Introduction. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery and improved post-operative pain management make it possible to perform major foot/ankle operations as day-case. This could have significant impact on length of stay, saving resources and is in keeping with government policy. However, there are theoretical concerns about complications and low patient satisfaction due to pain. Methods. The survey was developed following review of the literature and was approved for distribution by the BOFAS (British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society) scientific committee. An online survey (19 questions) was sent to UK foot and ankle surgeons via the BOFAS membership list. Major foot/ ankle procedures were defined as surgery that is usually performed as an inpatient in majority of centres and day-case as same day discharge, with day surgery as the intended pathway. Results. A total of 132 surgeons responded, 80% from Acute NHS Trusts. The majority (78%) thought that more procedures could be performed as day-case at their centre. Currently 45% of respondents perform less than 100 day-case surgeries per year for these procedures. Despite post-operative pain and patient satisfaction being theoretical concerns for day-case surgery in this population; these outcomes were only measured by 34% and 10% of respondents respectively. The top perceived barriers to performing more major foot and ankle procedures as day-case were: Lack of physiotherapy input pre/post-operatively (23%), Lack of out of hours support (21%). Conclusions. There is consensus among surgeons to do more major foot/ ankle procedures as day-case. Despite theoretical concerns about post-operative pain and satisfaction this was only measured by a third of those surveyed. Out of hours support and physiotherapy input pre/ post-op were perceived as the main barriers. There is a need to scope the provision of physiotherapy pre/post-operatively and out of hours support at sites where this is a perceived barrier

Aims. Day-case success rates after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) may vary, and detailed data are needed on causes of not being discharged. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between surgical procedure type and successful day-case surgery, and to analyze causes of not being discharged on the day of surgery when eligible and scheduled for day-case THA, TKA, and mUKA. Methods. A multicentre, prospective consecutive cohort study was carried out from September 2022 to August 2023. Patients were screened for day-case eligibility using well defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and discharged when fulfilling predetermined discharge criteria. Day-case eligible patients were scheduled for surgery with intended start of surgery before 1.00 pm. Results. Of 6,142 primary hip and knee arthroplasties, eligibility rates for day-case surgery were 34% for THA (95% CI 32% to 36%), 34% for TKA (95% CI 32% to 36%), and 52% for mUKA (95% CI 49% to 55%). Surgery before 1.00 pm was achieved in 85% of eligible patients. The day-case success rate among patients with surgery before 1.00 pm was 59% (95% CI 55% to 62%) for THA, 61% (95% CI 57% to 65%) for TKA, and 72% (95% CI 68% to 76%) for mUKA. Overall day-case success rates (eligible and non-eligible) were 19% (95% CI 17% to 20%) for THA, 20% (95% CI 18% to 21%) for TKA, and 42% (95% CI 39% to 45%) for mUKA. Adjusted analysis confirmed higher day-case success in eligible mUKA patients (odds ratio 1.9 (1.6 to 2.3)) compared to TKA and THA patients. Primary causes for day-case failure were mobilization issues (9% to 12% between procedures), prolonged spinal anaesthesia (4% to 9%), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (4% to 14%). Conclusion. THA and TKA patients showed comparable eligibility (34%) with similar day-case success rates (59 to 61%), whereas mUKA patients demonstrated higher eligibility (52%) and day-case success (72%). Mobilization issues, prolonged spinal anaesthesia, and PONV were the most frequent causes for not being discharged

The interest in day-case hip arthroplasty is increasing; however, there are conflicting results regarding readmission risk, and little is known about patients’ attitude towards day-case surgery. We aimed to investigate differences in 30-day readmission rates between day-case patients and single-overnight-stay patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and explore patients’ attitude towards day-case surgery. From the Danish National Patient Register we identified 29,486 THAs (1353 day-case THAs and 28,133 single-overnight-stay THAs) performed between 2010 and 2020. Day-case surgery was defined as discharge on the day-of-surgery. Overnight admissions within 30 days of surgery were considered readmissions. Differences in readmission rates between day-case and single-overnight-stay patients were investigated using logistic regression adjusted for patient characteristics and year of surgery. In a single-center descriptive study, 2395 hip arthroplasty patients from 2016 to start-2023 answered a questionnaire on patient characteristics, attitude towards day-case surgery and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). The overall 30-day readmission rate was 4.4% (CI: 4.2–4.6%) with no difference between day-case (4.4%) and single-overnight-stay THAs (4.4%) (odds-ratio: 1.2 [CI: 0.91–1.6]). In the descriptive study answers to the question whether patients were interested in being discharged on the day of surgery, were: “Yes” = 41%, “Do not know” = 20%, “No” = 39%. Patients responding “No” had lower preoperative PROM-scores, were older (“No” = 70.2 y vs. “Yes” = 65.3 y), and more often female (“No” = 72% vs. “Yes” = 52% female). Based on nationwide data from 2010–2020, day-case THA patients were not more likely to be readmitted compared to single-overnight-stay patients. However, most patients were not positive towards day-case surgery. While surgeons may consider day-case surgery to be safe, patients are not intuitively positive, indicating an attitude mismatch. To achieve high success rate and patient satisfaction in day-case surgery, shared-decision making initiatives within day-case surgery are needed

Background: Local blocks, as the sole means of anaesthesia, in forefoot surgery have previously been described. This technique is not widely practised in the UK but we have routinely used such blocks for many years. Our aim was to assess how well patients tolerated this technique.

Methods: 64 consecutive day cases of fore-foot surgery were recruited prospectively for local anaesthetic block. A range of operations were performed including basal osteotomy of 1st metatarsal and MTPJ arthrodesis. No patients declined to be included. Peripheral nerve blockade was performed by the orthopaedic surgeon or his registrar. Efficacy of block was assessed intra-operatively with a visual analogue score (VAS) of 0 to 10 (10 being worst pain imaginable and 0 being no pain). Overall satisfaction with the anaesthetic procedure was assessed on a 5 point scale (from 1 = very unsatisfied to 5 = very satisfied) at 2 weeks.

Results: Average time to perform the block was 6 minutes (range 3 to 12 mins). Mean VAS for knife to skin was 0.38 (95% confidence ± 0.31) and for ankle tourniquet was 1.44 (95% confidence ± 0.51). At follow up mean satisfaction at 2 weeks was 4.2 out of 5 (95% confidence ± 0.30) with only 9 patients lost to follow up (86% of patients followed up). No complications were reported.

Conclusion: Our experience is that these blocks are quick and easy to perform in the hands of orthopaedic surgeons. They are well tolerated and effective. They result in a considerable cost saving in terms of theatre efficiency and anaesthetist and ODP resources. These savings are still being evaluated.

Aims. COVID-19 necessitated abrupt changes in trauma service delivery. We compare the demographics and outcomes of patients treated during lockdown to a matched period from 2019. Findings have important implications for service development. Methods. A split-site service was introduced, with a COVID-19 free site treating the majority of trauma patients. Polytrauma, spinal, and paediatric trauma patients, plus COVID-19 confirmed or suspicious cases, were managed at another site. Prospective data on all trauma patients undergoing surgery at either site between 16 March 2020 and 31 May 2020 was collated and compared with retrospective review of the same period in 2019. Patient demographics, injury, surgical details, length of stay (LOS), COVID-19 status, and outcome were compared. Results. There were 1,004 urgent orthopaedic trauma patients (604 in 2019; 400 in 2020). Significant reductions in time to theatre and LOS stay were observed. COVID-19 positive status was confirmed in 4.5% (n = 18). The COVID-19 mortality rate was 1.8% (n = 7). Day-case surgery comprised 47.8% (n = 191), none testing positive for COVID-19 or developing clinically significant COVID-19 symptoms requiring readmission, at a minimum of 17 days follow-up. Conclusion. The novel split-site service, segregating suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases, minimized onward transmission and demonstrated improved outcomes regarding time to surgery and LOS, despite altered working patterns and additional constraints. Day-surgery pathways appear safe regarding COVID-19 transmission. Lessons learned require dissemination and should be sustained in preparation for a potential second wave or, the return of a “normal” non-COVID workload. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:568–575

Aims

The rate of day-case total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the UK is currently approximately 0.5%. Reducing length of stay allows orthopaedic providers to improve efficiency, increase operative throughput, and tackle the rising demand for joint arthroplasty surgery and the COVID-19-related backlog. Here, we report safe delivery of day-case TKA in an NHS trust via inpatient wards with no additional resources.

Aims

It is common practice for patients to have postoperative blood tests after total joint replacement (TJR). However, there have been significant improvements in perioperative care with arthroplasty surgery, and a drive to reduce the length of stay (LOS) and move towards day-case TJR. We should reconsider whether this intervention is necessary for all patients.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(12):1120–1122.

We reviewed our results and complications of using a pre-bent 1.6mm Kirschner wire (K-wire) for extra-articular metacarpal fractures. The surgical procedure was indicated for angulation at the fracture site in a true lateral radiograph of at least 30 degrees and/or in the presence of a rotatory deformity. A single K-wire is pre-bent in a lazy-S fashion with a sharp bend at approximately 5 millimetres and a longer smooth curve bent in the opposite direction. An initial entry point is made at the base of the metacarpal using a 2.5mm drill by hand. The K-wire is inserted blunt end first in an antegrade manner and the fracture reduced as the wire is passed across the fracture site. With the wire acting as three-point fixation, early mobilisation is commenced at the metacarpo-phalangeal joint in a Futuro hand splint. The wire is usually removed with pliers post-operatively at four weeks in the fracture clinic. We studied internal fixation of 18 little finger and 2 ring finger metacarpal fractures from November 2007 to August 2009. The average age of the cohort was 25 years with 3 women and 17 men. The predominant mechanism was a punch injury with 5 diaphyseal and 15 metacarpal neck fractures. The time to surgical intervention was a mean 13 days (range 4 to 28 days). All fractures proceeded to bony union. The wire was extracted at an average of 4.4 weeks (range three to six weeks). At an average follow up of 8 weeks, one fracture had to be revised for failed fixation and three superficial wound infections needed antibiotic treatment. With this simple and minimally invasive technique performed as day-case surgery, all patients were able to start mobilisation immediately. The general outcome was good hand function with few complications

