Cementless knee arthroplasty has seen a recent resurgence in popularity due to conceptual advantages, including improved osseointegration providing biological fixation, increased surgical efficiency, and reduced systemic complications associated with cement impaction and wear from cement debris. Increasingly younger and higher demand patients are requiring knee arthroplasty, and as such, there is optimism cementless fixation may improve implant survivorship and functional outcomes. Compared to cemented implants, the National Joint Registry (NJR) currently reports higher revision rates in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but lower in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, recent studies are beginning to show excellent outcomes with cementless implants, particularly with UKA which has shown superior performance to cemented varieties. Cementless TKA has yet to show long-term benefit, and currently performs equivalently to cemented in short- to medium-term cohort studies. However, with novel concepts including 3D-printed coatings, robotic-assisted surgery, radiostereometric analysis, and kinematic or functional knee alignment principles, it is hoped they may help improve the outcomes of cementless TKA in the long-term. In addition, though cementless implant costs remain higher due to novel implant coatings, it is speculated cost-effectiveness can be achieved through greater surgical efficiency and potential reduction in revision costs. There is paucity of level one data on long-term outcomes between fixation methods and the cost-effectiveness of modern cementless knee arthroplasty. This review explores recent literature on cementless knee arthroplasty, with regards to clinical outcomes, implant survivorship, complications, and cost-effectiveness; providing a concise update to assist clinicians on implant choice. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):48–57

Aims. The primary objective of this registry-based study was to compare patient-reported outcomes of cementless and cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during the first postoperative year. The secondary objective was to assess one- and three-year implant survival of both fixation techniques. Methods. We analyzed 10,862 cementless and 7,917 cemented UKA cases enrolled in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry, operated between 2017 and 2021. Pre- to postoperative change in outcomes at six and 12 months’ follow-up were compared using mixed model analyses. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were applied to quantify differences in implant survival. Adjustments were made for patient-specific variables and annual hospital volume. Results. Change from baseline in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and activity-related pain was comparable between groups. Adjustment for covariates demonstrated a minimally greater decrease in rest-related pain in the cemented group (β = -0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.16 to -0.01)). Cementless fixation was associated with a higher probability of achieving an excellent OKS outcome (> 41 points) (adjusted odds ratio 1.2 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.3)). The likelihood of one-year implant survival was greater for cemented implants (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.35 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.71)), with higher revision rates for periprosthetic fractures of cementless implants. During two to three years’ follow-up, the likelihood of implant survival was non-significantly greater for cementless UKA (adjusted HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.04)), primarily due to increased revision rates for tibial loosening of cemented implants. Conclusion. Cementless and cemented medial UKA led to comparable improvement in physical function and pain reduction during the initial postoperative year, albeit with a greater likelihood of achieving excellent OKS outcomes after cementless UKA. Anticipated differences in early physical function and pain should not be a decisive factor in the choice of fixation technique. However, surgeons should consider the differences in short- and long-term implant survival when deciding which implant to use. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(5):401–410

Abstract. Introduction. Anecdotal reports suggest some cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements (OUKRs) have painful early subsidence of the tibial component with valgus rotation and/or posterior tilting. The incidence of subsidence and its association with pain is poorly understood. This radiographic study aimed to evaluate the incidence of tibial subsidence and five-year patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a cementless OUKR cohort. Methodology. Cementless OUKRs from a high-volume centre with acceptable post-operative and five-year radiographs were included. Subsidence was determined by measuring the angle of the tibial tray/tibial axis angle and distance between the tibial tray axis and fibula head on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs using a custom MATLAB program. Analysis of 5-year PROMs assessed the relationship between subsidence and pain. Radiographs indicating tibial subsidence were validated by two observers. Results. Radiographs of 94 cementless OUKRs were analysed of which five tibial components had subsided (incidence=5%) with an average of 1.92° varus rotation and 2.97° posterior tilt. Subsidence appeared to occur within the first post-operative year with all tibial components fixed securely at 5 years. Two subsiders had moderate pain (ICOAP=20.5,15.9, AKSS Pain=20,45) and lower Oxford Knee Scores (OKS=26,31) compared to the cohort means (ICOAP=3.91, AKSS Pain=45.9, OKS = 43.6). These two subsiders had BMIs greater than 30. Conclusion. This study found 5% of cementless OUKRs in the cohort underwent tibial subsidence. Subsidence with moderate pain occurred in 2% of cases, and pain may be associated with obesity. A larger study is needed to study subsidence in greater detail

