Aim. Polypropylene (PPE) synthetic mesh is increasingly used in knee arthroplasty surgery to salvage a disrupted extensor mechanism. Despite its clinical success, it is associated with a high rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), which is hypothesized to be caused by bacterial biofilm. The purpose of the current study is to describe the progression of PPE-based biofilm formation over time and to determine if intraoperative antiseptic solutions could be used to effectively remove biofilm when treating PJI. Method. Commercially available knotted monofilament PPE mesh. 1. was cut into 10mm circular shape, immersed in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus and cultured individually in 48-well plates for 10 days to elucidate the biofilm grown on mesh over time. At every 24 hours, a triplicate of samples was retrieved and biofilm on the mesh was dislodged by sonicating at 52 kHz for 15 minutes and quantified by counting colony-forming units (CFUs) after overnight growth. The biofilm growth was also verified using scanning electron microscopy. The effect of saline and antiseptic solutions was verified by exposing 1) 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate. 2. , 2) acetic acid-based mixture. 3. , 3) diluted povidone-iodine (0.35%), 4) undiluted povidone-iodine (10%). 4. , and 5) 1:1 combination of 10% povidone-iodine & 3% hydrogen peroxide on immature and mature biofilms for 3 minutes, created by culturing with bacteria for 24 hours and 72 hours respectively. All experiments were performed in quintuples and repeated. Antiseptic treatments that produced a three-log reduction in CFU counts compared to controls were considered clinically significant. Results. PPE-mesh produced reliable CFU counts at 24 hours and reached peak growth at 72 hours. For immature biofilm, all formulations of povidone-iodine produced significant reductions in CFU counts compared to controls. Although not meeting the established threshold, saline irrigation removed 86.5% of CFUs, while formulation based on chlorohexidine and acetic acid removed 99.2% and 99.7% respectively. For mature biofilm, formulations based on povidone-iodine and acetic acid produced significant reductions in CFU counts. Conclusions. Our findings suggest biofilm may form on mesh as early as 24 hours after bacterial exposure. Povidone-iodine formulations were consistently the most effective in removing biofilm on mesh surfaces. We recommend that surgeons consider using an antiseptic solution, preferably povidone-iodine-based, in addition to regular saline lavage when attempting to salvage a PPE mesh in the setting of PJI. 1. Marlex mesh (CR Bard, Davol Inc, Warwick, RI), . 2. Irrisept (Irrimax Corp, Gainesville, FL), . 3. Bactisure (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN), . 4. Aplicare (Inc, Meriden, CT)

Aim

Identifying the optimal agent for irrigation for periprosthetic joint infection remains challenging as there is limited data. The ideal solution should have minimal cytotoxicity while maintaining bactericidal activity. We developed a novel activated-zinc solution containing zinc-chloride (ZnCl₂) and sodium-chlorite (NaClO₂). The purpose of this study was 1.) to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of 2 concentrations (“CZ1”, “CZ2”) against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 2.) to evaluate untoward effects of the solution on local wound tissue 24 hours after solution exposure in pig wound models.

Objective: To compare the in-vitro antimicrobial action of surgical irrigation fluids: 0.9% saline, 2g/L cephradine, 80mg/L gentamicin, 10% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) and 40ppm aqueous iodine (laq) for activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli in the presence of blood, plasma and saline.

Materials and Methods: 5mL of antimicrobial agent was added to 5ml of blood, plasma or saline containing 10^5–10⁶ CFU/mL of the test bacterium. At 15 seconds, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours, a 1mL sample was inactivated in 9mL of 0.5% sodium thiosulphate. The bacterial numbers were determined using a biochemical assay (Chemiluminescence) with a calibration curve and by spread plate counts. The data were transformed by a logarithmic function and analysed by linear regression to give 95% confidence intervals for their gradient of change over 2 hours. Significant differences were defined at the 5% level.