It is not often that the patient, surgeon and hospital management are happy about the same service. However, day-case surgery is an exception, as it has well recognised cost-effectiveness. The new day-surgical shoulder arthroscopy service was audited from its commencement in August 2008 until April 2010. The objectives were to see if patients were going home the same day. All data was gathered retrospectively via the hospital's online database and the patients' notes were collected. An Excel database was created. From August 2008 to April 2010, a total of 41 arthroscopies were performed on 41 patients. Consultant K.A. was the operator in each case. In all cases, an interscalene nerve block was attempted by a consultant anaesthetist. All patients received endotracheal intubation and they were placed in a ‘beach-chair’ position. 49% of patients were male and 51% female. Age range was from 17-70 and the average age was 51 years. 66% underwent a sub-acromial decompression and the remainder had a cuff repair. There were two unplanned admissions due to an ineffective interscalene nerve block and the other patient suffered from paranoid schizophrenia and his carer was unavailable. All patients that went home did not re-attend as an emergency. There were no adverse events documented. After discussion with senior staff, we conclude that this service is working well. Key facets of this service are that it should be consultant led with a familiar team, adhere to the standard day-surgical criteria and use interscalene nerve analgesia. The use of continuous regional anaesthetic infusion pumps may improve patient comfort, as reports suggest that they have some advantages. This service shall be re-audited in 2 years time

Aims

Fractures of the distal radius are common, and form a considerable proportion of the trauma workload. We conducted a study to examine the patterns of injury and treatment for adult patients presenting with distal radius fractures to a major trauma centre serving an urban population.

Carpal tunnel syndrome requiring decompression is common at the world’s largest lamb processing plant. However there is little to guide us in advising patients on return to heavy manual work postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to establish current New Zealand practice and whether expeditious return to work was possible. Following informed consent a retrospective review of those with neurophysiologically-confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome requiring decompression over four seasons was performed. Open, day-case surgery was performed in all cases by the senior author. Patient demographics, time to return to work, further absenteeism, pain-free interval and complications were examined. A prospective study in the subsequent season was then performed. Additional information gathered for previous seasons pre and 6 week postoperatively included QuickDASH, SF36, grip-strength visual analogue pain, paraesthesiae and numbness scores. Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis. An email survey of the NZOA was also performed. One hundred percent follow-up was achieved. In the retrospective group 281 in 187 patients were performed. The average time to return to light duties/rehabilitation was 11 (9 – 42) days. The mean pain free interval was 24 (10 – 63) days. Return to full-duties was on average 28 (10 – 70) dayswith three patients (1% of the total cohort) requiring further time off. Ninety-nine percent returned to their previous role. There were two infections. In the prospective group in this study, 26 hands underwent decompression in 13 patients. The average return to light duties/rehabilitation was 13 (10–25) days and to full duties 32 (21–56) days. Ninety-two percent returned to their previous role and there was one superficial infect ion. The improvement in mean total QuickDASH scores (total score possible 300) were from 140 points (standard deviation 63: 95% CI 101–178) to 68 (standard deviation 54; 95% CI 34–100) and this was statistically significant (p< 0.01). The difference in Short Form 36 scores was not statistically significant (p = 0.6). The differences in numbness, pain and paraesthesiae visual analogue scores were all statistically significant at 6 weeks after surgery (p< 0.01, p< 0.01 and p=0.01 respectively). All patients felt that the operation had been overall worthwhile and at the time of submission none had taken any further time off work. Examining lamb boners as a separate group and using Survival and Cox regression analysis the average return to full working duties for lamb boners was 29 days which is significantly different to New Zealand Orthopaedic surgical practice. The unique population at this plant has allowed a culture to develop whereby early return to light duties after removal of sutures is expected. This culture, good patient education, and coordinated efforts at all levels of the care pathway are undoubtedly necessary for this level of achievement

Aims

Due to widespread cancellations in elective orthopaedic procedures, the number of patients on waiting list for surgery is rising. We aim to determine and quantify if disparities exist between inpatient and day-case orthopaedic waiting list numbers; we also aim to determine if there is a ‘hidden burden’ that already exists due to reductions in elective secondary care referrals.

Aims

COVID-19 represents one of the greatest global healthcare challenges in a generation. Orthopaedic departments within the UK have shifted care to manage trauma in ways that minimize exposure to COVID-19. As the incidence of COVID-19 decreases, we explore the impact and risk factors of COVID-19 on patient outcomes within our department.

Aims

We present the development of a day-case total hip arthroplasty (THA) pathway in a UK National Health Service institution in conjunction with an extensive evidence-based summary of the interventions used to achieve successful day-case THA to which the protocol is founded upon.

Aims

The exact risk to patients undergoing surgery who develop COVID-19 is not yet fully known. This study aims to provide the current data to allow adequate consent regarding the risks of post-surgery COVID-19 infection and subsequent COVID-19-related mortality.