Cementless fixation is an alternative to cemented unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), with several advantages over cementation. This study reports on the 15-year survival and 10-year clinical outcomes of the cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (OUKR). This prospective study describes the clinical outcomes and survival of first 693 consecutive cementless medial OUKRs implanted in New Zealand. The sixteen-year survival was 89.2%, with forty-six knees being revised. The commonest reason for revision was progression of arthritis, which occurred in twenty-three knees, followed by primary dislocation of the bearing, which occurred in nine knees. There were two bearing dislocations secondary to trauma and a ruptured ACL, and two tibial plateau fractures. There were four revisions for polyethylene wear. There were four revisions for aseptic tibial loosening, and one revision for impingement secondary to overhang of the tibial component. There was only one revision for deep infection and one revision where the indication was not stated. The mean OKS improved from 23.3 (7.4 SD) to 40.59 (SD 6.8) at a mean follow-up of sixteen years. In conclusion, the cementless OUKR is a safe and reproducible procedure with excellent sixteen-year survival and clinical outcomes

The purposes of this study were to report the accuracy of stem anteversion for Exeter cemented stems with the Mako hip enhanced mode and to compare it to Accolade cementless stems. We reviewed the data of 25 hips in 20 patients who underwent THA through the posterior approach with Exeter stems and 25 hips in 19 patients with Accolade stems were matched for age, gender, height, weight, disease, and approaches. There was no difference in the target stem anteversion (20°–30°) between the groups. Two weeks after surgery, CT images were taken to measure stem anteversion. The difference in stem anteversion between the plan and the postoperative CT measurements was 1.2° ± 3.8° (SD) on average with cemented stems and 4.2° ± 4.2° with cementless stems, respectively (P <0.05). The difference in stem anteversion between the intraoperative measurements and the postoperative CT measurements was 0.75° ± 1.8° with Exeter stems and 2.2° ± 2.3° with Accolade stems, respectively (P <0.05). This study demonstrated a high precision of anteversion for Exeter cemented stems with the Mako enhanced mode and its clinical accuracy was better with the cemented stems than that with the cementless stems. Although intraoperative stem anteversion measurements with the Mako system were more accurate with the cemented stems than that with the cementless stem, the difference was about 1° and the accuracy of intra-operative anteversion measurements was quite high even with the cementless stems. The smaller difference in stem anteversion between the plan and postoperative measurements with the cemented stems suggested that stem anteversion control was easier with cemented stems under the Mako enhanced mode than that with cementless stems. Intraoperative stem anteversion measurement with Mako total hip enhanced mode was accurate and it was useful in controlling cemented stem anteversion to the target angle