Results: In saline. All bacteria were killed within 15 seconds with PVP-I and Iaq, but showed no significant reduction with saline, cephradine or gentamicin. In plasma. E. coli was killed within 15 seconds with all irrigation fluids. S. aureus and S. epidermidis showed no significant reduction with saline, Iaq or cephradine, but did show a significant reduction in the presence of gentamicin. With PVP-I, all S. epidermidis were killed within 15 seconds and all S. aureus within 5 minutes. In blood. E.coli with PVP-I, Iaq and cephradine showed no significant reduction. E. coli with gentamicin did show a significant reduction. Both staphylococci showed a significant reduction over 2 hours with PVP-I and gentamicin, but no significant reduction with saline, cephradine and Iaq.

Conclusions: As blood has a strong chemical inactivating effect on iodine – based formulations, Iaq and PVP-I cannot be recommended for surgical irrigation. Gentamicin should be used in preference to cephradine in surgical irrigation fluids if an antimicrobial agent is required. The residual immunological components (particularly complement) in blood and plasma may enhance the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents.

Aim. Chemical debridement is a fundamental step during Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) surgery. Antiseptic solutions are commonly used, but evidence on the optimal antiseptic, concentration, and irrigation time is lacking. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the anti-biofilm capacity of povidone iodine, H. 2. 0. 2. , acetic acid and Bactisure™ after different exposure times, as well as their combinations. Method. Surgical steel discs inoculated with methicillin susceptible (MSSA) and resistant S. aureus (MRSA), P. aeruginosa, and S. epidermidis were exposed to the following antiseptic solutions: 0.3% (PI0.3) and 10% povidone iodine (PI10), H. 2. 0. 2. , 3% Acetic acid (AA3) and Bactisure™. Combinations included AA3, H. 2. 0. 2. , and PI10 in various orders. Exposure time for the antiseptics solutions was 1, 3 and 5 minutes, while combinations had a 9-minute total exposure, 3 minutes per antiseptic sequentially. All experiments were performed in triplicate and with a sterile saline control. nThe reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) was measured after sonication, and biofilm structure was analyzed via scanning electron microscopy. Results. PI showed the highest antibiofilm activity. PI0.3 eradicated bacteria on the discs after 3 and 5 minutes of exposure, but only achieved a 77.1% reduction after 1 minute. After PI10 treatment, we did not recover any bacteria regardless of exposure time. H. 2. 0. 2. , AA3, and Bactisure™ reached a significantly lower bacterial decrease at all exposure times compared to PI0.3 and PI10. AA3 was less effective against MSSA and S. epidermidis. H. 2. 0. 2. showed less activity against MRSA than PI0.3, PI10, and Bactisure™. Combinations of antiseptics starting with AA3 showed the best results in terms of CFU reduction and cell viability. Conclusions. We propose a sequential combination of AA3 + H. 2. 0. 2. + PI10 with an exposure time of 9 minutes for the chemical debridement in PJI surgery. First, AA3 performs debridement and disruption of the biofilm. Then, H. 2. 0. 2. has a bactericidal effect and increases the porosity of the cell wall, and PI10 has a final bactericidal effect. If combinations are unavailable, PI is a cost-effective alternative

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication following joint replacement. Antiseptic solutions are often used for intraoperative wound irrigation particularly in cases of revision for PJI. Antiseptic irrigation is intended to eradicate residual bacteria which may be either free floating or in residual biofilm although there is no clear clinical efficacy for its use. Also, reviewing the scientific literature there is discordance in in vitro results where some studies questions antiseptic efficacy whilst others suggest that even at low concentration antiseptic agents are effective at eradicating bacterial biofilms. The aim of this in vitro study was to establish the efficacy of undiluted antiseptic agents at eradication of a typical PJI forming biofilm and determine the importance of an antiseptic neutralisation step in this assessment. Mature Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms grown on TiAl6V4 discs were submerged in chlorohexidine (CHL) gluconate 4%, povidone-iodine (PI) 10% or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control solution. The discs were then rinsed, the biofilm bacteria suspended in solution using sonication and vortexing, and the viable count (CFU/ml) of the bacterial suspensions determined. The rinse/suspension solution was either (a) PBS or (b) Dey-Engley neutralization broth (NB). When PBS was used to rinse/suspend the biofilm a highly significant, 7.5 and 4.1, mean log reduction in biofilm vitality was observed from the control, for CHL 4% and PI 10%, respectively. However, when NB was the rinse/suspension solution the apparent antiseptic biofilm eradication efficacy was replaced with a statistically significant but clinically irrelevant less the one log-reduction in biofilm vitality. Clinical antiseptic agents are ineffective at eradicating S. epidermidis biofilm in an in vitro PJI model and absence of a neutralisation step gives the false impression of efficacy. Antiseptics alone are an ineffective treatment for biofilm related PJI and no substitute for meticulous debridement

