Aims. Orthopaedic surgery requires grafts with sufficient mechanical strength. For this purpose, decellularized tissue is an available option that lacks the complications of autologous tissue. However, it is not widely used in orthopaedic surgeries. This study investigated clinical trials of the use of decellularized tissue grafts in orthopaedic surgery. Methods. Using the ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG) and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) databases, we comprehensively surveyed clinical trials of decellularized tissue use in orthopaedic surgeries registered before 1 September 2022. We evaluated the clinical results, tissue processing methods, and commercial availability of the identified products using academic literature databases and manufacturers’ websites. Results. We initially identified 4,402 clinical trials, 27 of which were eligible for inclusion and analysis, including nine shoulder surgery trials, eight knee surgery trials, two ankle surgery trials, two hand surgery trials, and six peripheral nerve graft trials. Nine of the trials were completed. We identified only one product that will be commercially available for use in knee surgery with significant mechanical load resistance. Peracetic acid and gamma irradiation were frequently used for sterilization. Conclusion. Despite the demand for decellularized tissue, few decellularized tissue products are currently commercially available, particularly for the knee joint. To be viable in orthopaedic surgery, decellularized tissue must exhibit biocompatibility and mechanical strength, and these requirements are challenging for the clinical application of decellularized tissue. However, the variety of available decellularized products has recently increased. Therefore, decellularized grafts may become a promising option in orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(3):179–188

Aims. People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial). Methods. An online cross-sectional survey was piloted by the multidisciplinary research team, then shared with clinical professional groups in the UK who are involved in the management of adults with severe, persistent LBP. The survey had seven sections that covered the demographic details of the clinician, five hypothetical case vignettes of patients with varying presentations, a series of questions regarding the preferred management, and whether or not each clinician would be willing to recruit the example patients into future clinical trials. Results. There were 72 respondents, with a response rate of 9.0%. They comprised 39 orthopaedic spine surgeons, 17 neurosurgeons, one pain specialist, and 15 allied health professionals. Most respondents (n = 61,84.7%) chose conservative care as their first-choice management option for all five case vignettes. Over 50% of respondents reported willingness to randomize three of the five cases to either surgery or BCC, indicating a willingness to participate in the future randomized trial. From the respondents, transforaminal interbody fusion was the preferred approach for spinal fusion (n = 19, 36.4%), and the preferred method of BCC was a combined programme of physical and psychological therapy (n = 35, 48.5%). Conclusion. This survey demonstrates that there is uncertainty about the role of lumbar spine fusion surgery and BCC for a range of example patients with severe, persistent LBP in the UK. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):612–620

