Abduction braces are commonly prescribed following the closed reduction of a dislocated prosthetic hip joint. Their use is controversial with limited evidence to support their use. We have conducted a retrospective review of dislocations in primary total hip replacements over a nine year period and report redislocation rates in patients braced, compared to those who were not. 67 patients were identified. 69% of those patients who were braced had a subsequent dislocation. Likewise 69% of those who did not receive a brace re-dislocated. 33% of patients that were braced dislocated whilst wearing the brace. Bracing was associated with patient discomfort, sleep disturbance, skin irritation and breakdown. Small femoral head size, monoblock femoral components and poor biomechanical reconstruction was prevalent amongst dislocators. Abduction bracing following closed reduction of a total hip replacement is costly(e950), does not prevent redislocation and may be the cause of considerable morbidity to the patient

Purpose. To correlate the initial brace correction with quantity and quality of brace wear within the first 6 months for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Method. Brace treatment for AIS has been debated for years. Prediction of treatment outcomes is difficult as the actual brace usage is generally unknown. As technology became more advanced, electronic devices were able to measure adherence in both quantity (how much time the brace has been worn) and quality (how tightly the brace has been worn) of brace usage without need for patient interaction. The developed adherence monitor consisted of a force sensor and a data acquisition unit. Subjects were monitored within the first 6 months of brace wear. The data sample rate was set to be one sample per minute. Data was downloaded at the patients routine clinical visits. The prescription, first in-brace and first follow-up out-of-brace Cobb angles were measured. Twelve AIS subjects (10F, 2M), age between 9.8 and 14.7 years, average 11.9 1.5 years, who were prescribed a new TLSO and full-time brace wear (23 hours/day) participated. All braces were made by the same orthotist. The force value at the major pressure pad at the prescribed tightness level was recorded as the individualized reference value. The normalized force value (measured force magnitude relative to the individualized reference value) was used for the quality factor. The time of brace usage relative to the prescribed time was used as the quantity factor. Results. The first in-brace follow-up visit was approximately 2 months after the brace fitting session and the first out-of-brace follow-up visit was scheduled after 4 months. The Cobb angle of the major curve prior to bracing, in-brace and at the first follow-up out-of-brace were 31.3 6.2, 16.5 8.7 and 31.8 7.1 degrees, respectively. The mean reference force value was 1.1 0.23N. The average quantity and quality of the brace usage were 61.2 12.2% and 63.4 8.8%, respectively. A relationship was found between wear time with a change in Cobb angle (pre brace – the first follow-up out-of-brace) (r = 0.77). The more time that the brace was worn resulted in a better treatment result. A moderate correlation was found between the force value at the major pressure pad and the in-brace correction (r = 0.40). Also, a moderate relationship was found between wear quality during daytime with a change in Cobb angle (r = 0.67). The more time that the brace was worn close to the prescribed tightness level during the daytime resulted in a better outcome. Conclusion. This study showed the brace effectiveness is dependent on both the quantity and quality of brace usage

Aims. To compare the cost-utility of removable brace compared with cast in the management of adult patients with ankle fracture. Methods. A within-trial economic evaluation conducted from the UK NHS and personnel social services (PSS) perspective. Health resources and quality-of-life data were collected as part of the Ankle Injury Rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre, randomized controlled trial over a 12-month period using trial case report forms and patient-completed questionnaires. Cost-utility analysis was estimated in terms of the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Estimate uncertainty was explored by bootstrapping, visualized on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio plane. Net monetary benefit and probability of cost-effectiveness were evaluated at a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds and visualized graphically. Results. The incremental cost and QALYs of using brace over a 12-month period were £46.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) £-9 to £147) and 0.0141 (95% CI -0.005 to 0.033), respectively. The cost per QALY gained was £3,318. The probability of brace being cost-effective at a £30,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold was 88%. The results remained robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. Conclusion. This within-trial economic evaluation found that it is probable that using a removable brace provides good value to the NHS when compared to cast, in the management of adults with ankle fracture. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(6):455–462