Aim. Irrigation and debridement with an irrigation solution are essential components of the surgical management of acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Nevertheless, there is a lack of agreement regarding the most effective solution to use. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature concerning the efficacy of different irrigation solutions over bacterial biofilm. Method. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Network meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus databases from inception to September 1, 2023. We combined terms related to PJI, biofilm and irrigation solutions studied in vitro. We performed a network meta-analysis to analyze which irrigation solution achieved a higher reduction of colony forming units (CFU) after specific exposure times, always with a maximum of five minutes, replicating intraoperative conditions. Effect-size was summarized with logarithmic response ratio (logRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The rank probability for each treatment was calculated using the p-scores. Results. We screened 233 potential sources. Following deduplication, screening and full-text review, four studies with ten irrigation solutions for different duration of exposures were included, always less than five minutes, replicating intraoperative conditions. Solutions were studied over mature biofilms of most frequent bacteria grown over metal, bone cement or polyethylene surfaces. The highest effect was achieved with povidone iodine 10% during 5 minutes (logRR: −12.02; 95% CI: −14.04, −9.99). The best ranked solutions were povidone iodine 10% during five, three and one minute (respective p-scores: 0.977, 0.932, 0.887) and its combination with hydrogen peroxide for 3 minutes (p-score: 0.836). Povidone iodine 0.3% acting for 5 minutes completed the top 5 best ranked solutions in this study (p-score: 0.761). We assumed that there were no inconsistencies in our network because after examining both scenarios, with and without inconsistencies, the results were not significantly different. Conclusions. Our results show that 10% povidone-iodine is the best antiseptic solution when studied in vitro in the context of prosthetic joint infection. However, the included studies did not evaluate the possible cytotoxic effects of these solutions. This should also be taken into account before choosing the most appropriate antiseptic solution

Effective pre-surgical preparation is an important step in limiting surgical wound contamination and prevention of surgical site infection. The purpose of this study is to evaluate bacterial skin contamination after surgical skin preparation in foot surgery prior to surgery and at the end of surgery, in order to determine if current techniques are satisfactory in eliminating harmful pathogens, and to compare the results of the cultures obtained pre and post operatively with infection rate. Twenty consecutive patients scheduled for Hallux Valgus procedures were studied. Each lower extremity was prepared in the regular method with a two-step technique, Septal scrub followed by a Alcohol Chlorhexidine antiseptic solution. After preparation and draping, cultures were obtained at three locations: the hallux nailfold, first, second, third and fourth web spaces, and the anterior ankle (control). Prior to surgery, positive cultures were obtained from 80% of hallux nailfolds and 5% of web spaces. At the end of surgery, positive cultures were obtained from 80% of hallux nailfolds and 25% of web spaces. None of the controls had positive culture. 5% of all cases developed post operative infection. Based on the findings of the current study, pre-surgical skin preparation with a two-step Septal scrub followed by a Alcohol Chlorhexidine antiseptic solution is not sufficient in eliminating pathogens in foot and ankle surgery. No statistical correlation was found between the results of the cultures obtained preoperatively or post operatively with post operative infection rate. The unique environment of the foot and its resident organisms probably plays a role in the higher infection rates associated with surgery of the foot. Better methods of preparing the surgical site should be searched for