Low back pain (LBP) is the main cause of disability worldwide and is primarily triggered by intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Although several treatment options exist, no therapeutic tool has demonstrated to halt the progressive course of IDD. Therefore, several clinical trials are being conducted to investigate different strategies to regenerate the intervertebral disc, with numerous studies not reaching completion nor being published. The aim of this study was to analyze the publication status of clinical trials on novel regenerative treatments for IDD by funding source and identify critical obstacles preventing their conclusion. Prospective clinical trials investigating regenerative treatments for IDD and registered on . ClinicalTrials.gov. were included. Primary outcomes were publication status and investigational treatment funding. Fisher's exact test was utilized to test the association for categorical variables between groups. 25 clinical trials were identified. Among these, only 6 (24%) have been published. The most common source of funding was university (52%), followed by industry (36%) and private companies (12%). Investigational treatments included autologous (56%) or allogeneic (12%) products alone or in combination with a carrier or delivery system (32%). The latter were more likely utilized in industry or privately funded studies (Fig. 1, p=0.0112). No significant difference was found in terms of funding regarding the publication status of included trials (Table 1, p=0.9104). Most clinical trials investigating regenerative approaches for the treatment of IDD were never completed nor published. This is likely due to multiple factors, including difficult enrollment, high dropout rate, and publication bias. 3. More accurate design and technical support from stakeholders and clinical research organization (CROs) may likely increase the quality of future clinical trials in the field. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Aims. To describe outcome reporting variation and trends in non-pharmacological randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of distal tibia and/or ankle fractures. Methods. Five electronic databases and three clinical trial registries were searched (January 2000 to February 2022). Trials including patients with distal tibia and/or ankle fractures without concomitant injuries were included. One reviewer conducted all searches, screened titles and abstracts, assessed eligibility, and completed data extraction; a random 10% subset were independently assessed and extracted by a second reviewer at each stage. All extracted outcomes were mapped to a modified version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. The quality of outcome reporting (reproducibility) was assessed. Results. Overall, 105 trials (n = 16 to 669 participants) from 27 countries were included. Trials compared surgical interventions (n = 62), post-surgical management options (n = 17), rehabilitative interventions (n = 14), surgical versus non-surgical interventions (n = 6), and pre-surgical management strategies (n = 5). In total, 888 outcome assessments were reported across seven domains: 263 assessed body structure or function (85.7% of trials), 136 activities (68.6% of trials), 34 participation (23.8% of trials), 159 health-related quality of life (61.9% of trials), 247 processes of care (80% of trials), 21 patient experiences (15.2% of trials), and 28 economic impact (8.6% of trials). From these, 337 discrete outcomes were described. Outcome reporting was inconsistent across trials. The quality of reporting varied widely (reproducibility ranged 4.8% patient experience to 100% complications). Conclusion. Substantial heterogeneity in outcome selection, assessment methods, and reporting quality were described. Despite the large number of outcomes, few are reported across multiple trials. Most outcomes are clinically focused, with little attention to the long-term consequences important to patients. Poor reporting quality reduces confidence in data quality, inhibiting data synthesis by which to inform care decisions. Outcome reporting guidance and standardization, which captures the outcomes that matter to multiple stakeholders, are urgently required. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):832–840

Aims. Osteoarthritis (OA) affecting the thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) is a common painful condition. In this study, we aimed to explore clinicians’ approach to management with a particular focus on the role of specific interventions that will inform the design of future clinical trials. Methods. We interviewed a purposive sample of 24 clinicians, consisting of 12 surgeons and 12 therapists (four occupational therapists and eight physiotherapists) who managed patients with CMCJ OA. This is a qualitative study using semi-structured, online interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results. A total of 14 themes were developed, six of which were developed relating to the clinical management of CMCJ OA: 1) A flexible ‘ladder’ approach starting with conservative treatment first; 2) The malleable role of steroid injection; 3) Surgery as an invasive and risky last resort; 4) A shared and collaborative approach; 5) Treating the whole person; and 6) Severity of life impact influences treatment. The remaining eight themes were developed relating to clinical trial barriers and facilitators: 1) We need to embrace uncertainty; 2) You are not losing out by taking part; 3) It is difficult to be neutral about certain treatments; 4) Difficult to recruit to ‘no treatment’ ; 5) Difficult to recruit to a trial comparing no surgery to surgery; 6) Patients are keen to participate in research; 7) Burden on staff and participants; and 8) A enthusiasm for a variety of potential trial arms. Conclusion. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of how clinicians manage thumb CMCJ OA in their practice settings. Our study also provides useful insights informing the design of randomized clinical trials involving steroid injections and surgery in people with thumb CMCJ OA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(4):321–331

Fracture nonunion is a severe clinical problem for the patient, as well as for the clinician. About 5-20% of fractures does not heal properly after more than six months, with a 19% nonunion rate for tibia, 12% for femur and 13% for humerus, leading to patient morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and high costs. The standard treatment with iliac crest-derived autologous bone filling the nonunion site may cause pain or hematoma to the patient, as well as major complications such as infection. The application of mesenchymal autologous cells (MSC) to improve bone formation calls for randomized, open, two-arm clinical studies to verify safety and efficacy. The ORTHOUNION * project (ORTHOpedic randomized clinical trial with expanded bone marrow MSC and bioceramics versus autograft in long bone nonUNIONs) is a multicentric, open, randomized, comparative phase II clinical trial, approved in the framework of the H2020 funding programme, under the coordination of Enrique Gòmez Barrena of the Hospital La Paz (Madrid, Spain). Starting from January 2017, patients with nonunion of femur, tibia or humerus have been actively enrolled in Spain, France, Germany, and Italy. The study protocol encompasses two experimental arms, i.e., autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells after expansion (‘high dose’ or ‘low dose’ MSC) combined to ceramic granules (MBCP™, Biomatlante), and iliac crest-derived autologous trabecular bone (ICAG) as active comparator arm, with a 2-year follow-up after surgery. Despite the COVID 19 pandemic with several lockdown periods in the four countries, the trial was continued, leading to 42 patients treated out of 51 included, with 11 receiving the bone graft (G1 arm), 15 the ‘high dose’ MSC (200x10. 6. , G2a arm) and 16 the ‘low dose’ MSC (100x10. 6. , G2b arm). The Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute has functioned as coordinator of the Italian clinical centres (Bologna, Milano, Brescia) and the Biomedical Science and Technologies and Nanobiotechnology Lab of the RIT Dept. has enrolled six patients with the collaboration of the Rizzoli’ 3rd Orthopaedic and Traumatological Clinic prevalently Oncologic. Moreover, the IOR Lab has collected and analysed the blood samples from all the patients treated to monitor the changes of the bone turnover markers following the surgical treatment with G1, G2a or G2b protocols. The clinical and biochemical results of the study, still under evaluation, are presented. * ORTHOUNION Horizon 2020 GA 733288

Aims. Frozen shoulder is a common, painful condition that results in impairment of function. Corticosteroid injections are commonly used for frozen shoulder and can be given as glenohumeral joint (GHJ) injection or suprascapular nerve block (SSNB). Both injection types have been shown to significantly improve shoulder pain and range of motion. It is not currently known which is superior in terms of relieving patients’ symptoms. This is the protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate the clinical effectiveness of corticosteroid injection given as either a GHJ injection or SSNB. Methods. The Therapeutic Injections For Frozen Shoulder (TIFFS) study is a single centre, parallel, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 basis to either a GHJ corticosteroid injection or SSNB. Participants in both trial arms will then receive physiotherapy as normal for frozen shoulder. The primary analysis will compare the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at three months after injection. Secondary outcomes include OSS at six and 12 months, range of shoulder movement at three months, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale, abbreviated Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and EuroQol five-level five-dimension health index at three months, six months, and one year after injection. A minimum of 40 patients will be recruited to obtain 80% power to detect a minimally important difference of ten points on the OSS between the groups at three months after injection. The study is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT04965376. Conclusion. The results of this trial will demonstrate if there is a difference in shoulder pain and function after GHJ injection or SSNB in patients with frozen shoulder. This will help provide effective treatment to patients with frozen shoulder. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(3):205–209

Abstract. Background. Autologous chondrocyte implantation is a NICE approved intervention however it involves the morbidity of two operations, a prolonged rehabilitation and substantial healthcare costs. This study describes a novel, one-step, bone marrow (BM) derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation technique for treating knee osteochondral lesions and presents our prospective clinical study investigating the success of this technique in 206 lesions over a 5 year period. Methodology. The surgical technique involves harvesting BM from patients’ anterior superior iliac spines, centrifugation to isolate MSCs and seeding into a type 1 collagen scaffold (SyngenitTM Biomatrix). Autologous fibrin glue is used to secure the scaffold into the defect. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 15 – 55 years old with symptomatic osteochondral lesions >1cm2. Exclusion criteria included patients with ligament instability, uncorrected alignment, inflammatory arthropathy and a Body Mass Index >35 kg/m2. Outcome measures included the Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System (MCKRS), complications and reoperations. Results. Mean MCKR scores showed statistically significant improvements compared to pre-operative scores at 6 months 58.79 ± 3.5 and 1 year postoperatively 63.82 ± 3.93 with further improvements at 2 years and 5 years which did not reach statistical significance. Survival rates were 97.9%, 94% and 93.2% at 1, 2 and 5 years. Multiple regression analysis identified previous cartilage surgery, microfracture and age as factors affecting MCKRS scores (p < 0.029, 0.001 and 0.030, respectively). Conclusions. One-step BM derived stem cell transplantation demonstrates satisfactory outcomes over a 5 year period

Device-associated bacterial infections are a major and costly clinical challenge. This project aimed to develop a smart new biomaterial for implants that helps to protect against infection and inflammation, promote bone growth, and is biodegradable. Gallium (Ga) doped strontium-phosphate was coated on pure Magnesium (Mg) through a chemical conversion process. Mg was distributed in a graduated manner throughout the strontium-phosphate coating GaSrPO4, with a compact structure and a Ga-rich surface. We tested this sample for its biocompatibility, effects on bone remodeling and antibacterial activities including Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis and E. coli - key strains causing infection and early failure of the surgical implantations in orthopaedics and trauma. Ga was distributed in a gradient way throughout the entire strontium-phosphate coating with a compact structure and a gallium-rich surface. The GaSrPO4 coating protected the underlying Mg from substantial degradation in minimal essential media at physiological conditions over 9 days. The liberated Ga ions from the coatings upon Mg specimens inhibited the growth of bacterial tested. The Ga dopants showed minimal interferences with the SrPO4 based coating, which boosted osteoblasts and undermined osteoclasts in in vitro co-cultures model. The results evidenced this new material may be further translated to preclinical trial in large animal model and towards clinical trial. Acknowledgements: Authors are grateful to the financial support from the Australian Research Council through the Linkage Scheme (ARC LP150100343). The authors acknowledge the facilities, and the scientific and technical assistance of the RMIT University and John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University

Introduction. Unstable ankle fractures are routinely managed operatively. Due to soft-tissue and implant related complications, there has been recent literature reporting on the non-operative management of well-reduced medial malleolus fractures following fibular stabilisation, but with limited evidence supporting routine application. This trial assessed the superiority of internal fixation of well-reduced (displacement ≤2mm) medial malleolus fractures compared with non-fixation following fibular stabilisation. Methods and participants. Superiority, pragmatic, parallel, prospective randomised clinical trial conducted over a four year period. A total of 154 adult patients with a bi- or trimalleolar fractures were recruited from a single centre. Open injuries and vertical medial malleolar fractures were excluded. Following fibular stabilisation, patients were randomised intra-operatively on a 1:1 basis to fixation or non-fixation after satisfactory fluoroscopic fracture reduction was confirmed. The primary outcome was the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at one-year post-randomisation. Complications and radiographic outcomes were documented over the follow-up period. Results. Among 154 participants (mean age, 56.5 years; 119 women [77%]), 144 [94%] completed the trial. At one-year the median OMAS was 80 (IQR, 60–90) in the fixation group compared with 72.5 (IQR, 55–90) in the non-fixation group (p=0.17). Complication rates were comparable. Significantly more patients in the non-fixation group developed a radiographic non-union (20% vs 0%; p<0.001), with the majority (n=8/13) clinically asymptomatic and one patient required surgical re-intervention for this. Fracture type and reduction quality appeared to influence fracture union and patient outcome. Conclusions. In this randomised clinical trial comparing internal fixation of well-reduced medial malleolus fractures with non-fixation, following fibular stabilisation, fixation was not superior according to the primary outcome. However, 1 in 5 patients following non-fixation developed a radiographic non-union and whilst the re-intervention rate to manage this was low, the future implications require surveillance. These results may support selective non-fixation of anatomically reduced medial malleolus fractures

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has included low back pain in its list of twelve priority diseases. Notably, Degenerative disc disease (DDD) presents a large, unmet medical need which results in a disabling loss of mechanical function. Today, no efficient therapy is available. Chronic cases often receive surgery, which may lead to biomechanical problems and accelerated degeneration of adjacent segments. Our consortium partners have developed and studied mesenchymal stem cell-based, regenerative therapies trials. In previous phase 2 trial, patients exhibited rapid and progressive improvement of functional and pain indexes after 1 year with no significant side effects. To develop the world's first rigorously proven, effective treatment of DDD, EUROSPINE aims to assess, via a multicentre, randomized, controlled, phase 2b clinical trial including 112 patients with DDD, the efficacy of an allogenic intervertebral mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapy. This innovative therapy aims to rapidly and sustainably (at least 24 months) reduce pain and disability. In addition, the consortium aims to provide new knowledge on immune response & safety associated with allogeneic BM-MSC intradiscal injection. This simple procedure would be cost-effective, minimally invasive, and standardised. At the end of the RESPINE trial, we aim to propose a broadly available and clinically applicable treatment for DDD, marketed by European SMEs

Objectives. The diagnosis of surgical site infection following endoprosthetic reconstruction for bone tumours is frequently a subjective diagnosis. Large clinical trials use blinded Central Adjudication Committees (CACs) to minimise the variability and bias associated with assessing a clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the level of inter-rater and intra-rater agreement in the diagnosis of surgical site infection in the context of a clinical trial. Materials and Methods. The Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumour Surgery (PARITY) trial CAC adjudicated 29 non-PARITY cases of lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstruction. The CAC members classified each case according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria for surgical site infection (superficial, deep, or organ space). Combinatorial analysis was used to calculate the smallest CAC panel size required to maximise agreement. A final meeting was held to establish a consensus. Results. Full or near consensus was reached in 20 of the 29 cases. The Fleiss kappa value was calculated as 0.44 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 0.53), or moderate agreement. The greatest statistical agreement was observed in the outcome of no infection, 0.61 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.72, substantial agreement). Panelists reached a full consensus in 12 of 29 cases and near consensus in five of 29 cases when CDC criteria were used (superficial, deep or organ space). A stable maximum Fleiss kappa of 0.46 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.35) at CAC sizes greater than three members was obtained. Conclusions. There is substantial agreement among the members of the PARITY CAC regarding the presence or absence of surgical site infection. Agreement on the level of infection, however, is more challenging. Additional clinical information routinely collected by the prospective PARITY trial may improve the discriminatory capacity of the CAC in the parent study for the diagnosis of infection. Cite this article: J. Nuttall, N. Evaniew, P. Thornley, A. Griffin, B. Deheshi, T. O’Shea, J. Wunder, P. Ferguson, R. L. Randall, R. Turcotte, P. Schneider, P. McKay, M. Bhandari, M. Ghert. The inter-rater reliability of the diagnosis of surgical site infection in the context of a clinical trial. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:347–352. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.58.BJR-2016-0036.R1

Study aim. There is an ever increasing demand for quality clinical trials in surgery. Surgeons' co-operation and enthusiasm to participate are important, if not crucial in success of such studies, especially if they are multi-centred. Clinician's individual uncertainty (equipoise) about a case has been often cited as an ethical basis for inviting a patient to take part in a clinical trial. This study aims to establish current attitudes of surgeons participating in a national multi-centred randomised controlled trial and explores an on line tool for instant assessment of collective uncertainty (equipoise) for individual clinical cases eligible for a trial. Study design. Surgeons taking part in the UK Heel Fracture Trial were invited to take part. If agreed, they were asked to evaluate treatment prognosis for eligible for the trial anonymised cases of calcaneal fractures online by means of specially designed system. The cases were published on a password protected website on ad-hoc basis during the three years course of the trial. Their responses were submitted instantly on line. Results. 16 out of 24 surgeons agreed to participate. The participating surgeons were emailed links to cases (normally in butches of three) less than once a month. It took them 10-15 min to assess all three cases via interactive interface. Of those who agreed 12 submitted their opinion at least once. 7 voted consistently during the course of the trial. Seventy one cases had been published. The data collected from responses allowed to assess individual and collective uncertainty about clinical cases. 4 surgeons demonstrated tendency towards individual uncertainty, balanced by 4 who did not accept it. However, sufficient collective uncertainty was demonstrated in 84.5% of cases. Discussion. Level of surgeons' enthusiasm towards clinical research appears to be moderate in a selected population of orthopaedic surgeons who already agreed to take part in a randomised clinical trial, despite a very low research time burden of this study. It is important to continue to promote multi-centred studies in order to improve surgeons' attitude towards quality clinical research. Extra efforts by academic clinicians to develop further low research time burden methodologies may increase acceptance and volume of multi-centred clinical research. This study supports previously expressed view that individual uncertainty is a very unreliable and unnecessary justification to offer a subject to take part in a clinical trial. The system used in the study offers surgeons to express their opinions and preferences freely. The instant on line comparison of opinions provides a clear assessment of collective uncertainty, which can be returned to a treating surgeon and a patient him/herself within 48 hours. In absence of collective uncertainty it would be ethical to offer a patient the best treatment according to current opinion. These cases can then be followed up as part of an inclusive trial, if a subject agrees. We believe that using the system may improve decision making process in randomised controlled trials, for example in selected challenging cases