Knee swelling is common after injury or surgery, resulting in pain, restricted range of movement and limited mobility. Accurately measuring knee swelling is critical to assess recovery. However, current measurement methods are either unreliable or expensive [1,2]. Therefore, a new measurement method is developed. This wearable (the ‘smart brace’) has shown the ability to distinguish a swollen knee from a not swollen knee using multi-frequency-bio impedance analysis (MF-BIA) [3]. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of this smart brace. The study involved 25 usable measurements on patients treated for unilateral knee osteoartritis with a 5mL injection of Lidocaïne + DepoMedrol (1:4). MF-BIA measurements were taken before and after the injection, both on the treated and untreated knee. The smart brace accurately measured the effect of the injection by a decrease in resistance of up to 2.6% at 100kHz (p<0.01), where commonly used gel electrodes were unable to measure the relative difference. Remarkably, both the smart brace and gel electrodes showed a time component in the MF-BIA measurements. To further investigate this time component, 10 participants were asked to lie down for 30 minutes, with measurements taken every 3 minutes using both gel electrodes and the smart brace on both legs. The relative change between each time step was calculated to determine changes over time. The results showed presence of a physiological aspect (settling of knee fluids), and for the brace also a mechanical aspect (skin-electrode interface) [4]. The mechanical aspect mainly interfered with reactance values. Overall, the smart brace is a feasible method for quantitatively measuring knee swelling as a relative change over time. However, the skin-electrode interface should be improved for reliable measurements at different moments in time. The findings suggest that the smart brace could be a promising tool for monitoring knee swelling during rehabilitation

There is a significant positive association between hours of brace wear and rate of success in the treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). The abandon rate reported in the literature averages 18%. In a recent randomized trial conducted at our center; the abandon rate was 4%. We aim to document the abandon rate towards brace treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on AIS progression. We reviewed a database of AIS patients recruited between March and September 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients with AIS under brace treatment according to SRS criteria. The patients were divided in 2 cohorts: those with a self-reported good adherence to treatment and those who voluntarily abandoned treatment during follow-up. Patients with irregular adherence were excluded. Data analysis included age, gender, Risser stage, type of brace, Cobb angles at first visit and last follow-up (mean 11 months) and % of progression. Unpaired student tests were used for comparison. 154 patients met inclusion criteria. 20 patients were excluded due to irregular adherence. 89 patients (age: 12.1 y.o. ±1.4) reported good adherence to treatment, while 45 patients (age: 12.6 y.o. ±1.5) abandoned treatment, an abandon rate of 29%. The cohort of compliant patients started treatment with a mean main thoracic (MT) curve of 26° and finished with 27°. The mean difference between measurements was +0.65°±7.5; mean progression rate was −4.6%. However, patients who abandoned treatment started with a mean MT curve of 28° and finished with 33°, with a mean increase of +5°±8 and a mean progression rate of −11%. The differences between the 2 cohorts were statistically significant (p=0.002). Five (5) patients from the abandon group were offered for surgery because of curve progression. The abandon rate of brace treatment in AIS significantly increased during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who voluntarily discontinued treatment had significant increases in curve progression and surgical indication rates

