Aims

Despite higher rates of revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) being reported for uncemented stems in patients aged > 75 years, they are frequently used in this age group. Increased mortality after cemented fixation is often used as a justification, but recent data do not confirm this association. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the design of the stem and the type of fixation on the rate of revision and immediate postoperative mortality, focusing on the age and sex of the patients.

Introduction

During THA in lateral position, keeping accurate lateral position is very important for obtaining good cup position. We normally use two kinds of hip positioner, but sometimes we can only use universal positioner provided with operational table. The pelvic tilt can be changed by surgical procedures such as traction, dislocation, reduction and so forth. In the present study, pre-op and post-op pelvic tilt was assessed using Kinect (Xbox 360′s sensor) as 3D scanner.

Introduction and Aims: Successful cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) is well documented, with increasing reports in elderly patients. Concerns exist with respect to the ability to achieve and maintain long-term cementless femoral fixation in this patient population. This study reviews the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a tapered porous femoral component in cementless THA in elderly patients.

Method: Forty-nine hips in 47 patients over 74 years of age underwent primary cementless THA with a tapered stem between April 1996 and April 2000. All femoral heads were sent to pathology. Radiographs, Harris hip scores and clinical data were evaluated. Revision status was known for all hips.

Results: Average age: 79 years, mean follow-up was 46 months. Six patients died during the study (mean 40 months) all THA unrelated. Twenty-two peri-operative variances occurred. There were no dislocations. Three irrigation and drainage procedures were performed, and no revisions. Mean post-operative HHS improved by 33, with 87 percent of patients having no or minimal pain. We identified two cases of stem subsidence to a stable position with no progressive radiolucencies. Mean length of stay was 4.5 days. One patient required intensive care, 52 percent were discharged to home. Metastatic cancer was identified in one femoral head.

Conclusion: Using revision status as an end-point, the success rate was 100 percent. No peri-operative deaths or significant orthopaedic complications were identified. Advanced age and Dorr C anatomy is not a contraindication for tapered cementless THA. The femoral head should routinely be sent to pathology.

Introduction: Although Metal wires and cables are popular tools to fix greater trochanter in revision THA, non union, pain and breakage are well known. For these situations, we used polyethylene tape which is occasionally applied for the spine surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical result of greater trochanter fixation using polyethylene tape in revision THA cases.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent revisions THA (six cases) and re-revision THA (two cases) (mean age at operation; seventy), with a minimum followup of two years. In revision cases, we attached greater trochanter to proximal femur fixing like figure eight with this tape. Migration of greater trochanter, union rate, pain and dislocation were evaluated in this study.

Result: Bone union was achieved without migration and we did not experience any patients with pain. However migration of greater trochanter to cranially and anteriorly 3mm was observed in all re-revision cases. A patient dislocated twice after the re-revision.

Discussion: We demonstrated that the polyethylene tape had several advantages used in greater trochanter fixation. Strength of the polyethylene tape has been reported as strong as the stainless cable. The polyethylene tape did not cause any adverse effects including pain and cheese cut phenomenon because of broad contact area with bone. The tape could be put directly on the stem, which is impossible with metal wires and cables. In addition, we do not expect any third body wear. We concluded that polyethylene tape applied for fixing greater trochanter in revision THA would be safe and effective.

Displaced acetabular fractures in the older patient present significant treatment challenges. There is evidence the morbidity and mortality associated is similar to the fractured neck of femur cohort. Despite growing literature, there remains significant controversy regarding treatment algorithms; varying between conservative management, to fracture fixation and finally surgical fixation and simultaneous THA to allow immediate full weight bearing. £250k NIHR, Research for Patient Benefit (Ref: PB-PG-0815-20054). Trial ethical approval (17/EE/0271). After national consultation, 3 arms included; conservative management, fracture fixation and simultaneous fracture fixation with THA. Statistical analysis required minimum 12 patients/3 arms to show feasibility, with an optimum 20/arm. Inclusion criteria; patients >60 years & displaced acetabular fracture. Exclusion criteria: open fracture, THA in situ, pre-injury immobility, polytrauma. Primary outcome measure - ability recruit & EQ-5D-5L at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures (9 months); OHS, Disability Rating Index, radiographs, perioperative physiological variables including surgery duration, blood loss, complications and health economics. 11 UK level 1 major trauma centres enrolled into the trial, commenced December 2017. Failure surgical equipoise was identified as an issue regarding recruitment. Full trial recruitment (60 patients) achieved; 333 patients screened. 66% male, median age 76 (range 63–93), median BMI 25 (range 18–37), 87% full mental capacity, 77% admitted from own home. 75% fall from standing height. 60% fractures; anterior column posterior hemi-transverse. Trial feasibility confirmed December 2020. Presented data- secondary outcomes that are statistically significant in improvement from baseline for only the fix and replace arm, with acceptable trial complications. Issues are highlighted with conservative management in this patient cohort. Our unique RCT informs design and sample size calculation for a future RCT. It represents the first opportunity to understand the intricacies of these treatment modalities. This RCT provides clinicians with information on how best to provide management for this medically complex patient cohort