Abstract. Objectives. Obesity is prevalent with nearly one third of the world's population being classified as obese. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment option for high BMI patients achieving similar outcomes to non-obese patients. However, increased rates of aseptic loosening in patients with a high BMI have been reported. In patients with high BMI/body mass there is an increase in strain placed on the implant fixation interfaces. As such component fixation is a potential concern when performing TKA in the obese patient. To address this concern the use of extended tibial stems in cemented implants or cementless fixation have been advocated. Extend tibial stems are thought to improve implant stability reducing the micromotion between interfaces and consequently the risk of aseptic loosening. Cementless implants, once biologic fixation is achieved, effectively integrate into bone eliminating an interface. This retrospective study compared the use of extended tibial stems and cementless implants to conventional cemented implants in high BMI patients. Methods. From a prospectively maintained database of 3239 primary Attune TKA (Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana), obese patients (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m²) were retrospectively reviewed. Two groups of patients 1) using a tibial stem extension [n=162] and 2) cementless fixation [n=163] were compared to 3) a control group (n=1426) with a standard tibial stem cemented implant. All operations were performed by or under the direct supervision of specialist arthroplasty surgeons. Analysis compared the groups with respect to class I, II, and III (BMI >30kg/m², >35 kg/m², >40 kg/m²) obesity. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for aseptic loosening, and revision for tibial loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to compare the primary outcomes between groups. Where radiographic images at greater than 3 months post-operatively were available, radiographs were examined to compare the presence of peri-implant radiolucent lines. Results. The mean follow-up of 4.8, 3.4, and 2.5 years for cemented, stemmed, and cementless groups respectively. In total there were 34 all-cause revisions across all the groups with revision rates of 4.55, 5.50, and 0.00 per 1000-implant-years for cemented, stemmed, and cementless groups respectively. Survival Analysis did not show any significant differences between the three groups for all-all cause revision. There were 6 revisions for aseptic loosening (5 tibial and 1 femoral); all of which were in the standard cemented implant group. In contrast there were no revisions in the stemmed or cementless implant groups, however, this was not significant on survival analysis. Analysis looking at class I, II, and III obesity also did not show any significant differences in survival for all cause revision or aseptic loosening. Conclusion. This retrospective analysis showed that there were no revisions required for aseptic loosening when either a cemented stemmed or cementless implant were used in obese patients. These findings are in line with other studies showing that cementless fixation or extended stem implants are a reasonable option in obese patients who represent an increasing cohort of patients requiring TKR. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Abstract. Introduction. Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) offers a number of conceptual benefits including osteointegration, bone preservation and reduced aseptic loosening from third body wear. Evidence of equivalence to cemented fixation exists, but the cam-post interaction of posterior-stabilised (PS)-TKA on implant osteointegration remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the survivorship of a single prosthesis PS-TKA. Methodology. All patients undergoing a PS-TKA using the Triathlon Total Knee System (Stryker Orthopaedics, USA) between 01/01/2010 and 08/04/2019, with exposure to at least 2 years’ risk of revision were identified from the hospital database. Results. 1001 TKAs were identified; 734 cementless and 267 cemented. The cementless group more frequently were male, younger, of higher BMI; and had larger components used (p<0.01). Mean exposure to risk of revision was longer in the cementless group (69.5 vs 57 months, p<0.05). Return to theatre rates were similar (4.6% vs 4.8% p = 0.88), a greater proportion in the cementless group underwent revision (2.9% vs 1.1% p=0.11). Multivariate analysis was only possible for reoperations, increased with cemented fixation (OR 2.34 CI 1.01-5.43) and decreased with age (OR 0.96 CI 0.92-1.00). Conclusion. Both cementless and cemented Triathlon PS-TKA demonstrate excellent survivorship, with revision rates of 2.9% and 1.1% at a mean of 5.25 years. This difference was not statistically significant, and variations in baseline characteristics may have influenced it. Further study is planned to assess radiographs of these patients for evidence of osteointegration, and we advocate further study with greater patient numbers

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume. This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant. For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161. Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume. This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant. For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161. Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique

The Paprosky acetabular bone defect classification system and related algorithms for acetabular reconstruction cannot properly guide cementless acetabular reconstruction in the presence of porous metal augments. We aimed to introduce a rim, points, and column (RPC)-oriented cementless acetabular reconstruction algorithm and its clinical and radiographic outcomes. A total of 123 patients (128 hips) were enrolled. A minimum 5-year radiographic follow-up was available for 96 (75.8%) hips. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up durations were 6.8±0.9 (range: 5.2–9.2) and 6.3±1.9 (range: 5.0–9.2) years, respectively. Harris hip score (HHS) improved significantly from 35.39±9.91 preoperatively to 85.98±12.81 postoperatively (P<0.001). Among the fixation modes, 42 (32.8%) hips were reconstructed with rim fixation, 42 (32.8%) with three-point fixation without point reconstruction, 40 (31.3%) with three-point fixation combined with point reconstruction, and 4 (3.1%) with three-point fixation combined with pelvic distraction. Complementary medial wall reconstruction was performed in 20 (15.6%) patients. All acetabular components were radiographically stable. Nine-year cumulative Kaplan–Meier survival rates for 123 patients with the endpoint defined as periprosthetic joint infection, any reoperation, and dissatisfaction were 96.91% (confidence interval [CI]: 86.26%, 99.34%), 97.66% (CI: 92.91%, 99.24%), and 96.06% (CI: 86.4%, 98.89%), respectively. Cup stability in cementless acetabular reconstruction depends on rim or three-point fixation. The continuity of the anterior and posterior columns determines whether the points provide adequate stability to the cup. Medial wall reconstruction is an important complementary fixation method for rim or three-point fixation. The patients who underwent cementless acetabular reconstruction guided by the RPC decision-making algorithm demonstrated satisfactory mid-term clinical function, satisfaction levels, radiographic results, and complication rates

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), cementless cup without screw holes has the putative benefits of maximizing host bone contact and reducing osteolysis by eliminating channels to backside wear particles. However, supplemental trans-acetabular screws cannot be used. 74 hips in 60 patients receiving same model of cementless cup without screw holes (Depuy Duraloc 100 HA cup) from 6/1999 to 3/2003 were prospectively followed up. All patients were allowed to have immediate full weight bearing. Age at THA was 53 ± 13 (range 24–74) years. Osteonecrosis was the leading hip disease (45% of hips). Survivorship was assessed using revision of the cup as the end point. Radiological parameters, including lateral opening angle, vertical and horizontal migration distances of the cups were measured. Paired t-test was used to compare between the measurements in early postoperative period and at final follow up. 51 hips were assessed at minimum 20 years follow-up. The mean follow-up was 22.6 (range 21 – 25) years. All the cups were well fixed. There were two cup revisions. Conventional polyethylene (PE) was used in both hips; osteolysis occurred 17 and 18 years later. Both cups were well fixed but were revised, one due to cup mal-positioning, one due to need in upsizing the articulation. 14 other hips were revised but these cups were well fixed and not revised; 9 loosened stems (most were cemented Elite plus stems), 5 PE wear and osteolysis (all were conventional PE). At 20 years, the survivorship of cups was 96.1%. Changes in lateral opening angle, vertical and horizontal migration distances were 0.44±1.59°, 0.01±1.52mm and -0.32±1.47mm respectively, without statistical significance. This study provided evidence of excellent long-term survivorship of cementless cup without screw holes. Immediate postoperative weight-bearing also did not lead to cup migration in the long-term

The last two decades have seen remarkable technological advances in total hip arthroplasty (THA) implant design. Porous ingrowth surfaces and highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) have been expected to dramatically improve implant survivorship. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate survival of contemporary cementless acetabular components following primary THA. 16,421 primary THAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2000 and 2019 were identified from our institutional total joint registry. Patients received one of 12 contemporary cementless acetabular designs with HXLPE liners. Components were grouped based on ingrowth surface into 4 categories: porous titanium (n=10,952, mean follow-up 5 years), porous tantalum (n=1223, mean follow-up 5 years), metal mesh (n=2680, mean follow-up 6.5 years), and hydroxyapatite (HA) coated (n=1566, mean follow-up 2.4 years). Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to assess the survivorship free of acetabular revision. A historical series of 182 Harris-Galante-1 (HG-1) acetabular components was used as reference. The 15-year survivorship free of acetabular revision was >97% for all 4 contemporary cohorts. Compared to historical control, porous titanium (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02–0.17, p<0.001), porous tantalum (HR 0.09, 95%CI 0.03–0.29, p<0.001), metal mesh (HR 0.11, 95%CI 0.04–0.31, p<0.001), and HA-coated (HR 0.14, 95%CI 0.04–0.48, p=0.002) ingrowth surfaces had significantly lower risk of any acetabular revision. There were 16 cases (0.1%) of acetabular aseptic loosening that occurred in 8 (0.07%) porous titanium, 5 (0.2%) metal mesh, and 3 (0.2%) HA-coated acetabular components. 7 of the 8 porous titanium aseptic loosening cases occurred in one known problematic design. There were no cases of aseptic loosening in the porous tantalum group. Modern acetabular ingrowth surfaces and HXLPE liners have improved on historical results at the mid-term. Contemporary designs have extraordinarily high revision-free survivorship, and aseptic loosening is now a rare complication. At mid-term follow-up, survivorship of contemporary uncemented acetabular components is excellent and aseptic loosening occurs in a very small minority of patients