The Pavlik harness (PH) is commonly used to treat infantile dislocated hips. Variability exists in the duration of brace treatment after successful reduction of the dislocated hip. In this study we evaluate the effect of prescribed time in brace on acetabular index (AI) at two years of age using a prospective, international, multicenter database. We retrospectively studied prospectively enrolled infants with at least one dislocated hip that were initially treated with a PH and had a recorded AI at two-year follow-up. Subjects were treated at one of two institutions. Institution 1 used the PH until they observed normal radiographic acetabular development. Institution 2 followed a structured 12-week brace treatment protocol. Hip dislocation was defined as less than 30% femoral head coverage at rest on the pre-treatment ultrasound or IHDI grade III or IV on the pre-treatment radiograph. Fifty-three hips met our inclusion criteria. Hips from Institution 1 were treated with a brace 3x longer than hips from institution 2 (adjusted mean 8.9±1.3 months vs 2.6±0.2 months)(p < 0 .001). Institution 1 had an 88% success rate and institution 2 had an 85% success rate at achieving hip reduction (p=0.735). At 2-year follow-up, we observed no significant difference in AI between Institution 1 (adjusted mean 25.6±0.9˚) compared to Institution 2 (adjusted mean 23.5±0.8˚) (p=0.1). However, 19% of patients from Institution 1 and 44% of patients from Institution 2 were at or below the 50th percentile of previously published age- and sex- matched AI normal data (p=0.049). Also, 27% (7/26) of hips from Institution 1 had significant acetabular dysplasia, compared to a 22% (6/27) from Institution 2 (p=0.691). We found no correlation between age at initiation of bracing and AI at 2-year follow-up (p=0.071). Our findings suggest that prolonged brace treatment does not result in improved acetabular index at age two years. Hips treated at Institution 1 had the same AI at age two years as hips treated at Institution 2, while spending about 1/3 the amount of time in a brace. We recommend close follow-up for all children treated for dislocated hips, as ~1/4 of infants had acetabular index measurements at or above the 90th percentile of normal. Continued follow-up of this prospective cohort will be critical to determine how many children require acetabular procedures during childhood. The PH brace can successfully treat dislocated infant hips, however, prolonged brace treatment was not found to result in improved acetabular development at two-year follow-up

Introduction. Mode of non-operative management of thoracolumbar spine fracture continues to remain controversial with the most common modality hinging on bracing. TLSO is the device with a relative extension locked position, and many authors suggest they may have a role in the healing process, diminishing the load transferred via the anterior column, limiting segmental motion, and helping in pain control. However, several studies have shown prolonged use of brace may lead to skin breakdown, diminished pulmonary capacity, weakness of paraspinal musculature with no difference in pain and functional outcomes between patients treated with or without brace. Aims. To identify number of spinal braces used for spinal injury and cost implications (in a DGH), to identify the impact on length of stay, to ascertain patient compliance and quality of patient information provided for brace usage, reflect whether we need to change our practice on TLSO brace use. Methods. Data collected over 18-month period (from Jan.2020 to July 2021). Patients were identified from the TLSO brace issue list of the orthotic department, imaging (X-rays, CT, MRI scans) reviewed to confirm fracture and records reviewed to confirm neurology and non-operative management. Patient feedback was obtained via post or telephone consultation. Inclusion criteria- patients with single or multi -level thoracolumbar osteoporotic or traumatic fractures with no neurological involvement treated in a TLSO brace. Exclusion criteria- neurological involvement, cervical spine injuries, decision to treat surgically, concomitant bony injuries. Results. 72 braces were issued in the time frame with 42 patients remaining in the study based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patient feedback reflected that 62% patients did not receive adequate advice for brace usage, 73% came off the brace earlier than advised, and 60% would prefer to be treated without a brace if given a choice. The average increase in length of stay was 3 days awaiting brace fitting and delivery. The average total cost burden on the NHS was £127,500 (lower estimate) due to brace usage. Conclusion. If there is equivalence between treatment with/without a brace, there is a need to rethink the practice of prescribing brace for all non-operatively treated fractures and a case-by-case approach may prove more beneficial

