysis will be reported

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to compare surgical methods (sliding hip screw (SHS) vs intramedullary nailing (IMN)) for trochanteric hip fracture in relation to death within 120 days after surgery and return to independent living. The secondary aim was to assess whether the associations between surgical method and death or ability to return to independent living varied depending on fracture subtype or other patient characteristics. Methods. A total of 27,530 individuals from the Swedish Hip Fracture Register RIKSHÖFT (SHR) aged ≥ 70 years, admitted to hospital between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019 with trochanteric hip fracture, were included. Within this cohort, 12,041 individuals lived independently at baseline, had follow-up information in the SHR, and were thus investigated for return to independent living. Death within 120 days after surgery was analyzed using Cox regression with SHS as reference and adjusted for age and fracture type. Return to independent living was analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for age and fracture type. Analyses were repeated after stratification by fracture type, age, and sex. Results. Overall, 2,171 patients (18%) who were operated with SHS and 2,704 patients (18%) who were operated with IMN died within 120 days after surgery. Adjusted Cox regression revealed no difference in death within 120 days for the whole group (hazard ratio 0.97 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.03)), nor after stratification by fracture type. In total, 3,714 (66%) patients who were operated with SHS and 4,147 (64%) patients who were operated with IMN had returned to independent living at follow-up. There was no significant difference in return to independent living for the whole group (odds ratio 0.95 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.03)), nor after stratification by fracture type. Conclusion. No overall difference was observed in death within 120 days or return to independent living following surgery for trochanteric hip fracture, depending on surgical method (SHS vs IMN) in this recent Swedish cohort, but there was a suggested benefit for SHS in subgroups of patients. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(10):843–850

Introduction. Undisplaced femoral neck fractures have been given little attention in the literature. By using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, this study investigates risk for reoperation and the clinical results, including pain, patient satisfaction, and quality of life, after undisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Material and Methods. Data on 4,468 patients over 70 years of age with undisplaced femoral neck fractures operated with internal fixation (IF) were compared to 10,289 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with IF (n = 3,389) or bipolar hemiarthroplasty (n = 6,900). The evaluation was based on number of reported reoperations and patients' assessment (visual analogue scales concerning pain (0–100) and patient satisfaction (0–100), and quality of life (EQ-5D)) four and twelve months postoperatively. The patients were followed for 0–1 year. The Cox multiple regression model was used to construct adjusted survival curves. Subanalyses were performed on undisplaced femoral neck fractures to investigate different risk factors for reoperation. Results. The survival rate of implants after one year was 89% after screw fixation for undisplaced fractures, 79% after screw fixation for displaced fractures, and 97% after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures (Kaplan Meier). Adjusted for age, sex, ASA-classification, and cognitive function the displaced fractures operated with internal fixation had higher risk of reoperation compared to the undisplaced fractures operated with internal fixation (RR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.69–2.17; p<0.001). The displaced fractures operated with hemiarthroplasty had a lower risk of reoperation compared to the undisplaced fractures (RR 0.32, 95%CI: 0.27–0.38; p<0.001). Patients treated with IF for undisplaced fractures were more satisfied, had less pain, and higher quality of life compared to patients treated with IF after displaced fractures (p<0.05). The patients treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures had, however, the least pain, were most satisfied, and reported the highest quality of life. Discussion and Conclusion. The clinical outcome after undisplaced femoral neck fractures treated with screw fixation was better than the results of screw fixation for displaced fractures, but poorer than the clinical results for patients with displaced femoral neck fractures operated with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty. However, the differences in clinical outcome were smaller than what is considered to be of clinical importance. One year postoperatively screw osteosynthesis of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients still seems to be a good alternative