Periprosthetic fractures around the femur during and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain a common mode of failure. It is important therefore to recognise those factors that place patients at increased risk for development of this complication. Prevention of this complication, always trumps treatment. Risk factors can be stratified into: 1. Patient related factors; 2. Host bone and anatomical considerations; 3. Procedural related factors; and 4. Implant related factors. Patient Factors. There are several patient related factors that place patients at risk for development of a periprosthetic fracture during and after total hip arthroplasty. Metabolic bone disease, particularly osteoporosis increases the risk of periprosthetic fracture. In addition, patients that smoke, have long term steroid use or disuse, osteopenia due to inactivity should be identified. A metabolic bone work up and evaluation of bone mineralization with a bone densitometry test can be helpful in identifying and implementing treatment prior to THA. Pre-operative Host Bone and Anatomic Considerations. In addition to metabolic bone disease the “shape of the bone” should be taken into consideration as well. Dorr has described three different types of bone morphology (Dorr A, B, C), each with unique characteristics of size and shape. It is important to recognise that not one single cementless implant may fit all bone types. The importance of templating a THA prior to surgery cannot be overstated. Stem morphology must be appropriately matched to patient anatomy. Today, several types of cementless stem designs exist with differing shape and areas of fixation. It is important to understand via pre-operative templating which stem works best in what situation. Procedural Related Factors. There has been a resurgence in interest in the varying surgical approaches to THA. While the validity and benefits of each surgical approach remains a point of debate, each approach carries with it its own set of risks. Several studies have demonstrated increased risk of periprosthetic fractures during THA with the use of the direct anterior approach. Risk factors for increased risk of periprosthetic fracture may include obesity, bone quality and stem design. Implant Related Factors. As mentioned there are several varying cementless implant shapes and sizes that can be utilised. There is no question that cementless fixation remains the most common mode of fixation in THA. However, one must not forget the role of cemented fixation in THA. Published results on long term fixation with cemented stems are comparable if not exceeding those of press fit fixation. In addition, the literature is clear that cemented fixation in the elderly hip fracture patient population is associated with a lower risk of periprosthetic fracture and lower risk of revision. The indication and principles of cemented stem fixation in THA should not be forgotten