Individuals with multi-compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) frequently experience challenges in activities of daily living (ADL) such as stair ambulation. The Levitation “Tri-Compartment Offloader” (TCO) knee brace was designed to reduce pain in individuals with multicompartment KOA. This brace uses novel spring technology to reduce tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces via reduced quadriceps forces. Information on brace utility during stair ambulation is limited. This study evaluated the effect of the TCO during stair descent in patients with multicompartment KOA by assessing knee flexion moments (KFM), quadriceps activity and pain. Nine participants (6 male, age 61.4±8.1 yrs; BMI 30.4±4.0 kg/m2) were tested following informed consent. Participants had medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grades two to four) diagnosed by an orthopaedic surgeon. Joint kinetics and muscle activity were evaluated during stair descent to compare three bracing conditions: 1) without brace (OFF); 2) brace in low power (LOW); and 3) brace in high power (HIGH). The brace spring engages from 60° to 120° and 15° to 120° knee flexion in LOW and HIGH, respectively. Individual brace size and fit were adjusted by a trained researcher. Participants performed three trials of step-over-step stair descent for each bracing condition. Three-dimensional kinematics were acquired using an 8-camera motion capture system. Forty-one spherical reflective markers were attached to the skin (on each leg and pelvis segment) and 8 markers on the brace. Ground reaction forces and surface EMG from the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) were collected for the braced leg. Participants rated knee pain intensity performing the task following each bracing condition on a 10cm Visual Analog Scale ranging from “no pain” (0) to “worst imaginable pain” (100). Resultant brace and knee flexion angles and KFM were analysed during stair contact for the braced leg. The brace moment was determined using brace torque-angle curves and was subtracted from the calculated KFM. Resultant moments were normalized to bodyweight and height. Peak KFMs were calculated for the loading response (Peak1) and push-off (Peak2) phases of support. EMG signals were normalized and analysed during stair contact using wavelet analysis. Signal intensities were summed across wavelets and time to determine muscle power. Results were averaged across all 3 trials for each participant. Paired T-tests were used to determine differences between bracing conditions with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (α=0.025). Peak KFM was significantly lower compared to OFF with the brace worn in HIGH during the push-off phase (p Table 1: Average peak knee flexion moments, quadriceps muscle power and knee pain during stair descent in 3 brace conditions (n=9). Quadriceps activity, knee flexion moments and pain were significantly reduced with TCO brace wear during stair descent in KOA patients. These findings suggest that the TCO assists the quadriceps to reduce KFM and knee pain during stair descent. This is the first biomechanical evidence to support use of the TCO to reduce pain during an ADL that produces especially high knee forces and flexion moments. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the longer-term outcomes of operatively and nonoperatively managed patients treated with a removable brace (fixed-angle removable orthosis) or a plaster cast immobilization for an acute ankle fracture. Methods. This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing adults with an acute ankle fracture, initially managed either by operative or nonoperative care. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either a cast immobilization or a fixed-angle removable orthosis (removable brace). Data were collected on baseline characteristics, ankle function, quality of life, and complications. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) was the primary outcome which was used to measure the participant’s ankle function. The primary endpoint was at 16 weeks, with longer-term follow-up at 24 weeks and two years. Results. Overall, 436 patients (65%) completed the final two-year follow-up. The mean difference in OMAS at two years was -0.3 points favouring the plaster cast (95% confidence interval -3.9 to 3.4), indicating no statistically significant difference between the interventions. There was no evidence of differences in patient quality of life (measured using the EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire) or Disability Rating Index. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that patients treated with a removable brace had similar outcomes to those treated with a plaster cast in the first two years after injury. A removable brace is an effective alternative to traditional immobilization in a plaster cast for patients with an ankle fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(4):382–388

Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of morphological spinal parameters to predict the outcome of bracing in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to establish a novel supine correction index (SCI) for guiding bracing treatment. Methods. Patients with AIS to be treated by bracing were prospectively recruited between December 2016 and 2018, and were followed until brace removal. In all, 207 patients with a mean age at recruitment of 12.8 years (SD 1.2) were enrolled. Cobb angles, supine flexibility, and the rate of in-brace correction were measured and used to predict curve progression at the end of follow-up. The SCI was defined as the ratio between correction rate and flexibility. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was carried out to assess the optimal thresholds for flexibility, correction rate, and SCI in predicting a higher risk of progression, defined by a change in Cobb angle of ≥ 5° or the need for surgery. Results. The baseline Cobb angles were similar (p = 0.374) in patients whose curves progressed (32.7° (SD 10.7)) and in those whose curves remained stable (31.4° (SD 6.1)). High supine flexibility (odds ratio (OR) 0.947 (95% CI 0.910 to 0.984); p = 0.006) and correction rate (OR 0.926 (95% CI 0.890 to 0.964); p < 0.001) predicted a lower incidence of progression after adjusting for Cobb angle, Risser sign, curve type, menarche status, distal radius and ulna grading, and brace compliance. ROC curve analysis identified a cut-off of 18.1% for flexibility (sensitivity 0.682, specificity 0.704) and a cut-off of 28.8% for correction rate (sensitivity 0.773, specificity 0.691) in predicting a lower risk of curve progression. A SCI of greater than 1.21 predicted a lower risk of progression (OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.251 to 0.955); sensitivity 0.583, specificity 0.591; p = 0.036). Conclusion. A higher supine flexibility (18.1%) and correction rate (28.8%), and a SCI of greater than 1.21 predicted a lower risk of progression. These novel parameters can be used as a guide to optimize the outcome of bracing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):495–503

Abstract. Introduction. Knee braces are limited to providing passive support. There is currently no brace available providing both continuous monitoring and active robot-assisted movements of the knee joint. This project aimed to develop a wearable intelligent motorised robotic knee brace to support and monitor rehabilitation for a range of knee conditions including post-surgical rehabilitation. This brace can be used at home providing ambulatory continuous passive movement obviating the need for hospital admissions. Methodology. A wearable sensing system monitoring knee range of motion was developed to provide remote feedback to clinicians and real-time guidance for patients. A prototype of an exoskeleton providing dynamic motion assistance was developed to help patients complete their exercise goals and strengthen their muscles. The accuracy and reliability of those functions were validated in human participants during exercises including knee flexion/extension (FE) in bed and in chair, sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit. Results. The knee FE measurement from the sensing system showed high accuracy (correlation coefficient of 0.99°) in human participants. The real-time FE data during exercises showed that the desired exoskeleton rotation fitted well with the participant's knee rotation. This indicated the exoskeleton could coordinate with the participant's knee motion by providing consistent motion assistance. The development of user interfaces to provide feedback is currently underway. Conclusion. A wearable robotic knee brace to monitor and support knee rehabilitation exercises was successfully developed. Further development of this device with the use of artificial intelligence has the potential to aid patient rehabilitation in a variety of knee conditions