Background. A well conducted randomised study found similar functional results for patients with displaced femoral neck fracture comparing operation with a modern uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. The mortality associated with the two procedures has not been sufficiently investigated. Aim of study. To investigate the mortality and the risk factors for death among patients with displaced femoral neck fractures the first year after surgery, comparing operation with modern uncemented and cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA). Methods. 8,636 patients (65 years and older) with displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden 3 and 4) operated with a cemented (n = 6,907) or a uncemented bipolar HA (n = 1,729) were selected from the files of The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register 2005–2009. Mortality was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and risk factors of death were investigated using Cox-regression analysis. A power analysis showed the study sample to be sufficient to detect a difference in mortality of 3% at one year postoperatively. Results. Overall mortality one year postoperatively was 27%. We found no difference in the risk of death when comparing operation with cemented with uncemented bipolar HA one year (RR = 0.97, p = 0.51), 240 days (RR = 1.00, p = 0.95), 120 days (RR = 1.04, p = 0.57), and 30 days (RR = 1.12, p = 0.23) postoperatively. However, 10 days postoperatively there was an increased risk of death for patients operated with cemented HA compared to those operated with uncemented bipolar HA (RR = 1.34, p = 0.03). High age, male gender, cognitive impairment, increasing ASA score, and delay in surgery >48 hours after injury were all associated with an increased risk of death one year postoperatively. Interpretation. The early increased risk of death for patients operated with a cemented HA might be caused by the bone cement implantation syndrome. Our results further indicate that the difference in mortality one year postoperatively is likely to be less than 3%

Background. Systematic reviews disagree, but some recent studies have shown better function and less pain after operation with bipolar hemiarthroplasty compared to fixation by two screws in elderly patients operated for displaced femoral neck fractures. There is still uncertainty regarding the mortality associated with both procedures. Aim of the study. To investigate mortality and the risk factors for death among patients with displaced femoral neck fractures within the first three years after surgery, comparing operation with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) and internal fixation (IF) by two screws. Methods. 12,313 patients (65 years or older) with displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden 3 and 4) operated either with IF by two screws (n = 3,436) or a bipolar HA (n = 8,877) were selected from the files of The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register 2005–2009. Mortality was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and risk factors for death were studied using Cox-regression analysis. A power analysis showed the study sample to be sufficient to detect a difference in mortality of 3% at one and three years postoperatively. Results. The overall one-year mortality was 28% and three-year mortality was 50%. High age, male gender, cognitive impairment, increasing ASA score and delay in surgery >48 hours after injury were all associated with increased risk of death. For patients operated with a bipolar HA there was a statistically significant increased risk of death at day 30 (RR = 1.30, p<0.01), day 120 (RR = 1.15, p = 0.01), and day 240 (RR = 1.10, p<0.01) postoperatively compared to IF by two screws. At one year (RR = 1.04, p = 0.28) and three years (RR = 1.05, p = 0.16) postoperatively, we found no difference in the risk of death when comparing operation with bipolar HA to IF by two screws. Interpretation. The mortality for patients with displaced femoral neck fractures was considerable and dependent on age, gender, ASA score, cognitive status, and timing of surgery. Given the small magnitude of the difference in short-term mortality and no difference in one- and three-year mortality (or at least less than 3%) between the two treatment groups, we do not believe our findings should influence the choice of treatment method

Aims. The aims of this study were to assess quality of life after hip fractures, to characterize respondents to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to describe the recovery trajectory of hip fracture patients. Methods. Data on 35,206 hip fractures (2014 to 2018; 67.2% female) in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register were linked to data from the Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway. PROMs data were collected using the EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) scoring instrument and living patients were invited to respond at four, 12, and 36 months post fracture. Multiple imputation procedures were performed as a model to substitute missing PROM data. Differences in response rates between categories of covariates were analyzed using chi-squared test statistics. The association between patient and socioeconomic characteristics and the reported EQ-5D-3L scores was analyzed using linear regression. Results. The median age was 83 years (interquartile range 76 to 90), and 3,561 (10%) lived in a healthcare facility. Observed mean pre-fracture EQ-5D-3L index score was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.803 to 0.810), which decreased to 0.66 at four months, to 0.70 at 12 months, and to 0.73 at 36 months. In the imputed datasets, the reduction from pre-fracture was similar (0.15 points) but an improvement up to 36 months was modest (0.01 to 0.03 points). Patients with higher age, male sex, severe comorbidity, cognitive impairment, lower income, lower education, and those in residential care facilities had a lower proportion of respondents, and systematically reported a lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The response pattern of patients influenced scores significantly, and the highest scores are found in patients reporting scores at all observation times. Conclusion. Hip fracture leads to a persistent reduction in measured HRQoL, up to 36 months. The patients’ health and socioeconomic status were associated with the proportion of patients returning PROM data for analysis, and affected the results reported. Observed EQ-5D-3L scores are affected by attrition and selection bias mechanisms and motivate the use of statistical modelling for adjustment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(4):394–400

Aims. Our primary aim was to assess reoperation-free survival at one year after the index injury in patients aged ≥ 75 years treated with internal fixation (IF) or arthroplasty for undisplaced femoral neck fractures (uFNFs). Secondary outcomes were reoperations and mortality analyzed separately. Methods. We retrieved data on all patients aged ≥ 75 years with an uFNF registered in the Swedish Fracture Register from 2011 to 2018. The database was linked to the Swedish Arthroplasty Register and the National Patient Register to obtain information on comorbidity, mortality, and reoperations. Our primary outcome, reoperation, or death at one year was analyzed using restricted mean survival time, which gives the mean time to either event for each group separately. Results. Overall, 3,909 patients presenting with uFNFs were included. Of these patients, 3,604 were treated with IF and 305 with primary arthroplasty. There were no relevant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between groups. In the IF group 58% received cannulated screws and 39% hook pins. In the arthroplasty group 81% were treated with hemiarthroplasty and 19% with total hip arthroplasty. At one year, 32% were dead or had been reoperated in both groups. The reoperation-free survival time over one year of follow-up was 288 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 284 to 292) in the IF group and 279 days (95% CI 264 to 295) in the arthroplasty group, with p = 0.305 for the difference. Mortality was 26% in the IF group and 31% in the arthroplasty group at one year. Reoperation rates were 7.1% in the IF group and 2.3% in the arthroplasty group. Conclusion. In older patients with a uFNF, reoperation-free survival at one year seems similar, regardless of whether IF or arthroplasty is the primary surgery. However, this comparison depends on the choice of follow-up time in that reoperations were more common after IF. In contrast, we found more early deaths after arthroplasty. Our study calls for a randomized trial comparing these two methods. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(2):86–92

Aims. This study aimed to identify risk factors (patient, healthcare system, and socioeconomic) for mortality after hip fractures and estimate their relative importance. Further, we aimed to elucidate mortality and survival patterns following fractures and the duration of excess mortality. Methods. Data on 37,394 hip fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from January 2014 to December 2018 were linked to data from the Norwegian Patient Registry, Statistics Norway, and characteristics of acute care hospitals. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate risk factors associated with mortality. The Wald statistic was used to estimate and illustrate relative importance of risk factors, which were categorized in modifiable (healthcare-related) and non-modifiable (patient-related and socioeconomic). We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) comparing deaths among hip fracture patients to expected deaths in a standardized reference population. Results. Mean age was 80.2 years (SD 11.4) and 67.5% (n = 25,251) were female. Patient factors (male sex, increasing comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and Charlson Comorbidity Index)), socioeconomic factors (low income, low education level, living in a healthcare facility), and healthcare factors (hip fracture volume, availability of orthogeriatric services) were associated with increased mortality. Non-modifiable risk factors were more strongly associated with mortality than modifiable risk factors. The SMR analysis suggested that cumulative excess mortality among hip fracture patients was 16% in the first year and 41% at six years. SMR was 2.48 for the six-year observation period, most pronounced in the first year, and fell from 10.92 in the first month to 3.53 after 12 months and 2.48 after six years. Substantial differences in median survival time were found, particularly for patient-related factors. Conclusion. Socioeconomic, patient-, and healthcare-related factors all contributed to excess mortality, and non-modifiable factors had stronger association than modifiable ones. Hip fractures contributed to substantial excess mortality. Apparently small survival differences translate into substantial disparity in median survival time in this elderly population. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):884–893

Aims. This study aimed to describe preoperative waiting times for surgery in hip fracture patients in Norway, and analyze factors affecting waiting time and potential negative consequences of prolonged waiting time. Methods. Overall, 37,708 hip fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from January 2014 to December 2018 were linked with data in the Norwegian Patient Registry. Hospitals treating hip fractures were characterized according to their hip fracture care. Waiting time (hours from admission to start of surgery), surgery within regular working hours, and surgery on the day of or on the day after admission, i.e. ‘expedited surgery’ were estimated. Results. Mean waiting time was 22.6 hours (SD 20.7); 36,652 patients (97.2%) waited less than three days (< 72 hours), and 27,527 of the patients (73%) were operated within regular working hours (08:00 to 16:00). Expedited surgery was given to 31,675 of patients (84%), and of these, 19,985 (53%) were treated during regular working hours. Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes 4 and 5 were more likely to have surgery within regular working hours (odds ratio (OR) 1.59; p < 0.001), and less likely to receive expedited surgery than ASA 1 patients (OR 0.29; p < 0.001). Low-volume hospitals treated a larger proportion of patients during regular working hours than high volume hospitals (OR 1.26; p < 0.001). High-volume hospitals had less expedited surgery and significantly longer waiting times than low and intermediate-low volume hospitals. Higher ASA classes and Charlson Comorbidity Index increased waiting time. Patients not receiving expedited surgery had higher 30-day and one-year mortality rates (OR 1.19; p < 0.001) and OR 1.13; p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion. There is inequality in waiting time for hip fracture treatment in Norway. Variations in waiting time from admission to hip fracture surgery depended on both patient and hospital factors. Not receiving expedited surgery was associated with increased 30-day and one-year mortality rates. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):710–720

Aims. Hip fracture patients have high morbidity and mortality. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assess the quality of care of patients with hip fracture, including those with chronic cognitive impairment (CCI). Our aim was to compare PROMs from hip fracture patients with and without CCI, using the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR). Methods. PROM questionnaires at four months (n = 34,675) and 12 months (n = 24,510) after a hip fracture reported from 2005 to 2018 were analyzed. Pre-injury score was reported in the four-month questionnaire. The questionnaires included the EuroQol five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire, and information about who completed the questionnaire. Results. Of the 34,675 included patients, 5,643 (16%) had CCI. Patients with CCI were older (85 years vs 81 years) (p < 0.001), and had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification compared to patients without CCI. CCI was unrelated to fracture type and treatment method. EQ-5D index scores were lower in patients with CCI after four months (0.37 vs 0.60; p < 0.001) and 12 months (0.39 vs 0.64; p < 0.001). Patients with CCI had lower scores for all dimensions of the EQ-5D-3L pre-fracture and at four and 12 months. Conclusion. Patients with CCI reported lower health-related quality of life pre-fracture, at four and 12 months after the hip fracture. PROM data from hip fracture patients with CCI are valuable in the assessment of treatment. Patients with CCI should be included in future studies. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):454–465

Aims. The aim of this study was to describe variation in hip fracture treatment in Norway expressed as adherence to international and national evidence-based treatment guidelines, to study factors influencing deviation from guidelines, and to analyze consequences of non-adherence. Methods. International and national guidelines were identified and treatment recommendations extracted. All 43 hospitals routinely treating hip fractures in Norway were characterized. From the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR), hip fracture patients aged > 65 years and operated in the period January 2014 to December 2018 for fractures with conclusive treatment guidelines were included (n = 29,613: femoral neck fractures (n = 21,325), stable trochanteric fractures (n = 5,546), inter- and subtrochanteric fractures (n = 2,742)). Adherence to treatment recommendations and a composite indicator of best practice were analyzed. Patient survival and reoperations were evaluated for each recommendation. Results. Median age of the patients was 84 (IQR 77 to 89) years and 69% (20,427/29,613) were women. Overall, 79% (23,390/29,613) were treated within 48 hours, and 80% (23,635/29,613) by a surgeon with more than three years’ experience. Adherence to guidelines varied substantially but was markedly better in 2018 than in 2014. Having a dedicated hip fracture unit (OR 1.06, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.11) and a hospital hip fracture programme (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27) increased the probability of treatment according to best practice. Surgery after 48 hours increased one-year mortality significantly (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.22; p = 0.001). Alternative treatment to arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) increased mortality after 30 days (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.62)) and one year (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.72), and also increased the number of reoperations (OR 4.61, 95% CI 3.73 to 5.71). An uncemented stem increased the risk of reoperation significantly (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48; p = 0.030). Conclusion. Our study demonstrates a substantial variation between hospitals in adherence to evidence-based guidelines for treatment of hip fractures in Norway. Non-adherence can be ascribed to in-hospital factors. Poor adherence has significant negative consequences for patients in the form of increased mortality rates at 30 and 365 days post-treatment and in reoperation rates. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-10:644–653

Introduction: Among numerous international studies on hip fractures only few were dealing with the occurrence and risk of a subsequent hip fracture. Some studies contain information identifying patients at risk of subsequent hip fractures as well as the risk of a hip fracture following another osteoporotic fracture, others on outcome following the subsequent fracture. Material and methods: The Funen County Hip Fracture Register contains information on every consecutive hip fracture in the county of Funen since January 1st 996. The register contains general information about the patient i.e.: type of fracture, operative treatment, complications, living conditions, ADL, as well as information from 4 and 12 month out-patient visit and if necessary re-surgery. A maximum of 155 variables can be recorded about every patient. The register has been subjected to a complete revision and validation (4.660 patient files was checked) and contained a total number of 7.457 hip fractures from January 1st 1996 to December 31st 2003. Incidence numbers were calculated based on risk of fracture from the first fracture since January 1st 1996 to death or December 31st 2003. Results: In the period January 1st 1996 to December 31st 2003, 7,457 fractures were registered. Of these, 261 patients were registered with a second fracture, the primary fracture occurring before the period and thus excluded. Within the period 6,676 primary fractures were registered, and of these 520 patients (7.5 %) experienced a subsequent fracture. The median time from primary to subsequent fracture was 8 months (range 0–75 months) in males and 14 months (range 0–82 months) in females, the overall median was 13.5 months (range 0–82 months). In males the risk of dying after the primary hip fracture was 10 times higher than the risk of sustaining a subsequent hip fracture, in females it was five times higher. Conclusion: Only few patients with a hip fracture will experience a subsequent hip fracture and with the short time frame presented, any intervention should have immediate impact

Aims

The aim of this investigation was to compare risk of infection in both cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) as well as in total hip arthroplasty (THA) following femoral neck fracture.

Aims

Hip fractures are some of the most common fractures encountered in orthopaedic practice. We aimed to identify whether perioperative hypotension is a predictor of 30-day mortality, and to stratify patient groups that would benefit from closer monitoring and early intervention. While there is literature on intraoperative blood pressure, there are limited studies examining pre- and postoperative blood pressure.

Aims

To investigate if preoperative CT improves detection of unstable trochanteric hip fractures.

The Scottish Hip Fracture Audit (. 1. ) was founded on Rikshoft, the Swedish hip fracture register (. 2. ), and since 1993 has documented case-mix, process and outcomes of hip fracture care in Scotland. Evidence-based national guidelines on hip fracture care were updated by a multidisciplinary group in 2002(. 3. ). And hip fracture serves as a tracer condition by the health quality assurance authority for its work on older people, which reported in 2004 (. 4. ). Audit data are used locally to document care and support and monitor service developments. Synergy between the guidelines and the audit provides a means of improving care locally and monitoring care nationally. External review by the quality assurance body shows to what extent guideline-based standards relating to A& E care, pre-operative delay, multidisciplinary care and audit participation are met. Three national-level initiatives on hip fracture care have delivered: reliable and largescale comparative information on case-mix, care and outcomes; evidence-based recommendations on care; and nationally accountable standards inspected and reported by the national health quality assurance authority. These developments are linked and synergistic, and enjoy both clinical and managerial support. They provide an evolving framework for clinical governance and quality assurance, with methods for casemix-adjusted outcome assessment for hip fracture care also now developed

Introduction. Displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly are normally treated with 2 screws/pins (IF) or bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA). The aim of this study was to compare IF and HA as treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures using reoperations and functional result (patient satisfaction, pain, and quality of life) as outcome. Material and Methods. From January 2005 all hip fractures in Norway are reported to the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register. At 4, 12, and 36 months postoperatively a questionnaire assessing satisfaction (VAS 0-100), pain (VAS 0-100), and quality of life (EQ-5D) is sent to the patients. To ensure more than 3 years follow-up, only patients operated in 2005 were included in the present study. Consequently 1,968 patients over 70 years of age operated with IF (n = 958) or HA (n = 1,010) due to displaced femoral neck fractures were included in the analyses on reoperations. Of these, 280 patients responded to all questionnaires and were included in the analyses on functional results (IF: n = 135, HA: n = 145). The patients remained in the same treatment group according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results. Through December 2008 496 (51.8%) patients had died in the IF group and 519 patients (51.4%) in the HA group. There were 238 (24.8%) reoperations performed in the IF group and 26 (2.6%) in the HA group. For the 280 patients included in the analyses on functional results, no preoperative differences were found between the two treatment groups concerning sex, comorbidity (ASA-class), cognitive dysfunction, and EQ-5Dindexscore. However, the patients in the HA group were older than the patients in the IF group (79.7 vs 77.7 years, p = 0.002). At all follow-ups, the HA-group were significant more satisfied with the result of the operation compared to the IF-group. The HA group reported less pain compared to the IF group after four months (18 vs 35, p<0.001) and after twelve months (16 vs 29, p<0.001). After 3 years no difference in pain between the two groups could be found. After four months the EQ 5Dindexscore was 0.69 in the HA-group and 0.58 in the IF-group (p<0.001), after twelve months 0.75 in the HA-group and 0.67 in the IF-group (p = 0.001), and after 3 years follow-up 0.74 in the HA-group and 0.71 in the IF-group (p<0.089). Discussion and Conclusion. There were more reoperations in the IF group than in the HA group. The superior functional results found in the HA group after 4 and 12 months were less evident after 3 years. For this frail patient group, a short rehabilitation period with minimized need for reoperations is important, and consequently, a hemiarthroplasty should be recommended as treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures

Background: Implant fractures are complications that have a great impact on the patient’s quality of life after total hip arthroplasty. Nevertheless their occurrence is often considered as rare in clinical practice. We compared incidences of implant fractures in various datasets in order to calculate the risk of a fracture and assess the quality of these datasets for such evaluations. Methods: In a structured literature analysis based on a standardised methodology the incidence of reoperations was evaluated comparing clinical studies published in Medline-listed journals and annual reports of National Arthroplasty Registers worldwide. Case reports and experimental studies were not considered. Results: The majority of clinical studies are monocentre trials. The publications comprise a cumulative number of 72,571 stems with 234 stem fractures, 73,743 cups with 191 component fractures, and 16,381 ceramic heads with 44 fractures. A survey among the members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons covered 64,483 primary operations, hence including a similar number of primary cases as all monocentre studies together. This dataset involves 355 implant fractures. By contrast, worldwide Register data refer to 733,000 primary operations, i.e. approximately 10 times as many as sample-based datasets. In general, sample-based datasets present higher revision rates than register data. The deviations are high, with a maximum factor of 64 for hip stems. Whereas the AAHKS survey exhibits lower deviations than the monocentre trials, they are still too high for this data collection tool being considered as reliable and safe to provide valid data for general conclusions. The incidence of implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty in pooled worldwide arthroplasty register datasets is 304 fractures per 100.000 implants. In other words, one out of 323 patients has to undergo revision surgery due to an implant fracture after THA in their lifetime. Conclusion: For general assessments in the context of implant fractures, register data have the highest value. Clinical studies, which often focus on a particular implant, are of very limited value for global conclusions. Structured surveys produce more reliable data than clinical studies and are superior to monocentre trials. However, the AAHKS survey presents data that also show considerable differences to data from registers. For the detection of rare, but severe complications like implant fractures sample-based studies achieve the goal of providing accurate figures only to a very limited extent, even if the samples are large. Here, too, comprehensive national arthroplasty registers are the most suitable tool to identify such incidents and calculate reliable figures. Contrary to the prevalent opinion, implant fractures still are a relevant problem in arthroplasty

In Scandinavia registers of locomotor system disease and trauma were developed in the mid 1970’s. In Sweden since then there exists registers of hip and knee arthroplasties and some years later similar registers were developed in Norway, Finland and Denmark. In 1988 a register on the treatment and rehabilitation of hip fractures started in Sweden and also since 1993 a spine register has been in use. The arthroplasty registers contain parameters concerning age, sex, diagnosis and technical factors for the operation. The outcome parameter is survival of the prosthesis e.g. if it has been revised or not. The real need to perform a revision arthroplasty has been considered a sufficiently well defined parameter to register. The hip fracture registration contains also background parameters as well as rehabilitation outcome including functional outcome parameters above all walking capacity and place of living. Functional outcome and patient rated quality of life are also included in the spine register. The arthroplasty registers have been very useful to separate better from not so well performing models as well as showing the importance of good cementing technique, type of cement as well as the influence of age, sex and diagnosis in a more rapid and reliable way because of the large-scale magnitude of the study. The hip fracture register has shown the importance of optimised operation and rehabilitation, which saves considerable resources in this increasing group of elderly patients. The symposium will exemplify performance, spread and results of orthopedic registers, which is an efficient way to evaluate on a large-scale everyday orthopedic practise. This way of registration has attracted great interest and is now spreading internationally. For hip fractures a European project has started called SAHFE (Standardised Audit of Hip Fractures in Europe)