Aims. There are reports of a marked increase in perioperative mortality in patients admitted to hospital with a fractured hip during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, USA, Spain, and Italy. Our study aims to describe the risk of mortality among patients with a fractured neck of femur in England during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. We completed a multicentre cohort study across ten hospitals in England. Data were collected from 1 March 2020 to 6 April 2020, during which period the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic. Patients ≥ 60 years of age admitted with hip fracture and a minimum follow-up of 30 days were included for analysis. Primary outcome of interest was mortality at 30 days post-surgery or postadmission in nonoperative patients. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and discharge destination. Results. In total, 404 patients were included for final analysis with a COVID-19 diagnosis being made in 114 (28.2%) patients. Overall, 30-day mortality stood at 14.4% (n = 58). The COVID-19 cohort experienced a mortality rate of 32.5% (37/114) compared to 7.2% (21/290) in the non-COVID cohort (p < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, 30-day mortality was greatest in patients who were confirmed to have COVID-19 (odds ratio (OR) 5.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.95 to 10.80; p < 0.001) with an adjusted excess risk of 20%, male sex (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.29; p = 0.004) and in patients with ≥ two comorbidities (OR 4.68, CI 1.5 to 14.61; p = 0.008). Length of stay was also extended in the COVID-19 cohort, on average spending 17.6 days as an inpatient versus 12.04 days in the non-COVID-19 group (p < 0.001). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that patients who sustain a neck of femur fracture in combination with COVID-19 diagnosis have a significantly higher risk of mortality than would be normally expected. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:697–705

Aim. Management of bone and joint infection can be technically complex and often requires a prolonged course of antibiotics. Traditionally, bone and joint infection management utilises nurse-led outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) where adherence is unlikely to be an issue. However, with increasing evidence in favour of oral therapy, the question of adherence merits further consideration. We describe the adherence of both oral (PO) and self-administered intravenous (IV) antibiotics in the treatment of bone and joint infection using paper questionnaires (8-item Modified Morisky Adherence Score (MMAS)) and, in a subset of participants, electronic pill containers (Medication Event Monitoring Systems*). Method. All eligible participants enrolled in the OVIVA trial (2010–2015) were randomised to six weeks of either PO or IV antibiotic treatment arms. Self-administering patients were followed up with questionnaires at day 14 and 42. A subset of PO participants was also given the medication event monitoring system* in order to validate the adherence questionnaires. The results were correlated with treatment failures at one-year follow-up. Results. 1,054 participants were enrolled in the OVIVA study. At day 14, 68% of participants recorded high adherence in both the IV (N=72) and PO arms (N=303) using the 8-item MMAS. At day 42, only 51% maintained high adherence in the PO arm (N=323) as compared to a 68% in the self-administered IV arm (N=80). The medication event monitoring system* results at day 42 demonstrated that 51% of participants achieved adherence of 100% (range 45–100). There was no statistically significant correlation between adherence and treatment failure in either randomised treatment arm. Conclusions. This is the first large scale study to quantitatively assess compliance with antibiotics in bone and joint infections using established adherence tools. Our results suggest that oral antibiotic adherence decreases significantly over time. Despite the absence of apparent excess risk of therapeutic failure in this trial, we strongly advise careful patient education and adherence support in order to optimise clinical outcomes. Acknowledgements. The OVIVA study is funded by the National Institute for Health research (Health Technology Assessment); project number 11/36/29. *MEMS® Medication Event Monitoring System

Introduction. The goal of tibial tray placement in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to maximize tibial surface coverage while maintaining proper rotation. Maximizing tibial surface coverage without component overhang reduces the risk of tibial subsidence. Proper tibial rotation avoids excess risk of patellar maltracking, knee instability, inappropriate tibial loading, and ligament imbalance. Different tibial tray designs offer varying potential in optimizing the relationship between tibial surface coverage and rotation. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) generates customized guides from an MRI- or CT-based preoperative plan for use in TKA. The purpose of the present study was to utilize MRI information, obtained as part of the PSI planning process, to determine, for anatomic, symmetric, and asymmetric tibial tray designs, (1) which tibial tray design achieves maximum coverage, (2) the impact of maximizing coverage on rotation, and (3) the impact of establishing neutral rotation on coverage. Methods. In this prospective comparative study, MR images for 100 consecutive patients were uploaded into Materialise™ PSI software that was used to evaluate characteristics of tibial component placement. Tibial component rotation and surface coverage was analyzed using the preoperative planning software. Anatomic (Persona™), symmetric (NexGen™), and asymmetric (Natural-Knee II™) designs from a single manufacturer (Zimmer™) were evaluated to assess the relationship of tibial coverage and tibial rotation. Tibial surface coverage, defined as the proportion of tibial surface area covered by a given implant, was measured using Adobe Photoshop™ software (Figure 1). Rotation was calculated with respect to the tibial AP axis, which was defined as the line connecting the medial third of the tibial tuberosity and the PCL insertion. Results. When tibial surface coverage was maximized, the anatomic tray compared to the symmetric/asymmetric trays showed significantly higher surface coverage (82.1% vs 80.4/80.1%; p<0.01), significantly less deviation from the AP axis (0.3° vs 3.0/2.4°; p<0.01), and a significantly higher proportion of cases within 5° of the AP axis (97% vs 73/77%). When constraining rotation to the AP axis, the anatomic tray showed significantly higher surface coverage compared to the symmetric/asymmetric trays (80.8% vs 76.3/75.8%; p<0.01). No significant differences were found between symmetric and asymmetric trays. Discussion. We found that the anatomic tibial tray resulted in significantly higher tibial coverage with significantly less deviation from the AP axis compared to the symmetric and asymmetric trays. When rotation was constrained to the AP axis, the anatomic tray resulted in significantly higher tibial coverage than the symmetric and asymmetric trays. Tibial rotation is recognized as an important factor in the success of a total knee replacement. Maximizing coverage with the least compromise in rotation is the goal for tibial tray design. In this study, the anatomic tibia seemed to optimize the relationship between tibial surface coverage and rotation. This study additionally illustrates the way by which advanced preoperative planning tools (ie. MRI/computer reconstructions) allow us to obtain valuable information with regard to implant design