Introduction. Although surgical remedies tend to be the long-term solutions for patients with osteoarthritis (OA), many alternatives exist that offer the potential to slow progression, alleviate pain, and/or restore function. One such option is the unloader OA knee brace. The objective of this study was to assess the in vivo medial joint space narrowing with and without the brace during weight-bearing portion of gait. Methods. Twenty subjects were evaluated after being clinically assessed by a single surgeon to be bone-on-bone on the medial side. In vivo gait kinematics were collected using a validated 3D-to-2D fluoroscopic registration technique (Figure 1). Subjects were asked to first walk on a treadmill without a brace (Figure 2), and then, after a qualified technician fit a properly sized brace to each subject, they were asked to walk again (Figure 3). In vivo fluoroscopic images were captured and registered at heel-strike (HS) and mid stance (MS) for both scenarios. CT scans were used to acquire the patient-specific bone models that were used in the registration process. Results. All twenty subjects experienced a positive increase in medial joint space and verbally stated their knee pain lessened while wearing the brace. The average medial joint space change was 1.7±0.8 mm (3.1 max, 0.3 min) at HS and 1.6±0.8 mm (3.7 max, 0.4 min) at MS (Figure 4). Five patients experienced more than 2.5 mm of medial joint space change when wearing the unloader brace, indicating substantial effectiveness of the brace. Conclusion. While previous unloader brace studies have focused on outcome scores and patient satisfaction to analyze brace effectiveness, this study quantifiably demonstrated improvement in joint space narrowing due to the unloader brace. These results suggest that unloader braces may provide benefit in the interim when symptoms of OA are present prior to need for surgical intervention. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Aims. Radiological residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) has been reported in up to 30% of children who had successful brace treatment of infant developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Predicting those who will resolve and those who may need corrective surgery is important to optimize follow-up protocols. In this study we have aimed to identify the prevalence and predictors of RAD at two years and five years post-bracing. Methods. This was a single-centre, prospective longitudinal cohort study of infants with DDH managed using a published, standardized Pavlik harness protocol between January 2012 and December 2016. RAD was measured at two years’ mean follow-up using acetabular index-lateral edge (AI-L) and acetabular index-sourcil (AI-S), and at five years using AI-L, AI-S, centre-edge angle (CEA), and acetabular depth ratio (ADR). Each hip was classified based on published normative values for normal, borderline (1 to 2 standard deviations (SDs)), or dysplastic (> 2 SDs) based on sex, age, and laterality. Results. Of 202 infants who completed the protocol, 181 (90%) had two and five years’ follow-up radiographs. At two years, in 304 initially pathological hips, the prevalence of RAD (dysplastic) was 10% and RAD (borderline) was 30%. At five years, RAD (dysplastic) decreased to 1% to 3% and RAD (borderline) decreased to < 1% to 2%. On logistic regression, no variables were predictive of RAD at two years. Only AI-L at two years was predictive of RAD at five years (p < 0.001). If both hips were normal at two years’ follow-up (n = 96), all remained normal at five years. In those with bilateral borderline hips at two years (n = 21), only two were borderline at five years, none were dysplastic. In those with either borderline-dysplastic or bilateral dysplasia at two years (n = 26), three (12%) were dysplastic at five years. Conclusion. The majority of patients with RAD at two years post-brace treatment, spontaneously resolved by five years. Therefore, children with normal radiographs at two years post-brace treatment can be discharged. Targeted follow-up for those with abnormal AI-L at two years will identify the few who may benefit from surgical correction at five years’ follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(7):744–750

Introduction. Acute ankle injuries are commonly seen in musculoskeletal practice. Surgical management is the gold standard for lateral ligament injury in those with failed conservative treatment for a minimum of six months. Several studies have shown good functional outcome and early rehabilitation after MBG repair with an internal brace augmentation which is a braided ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene ligament used to enhance the repair that acts as a secondary stabiliser. Hence the aim of the study was to compare the results with and without augmentation. Methods. A single centre retrospective review conducted between November 2017 and October 2019 and this included 172 patients with symptomatic chronic lateral ligament instability with failed conservative management. The diagnosis was confirmed by MRI. All patients had an ankle arthroscopy followed by open ligament repair. Patients were grouped into isolated MBG and internal brace groups for analyses and all had dedicated rehabilitation. Results. A total of 148 patients were available for final follow up with 87 patients in the MBG group and 61 patients in the IBA group. Mean Age was 38 years and mean follow up was 22 months. The internal brace group showed better Manchester Oxford foot and ankle score (19.7 vs 18.2) and more patients returning to preinjury activity levels (73 vs 55) as compared to isolated repair. Conclusion. Internal brace augmentation with MBG repair facilitated early rehabilitation and return to pre injury activity level in majority of patients compared to isolated MBG repair

Abstract. Background. The gold standard treatment for Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury is reconstruction (ACL-R). Graft failure is the concern and ensuring a durable initial graft with rapid integration is crucial. Graft augmentation with implantable devices (internal brace reinforcement) is a technique purported to reduce the risk of rupture and hasten recovery. We aim to compare the short-term outcome of ACL-R using augmented hamstring tendon autografts (internally braced with neoligament) and non-augmented hamstring autografts. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing augmented and non-augmented ACL-R. All procedures were performed in a single centre using the same technique. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] was used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Results. There were 70 patients in the augmented and 111 patients in the control group. Mean graft diameter in the augmented group was 8.82mm versus 8.44mm in the non-augmented. Six strand graft was achievable in 73.5% of the augmented group compared to 33% in the non-augmented group. Two graft failures were reported in the non-augmented group and none in the augmented group. Patient satisfaction rates were higher in the augmented group. There was a statistically insignificant improvement in the postoperative KOOS in the augmented group compared to the non-augmented group (p 0.6). Irrespective of augmentation status, no correlation was found between the functional score and age, or femoral tunnel width. Conclusion. Augmented ACL-R may achieve superior graft diameters, lower failure rates and better patient reported outcomes when compared to nonaugmented ACL-R. Prospective trials are needed to examine this further