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore clinicians’ experience of a paediatric randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing surgical reduction with non-surgical casting for displaced distal radius fractures.

Aims. Patients receiving cemented hemiarthroplasties after hip fracture have a significant risk of deep surgical site infection (SSI). Standard UK practice to minimize the risk of SSI includes the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement with no consensus regarding type, dose, or antibiotic content of the cement. This is the protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of high dose dual antibiotic-loaded cement in comparison to low dose single antibiotic-loaded cement in patients 60 years and over receiving a cemented hemiarthroplasty for an intracapsular hip fracture. Methods. The WHiTE 8 Copal Or Palacos Antibiotic Loaded bone cement trial (WHiTE 8 COPAL) is a multicentre, multi-surgeon, parallel, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. The pragmatic study will be embedded in the World Hip Trauma Evaluation (WHiTE) (ISRCTN 63982700). Participants, including those that lack capacity, will be allocated on a 1:1 basis stratified by recruitment centre to either a low dose single antibiotic-loaded bone cement or a high dose dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement. The primary analysis will compare the differences in deep SSI rate as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention within 90 days of surgery via medical record review and patient self-reported questionnaires. Secondary outcomes include UK Core Outcome Set for hip fractures, complications, rate of antibiotic prescription, resistance patterns of deep SSI, and resource use (more specifically, cost-effectiveness) up to four months post-randomization. A minimum of 4,920 patients will be recruited to obtain 90% power to detect an absolute difference of 1.5% in the rate of deep SSI at 90 days for the expected 3% deep SSI rate in the control group. Conclusion. The results of this trial will provide evidence regarding clinical and cost-effectiveness between low dose single and high dose dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement, which will inform policy and practice guidelines such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance on management of hip fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):72–78

Background. Definitive proof is lacking on mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) cellular therapy to regenerate bone if biological potential is insufficient. High number of MSCs after GMP expansion may solve the progenitor insufficiency at the injury but clinical trials are pending. Methods. A prospective, multicenter, multinational Phase I/IIa interventional clinical trial was designed under the EU-FP7 REBORNE Project to evaluate safety and early efficacy of autologous expanded MSCs loaded on biomaterial at the fracture site in diaphyseal and/or metaphysodiaphyseal fractures (femur, tibia, humerus) nonunions. The trial included 30 recruited patients among 5 European centres in France, Spain, Germany, and Italy. Safety endpoints (local and general complication rate) and secondary endpoints for early efficacy (number of patients with clinically and radiologically proven bone healing at 12 and 24 weeks) were established. Cultured MSCs from autologous bone marrow, expanded under GMP protocol was the Investigational Medicinal Product, standardised in the participating countries confirming equivalent cell production in all the contributing GMP facilities. Cells were mixed with CE-marked biphasic calcium phosphate biomaterial in the surgical setting, at an implanted dose of 20−106 cells per cc of biomaterial (total 10cc per case) in a single administration, after debridement of the nonunion. Results. Of 30 recruited patients, 28 patients received the treatment and completed the protocol up to 24 weeks (one case pending at submission). No adverse effects related to cells were detected. Two superficial infections associated to musculoskeletal flaps were solved with antibiotics. Preliminary efficacy results at 3 months confirmed 14 consolidations (out of 27 cases, 52%). At 6 months, 20 consolidations (out of 26 cases, 77%) were confirmed. One failure underwent reoperation at 6 months. One case FU was pending at submission. Conclusions. Preliminary results confirm safety, feasibility and efficacy at 3 and 6 months with the described procedure. Level of evidence. II

