Aims: Better understanding of the influence of body mass to plantar peak pressure as a main biomechanical risk factor for ulcerations in the diabetic foot. To predict the effect of weight change on peak pressure. Methods: In-shoe peak pressure measurement (PEDAR, Novel) are performed in 5 patients with diabetic neuropathy and 5 controls: all wearing the same kind of ready made shoes with ready made standard fitting insoles of cork. Each subject is measured in 3 modes of weight simulation: normal weight, 20 kg weight increase (waistcoat with weight pieces) and 20 kg weight release by a movable overhead suspension covering a 6m walkway. Pace is selected individually after some pre-test walking to be comfortable in all 3 weight modes. For data analysis the plantar area of the foot is divided into 6 regions, particularly metatarsal region and heel. Results: No significant difference between diabetics and controls is found. In the most threatened regions (metatarsals and heel) peak pressure increases and decreases linearly with weight: A simulated weight change ± 20 kg increases/ decreases metatarsal peak pressure by ± 6.4 N/cm2. The corresponding figure for the heel region is ± 2.6 N/cm2. Conclusions: Weight increase or weight loss in the individual patient has at least in the metatarsal and heel region a significant effect to the plantar peak pressure. The linear relationship allows for a simple method of predicting the effect of weight change to peak pressure

Introduction. A common acute orthopaedic presentation is an ulcerated or infected foot secondary to diabetic neuropathy. Surgical debridement or amputation are often required to manage this complication of diabetes. International literature indicates that amputation may lead to further complications and an increased mortality rate. The aim of this study is to investigate the mortality rate associated with different surgical interventions. This will inform surgical management of patients presenting with acute foot complications from diabetes. Methods. This is a retrospective review of patients with diabetic foot infections aged >16 years attending Middlemore Hospital over a 10-year period (2012–2021). Clinical records were examined to determine whether patients were managed with no surgery, surgery but not amputation, or amputation. We recorded relevant baseline characteristics and comorbidities. Regression models were used to determine factors associated with mortality. Results. Over the study period, 1260 patients were included in analysis. Patients were divided into three groups, a control group who received no surgical intervention (n=554), those receiving surgery but not amputation (n=269), and those who underwent amputation (n=437). After adjustment for potential confounders, mortality rates were significantly higher in those who underwent amputation compared with those who received surgical intervention without amputation. Survival probability at 1 year and 5 years was highest in the surgical intervention but not amputation group. Conclusion. It is clinically important that there is a lower mortality rate in patients who undergo surgical intervention without amputation. Treatment that aims to salvage the limb rather than amputate should be considered in management of patients with diabetic foot complications to optimise their care

Charcot neuroarthropathy is a rare but serious complication of diabetes, causing progressive destruction of the bones and joints of the foot leading to deformity, altered biomechanics and an increased risk of ulceration. Management is complicated by a lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria and an incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis. In this review, we consider recent insights into the development of Charcot neuroarthropathy. It is likely to be dependent on several interrelated factors which may include a genetic pre-disposition in combination with diabetic neuropathy. This leads to decreased neuropeptides (nitric oxide and calcitonin gene-related peptide), which may affect the normal coupling of bone formation and resorption, and increased levels of Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, potentiating osteoclastogenesis. Repetitive unrecognized trauma due to neuropathy increases levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor α) which could also contribute to increased bone resorption, in combination with a pre-inflammatory state, with increased autoimmune reactivity and a profile of monocytes primed to transform into osteoclasts - cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14). Increased blood glucose and loss of circulating Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-Products (AGLEPs), leading to increased non-enzymatic glycation of collagen and accumulation of AGLEPs in the tissues of the foot, may also contribute to the pathological process. An understanding of the relative contributions of each of these mechanisms and a final common pathway for the development of Charcot neuroarthropathy are still lacking. Cite this article: S. E. Johnson-Lynn, A. W. McCaskie, A. P. Coll, A. H. N. Robinson. Neuroarthropathy in diabetes: pathogenesis of Charcot arthropathy. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:373–378. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.75.BJR-2017-0334.R1