Background. Improvement of Scheuermann's thoracic kyphosis in the growing spine with Milwaukee brace treatment has been reported. However, the role of brace treatment in Mb. Scheuermann is controversial. We report results of brace treatment by low profile scoliosis module with sternal shield. Indication. Thoracic kyphosis >55° or back pain and kyphosis >50°. Material. 21 consecutive patients (17 boys, 4 girls) referred to the Orton Orthopaedic Hospital between 2000-2007. One boy interrupted treatment and the follow-up of two boys was carried out at another hospital. The data of 18 patients are reported. Results. The mean age of patients at the beginning of treatment was 14 years (11-17) and the average thoracic kyphosis was 71° (50-94). On extension radiographs, the kyphosis decreased to 43°(16-66) with a mean correction of 38%. The average time of brace treatment was 2,5 (1-7) years. The final follow- up visit was at the age of 19 (15-21) years. At the final follow-up, the mean thoracic kyphosis was 59° (30-78). Permanent correction of thoracic kyphosis was achieved in 15 patients (83%) with a mean correction of 15 degrees. In two patients no correction was achieved and in one patient the kyphosis increased 9°. No patient required operative treatment. Discussion and conclusion. The efficiency of brace treatment is difficult to prove because natural history of Scheuermann's kyphosis is not fully known. Our material is too small for any final conclusions. However, treatment of the growing spine with modified low profile brace seem to decrease progression of kyphosis in most cases and operative treatment may be avoided

Introduction: Posterior dislocation of replacement hip joints may occur during hip flexion and adduction. A hip brace is commonly used for recurrent dislocations in patients awaiting revision surgery or when unfit for it. However, these hip braces are cumbersome and have a low patient compliance. Knee braces are more comfortable to wear, and they also restrict hip movement by tightening the hamstrings. With this background we investigated the effect of a knee brace, applied in full extension, on hip flexion and adduction. Methods: The movement of 20 normal hips in 20 healthy volunteers aged 25–62, were assessed using a magnetic tracking system (Polhemus Fastrak). One tracking sensor was attached near the anterior superior iliac spine and another one on the lateral aspect of the thigh at a fixed distance from the knee joint. Subjects were then asked to lie on a couch and flex and adduct their hip three times each with the knee bent and then with their knee braced in extension. Two sets of three readings were recorded. During each movement the tracker recorded hip flexion and adduction angles, with a measurement accuracy of 0.15 degrees. Results: With a flexed knee, the mean hip flexion angle was 66.0 degrees (CI95 = 61.1, 70.8). With the knee braced, the mean hip flexion angle was 35.3 (CI95 = 28.5, 42.1). Hence the knee brace reduced hip flexion by 46% (30.7 deg). A paired t-test found this highly significant, with P < < 0.001. With a flexed knee, the mean hip adduction angle was 23.7 degrees (CI95 = 20.6, 26.9). With the knee braced, the mean hip adduction angle was 21.6 (CI95 = 19.2, 24.1). Hence the knee brace reduced hip adduction by 9% (2.1 deg). A paired t-test found this was not significant with P = 0.3. Conclusion: The results indicate that a knee brace can restrict hip flexion by almost 50%. This information may be useful for patients in whom restriction of hip flexion provides hip stability. As the knee brace is more comfortable than the hip brace, a better patient compliance is expected