Abstract. Introduction. Cementless fixation of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements (UKRs) is an alternative to cemented fixation, however, it is unknown whether cementless fixation is as good long-term. This study aimed to compare primary and long-term fixation of cemented and cementless Oxford UKRs using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Methodology. Twenty-nine patients were randomised to receive cemented or cementless Oxford UKRs and followed for ten years. Differences in primary fixation and long-term fixation of the tibial components (inferred from 0/3/6-month and 6-month/1-year/2-year/5-year/10-year migration, respectively) were analysed using RSA and radiolucencies were assessed on radiographs. Migration rates were determined by linear regression and clinical outcomes measured using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Results. Preliminary analysis of Maximum Total Point Motion (MTPM) indicated cementless tibial components undergo significantly more migration than cemented components during the first 6 months (1.6mm/year, SD=0.92 versus 1.3mm/year, SD=1.1, p<0.001). Cementless migration was predominantly subsidence inferiorly (Mean=0.51mm/year, SD=0.29, p<0.001) and posteriorly (0.13mm/year, SD=0.21, p=0.03). Contrastingly, from 6 months to 10 years cemented components migrated significantly (MTPM=0.039mm/year, SD=0.11, p=0.04) whereas cementless components did not (MTPM=0.002mm/year, SD=0.02, p=0.744). Radiolucent lines occurred more frequently below cemented (10/13) than cementless (4/16) tibial components, but radiolucencies did not correlate with differences in migration or OKS. There was no significant difference in OKS between cemented and cementless. Conclusion. These results suggest that cementless tibial components migrate more than cemented before achieving primary fixation. However, long-term fixation of cementless tibial components appears to be as good, if not better, than cemented with the benefit of fewer radiolucent lines

Abstract. Introduction. With respect to survivorship following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), joint registries consistently demonstrate higher revision rates for both sexes in those less than 55 years. The current study analyses the survivorship of 500 cementless TKAs performed in this age group in a high-volume primary joint unit where cementless TKA has traditionally been used for the majority of patients. Methods. This was a retrospective review of 500 consecutive TKAs performed in patients under the age of 55 between March 1994 and April 2017. The primary outcome measure for the study was all-cause revision. Secondary outcome measures included clinical, functional and radiological outcomes. Results. The all-cause revision rate was 1.6% (n=8) at a median of 55.7 months. Four were revised for infection, 2 for stiffness, 1 for aseptic loosening of the tibial component and 1 patella was resurfaced for anterior knee pain. The aseptic revision rate was 0.8% (n=4). Twenty-seven (5.4%) patients underwent a manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA). Including those who underwent MUA, 6.8% (n=34) underwent other non-revision procedures. Conclusion. Survivorship in our unit in this young patient cohort was excellent with an aseptic revision rate of 0.8% at 59.7 months using a fully cementless construct. The MUA rate was higher than expected

The significance of periprosthetic fractures about a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming increasingly important. Recent studies have demonstrated post-operative periprosthetic fracture rates are higher amongst cemented polished taper slip (PTS) stem designs compared to collared cementless (CC) designs. However, in the National Joint Registry, the rate of intra-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFF) with cementless implant systems remains higher (0.87% vs 0.42%. p <0.001) potentially leading to more post-operative complications. This study identifies the incidence of IOPFF, the fracture subtype and compares functional outcomes and revision rates of CC femoral implants with an IOPFF to CC stems and PTS stems without a fracture. 5376 consecutive CC stem THA, carried out through a posterior approach were reviewed for IOPFF. Each fracture was subdivided into calcar fracture, greater trochanter (GT) fracture or shaft fracture. 1:1:1 matched analysis was carried out to compare Oxford scores at one year. Matching criteria included; sex (exact), age (± 1 year), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade (exact), and date of surgery (± 6 months). Electronic records were used to review revision rates. Following review of the CC stems, 44 (0.8%) were identified as having an IOPFF. Of these 30 (0.6%) were calcar fractures, 11 (0.2%) GT fractures and 3 (0.06%) were shaft fractures. There were no shaft penetrations. Overall, no significant difference in Oxford scores at one year were observed when comparing the CC IOPFF, CC non-IOPFF and PTS groups. There were no CC stems revised for any reason with either a calcar fracture or trochanteric fracture within the period of 8 years follow-up. IOPFF do occur more frequently in cementless systems than cemented. The majority are calcar and GT fractures. These fractures, when identified and managed intra-operatively, do not have worse functional outcomes or revision rates compared to matched non-IOPFF cases

Introduction. The commonest causes of revision of Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) in National Registers are loosening and pain. Cementless UKR was introduced to address loosening and was found, in small randomised studies, to have better radiographic fixation than Cemented UKR. Although non-significant these studies also suggested the clinical outcome was better with cementless. The aim of this larger study was to compare the pain and function of cementless and cemented UKR at five years. Methods. 263 Cemented and 266 Cementless UKR of identical design, implanted by four high volume surgeons for the same indications, were reviewed by independent physiotherapists at five years. Revision, re-operation, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society score (AKSS) and EQ-5D were assessed. Two pain specific scores were also used: Pain Detect (PD) and Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). The pain scores were normalised onto a scale of 0 to 100 with 100 being the best. The cemented cohort was mainly implanted before the cementless, although there was considerable overlap. To explore whether differences were due to progressive improvement in surgical practice with time each cohort was divided into early and late subgroups. Results. Pre-operatively there were no differences between the devices in patient demographics or scores. At 5 years there were no differences in revision rate (0.8%), re-operation rate (2.2%) or medical complication rate (4%). The Cementless had significantly (p<0.05) better OKS (43 v 41), AKSS and EQ5D. There were significantly (p=0.03) fewer cementless cases with unexplained pain (2.3% v 6%). The cementless had significantly (p<0.002), less ‘strongest’ (84 v 76) and ‘average’ (90 v 85) pain as assessed by PD and less chronic (97 v 92) and intermittent (93 v 86) pain as assessed by ICOAP. Subgroup analysis found no significant differences in outcome between the early and late subgroups within the cohorts, whereas there were significant differences in outcomes between the late subgroup of the cemented cohort and the early subgroup of the cementless cohort. Discussion and Conclusion. Almost all outcome scores were significantly better following cementless compared to cemented UKR, suggesting that the cementless is better than cemented. However, as the cemented cases were mainly implanted before the cementless, it could be the difference was due to other factors, such as surgical technique or rehabilitation, that improved with time. This is unlikely to be the case as there were no differences between the early and late subgroups within the cohorts whereas there were differences between the late subgroup of the cemented cohort and the early subgroup of the cementless cohort which were implanted at a similar time. Although the functional scores following cementless are significantly better than cemented, the differences are similar to or smaller than the minimally clinical important difference (MCID) for these scores. In contrast there is significantly less pain following the cementless and the differences tended to be greater than the MCID. This suggests that Cementless UKR is associated with appreciably less pain and slightly better function than Cemented UKR. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Objectives. The primary stability of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR) relies on interference fit (or press fit). Insufficient interference may cause implant loosening, whilst excessive interference could cause bone damage and fracture. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal interference fit by measuring the force required to seat the tibial component of the cementless OUKR (push-in force) and the force required to remove the component (pull-out force). Materials and Methods. Six cementless OUKR tibial components were implanted in 12 new slots prepared on blocks of solid polyurethane foam (20 pounds per cubic foot (PCF), Sawbones, Malmo, Sweden) with a range of interference of 0.1 mm to 1.9 mm using a Dartec materials testing machine HC10 (Zwick Ltd, Herefordshire, United Kingdom) . The experiment was repeated with cellular polyurethane foam (15 PCF), which is a more porous analogue for trabecular bone. Results. The push-in force progressively increased with increasing interference. The pull-out force was related in a non-linear fashion to interference, decreasing with higher interference. Compared with the current nominal interference, a lower interference would reduce the push-in forces by up to 45% (p < 0.001 One way ANOVA) ensuring comparable (or improved) pull-out forces (p > 0.05 Bonferroni post hoc test). With the more porous bone analogue, although the forces were lower, the relationship between interference and push-in and pull-out force were similar. Conclusions. This study suggests that decreasing the interference fit of the tibial component of the cementless OUKR reduces the push-in force and can increase the pull-out force. An optimal interference fit may both improve primary fixation and decrease the risk of fracture. Cite this article: S. Campi, S. J. Mellon, D. Ridley, B. Foulke, C. A. F. Dodd, H. G. Pandit, D. W. Murray. Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:226–231. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0193.R1

Increasing femoral offset in total hip replacement (THR) has several benefits including improved hip abductor strength and enhanced range of motion. Biomechanical studies have suggested that this may negatively impact on stem stability. However, it is unclear whether this has a clinical impact. Using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), the aim of this study was to determine the impact of stem offset and stem size for the three most common cementless THR prostheses revised for aseptic loosening. The study period was September 1999 to December 2020. The study population included all primary procedures for osteoarthritis with a cementless THR using the Corail, Quadra-H and Polarstem. Procedures were divided into small and large stem sizes and by standard and high stem offset for each stem system. Hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age and gender, were performed to compare revision for aseptic loosening for offset and stem size for each of the three femoral stems. There were 55,194 Corail stems, 13,642 Quadra-H stem, and 13,736 Polarstem prostheses included in this study. For the Corail stem, offset had an impact only when small stems were used (sizes 8-11). Revision for aseptic loosening was increased for the high offset stem (HR=1.90;95% CI 1.53–2.37;p<0.001). There was also a higher revision risk for aseptic loosening for high offset small size Quadra-H stems (sizes 0-3). Similar to the Corail stem, offset did not impact on the revision risk for larger stems (Corail sizes 12-20, Quadra-H sizes 4-7). The Polarstem did not show any difference in aseptic loosening revision risk when high and standard offset stems were compared, and this was irrespective of stem size. High offset may be associated with increased revision for aseptic loosening, but this is both stem size and prosthesis specific

Introduction. Varus alignment in total knee replacement (TKR) results in a larger portion of the joint load carried by the medial compartment. [1]. Increased burden on the medial compartment could negatively impact the implant fixation, especially for cementless TKR that requires bone ingrowth. Our aim was to quantify the effect varus alignment on the bone-implant interaction of cementless tibial baseplates. To this end, we evaluated the bone-implant micromotion and the amount of bone at risk of failure. [2,3]. Methods. Finite element models (Fig.1) were developed from pre-operative CT scans of the tibiae of 11 female patients with osteoarthritis (age: 58–77 years). We sought to compare two loading conditions from Smith et al.;. [1]. these corresponded to a mechanically aligned knee and a knee with 4° of varus. Consequently, we virtually implanted each model with a two-peg cementless baseplate following two tibial alignment strategies: mechanical alignment (i.e., perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis) and 2° tibial varus alignment (the femoral resection accounts for additional 2° varus). The baseplate was modeled as solid titanium (E=114.3 GPa; v=0.33). The pegs and a 1.2 mm layer on the bone-contact surface were modeled as 3D-printed porous titanium (E=1.1 GPa; v=0.3). Bone material properties were non-homogeneous, determined from the CT scans using relationships specific to the proximal tibia. [2,4]. The bone-implant interface was modelled as frictional with friction coefficients for solid and porous titanium of 0.6 and 1.1, respectively. The tibia was fixed 77 mm distal to the resection. For mechanical alignment, instrumented TKR loads previously measured in vivo. [5]. were applied to the top of the baseplate throughout level gait in 2% intervals (Fig.1a). For varus alignment, the varus/valgus moment was modified to match the ratio of medial-lateral force distribution from Smith et al. [1]. (Fig.1b). Results. For both alignments and all bones, the largest micromotion and amount of bone at risk of failure occurred during mid stance, at 16% of gait (Figs.2,3). Peak micromotion, located at the antero-lateral edge of the baseplate, was 153±32 µm and 273±48 µm for mechanical and varus alignment, respectively. The area of the baseplate with micromotion above 40 µm (the threshold for bone ingrowth. [3]. ) was 28±5% and 41±4% for mechanical and varus alignment, respectively. The amount of bone at risk of failure at the bone-implant interface was 0.5±0.3% and 0.8±0.3% for the mechanical and varus alignment, respectively. Discussion. The peak micromotion and the baseplate area with micromotion above 40 µm increased with varus alignment compared to mechanical alignment. Furthermore, the amount of bone at risk of failure, although small for both alignments, was greater for varus alignment. These results suggest that varus alignment, consisting of a combination of femoral and tibial alignment, may negatively impact bone ingrowth and increase the risk of bone failure for cementless tibial baseplates of this TKR design

Aims. It is important to analyze objectively the hammering sound in cup press-fit technique in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in order to better understand the change of the sound during impaction. We hypothesized that a specific characteristic would present in a hammering sound with successful fixation. We designed the study to quantitatively investigate the acoustic characteristics during cementless cup impaction in THA. Methods. In 52 THAs performed between November 2018 and April 2022, the acoustic parameters of the hammering sound of 224 impacts of successful press-fit fixation, and 55 impacts of unsuccessful press-fit fixation, were analyzed. The successful fixation was defined if the following two criteria were met: 1) intraoperatively, the stability of the cup was retained after manual application of the torque test; and 2) at one month postoperatively, the cup showed no translation on radiograph. Each hammering sound was converted to sound pressures in 24 frequency bands by fast Fourier transform analysis. Basic patient characteristics were assessed as potential contributors to the hammering sound. Results. The median sound pressure (SP) of successful fixation at 0.5 to 1.0 kHz was higher than that of unsuccessful fixation (0.0694 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.04721 to 0.09576) vs 0.05425 (IQR 0.03047 to 0.06803), p < 0.001). The median SP of successful fixation at 3.5 to 4.0 kHz and 4.0 to 4.5 kHz was lower than that of unsuccessful fixation (0.0812 (IQR 0.05631 to 0.01161) vs 0.1233 (IQR 0.0730 to 0.1449), p < 0.001; and 0.0891 (IQR 0.0526 to 0.0891) vs 0.0885 (IQR 0.0716 to 0.1048); p < 0.001, respectively). There was a statistically significant positive relationship between body weight and SP at 0.5 to 1.0 kHz (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses indicated that the SP at 0.5 to 1.0 kHz and 3.5 to 4.0 kHz was independently associated with the successful fixation. Conclusion. The frequency bands of 0.5 to 1.0 and 3.5 to 4.0 kHz were the key to distinguish the sound characteristics between successful and unsuccessful press-fit cup fixation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(3):154–161