Aim. Forefoot ulcers in patients with diabetic neuropathy are a result of factors that result in increased forefoot plantar pressures. Progressive hindfoot equinus from contraction of gastrocnemius-soleus-tendo-Achilles complex and progressive plantar flexed metatarsal heads secondary to claw toe deformity results callus at the metatarsal heads which break down to ulceration. The aim is to describe 2-stage treatment pathway for managing these ulcers. Methods. Consecutive patients, who presented with forefoot ulcers since February 2019 were treated with a 2-stage treatment pathway. The first stage of this is an out-patient tendo-Achilles lengthening (TAL). The second stage is surgical proximal dorsal closing wedge metatarsal osteotomy for patients with persistent or recurrent ulcers. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Results. 112 patients (146 feet) underwent TAL by 3 consultants. Of these, 96 patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months (range 12–36 months). None had infection or wound related problems at the tenotomy sites; complete transection of the tendon was noted in 4 patients (4%) and one-patient developed heel callosity suggestive of over-lengthening. In 92 patients (96%), the ulcers healed within 10 weeks (± 4 weeks). Additional z-lengthening of peroneal longus and tibialis posterior tendons helped in patients with 1. st. metatarsal and 5. th. metatarsal head ulcers respectively. In 12 patients (10%), the ulcer failed to heal or recurred. MRI scan in these patients showed plantar flexed metatarsals from progressive claw toe deformity. The ulcer in this group healed after surgical offloading with proximal dorsal closing wedge osteotomy of the metatarsal/s, with no recurrence at a minimum 12months of follow-up. Conclusion. The described 2-stage treatment pathway results in long-term healing of neuropathic forefoot ulcers, and in 96% of patients, the ulcer healed after the first stage out-patient percutaneous TAL

Aim. To describe a 2-stage treatment pathway for managing neuropathic forefoot ulcers and the safety and efficacy of percutaneous tendo-Achilles lengthening (TAL) in out-patient clinics. Methods. Forefoot ulcers in patients with diabetic neuropathy are a result of factors that result in increased forefoot plantar pressure. Plantar flexed metatarsal heads secondary to progressive claw toe deformity and hindfoot equinus from changes within the gastrocnemius-soleus-tendo-Achilles complex, with additional contraction of tibialis posterior and peroneal longus, secondary to motor neuropathy results in progressive increase in forefoot plantar pressures. Consecutive patients, who presented to our Diabetic Foot clinic since February 2019 with forefoot ulcers or recurrent forefoot callosity were treated with TAL in the first instance, and in patients with recurrent or non-healing ulcers, by proximal dorsal closing wedge osteotomy; a 2-stage treatment pathway. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months to assess ulcer healing and recurrence. Results. One hundred and twelve patients (146 feet) underwent TAL by 3 consultants in the out-patient clinics. Of these, 96 feet were followed for a minimum of 12 months (range 12–36 months). None had infection or wound related problems at the tenotomy sites; complete transection of the tendon was noted in 4 patients (4%) and one-patient developed heel callosity suggestive of over-lengthening. In 92 feet (96%), the ulcers healed within 10 weeks (± 4 weeks). Additional z-lengthening of peroneal longus and tibialis posterior tendons helped in patients with big-toe and 5. th. metatarsal head ulcers. In 12 feet (10%), the ulcer failed to heal or recurred, the MRI scan in these patients showed plantar flexed metatarsals secondary to progressive claw toe deformity. The ulcer in this group healed after surgical offloading with proximal dorsal closing wedge osteotomy. In patients with osteomyelitis, the intramedullary canal was curetted and filled with local antibiotic eluting agents such as Cerament G. ®. The osteotomy site was stabilised with a percutaneous 1.6mm k-wire. Conclusion. The described 2-stage treatment pathway results in long-term healing of neuropathic forefoot ulcers, and in 96% of patients, the ulcer healed after out-patient percutaneous TAL alone. TAL is a safe and effective initial out-patient procedure with improved patient outcomes