Introduction: Posterior dislocation of replacement hips may occur during extreme hip flexion and adduction. Hip braces restrict movement, but they are uncomfortable and have a low patient compliance. Knee braces are more comfortable, and also restrict hip movement, by tightening the hamstrings. This study investigated the effect of a knee brace on hip movement. Methods: A magnetic tracker was used to measure the movement of 20 normal hips in 20 volunteers, aged 25–62. Sensors were attached over the iliac spine and lateral thigh. Subjects were asked to lie on a couch and flex and adduct their hip three times with their knee bent and three times with their knee braced in extension. During each movement the tracker recorded hip flexion and adduction angles, with an accuracy of 0.15 degrees. Results: With the knee flexed, the mean hip flexion angle was 66.00 (SD 11.0). With the knee braced, the mean hip flexion angle was 35.30 (SD 15.4). Hence the knee brace reduced hip flexion by 46 % (30.70) (paired t-test, P < < 0.001). With the knee flexed, the mean hip adduction angle was 23.70 (SD 7.1). With the knee braced, the mean hip adduction angle was 21.60 (SD 5.6). Hence the knee brace reduced hip adduction by 9 % (2.10). This was not significant (paired t-test, P = 0.3). Discussion: These results indicate that a knee brace can restrict hip flexion by almost 50%. This information may be useful for patients in whom restriction of hip flexion provides hip stability. As the knee brace is more comfortable than the hip brace, a better patient compliance is expected

Posterior dislocation of replacement hips may occur during hip flexion and adduction. Whilst hip braces can restrict hip movement, they are cumbersome and have a low patient compliance. Knee braces are more comfortable to wear and also restrict hip movement by tightening the hamstrings. This study investigated the effect of a knee brace on hip flexion and adduction. The movement of 20 normal hips in 20 healthy volunteers aged 25–62, were assessed using a magnetic tracking system (Polhemus Fastrak). Tracking sensors were attached over the iliac crest and lateral thigh. Subjects were asked to lie on a couch and flex and adduct their hip three times with their knee bent. A knee brace was then applied and the hip movements were repeated with the knee extended. During each movement the tracker recorded hip flexion and adduction angles with an accuracy of 0.15 degrees. When the knee was flexed, the mean hip flexion angle was 66.00 (CI95 = 61.1, 70.8). When the knee was braced, the mean hip flexion angle was 35.30 (CI95 = 28.5, 42.1). Hence the knee brace reduced hip flexion by 46 % (30.70). A paired t-test found this highly significant (P < 0.001). When the knee was flexed, the mean hip adduction angle was 23.70 (CI95 = 20.6, 26.9). When the knee was braced, the mean hip adduction angle was 21.60 (CI95 = 19.2, 24.1). Hence the knee brace reduced hip adduction by 9 % (2.10). A paired t-test found this was not significant (P = 0.3). These results indicate that a knee brace can restrict hip flexion by almost 50%. This information may be useful for patients in whom restriction of hip flexion provides hip stability. As the knee brace is more comfortable than the hip brace, a better patient compliance can be expected

Aim. The primary aim of this pilot study was to assess and evaluate the SpineCor Pain Relief Brace as a method of reducing the pain experienced by patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis. Method. Participants (n=24) with an average age of 67 (+/− 8) old that fulfilled the study inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into either a treatment or control group. Both sets of participants received questionnaires (ODI, SF 36v2 and EQ5D-5L) at 1,3,6,9 and 18 months. In addition to the questionnaires the treatment group also received the SpineCor Pain Relief Brace and took part in a semi structured interview. Results. The results from the trial were mixed; repeated measures analysis on the quantitative data showed the brace had a small effect on reducing reported pain and increasing activity. Results from the semi-structured interviews were more informative. Analysis revealed the brace enabled patients' to participate in activities at a higher intensity. Problems with the functionality of the brace such as toileting that ultimately limited the amount of time they could wear the brace were also identified. Conclusion. Overall, mild pain relief and improvements in functionality and activity levels were reported in addition to several functional problems with the brace. These problems could be attributed to the average age of the participants. No prior work has examined issues related to wearing a brace from the patient perspective. Further work is needed to develop a better understanding of the benefits and limitations of bracing for Degenerative scoliosis. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained