Aims. The aim of this study was to report a complete overview of both incidence, fracture distribution, mode of injury, and patient baseline demographics of paediatric distal forearm fractures to identify age of risk and types of activities leading to injury. Methods. Population-based cohort study with manual review of radiographs and charts. The primary outcome measure was incidence of paediatric distal forearm fractures. The study was based on an average at-risk population of 116,950. A total number of 4,316 patients sustained a distal forearm fracture in the study period. Females accounted for 1,910 of the fractures (44%) and males accounted for 2,406 (56%). Results. The overall incidence of paediatric distal forearm fractures was 738.1/100,000 persons/year (95% confidence interval (CI) 706/100,000 to 770/100,000). Female incidences peaked with an incidence of 1,578.3/100,000 persons/year at age ten years. Male incidence peaked at age 13 years, with an incidence of 1,704.3/100,000 persons/year. The most common fracture type was a greenstick fracture to the radius (48%), and the most common modes of injury were sports and falls from ≤ 1 m. A small year-to-year variation was reported during the five-year study period, but without any trends. Conclusion. Results show that paediatric distal forearm fractures are very common throughout childhood in both sexes, with almost 2% of males aged 13 years sustaining a forearm fracture each year. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(6):448–454

Our study seeks to determine whether characteristics of radiographs taken post-reduction of a forearm fracture can indicate future risk of refracture or loss of reduction. We hypothesize that reducing forearm fractures too precisely may be counterproductive and provide less benefit than reductions left slightly offset prior to cast immobilization. We conducted a retrospective review of 1079 pediatric patients treated for forearm fractures between January 2014 and September 2021 in a 327 bed regional medical center. Percent fracture displacement, location, orientation, comminution, fracture line visibility and angle of angulation were determined by AP and lateral radiographs. Percent fracture displacement was derived by: (Displacement of Bone Shafts / Diameter) x 100% = %Fracture Displacement. Patients treated with closed reduction were reduced from a mean displacement of 29.26±36.18% at an angulation of 22.67±16.57 degrees to 7.88±9.07% displacement and 3.89±6.68 degrees angulation post-reduction. Patients developing complications including a loss of reduction or refracture were found to have post-operative radiographs with a lower percent displacement (0.50±1.12) than those not developing complications (8.65±9.21)(p=0.0580). Post-reduction angulation (p=1.000), average reduction in angulation (p=1.000) and average reduction in displacement percent(p=0.2102) were not significantly associated with development of complications. Percent displacement of radial shafts was seen to be the most important metric to monitor in post-operative radiographs for patients undergoing closed reduction of a forearm fracture. We theorize a slight displacement provides greater surface area for osteoblastic expansion and callus formation leading to a decreased risk of refracture or loss of reduction. While our sample size precludes our ability to measure the ideal amount of post-reduction displacement for optimal healing, our results demonstrate that some degree of shaft displacement is required for optimal healing conditions

Background. Both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures constitute up to 5.4% of all fractures in children under 16 years of age in the United Kingdom. Most can be managed with closed reduction and cast immobilisation. Surgical fixation options include flexible intramedullary nailing and plating. However, the optimal method is controversial. Objectives. The main purpose of this study was to systematically search for and critically appraise articles comparing functional outcomes, radiographic outcomes and complications of nailing and plating for both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. Methods. A literature search of MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane library databases using specific search terms and limits was undertaken. The critical appraisal checklist (adapted from Critical Appraisal Skills Programme-CASP, Oxford; Guyatt et al) for an article on treatment was used to aid assessment. Results. All 7 studies identified were retrospective, comparative and non-randomized. They all included patients with similar baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences in group outcomes for range of forearm movement, time to fracture union and complication rates. Less operative time and better cosmesis was noted in the IM nailing groups. Some studies showed post-operative radial bow was significantly abnormal in the IM nailing groups, but did not affect forearm movement. Conclusion. Based on similar functional and radiographic outcomes, nailing seems to be a safe and effective option when compared to plating for forearm fractures in children. However, critical appraisal of the studies in this review identified some methodological deficiencies and further prospective, randomized trials are recommended

PURPOSE: Patients who sustain fall-related distal forearm fractures are at risk to sustain new fractures later in life. Risk factors for falls such as low physical activity, impaired gait and neuromuscular function, and comorbidity are well known, as well as risk factors for fractures such as female gender, old age, low body mass index (BMI) and low mobility. Fracture prevention is often directed toward bone mass density treatment, but there is evidence that high level of physical activity reduces falls and therefore also reduces fractures. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an important additional measure. The aims of this study were to evaluate the HRQoL, reported with EQ-5D and SF-12, in women who had sustained fall-related distal forearm fracture one year earlier and compare with Swedish normative data, and to physical performance and self-reported comorbidity. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty women with a fall-related distal forearm fracture were invited to examine health-related quality of life and physical performance at a mean time of 13 months after they had sustained their fracture (S.D. 1.6, range 10–17). The inclusion criteria were that they should be able to perform the physical tests and to understand verbal and written Swedish. Forty three women (72%), mean age 68 (SD 8.4, range 50–84), agreed to participate. METHODS: The women filled in two generic HRQoL-questionnaires; EQ-5D and SF-12. They self-rated their physical activity and reported ailments, which were regularly examined by a doctor, and intake of prescribed medication. They reported problems or difficulties from the locomotor system and depressive symptoms during the three last months. All women underwent physical performance tests; handgrip strength, one leg standing (OLS) and walking speed. Fisher’s exact test, Mann Whitney U test and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient were used in the statistical analyses. RESULTS: In the younger women (age 50–59) the HRQoL was lower compared to Swedish normative data. The EQ-5D index and VAS scores correlated moderately to the physical component summary (PCS-12) of the SF-12 (rs=0.73 and rs=0.69, respectively). The correlation to the mental component summary (MCS-12) of the SF-12 was lower (rs=0.32 and rs=0.22, respectively). Women who reported comorbidity and low physical activity scored lower in the corresponding items of health in both questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Low results in HRQoL questionnaires in apparently healthy older women with fall-related distal forearm fracture may indicate underlying comorbidity, not captured by physical performance tests. We suggest that HRQoL questionnaires should be used in additional to physical outcome measures for this patient group. The use of HRQoL questionnaires to find patients for preventive measures of falls and fractures should be further explored

The results of three years of treatment of children’s forearm fractures with flexible titanium nails was compared with the results from three original papers (Lascombes 1998, Richter 1998, Cullen 1998). 37 cases were identified using our trauma database and the main theatre database. 25 sets of case notes and x-rays were reviewed (age 4-16). The indication for fixation was fracture instability, either primarily or after initial conservative management. 6 cases were compound fractures. The fractures were reduced under general anaesthetic and then fixed using the ‘AO titanium elastic nail instrument and implant set’ (Synthes). 9 out of the 19 closed fractures needed to be opened for satisfactory reduction. Average theatre time was 104 minutes (25–165). Average hospital stay was two days (1–4). 22 of the patients were immobilised in plaster of Paris for an average of 5 weeks. Nails were removed on average 4 months after insertion (1–10 months). 16% had minor complications which included transient nerve impairment, superficial infection and refracture. All patients were considered to be fully recovered when discharged. Use of flexible nails in our district general hospital is comparable to previously published series in terms of case mix and complication rates

Aims. Torus fractures of the distal radius are the most common fractures in children. The NICE non-complex fracture guidelines recently concluded that bandaging was probably the optimal treatment for these injuries. However, across the UK current treatment varies widely due to a lack of evidence underpinning the guidelines. The Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial evaluates the effect of a soft bandage and immediate discharge compared with rigid immobilization. Methods. FORCE is a multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled equivalence trial. The primary outcome is the Wong-Baker FACES pain score at three days after randomization and the primary analysis of this outcome will use a multivariate linear regression model to compare the two groups. Secondary outcomes are measured at one and seven days, and three and six-weeks post-randomization and include the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity limb score, EuroQoL EQ-5D-Y, analgesia use, school absence, complications, and healthcare resource use. The planned statistical and health economic analyses for this trial are described here. The FORCE trial protocol has been published separately. Conclusion. This paper provides details of the planned analyses for this trial, and will reduce the risks of outcome reporting bias and data driven results. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:205–213

This study was conducted to investigate the characteristics, complications, radiologic features and clinical course of patients undergoing reduction of forearm fractures in order to better inform patient prognosis and postoperative management. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1079 pediatric patients treated for forearm fractures between January 2014 and September 2021 in a 327 bed regional medical center. A preoperative radiological assessment and chart review was performed. Percent fracture displacement, location, orientation, comonution, fracture line visibility and angle of angulation were determined by AP and lateral radiographs. Percent fracture displacement was derived by: (Displacement of Bone Shafts / Diameter) x 100% = %Fracture Displacement. Angle of angulation and percent fracture displacement were calculated by averaging AP and lateral radiograph measurements. 80 cases, averaging 13.5±8.3 years, were identified as having a complete fracture of the radius and/or ulna with 69 receiving closed reduction and 11 receiving fixation via an intramedullary device or percutaneous pinning. Eight patients (10%) experienced complications with four resulting in a refracture and four resulting in significant loss of reduction (LOR) without refracture. Fractures in the proximal ⅔s of the radius were associated with a significant increase in complications compared to fractures in the distal ⅓ of the radius (31.6% vs 3.4%) (P=.000428). Likewise, a higher percent fracture displacement was associated with a decreased risk of complications (28.7% vs 5.9% displacement)(P=0.0403). No elevated risk of complications was found based on fracture orientation, angulation, fracture line visibility, forearm bone(s) fractured, sex, age or arm affected. Our result highlights radius fracture location and percent fracture displacement as markers with prognostic value following forearm fracture. These measurements are simply calculated via pre-reduction radiographs, providing an efficient method of informing risk of complications following forearm fracture

Titanium Elastic Nails have been around for the last 40 years, but it has never been introduced properly in the Pacific especially in Samoa in the management of femoral & in severely displaced forearm fractures in the paediatric age group & also Adult upper limb Trauma. This paper looks at the cases treated in TTM Hospital (Apia, Samoa) from June 2019- June 2023, looking at common injury patterns, indications for fixation and the cost benefit to the family and hospital, in terms of early rehabilitation and improving the length of stay in hospital pre-Tens nail era from 6–8 weeks to 1–2 weeks in hospital. 29 cases were treated with TENs concept during this period, 17 femoral fractures, 10 forearm fractures & 1 humerus fracture. Lastly this is very useful skill and tool to have in every hospital in the Pacific Islands, through proper training to prevent long term complications

The widely used Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) estimates a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) using age, sex, body mass index, and seven clinical risk factors, including prior history of fracture. Prior fracture is a binary variable in FRAX, although it is now clear that prior fractures affect future MOF risk differently depending on their recency and site. Risk of MOF is highest in the first two years following a fracture and then progressively decreases with time – this is defined as imminent risk. Therefore, the FRAX tool may underestimate true fracture risk and result in missed opportunities for earlier osteoporosis management in individuals with recent MOF. To address this, multipliers based on age, sex, and fracture type may be applied to baseline FRAX scores for patients with recent fractures, producing a more accurate prediction of both short- and long-term fracture risk. Adjusted FRAX estimates may enable earlier pharmacologic treatment and other risk reduction strategies. This study aimed to report the effect of multipliers on conventional FRAX scores in a clinical cohort of patients with recent non-hip fragility fractures. After obtaining Research Ethics Board approval, FRAX scores were calculated both before and after multiplier adjustment, for patients included in our outpatient Fracture Liaison Service who had experienced a non-hip fragility fracture between June 2020 and November 2021. Patients age 50 years or older, with recent (within 3 months) forearm (radius and/or ulna) or humerus fractures were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients under the age of 50 years or those with a hip fracture. Age- and sex-based FRAX multipliers for recent forearm and humerus fractures described by McCloskey et al. (2021) were used to adjust the conventional FRAX score. Low, intermediate and high-risk of MOF was defined as less than 10%, 10-20%, and greater than 20%, respectively. Data are reported as mean and standard deviation of the mean for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. A total of 91 patients with an average age of 64 years (range = 50-97) were included. The majority of patients were female (91.0%), with 73.6% sustaining forearm fractures and 26.4% sustaining humerus fractures. In the forearm group, the average MOF risk pre- and post-multiplier was 16.0 and 18.8, respectively. Sixteen percent of patients (n = 11) in the forearm group moved from intermediate to high 10-year fracture risk after multiplier adjustment. Average FRAX scores before and after adjustment in the humerus group were 15.7 and 22.7, respectively, with 25% (n = 6) of patients moving from an intermediate risk to a high-risk score. This study demonstrates the clinically significant impact of multipliers on conventional FRAX scores in patients with recent non-hip fractures. Twenty-five percent of patients with humerus fractures and 16% of patients with forearm fractures moved from intermediate to high-risk of MOF after application of the multiplier. Consequently, patients who were previously ineligible for pharmacologic management, now met criteria. Multiplier-adjusted FRAX scores after a recent fracture may more accurately identify patients with imminent fracture risk, facilitating earlier risk reduction interventions