Introduction. We have investigated middle-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) cemented socket with improved technique using hydroxyapatite (HA) granules. IBBC (interfacial bioactive bone cement method, Oonishi) (1) is an excellent technique for augmenting cement-bone fixation in the long term. However, the technique is difficult and there are concerns over some points, such as bleeding control, disturbance of cement intrusion to anchoring holes by granules, difficulty of the uniform granular dispersion to the acetabular bone. To improve the original technique, we have modified IBBC (M-IBBC), and investigated the middle-term clinical results and radiographic changes. Materials and Methods. K-MAX HS-3 THA (Kyocera, Japan), with tapered cemented stem with small collar and all polyethylene cemented socket, was used for THA implants (Fig.1). Basically the third generation cementing technique was used for THA using bone cement. The socket fixation was performed with bone cement (Endurance, DePuy) and HA granules (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, Boneceram P; G-2, 0.3–0.6mm in size, Olympus, Japan) (Fig.2). In original IBBC technique, HA granules were dispersed on reamed acetabulum before cementing. In M-IBBC technique, HA granules were attached to bone cement on plastic plate, then inserted to reamed acetabulum and pressurized (Fig.3). 112 hip joints (95 cases) were operated between June 2010 and March 2014, and followed. The average follow-up period was 6.5 years, and average age at operation was 66.5 years. The clinical results were evaluated by Japan Orthopaedic Association Hip Score (JOA score), and X-p findings were evaluated using antero-posterior radiographs. The locations of radiolucent lines were identified according to the zones described by Delee and Charnley for acetabular components, and Zone 1 was divided into two parts, outer Zone 1a and inner Zone 1b. Results and Discussion. Revision was not performed. JOA score improved from 47 to 88. Socket and stem loosening was not observed. X-p findings of sockets demonstrated radiolucent line in Zone 1a/1b/2/3 in 0.9/0/0/0% immediately after the operation, 6.3/1.8/0/0.9% at 2 years postoperatively. After 2 years there was no progressive change, however, improvement of radiolucent line in Zone 1a was observed in two cases after 3 years postoperatively. Accordingly, at 5 years radiolucent line in Zone 1a/1b was observed in 4.4/1.8%. Oonish has reported excellent clinical results of THA with IBBC (1). To easily perform IBBC, we have modified the technique, improving the problems of IBBC. In this study, radiolucent line was observed at the margin of the socket in a small number of cases, and there was no progressive change. In addition, improvement of radiolucent line was observed in M-IBBC in this study, which was not observed in conventional cementing technique. Conclusions. It is demonstrated that M-IBBC provides stable socket cement fixation for THA. The interesting finding in M-IBBC cases was the improvement of radiolucent line, suggesting osteoconductive property of hydroxyapatite granules at the interface after the operations. The promising long-term clinical results of M-IBBC method, were expected. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Background. Method of fixation in THA is a contentious issue, with proponents of either technique citing improved implant survival and outcomes. Current comparisons rely on insufficiently powered studies with short-term follow up or larger poorly controlled registry studies. Patient factors are considered a key variable contributing to the risk of implant failure. One way to overcome this confounder is to compare the survival of cementless and cemented THAs patients who have undergone bilateral THAs with cemented hip on one side and cementless hip on the other. We compared stem survival of patients who have bilateral THA with one cemented stem in one hip and a cementless stem in the contralateral hip in the National Joint Registry. Methods. UK National Joint Registry is the largest registry of its kind in the world. This study included 2934 patients with 5868 THAs who underwent bilateral THAs s between 2003 and 2016. These patients had undergone bilateral sequential THAs within 3 years of each other: cemented THA on one side and cementless on the other, Patients had identical pre-operative American Society of Anaesthesiologists group for both THAs and same indication for surgery. Implant survival was compared using Cox regression with an endpoint of stem revision. Results. Ten-year all-cause survival of cementless stems was lower than for cemented stems (p<0.001), as was survival to aseptic loosening revision (p<0.001). Similar trends were seen across all age groups including young and old patients. There was a non-significant trend towards superiority of cemented stems in survival until periprosthetic fracture, dislocation and infection. Conclusion. Comparison of cementless with cemented stems within patients is a novel method to compare the outcomes of orthopaedic implants. Survival was better for cemented stems including for younger patients and aseptic loosening

Aims

It is important to analyze objectively the hammering sound in cup press-fit technique in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in order to better understand the change of the sound during impaction. We hypothesized that a specific characteristic would present in a hammering sound with successful fixation. We designed the study to quantitatively investigate the acoustic characteristics during cementless cup impaction in THA.

Aims

The aim of this investigation was to compare risk of infection in both cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) as well as in total hip arthroplasty (THA) following femoral neck fracture.

Aims

It is important to analyze objectively the hammering sound in cup press-fit technique in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in order to better understand the change of the sound during impaction. We hypothesized that a specific characteristic would present in a hammering sound with successful fixation. We designed the study to quantitatively investigate the acoustic characteristics during cementless cup impaction in THA.

Aims

Our primary aim was to assess reoperation-free survival at one year after the index injury in patients aged ≥ 75 years treated with internal fixation (IF) or arthroplasty for undisplaced femoral neck fractures (uFNFs). Secondary outcomes were reoperations and mortality analyzed separately.

Aims

The primary aim of this study is to assess the survival of the uncemented hydroxyapatite (HA) coated Trident II acetabular component as part of a hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a cemented Exeter stem. The secondary aims are to assess the complications, joint-specific function, health-related quality of life, and radiological signs of loosening of the acetabular component.

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the risk of postoperative complications in COVID-19-positive patients undergoing common orthopaedic procedures.

The main causes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions are loosening and instability. Use of a dual mobility cup cemented in a acetabular reconstruction cage device limits the risk of instability and does not hinder the acetabular fixation during THA revisions. The objective of this study was to analyse a retrospective series of 123 THA revisions with antiprotusio cage and dual mobility socket. Patients and methods: At a mean follow-up of 10 years, we analysed a continuous series of 123 revisions using a reconstruction device (87 Kerboull cross-plates, 12 Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cages, 24 custom-fit Novae ARM cages associated in all cases with a Novae Stick dual mobility cup cemented into the cage). There were 80 women and 43 males. The mean age at the surgery was 69.2 years old. PMA score increased from 9.6 +/− 3.06 preoperatively to 14.2 +/− 2. at the follow-up. 9 early dislocations occurred and one late dislocation. At the last follow-up, the X-rays showed nine hardware failures, including one cross-plate fracture, one hook fracture, and one flange fracture. Analysis of the radiological position of the cup showed a mean lowering of 13 mm and a 7 mm lateralisation compared to the preoperative position. 2 revisions for aseptic loosening and 3 for septic loosening were performed. This study confirms the advantage of dual mobility cups during acetabular reconstruction cemented in antiprotrusio cages as a way to limit, without eliminating, the risk of dislocation. Therefore cemented fixation of dual mobility cups in cages appears to be a reliable short-term option

Aims

After failed acetabular fractures, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging procedure and considered the gold standard treatment. The complexity of the procedure depends on the fracture pattern and the initial fracture management. This study’s primary aim was to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients who underwent delayed uncemented acetabular THA after acetabular fractures. The secondary aims were to assess the radiological outcome and the incidence of the associated complications in those patients.

Despite great progress in implant design, materials and new implantation techniques aseptic loosening is still the most frequent cause of implant failure in THA, which was found to be increased especially in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ON-FH). While a direct link between aseptic loosening and periprosthetic bone loss still remains elusive, there is plentiful evidence for a close association with early migration of implant components. Although the beneficial effect of bisphonates on periprosthetic bone mass is well established, little is known to date about their effects on implant migration. This is an important issue, because successful prevention of early implant migration would provide strong evidence of a beneficial effect on the survival rate of THA. Previously, Krismer et al. found that a total migration of the cup of ≥ 1mm and a subsidence of ≥ 1.5mm 2 years after surgery was highly predictive for aseptic implant failure of THA within 8 to 10 years. Fifty patients with end-stage ON-FH were consecutively enrolled to receive either 4mg of ZOL or saline solution (CTR) in a double-blind fashion. Radiographs standardized for EBRA-digital analysis were performed at each follow-up exam at 7 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly thereafter. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years (median follow-up: 2.8 years). Migration of the acetabular and femoral components was analyzed with the EBRA-digital software (University of Inns-bruck, Austria) independently by 3 investigators fully blinded to randomization. Within the placebo group, distal migration of the stem (subsidence) steadily increased up to −1.2mm ± 0.6 SD at 2 years after THA without reaching a plateau phase (P< 0.001, Friedman ANOVA). Less but a nearly curvilinear migration pattern was found for the acetabular components, with a transverse migration of 0.6mm ± 1.0 SD and a vertical migration of 0.6mm ± 0.8 SD at 2 years (P< 0.001, Friedman ANOVA). Treatment with ZOL effectively minimized the migration of cups in both the transverse and vertical direction (0.15 mm ± 0.6 SD and 0.06 mm ± 0.6 SD, respectively, P< 0.05, ANOVA), and a trend to a decreased subsidence was also found for stem migration (−0.91 mm ± 0.51 SD; P=0.11, ANOVA). In addition, total cup migration exceeding 1mm at 2 years was significantly reduced by ZOL in 8 patients (12 vs 4 in CTR vs ZOL, respectively) as was also found in 6 patients for subsidence (≥ 1.5mm in 9 vs 3 patients in CTR vs ZOL, respectively) (P< 0.05, Fisher’s exact). This is the first clinical trial reporting that a single infusion of ZOL suffices to improve initial implant fixation in THA. Based on best evidence available to date, this new concept shows great promise of improving the long-term outcome in THA and should be given attention in long-term trial

Proximal load fixation in THA is paramount for maximum bone preservation and thus longevity of the implant. Conventional femoral stems may not achieve satisfactory proximal fixation in proximal/ distal femoral canal mismatch as in champagne type of femur, mal-united fractures, excessively bowed femur and some young large patients. Such mismatch can lead to uneven loading and a higher incidence of loosening or periprosthetic fracture. This risk is becoming higher with the recent trend to mini-invasive surgery. As an alternative to standard stem, the short stem femoral prosthesis was originally developed in the 1950’s and has recently been making a resurgence as a design conducive to the minimal invasive techniques, and allows for greater preservation of the natural anatomy. Our objective is to measure the clinical and radiological outcomes of the Metha. ®. hip short stem (a cementless, metaphyseal fix conserving diaphysis implant) with computer assisted technique and minimal invasive surgical approach. This study is a single center, open label, data collection study of 35 consecutive subjects undergoing OrthoPilot. ®. navigation, Metha. ®. stem plasmapore cup system with minimal invasive muscle sparing surgical approach. (B. Braun Aesculap; Tuttlingen, Germany). Pre-Operatively an IRB Informed Consent, no exclusion specific to the implant, Harris Hip Evaluation and routine hip/pelvis plain xray was performed. Post-Operatively, a CT Scan within 6 months, repeat Harris Hip Score (HHS) Evaluation. The implant is made of titanium alloy with plasmapore coating in @ 2/3 of the implant (< 8 cm engages in proximal femur with a total length average of 10.75 cm)(range 9.75–11.75). The bearing surface is metal/ highly cross linked polyethylene. Size 32 head of modular neck with plasmapore shell. All cases were done thru muscle sparing anterolateral mini invasive approach. At 6 months ± 1 month with an average age = 67, BMI= 37 (one was 360 pounds), Harris score was 46 preop and 96 post op.No thigh pain, No dislocation, Trendelenberg negative. Patient satisfaction was high. One fell had a non displaced fx of the neck that did not require revision but slowed full weight bearing for 6 weeks. One subsided in a 360 pound patient after he went full wt bearing while getting out of the shower a week after surgery. This was revised with a standard stem. The tip of two implants was discovered to have penetrated the proximal femur with no symptoms at 3 months period and no restriction to weight bearing during that period. This happened in the first 5 cases in which we modified technique with no other penetrations. Xray/CT scan showed no subsidence good bony ingrowth no radiolucency or loosening. The two penetrated corteses showed intense bony overgrowth on the two protruded tips of stem. We conclude that cementless metaphyseal short stem with proximal plasmapore coating is associated with excellent clinical and radiological results. The technical errors we faced in the early two cases were identified and avoided by using awl canal finder with suction tube palpation of canal and direct visualization of the metaphyses before hammering the broach. The combination of the short stem prosthesis, modularity of the neck, computer assisted technique and minimal invasive arthroplasty is expected to reduce recovery time, increase the potential for successful restoration of function and add to the longevity of the prosthetic joint

The femoral diaphysis presents the best opportunity for fixation during revision THA. Both fully coated cylindrical and modular fluted tapered titanium stems have demonstrated excellent results. Cylindrical stems have demonstrated concerning rates of failure when used in larger, osteopenic canals or in canals with post-isthmal divergent morphologies. Modular stems offer the advantage of separating distal fixation needs from proximal version, leg length, and offset needs via a modular junction. Although early designs demonstrated some breakages at the taper or through thin proximal bodies, newer generation implants have not demonstrated such mechanical concerns. Additionally, the modular junctions do not appear to be having any problems with corrosion. Mid- to long-term data with various designs now support the safety and efficacy of these constructs that can handle a wide variety of challenges during femoral revision. Careful attention to detail is necessary to minimise the risk of subsidence and intra-operative fracture or femoral perforation

There is continuing debate among orthopedists regarding the appropriate treatment of femoral neck fractures, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), Total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty. In 2003 310,000 patients were hospitalized for hip fracture in the United States and about one-third were treated with total hip arthroplasty. Worldwide, the total number of hip fractures is expected to surpass 6 million by the year 2050. In a survey distributed by the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, and of the 381 members who responded, 85% preferred hemiarthroplasty, 2% preferred ORIF and 13% preferred THA. The decision to perform internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or THA is based on comminution of the fracture activity level and independence, bone quality, presence of rheumatoid or degenerative arthritis, and mental status. Evidence based practice indicates that in a young patient with good bone stock and a fracture with relatively low comminution an ORIF is the treatment of choice. If the patient has a comminuted fracture with poor bone quality, minimal DJD, no RA, and low activity demand a hemiarthroplasty is a reasonable choice. If the patient has a comminuted fracture with poor bone quality, DJD and high activity demand a total hip replacement is a reasonable choice