The goal of tibial tray placement in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to maximise tibial surface coverage while maintaining proper rotation. Maximising tibial surface coverage without component overhang reduces the risk of tibial subsidence. Proper tibial rotation avoids excess risk of patellar maltracking, knee instability, inappropriate tibial loading, and ligament imbalance. Different tibial tray designs offer varying potential in optimising the relationship between tibial surface coverage and rotation. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) generates customised guides from an MRI- or CT-based preoperative plan for use in TKA. The purpose of the present study was to utilise MRI information, obtained as part of the PSI planning process, to determine, for anatomic, symmetric, and asymmetric tibial tray designs, (1) which tibial tray design achieves maximum coverage, (2) the impact of maximising coverage on rotation, and (3) the impact of establishing neutral rotation on coverage. MR images for 100 consecutive patients were uploaded into Materialise™ PSI software that was used to evaluate characteristics of tibial component placement. Tibial component rotation and surface coverage was analysed using the preoperative planning software. Anatomic (Persona™), symmetric (NexGen™), and asymmetric (Natural-Knee II™) designs from a single manufacturer (Zimmer™) were evaluated to assess the relationship of tibial coverage and tibial rotation. Tibial surface coverage, defined as the proportion of tibial surface area covered by a given implant, was measured using Adobe Photoshop™ software. Rotation was calculated with respect to the tibial AP axis, which was defined as the line connecting the medial third of the tibial tuberosity and the PCL insertion. When tibial surface coverage was maximised, the anatomic tray compared to the symmetric/asymmetric trays showed significantly higher surface coverage (82.1% vs 80.4/80.1%; p<0.01), significantly less deviation from the AP axis (0.3° vs 3.0/2.4°; p<0.01), and a significantly higher proportion of cases within 5° of the AP axis (97% vs 73/77%). When constraining rotation to the AP axis, the anatomic tray showed significantly higher surface coverage compared to the symmetric/asymmetric trays (80.8% vs 76.3/75.8%; p<0.01). No significant differences were found between symmetric and asymmetric trays. We found that the anatomic tibial tray resulted in significantly higher tibial coverage with significantly less deviation from the AP axis compared to the symmetric and asymmetric trays. When rotation was constrained to the AP axis, the anatomic tray resulted in significantly higher tibial coverage than the symmetric and asymmetric trays. Tibial rotation is recognised as an important factor in the success of a total knee replacement. Maximising coverage with the least compromise in rotation is the goal for tibial tray design. In this study, the anatomic tibia seemed to optimise the relationship between tibial surface coverage and rotation. This study additionally illustrates the way by which advanced preoperative planning tools (ie. MRI/computer reconstructions) allow us to obtain valuable information with regard to implant design

Aims

Cementing in arthroplasty for hip fracture is associated with improved postoperative function, but may have an increased risk of early mortality compared to uncemented fixation. Quantifying this mortality risk is important in providing safe patient care. This study investigated the association between cement use in arthroplasty and mortality at 30 days and one year in patients aged 50 years and over with hip fracture.

The August 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Two days as good as three in TKA; Bilateral TKA: minimising the risks; Tranexamic acid in knee arthroplasty: everyone should be using it, but how?; Initial follow-up for knee arthroplasty?; Navigation finds its niche?; Another take on navigation?; Multimodal care for early knee osteoarthritis; ACL graft fixation methods under the spotlight

The August 2015 Trauma Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Thromboprophylaxis not required in lower limb fractures; Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and fracture risk: moving the boundaries in fracture; Posterior wall fractures refined; Neurological injury and acetabular fracture surgery; Posterior tibial plateau fixation; Tibial plateau fractures in the longer term; Comprehensive orthogeriatric care and hip fracture; Compartment syndrome: in the eye of the beholder?

The June 2013 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: the benefit of MRI in the follow-up of lumbar disc prolapse; gunshot injury to the spinal cord; the link between depression and back pain; floating dural sack sign; short segment fixation at ten years; whether early return to play is safer than previously thought; infection in diabetic spinal patients; and dynesis.

The February 2013 Oncology Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: proximal fibular tumours; radiotherapy-induced chondrosarcoma; mega-prosthesis; CRP predictions of sarcoma survival; predicting survival in metastatic disease; MRI for recurrence in osteoid osteoma; and a sarcoma refresher

The February 2013 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: the human genome; new RNA; cells, matrix and gene enhancement; the histology of x-rays; THR and VTE in the Danish population; potential therapeutic targets for GCT; optimising vancomycin elution from cement; and how much sleep is enough.

The June 2013 Knee Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: iodine washout: chondrotoxic or antiseptic?; stem tip pain following revision knee replacements; metalwork removal prior to TKR; astroturf and ACL rupture; Robert Jones dressings; if thicker gloves safer; and the long leg radiograph: is it still the gold standard?

The February 2013 Wrist & Hand Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: to splint or not to splint; salvage of the unsalvageable; a close shave for malunions; a classic approach to malunion; diabetic carpal tunnel; capsulodesis; a wrist from a fibula; thumb-based osteoarthritis - a further opinion from the Editor-in-Chief.

The April 2013 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: hip cartilage and magnets; labral repair or resection; who benefits from injection; rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis; whether ceramic implants risk fracture; dual articulation; and hydroxyapatite.