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for complications after operative management of ankle fractures. Generally, diabetic sequelae such as neuropathy and nephropathy portend greater risk; however, the degree of risk resulting from these patient factors is poorly defined. We sought to evaluate the effects of the diabetic sequelae of neuropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) on the risk of complications following operative management of ankle fractures. Using a national claims-based database we analyzed patients who had undergone operative management of an ankle fracture and who remained active in the database for at least two years thereafter. Patients were divided into two cohorts, those with a diagnosis of diabetes and those without. Each cohort was further stratified into five groups: neuropathy, CKD, PVD, multiple sequelae, and no sequelae. The multiple sequelae group included patients with more than one of the three sequelae of interest: CKD, PVD and neuropathy. Postoperative complications were queried for two years following surgery. The main complications of interested were: deep vein thrombosis (DVT), surgical site infection, hospital readmission within 90 days, revision internal fixation, conversion to ankle fusion, and below knee amputation (BKA). We identified 210,069 patients who underwent operative ankle fracture treatment; 174,803 had no history of diabetes, and 35,266 were diabetic. The diabetic cohort was subdivided as follows: 7,506 without identified sequelae, 8,994 neuropathy, 4,961 CKD, 1,498 PVD, and 12,307 with multiple sequelae. Compared to non-diabetics, diabetics without sequelae had significantly higher odds of DVT, infection, readmission, revision internal fixation and conversion to ankle fusion (OR range 1.21 – 1.58, p values range Compared to uncomplicated diabetics, diabetics with neuropathy alone and diabetics with multiple sequelae were found to have significantly higher odds of all complications (OR range 1.18 – 31.94, p values range < 0.001 - 0.034). Diabetics with CKD were found to have significantly higher odds of DVT, readmission, and BKA (OR range 1.34 – 4.28, p values range < 0.001 - 0.002). Finally, diabetics with PVD were found to have significantly higher odds of DVT, readmission, conversion to ankle fusion, and BKA (OR range 1.62 - 9.69, p values range < 0.001 - 0.039). Diabetic patients with sequelae of neuropathy, CKD or PVD generally had higher complication rates than diabetic patients without these diagnoses. Unsurprisingly, diabetic patients with multiple sequalae are at the highest risk of complications and had the highest odds ratios of all complications. While neuropathy is known to be associated with postoperative complications, our analysis demonstrates that CKD represents a significant risk factor for multiple complications following the operative management of ankle fractures and has rarely been discussed in prior studies

Diabetes is a poor prognostic indicator after an ankle fracture. Many surgeons avoid operating due to concerns regarding complications. We performed a retrospective analysis of complication rates for acute ankle fractures in diabetics with a control non-diabetic patient treated by all surgeons in our unit and assessed factors for success including long-segment fixation. Patient records were cross-referenced with departmental databases and a review of all ankle fractures managed in our department was conducted from 2012. All patients subjected to a retrospective-review of their follow-up for at least 6-months. Radiographs were assessed of the ankle before and at completion of treatment being reviewed independently (RA & FR). We identified the HB1Ac (diabetic-control) and systematic co-morbidities. Fractures were classified into unimalleolar, bi malleolar and trimalleolar and surgery grouped into standard or long-segment-rigid fixation. Statistical analysis was conducted using absolute/relative risk (RR); numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. We compared a control-group, a diabetic group managed conservatively, and undergoing surgery; comparing the concept of rigid fixation and prolonged imobilisation in isolation or combined. Further sub-analysis conducted assessing diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy. Ethics approval was granted as per our institutional policy by our governance lead. We identified 154 diabetic ankle fractures, seventy-six had conservative-treatment; 78 had operative fixation of which 23 had rigid-long-segment-fixation. The diabetic-groups had a higher risk-relative-risk of complication − 3.2 (P< 0.03) being linked to systematic complications of diabetes e.g. neuropathy 5.8 (P< 0.003); HBA1c 4.6 P< 0.004); and neuropathy or retinopathy 6.2 (P< 0.0003). Relative-risk reduction of complications occurred following surgery with prolonged immobilization (0.86) and rigid-fixation (0.65). The Number-Needed-to-Treat required to see a benefit from rigid fixation was 7. Diabetics have a higher risk for complications, however the risk is not as great as previously reported. We provide evidence of rigid-long-segment-fixation with prolonged-immobilization improving-outcomes

Diabetes is a poor prognostic indicator after an acute ankle fracture. Many surgeons avoid essential surgery due to their concerns regarding complications. We performed a retrospective analysis of complication rates for acute ankle fractures in diabetics with a control non-diabetic patient treated by all surgeons in our unit and assessed factors for success including long-segment fixation methodologies. Patient records were cross-referenced with departmental databases and a retrospective review of all ankle fractures managed in our department was conducted from 2014. All patients subjected to a retrospective review of their notes and assessment of their follow up for at least 6 months. Radiographs were assessed of the ankle before and at completion of treatment were reviewed independently (RA and FR). We identified all patients with a diabetic ankle fracture their HB1Ac (for diabetic control) and systematic co-morbidities. Fractures were classified into unimalleolar, bi malleolar and trimalleolar and surgery grouped into standard or long-segment-rigid fixation. Statistical analysis was conducted using absolute/relative risk (RR); numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. We compared a control-group, a diabetic group managed conservatively, and undergoing surgery; comparing the concept of rigid fixation. Further sub-analysis conducted to assess differences between diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy. Ethics approval was granted as per our institutional policy by our governance lead. We identified 64 patients with a diabetic ankle fractures, their fracture pattern and a control group. Thirty-one had conservative treatment; 33 had operative fixation of which 13 had rigid fixation. Compared to the control (n=32) both diabetic groups had a higher risk of possible complication. The relative risk was between 3.1–3.4 (P<0.002) and linked to systematic complications of diabetes e.g. neuropathy 5.9 (P<0.003); HBA1c 4.6 P<0.004); and neuropathy and retinopathy 6.2 P<0.0003). We observed RR is reduced for a complication occurring following surgery with prolonged immobilization (0.86) and rigid fixation (0.65) and NNT required to see a benefit from rigid fixation was 7. The overall RR for a complication was similar between conservative and surgical management (4.6 vs.5.1). We agree diabetics have a higher risk for complications than non-diabetics, however the risk is not as great as previously reported. There is little difference in surgical or conservative treatment but strong evidence indicating rigid long-segment-fixation with prolonged-immobilization could improve the risk benefit ratio when compared to non- operative management alone but further evaluation is required

Hind foot Charcot deformity is a disastrous complication of diabetic neuropathy and can lead to instability, ulceration and amputation. The treatment of these patients is controversial. Internal stabilisation and external fixation have demonstrated variable results of limb salvage and some authorities thus advise patients to undergo elective amputation. We report a series of 9 diabetic patients with severe hind foot deformity complicated by ulceration in 5/9, who underwent acute corrective internal fixation with successful correction of deformity, healing of ulceration in 4/5 patients and limb salvage in all cases. Conservative measures such as total contact casting were tried in 5 patients had predominant varus deformity, 2 with valgus deformity and 2 with unstable ankle joints. 5 patients had developed secondary ulceration. All patients underwent corrective hind foot fusion with tibio-talo-calcaneal arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail fixation and screws and bone grafting. One patient also with fixed planovalgus deformity of the foot underwent a corrective midfoot reconstruction. Patients were followed up in a diabetic/orthopaedic multidisciplinary foot clinic and were treated with total contact casting. (Mean follow up time was 15.6 ±6.9months) In all patients the deformity was corrected with successful realignment to achieve a plantigrade foot. Healing of the secondary ulcers was achieved in 4/5 cases and limb salvage was achieved in all cases. Three patients underwent further surgical procedure to promote bone fusion. One patient required removal of a significantly displaced fixation screw. Two patients had postoperative wound infections which that were treated with initially intravenous antibiotic therapy and then negative pressure wound therapy. In conclusion, internal fixation for severe hind foot deformity together with close follow up in a multidisciplinary diabetic/orthopaedic foot clinic can be successful in diabetic patients with advanced Charcot osteoarthropathy and secondary ulceration

Introduction. Hind foot Charcot deformity is a disastrous complication of diabetic neuropathy and can lead to instability, ulceration and major amputation. The treatment of these patients is controversial. Internal stabilization and/or external fixation have demonstrated variable results of limb salvage and some authorities thus advise patients to undergo elective major amputation. However, we report a series of 9 diabetic patients with severe hind foot deformity complicated by ulceration in 5/9, who underwent acute corrective internal fixation with successful correction of deformity, healing of ulceration in 4/5 patients and limb salvage in all cases. Methods. We treated 9 diabetic patients attending a multidisciplinary diabetic/orthopaedic foot clinic with progressive severe Charcot hind foot deformity despite treatment with total contact casting, 5 with predominant varus deformity and 2 with valgus deformity and 2 with unstable ankle joints. Five patients had developed secondary ulceration. All patients underwent corrective hind foot fusion with tibiotalo-calcaneal arthrodesis using a retrograde intra-medullary nail fixation and screws and bone grafting. One patient also with fixed plano-valgus deformity of the foot underwent a corrective mid-foot reconstruction. Results. Patients were followed up closely in the diabetic /orthopaedic multidisciplinary foot clinic and were treated with total contact casting. (Mean follow up time was 15.6 ±6.9months) In all patients the deformity was corrected with successful realignment to achieve a plantigrade foot. Healing of the secondary ulcers was achieved in 4/5casesand limb salvage was achieved in all cases. Three patients underwent further surgical procedure to promote bone fusion. One patient required removal of a significantly displaced fixation screw. In another patient with previously existing heel ulceration, the fixation device was removed due to progressive ulceration. However, by then, the patient had achieved fibrous union and stability of the hind foot. Two patients had postoperative wound infections which that were treated with initially intravenous antibiotic therapy and then negative pressure wound therapy. Conclusion. In conclusion, internal fixation for severe hind foot deformity together with close follow up in a multidisciplinary diabetic/orthopaedic foot clinic can be successful in diabetic patients with advanced Charcot osteoarthropathy and secondary ulceration

Proximal Release of Gastrocnemius (PROG) is a procedure which can be performed to treat various disorders of the foot and ankle. Gastrocnemius contracture/tightening is a condition which can lead to many chronic debilitating foot conditions like Metatarsalgia, Hallux Valgus, Plantar Fascitis, Diabetic foot ulcers etc, which in turn can significantly affect patient's quality of life. In this study we present eight cases who presented with forefoot pain, were treated with PROG and showed a complete resolution of their condition. The test used to determine Gastrocnemius contracture is the “SILFVERSKIOLD TEST”. It measures the dorsiflexion (DF) of the foot at the ankle joint (AJ) with knee extended & flexed to 90 degrees. The test is considered positive when DF at the AJ is greater with knee flexed than extended. We studied eight patients who presented to the orthopaedic outpatients between 2005 and 2010 with diverse foot conditions and having relative equinism. Six out of eight patients suffered from forefoot pain, out of which three had associated diabetic neuropathy and one out of these three had a diabetic foot ulcer. One was in association with arthritis of Talonavicular & Transmetatarsal joint, another had callosity under the head of second metatarsal. One patient had claw toes with associated Rheumatoid Arthritis. One of our patients presented with spasticity in his left calf, severe Hallux Valgus & dislocated MTPJ. He had an unsuccessful Strayer procedure on the same leg in the past. The final case had Achilles tendonitis & spurs. A finding common to all of them pre operatively was a positive Silfverskiold test, all having ZERO degree DF at the AJ with knee extended. Surgical release of the aponeurotic head of gastrocnemius was performed in prone position through a transverse incision. A cam walker was used for two weeks in those patients who were permitted to weight-bear, else a plaster for two weeks. No surgical complications occurred. Success was measured both in returning the ability to dorsiflex and resolution of related condition. DF in extension improved from an average of zero to 16(sixteen) degrees. Seven out of eight patients(including the patient with planter ulcer)had resolution of associated condition. One failure was a patient who continued to experience neuropathic pain. None of the patients complained of any weakness as a result of release. PROG is a straightforward procedure and should be considered in patients where gastrocnemius tightening is likely to be the contributing factor. This seems to improve the success of related procedures

In developed nations Charcot arthropathy is most commonly caused by diabetes mellitus. Worldwide, leprosy remains the primary cause. All evidence points to a relationship between neurologic loss, continued loading activities and the development of unrecognized bone fragmentation. In type 2 diabetes, dysregulation of leptin biology causes bone loss and may be an important factor in precipitating Charcot events. Bone density studies show massive loss of bone in patients with ankle and hindfoot Charcot problems, but not midfoot problems. This suggests a different mechanism for collapse. Stable collapse with ulcer development in the midfoot can be treated with exostectomy. Realignment and fusion remain the mainstays of treatment for diabetic Charcot neuropathy, especially in the ankle and hindfoot. Bone mineralization deficiencies require special consideration of fixation techniques. Thin wire external fixation – either as primary fixation or to reinforce/neutralize other methods can be very helpful. Large bridging screws and carefully selected bridging plates are frequently also valuable to consider. Excessive immobilization periods (often double the normal amount of time) are generally required. The goal may be limited to a braceable, plantigrade foot

Background. Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy is a rare, destructive process affecting the bones and joints of feet in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The aetiology of Charcot remains unknown, although it has been suggested that it is triggered by the occurrence of inflammation in the foot of a susceptible individual, and that the inflammation results in increased osteoclastic activity. Hypothesis. The increased bone turnover in acute Charcot is associated with increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines, related signalling peptides and bone turnover markers. Methods. 17 patients newly presenting with acute Charcot in diabetes and 16 non-diabetic patients without neuropathy undergoing elective forefoot surgery provided informed consented to participate. Samples of bone were taken by needle biopsy, and were stained with H&E to determine bone architecture and bone remodelling. Serum ALP, CTX, OPG and sRANKL TNF, IL1-beta, IL6 and CRP were measured by immunoassay. Blood was taken from the dorsal foot vein of both the affected and the unaffected foot, as well as an antecubital vein. Results. Classic histopathology features of fracture and bone remodelling were evident in Charcot bone biopsies. Systemic circulating concentrations in the Charcot group antecubital vein for both IL6 and OPG were significantly greater than in controls (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the dorsal vein concentrations of any analyte when the affected and unaffected feet were compared. However, in patients with an acute Charcot foot the concentration of OPG, ALP and CTX was higher in sera from the dorsal vein of affected foot when compared to controls (p<0.05), this difference was highly significant for IL6 (p<0.001). Conclusion. The elevation in CTX observed in the affected foot in patients with an acute Charcot foot reflects the bone breakdown and remodelling which is present. The higher circulating concentration of IL-6 in the Charcot patient group, reflects the inflammation which is present and which is thought to be central to the development of the condition. Although OPG values were significantly greater in Charcot than control group, circulating concentrations of OPG are known to be higher in diabetes

The February 2013 Wrist & Hand Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: to splint or not to splint; salvage of the unsalvageable; a close shave for malunions; a classic approach to malunion; diabetic carpal tunnel; capsulodesis; a wrist from a fibula; thumb-based osteoarthritis - a further opinion from the Editor-in-Chief.

The August 2014 Wrist & Hand Roundup360 looks at: Trapeziectomy superior to arthrodesis;Tamoxifen beneficial in the short term; Semi-occlusive dressing “the bee’s knees” even with exposed bone; “Open” a relative concept in the hand and wrist; Editorial decisions pushing up standards of reporting; Ulnar variance revisited; Traditionalists are traditional; Diabetes not so bad with carpal tunnel