At-home softcast removal with no routine clinical follow-up has shown to be safe and effective following paediatric orthopaedic trauma. It minimises clinician contact time and reduces cost. However, there is limited data on the caregiver experience. Retrospective analysis of paediatric fractures requiring application of circumferential softcast that was later removed at home. Two time points were included: (1)July–September 2022, (2)February–April 2023. Demographics data included age, fracture classification, angulation, manipulation requirement, complications or unplanned re-attendance. Caregivers were given an information leaflet on cast removal. Caregivers completed a telephone Likert questionnaire reviewing time taken to remove cast, qualitative descriptors of cast removal and overall satisfaction. 77 families were contacted at mean 93 days post injury. Mean age was 7.5 years. 41(53%) were distal radius and 20(26%) both-bone forearm fractures. The remaining were hand, elbow or tibia injuries. 40(52%) injuries required manipulation under procedural sedation with mean sagittal angulation 24 degrees. 13(17%) patients re-attended with cast problems. Caregivers estimated a mean 13 minutes to remove cast. 83% found it ‘extremely’ or ‘somewhat’ easy. 75% were ‘extremely’ or ‘somewhat’ satisfied. 71% were ‘extremely’ or ‘somewhat’ likely to recommend at-home cast removal. Qualitative descriptors ranged from from ‘traumatising’ to ‘fun’ and ‘straightforward’. The experience at our tertiary centre confirms at-home softcast removal with no further orthopaedic follow-up is safe and feasible, even in those requiring manipulation under sedation. The majority of families reported a positive experience; this however is not universal. Adequate patient information resources are integral to a positive caregiver's experiences

Infection and re-fracture are well-described complications following open paediatric forearm fractures. The purpose of this paper is to determine if patient, injury, and treatment characteristics can be used to predict the occurrence of these complications following the surgical management of paediatric open forearm fractures. This is an IRB-approved retrospective review at a single-institution paediatric level 1 trauma centrefrom 2007–2013 of all open forearm fractures. Medical records were reviewed to determine the type of open fracture, time to administration of initial antibiotics, time from injury to surgery, type of fixation, length of immobilisation, and complications. Radiographs were studied to document fracture characteristics. 262 patients with an average age of 9.7 years were reviewed. There were 219 Gustillo-Anderson Type 1 open fractures, 39 Type 2 fractures, and 4 Type 3 fractures. There were 9 infections (3.4%) and 6 re-fractures (2.3%). Twenty-eight (10.7%) patients returned to the operating room for additional treatment; 21 of which were for removal of implants. Contaminated wounds, as documented within the medical record, had a greater chance of infection (21% vs 2.2%, p=0.002). No difference in infection rate was seen with regard to timing of antibiotics (p=0.87), timing to formal debridement (p=0.20), Type 1 versus Type 2 or 3 open fractures (3.4% vs 5.0%, p=0.64), 24 hours vs. 48 hours of post-operative IV antibiotics (5.2% vs 3.5%, p=0.53), or when comparing diaphyseal, distal, and Monteggia fracture patterns (3.6 vs 2.9% vs 5.9%, p=0.81). There was no difference in infection rate when comparing buried or exposed intramedullary implants (3.5% vs 4.2%, p>0.99). Rate of re-fracture was not increased based on type of open wound (p>0.99) or fracture type (0.4973), although 5 of the 6 re-fractures were in diaphyseal injuries. In this series of open paediatric both bone forearm fractures, initial wound contamination was a significant risk factor for subsequent infection. The rate of infection did not vary with timing of antibiotics or surgery, type of open fracture, or length of post-operative antibiotics. A trend to higher re-fracture rates in diaphyseal injuries was noted. Surgeons should consider planned repeat irrigation and debridement for open forearm fractures with obviously contaminated wounds to reduce the subsequent infection risk

The August 2012 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360. looks at: whether 3D-CT gives a better idea of coverage than plain radiographs; forearm fractures after trampolining accidents; forearm fractures and the Rush pin; the fractured distal radius; elastic stable intramedullary nailing for long-bone fractures; aponeurotic recession for the equinus foot; the torn medial patellofemoral ligament and the adductor tubercle; slipped capital femoral epiphysis; paediatric wrist arthroscopy; and Pirani scores and clubfoot

Forearm fractures are a common paediatric injury. This study was aimed to describe the epidemiological of paediatric forearm fractures in the urban population of Glasgow. We reviewed of all the forearm fracture treated by the orthopaedic service in Yorkhill Children's Hospital in 2008. Datum gathered from case notes and radiographs using the prospective orthopaedic database to identify patients with forearm fractures. The age, sex, side and type of fracture, the timing and mechanism of the injury and treatment were documented for the 436 fractures. Census data were used to derive absolute age-specific incidences. Distinction was made between torus and other types of fractures. Torus fractures require no specific orthopaedic treatment and were segregated out. For the remaining 314 fractures, the age and sex distribution, seasonal variation of fractures and treatments for each type of fracture were examined. The incidence of forearm fractures in our population is 411 fractures per 100,000 population per year. An increased number of fractures occurred during the months of May and August. A fall from less than one metre was the commonest mechanism of injury, sporting injuries were the second commonest with football the most common sport associated. This study identifies some features which are in good agreement with studies from elsewhere in Britain, such as incidence and seasonality. However, there are also interesting differences – such as the Glasgow peak incidence for forearm fractures being at age 8, with a marked decline by 12 years. Furthermore, our findings have been extended to consideration of type of intervention, and likelihood of successful treatment

Aims. The aim of this study was to statistically analyse the incidence and distribution of forearm fractures in the adult age group (3rd–10th Decades) between 1997 and 2009. Methods. Records of patients with forearm fractures were retrieved from the hospital audit department using the predetermined codes to identify patients. The data included total number of patients between 20 and 100 years who were either reviewed in the fracture clinics or admitted to the hospital with forearm fractures along with patient gender, age at the time of incident and time of the year the incident occurred. Incidence of total fractures per year and per each month in the year was calculated. The patients were divided into age groups between 2nd to 10th decades. Linear regression analysis was carried out to identify the relationship between fracture incidence and the age or time of the injury. Correlation coefficients(R) and r2 were calculated for all the regression analyses. Fractures were also classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification system. SPSS (version 16) and Microsoft Excel 2007 were used for statistics. Results. A total of 1815 fractures were identified that included 573 males and 1242 females (F/M=2.17). The average age of patients was 59.8 years. Comparing the different months of the year for fracture incidence, the incidence of fractures was found to be highest in september per year. There was a linear increase in the incidence of fractures from January to September (R=0.9, r2=0.81) followed by a drop in subsequent months. There was a linear increase in the incidence of fractures per year from 70 in 1997 to 200 in 2009 (R=0.94, r2=0.885). Comparing the slopes of linear equations for males and females, the rate of increase in fractures in females was found to be approximately 3 times that of males. In women, There was a linear increase in the fracture incidence from the 3rd decade to the 9th decade (R=0.91, r2=0.84) followed by a sudden drop in the 10th decade. In men, there was a linear decrease in the fracture incidence from the 3rd to the 9th decade (r2=0.9559, R=0.98). 177 fractures were classified according to the OTA classification. OTA 23 type of fractures accounted for 85.3% percent of the forearm fractures followed by OTA 21 type (11.9%) and 22 type (2.8%). Further analysis showed the distribution to be: 23A-43.7%, 23B-9.9%, 23C-46.4%. Conclusion. In the last 13 years, there has been an increase in the total incidence of forearm fractures in both men and women; however, the rate of increase in women is almost 3 times that of men. With increasing age, the incidence of fracture increases in women and decreases in men. The drop in fractures in women the 10th decade can be attributed to a reduced living population after 90 years. The obtained linear equations can be useful in predicting the number of forearm fractures occurring in a certain age group in community

Aims. This study sought to estimate the clinical outcomes and describe the nationwide variation in practice, as part of the feasibility workup for a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended randomized clinical trial to determine the optimal treatment of torus fractures of the distal radius in children. Methods. Prospective data collection on torus fractures presenting to our emergency department. Patient consent and study information, including a copy of the Wong-Baker Faces pain score, was issued at the first patient contact. An automated text message service recorded pain scores at days 0, 3, 7, 21, and 42 postinjury. A cross-sectional survey of current accident and emergency practice in the UK was also undertaken to gauge current practice following the publication of NICE guidance. Results. In all, 30 patients with a mean age of 8.9 years were enrolled over a six-week period. Of the 150 potential data points, data was captured in 146, making the data 97.3% complete. Pain scores were recorded at day 0 (mean 6.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7 to 7.3)), day 3 (4.4 (95% CI 3.5 to 5.2)), day 7 (3.0 (95% CI 2.3 to 3.6)), day 21 (1.2 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.7)) and day 42 (0.4 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.7)). Of the 100 units who participated in the nationwide survey, 38% were unaware of any local or national protocols regarding torus fractures, 41% treated torus fractures with cast immobilization, and over 60% of patients had follow-up arranged, both contradictory to national guidelines. Conclusion. We have demonstrated the severity, recovery trajectory, and variation in pain scores among children with torus fractures. We demonstrate excellent follow-up of patient outcomes using text messages. Despite national guidelines, there is significant variation in practice. This data directly informed the development of an ongoing nationwide randomized clinical trial – the FORearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) study

We undertook a prospective, single blinded, randomized, controlled trial of one hundred children treated with either an above or below elbow cast for treatment of closed, distal third forearm fractures requiring reduction. The re-manipulation rate in the below elbow group was 2% (95%CI: 0–11%) compared to 6% (95%CI: 2–15%) in the above elbow group, p=0.62. Above elbow casts do not appear to improve fracture immobilization nor reduce the requirement for re-manipulation in pediatric distal third forearm fractures. Debate exists regarding the benefits of using below elbow casts instead of above elbow casts for maintaining reduction in pediatric distal third forearm fractures. The literature indicates a loss of reduction rate of 14.6% of children treated in an above elbow cast and 2.5% in those treated with a below elbow cast. We undertook a prospective, single blinded, randomized, controlled trial of one hundred children treated with either an above or below elbow cast for treatment of closed, distal third forearm fractures requiring reduction. Outcome measures included re-manipulation rate, fracture displacement during cast wear, and cast complications. One hundred patients were suitably enrolled; fifty-four received an above elbow cast, forty-six received a below elbow cast. The two groups were similar in terms of age and gender. The above elbow group contained a higher proportion of both bone fractures (41/54) than the below elbow group (27/46). There were no significant differences between the two cast groups in initial, post-reduction or cast-off fracture angulation; nor any difference in the amount of fracture displacement during cast wear. The number of cast complications was similar between the two groups. The re-manipulation rate in the below elbow group was 2% (95%CI: 0–11%) compared to 6% (95%CI: 2–15%) in the above elbow group, p=0.62. Above elbow casts do not appear to improve fracture immobilization nor reduce the requirement for re-manipulation in pediatric distal third forearm fractures. Funding Hip Hip Hooray, Saskatoon

Paediatric distal radial and forearm fractures account for 37.4% of all fractures in children. We present our 2.5-year results of a novel safe approach to the treatment of simple distal radial and diaphyseal fractures using intranasal diamorphine and entonox in a designated fracture reduction room in the emergency department. All simple fractures of the distal radius and forearm admitted to our ED between March 2012 and August 2014 that could be reduced using simple manipulation techniques were included in this study. These included angulated diaphyseal fractures of the forearm, angulated metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius and Salter Harris types I and II without significant shortening. All children included were given intranasal diamorphine as well as entonox. The orthopaedic registrar on call performed all reductions. 100 children had their distal radius or forearm fracture reduced in the emergency department using entonox and diamorphine analgesia and had a same day discharge. Average age was 10 years (range 2.20–16.37 years). No complications were reported regarding the use of the analgesia and all children and parents were pleased with their treatment not requiring a hospital admission. The mean initial dorsal angulation of all fracture types was 28.05° degrees (23.91–32.23 95% CI) which was reduced to 7.03° (5.11–8.95 95% CI) post manipulation. There were 9 cases lost to follow up. Two cases lost the initial reduction of the fracture on subsequent clinic follow up and underwent internal fixation in theatre. The use of entonox and intranasal diamorphine is a safe, effective treatment of providing adequate analgesia for children with distal radial and forearm fractures to allow manipulation of displaced dorsally angulated fractures in the emergency department. By facilitating a same day discharge, over £45,000 was saved using this safe method of treatment

Background and Aims:. Forearm fractures are common in the paediatric population and most are treated in a moulded plaster of Paris (POP) cast. It is our concern that many casts applied by our registrars are sub-optimal and that we need to improve our training process. The aim of our study was to review the adequacy of forearm cast application in paediatric patients at our institution and to identify if there is a need for a more formal training program with regard to plaster cast application. Methods:. A retrospective review of control x-rays of forearm fractures treated at our institution was undertaken. X-rays that were reviewed were done as part of the routine treatment protocol. X-ray measurements to assess POP application were the cast index and the gap index. A cast index of > 0.81 and Gap index of > 0.15 were regarded as an indication of poor cast application. Results:. Adequate control X-rays of twenty eight patients with a forearm fracture were available. The average patient age range was 5–12 years. There were thirteen distal metaphyseal fractures, nine diaphyseal fractures and six Salter-Harris type fractures. Of the 28 patients, 20 patients had a poor cast index and 17 patients had poor gap index. In 12 patients both the gap and the cast index were unacceptable. Conclusion:. Our study suggests that paediatric forearm plaster cast application by registrars at our institution is inadequate. This indicates a need for a strategy to improve the training in plaster cast application amongst our registrars

The aim was to compare the efficacy and outcomes of reduction of closed forearm fractures in a paediatric population using Ketamine in the Emergency Department (ED) setting versus reduction under general anaesthesia (GA) in the operating theatre (OT). A prospective audit of children presenting to our institution with closed fractures of the radius and/or ulna was conducted. Patients presenting to ED were offered manipulation under GA or Ketamine, and then grouped accordingly. Children were followed up until full range of motion had recovered. Outcomes measured at follow up were 1) need for remanipulation, 2) position at union, 3) total hospital stay and 4) functional outcome. Forearm fractures account for 22% of acute paediatric orthopaedic admissions to our institution. 70% require manipulation and splintage. 221 forearm fractures required manipulation during the study period. 90 patients (41%) were manipulated under Ketamine in the ED, 131 patients (59%) were manipulated in the OT. There was no significant difference in mean angulation of fractures treated by either method (p=0.20). There was no significant difference between the two methods with respect to rates of remanipulation (p=0.73) or poor position at union (p=0.55). There was a significantly shorter hospital stay for those treated in the ED. Treatment of paediatric forearm fractures in the ED under Ketamine sedation offers an effective alternative for selected fractures. It also offers considerable financial savings and is less of a drain on valuable theatre and staff resources

Introduction. Two randomised trials concluded cast type (above or below elbow) makes no significant difference in the re-displacement rate of paediatric forearm fractures involving the distal third of the radius. This has not, however, led to the universal use of below elbow casts. In particular we noted one trial reported significant re-displacement in 40% or more of cases, which was much higher than we would expect. To review the radiological outcomes and need for re-manipulation of paediatric distal forearm fractures treated with closed manipulation under anaesthesia in our institution, in part for subsequent comparison with published results. All forearm fractures treated at a specialist children's hospital in one year were reviewed retrospectively. Based on the methodology of one trial, we included all fractures involving the distal third of the radius, with or without an ulna fracture, which underwent closed manipulation. Outcomes were radiological alignment using existing radiographs and need for re-manipulation. Cast type was at the discretion of the treating surgeon. The radiological criteria for re-displacement were based on published methodology. 79 children underwent manipulation, 71 receiving above elbow casts and 8 below elbow casts. Radiologically 21% of injuries treated in an above elbow cast re-displaced (15/71) compared to 38% of those in below elbow plasters (3/8). In 2 cases the re-displacement was treated with re-manipulation. The preference in our institution was clearly for above elbow casts in this injury pattern. The small number of below elbow casts in our series limits any comparisons. Our rate of re-displacement using above elbow casts was half that of one of the published studies, so the existing literature is not consistent with our experience