The aim of this study was to review the role of clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery. A total of two electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from inception to September 2013 with no language restrictions. Articles related to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), research networks and orthopaedic research, were identified and reviewed. The usefulness of trainee-led research collaborations is reported and our knowledge of current clinical trial infrastructure further supplements the review. Searching yielded 818 titles and abstracts, of which 12 were suitable for this review. Results are summarised and presented narratively under the following headings: 1) identifying clinically relevant research questions; 2) education and training; 3) conduct of multicentre RCTs and 4) dissemination and adoption of trial results. This review confirms growing international awareness of the important role research networks play in supporting trials in orthopaedic surgery. Multidisciplinary collaboration and adequate investment in trial infrastructure are crucial for successful delivery of RCTs. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:169–74

High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating surgical therapies are fundamental to the delivery of evidence-based orthopaedics. Orthopaedic clinical trials have unique challenges; however, when these challenges are overcome, evidence from trials can be definitive in its impact on surgical practice. In this review, we highlight several issues that pose potential challenges to orthopaedic investigators aiming to perform surgical randomised controlled trials. We begin with a discussion on trial design issues, including the ethics of sham surgery, the importance of sample size, the need for patient-important outcomes, and overcoming expertise bias. We then explore features surrounding the execution of surgical randomised trials, including ethics review boards, the importance of organisational frameworks, and obtaining adequate funding. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:161–8

Aims

The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion.

Our knowledge of primary bone marrow edema (BME) of the knee is still limited. A major contributing factor is that it shares several radiological findings with a number of vascular, traumatic, and inflammatory conditions having different histopathological features and etiologies.

BME can be primary or secondary. The most commonly associated conditions are osteonecrosis, osteochondritis dissecans, complex regional pain syndrome, mechanical strain such as bone contusion/bruising, micro-fracture, stress fracture, osteoarthritis, and tumor. The etiology and pathogenesis of primary BME are unclear. Conservative treatment includes analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, weight-bearing limitations, physiotherapy, pulsed electromagnetic fields, prostacyclin, and bisphosphonates. Surgical treatment, with simple perforation, fragment stabilization, combined scraping and perforation, and eventually osteochondral or chondrocyte transplant, is reserved for the late stages. This retrospective study of a cohort of patients with primary BME of the knee was undertaken to describe their clinical and demographic characteristics, identify possible risk factors, and assess treatment outcomes.

We reviewed the records of 48 patients with primary BME of the knee diagnosed on MRI by two radiologists and two orthopedists. History, medications, pain type, leisure activities, smoking habits, allergies, and environmental factors were examined. Analysis of patients’ characteristics highlighted that slightly overweight middle-aged female smokers with a sedentary lifestyle are the typical patients with primary BME of the knee. In all patients, the chief symptom was intractable day and night pain (mean value, 8.5/10 on the numerical rating scale) with active as well as passive movement, regardless of BME extent. Half of the patients suffered from thyroid disorders; indeed, the probability of having a thyroid disorder was higher in our patients than in two unselected groups of patients, one referred to our orthopedic center (odds ratio, 18.5) and another suffering from no knee conditions (odds ratio, 9.8). Before pain onset, 56.3% of our cohort had experienced a stressful event (mourning, dismissal from work, concern related to the COVID-19 pandemic). After conservative treatment, despite the clinical improvement and edema resolution on MRI, 93.8% of patients described two new symptoms: a burning sensation in the region of the former edema and a reduced ipsilateral patellar reflex. These data suggest that even though the primary BME did resolve on MRI, the knee did not achieve full healing.