Introduction: Periprosthetic infection remains a main complication in arthroplasty. In case of a possible infection the surgeon has to have a concept of treatment which can be individually adjusted. Materials and Methods: To increase the success of implant retaining surgery VAC Instill therapy combining instillation of an antiseptic solution and VAC therapy was performed in 23 patients with periprosthetic hip infections. 19 patients had an early and 4 a late infection of the arthroplasty. Lavasept was used for irrigation. Results: Definitive wound closure was possible in all patients following 2.1 VAC exchange operations in average. The follow up was 19 months in average. In five of the 23 patients (22%) there was recurrent infection which made the explantation of the implant necessary. In early infection the success rate was 84%, in late infection 50%. Conclusion: VAC Instill therapy can be successfully used for salvage of infected endoprosthesis especially in case of early infection. The success rate seems to be higher than irrigation alone or suction drainage

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent nosocomial infections and depends on many factors: patient, microorganism, antiseptic solution use, antibiotic prophylaxis, hand scrubbing, wound care or hospital stay lenght. With the present paper the authors aim to study the SSI incidence after Total Knee (TKA) or Hip Arthroplasty (THA). All patients who underwent primary TKA or THA between January 2011 and May 2012 at our institution were considered. Patients who died within 1 year after the procedure of unrelated causes were excluded. Data collected included ASA classification, type of procedure, total and post-operative hospital stay, type and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Data were collected from the consultation at 1 month and 1 year post-operative, clinical registries and telephone interview. SSI was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Suspected cases of SSI included antibiotic administration longer than 5 days or absence of antibiotic prescription, hospital stay after the procedure longer than 9 days, patient referring infection symptoms, and clinical data reports of infection or re-intervention. During the studied period and after exclusion of 5 cases, a total of 251 surgeries (104 TKA, 147 THA) were performed, of which 2 were urgent. For both TKA and THA, the average total hospital stay was 9 days (8 days post-operative). The majority were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 2 and 3. There were 4 SSI (1,60%), 2 TKA (1,92%) and 2 THA (1,36%), all of them after discharge. Their average total hospital stay was 10,5 days. Antibiotic prophylaxis was used in 93% of the patients (97,4% a cephalosporin), with an average length of 5,7 days. Recommended hospital stay after a TKA or THA is about 5 days. On HELICS-CIRURGIA 2006–2010 report it was 10 days, similar to ours. In infected patients, our total hospital stay was lower (10,5 vs 26). Recommended duration of antibiotic prophylaxis is 24h. On HELICS-CIRURGIA more than 50% had it for more than 24h, which also happened with us; our antibiotic coverage was similar. Comparing to HELICS-CIRURGIA, the predominance of ASA 2 and 3 classifications was similar, but the overall SSI rate was lower (1,6% vs 2,24%). We conclude we must reduce hospital stay and antibiotic duration and keep the surveillance of SSI after TKA or THA

Topical treatment of infected wounds has a crucial role as an adjuvant to surgical debridement. Solutions currently used for local would treatment have either low antiseptic properties with low irritating effect, such as physiologically balanced solutions acting mostly by a mechanical irrigating effect, or antiseptic solutions which cause chemical irritation of the surrounding tissues. The use of topical substance with effective antiseptic properties, which is also not irritating to surrounding healthy tissues, should improve significantly the effectiveness of infected wound treatment. Previous reports on the use of Hexamethylenebiguanide solution for local antiseptic treatment in infected wounds indicated on a good curative effect without any local or systemic side effects. Unfortunately none of these reports is based on well designed statistical data which is essential for the safe and skilled use of any pharmaceutical agent. We present the results of controlled prospective double-blind study comparing the topical use of 0.1% Hexamethylenbiguanide solution with non lactated Ringer solution as agents for a topical treatment of infected wounds in extremities. The group of 104 patients with ischemic, combat, post surgical or due to open fracture wounds treated by either of these solutions following surgical debridement without additional systemic antibiotic use. According to the strict follow-up protocol, wounds’ healing was evaluated on a weekly basis. In the group of patients treated by the 0.1% Hexamethylenbiguanide solution, 75% rate of a complete wound healing was observed. In the control group the rate of healing was 52% [p=0.026, Chi square test, Figure 1]. These results indicate the high effectiveness of the Hexamethylenbiguanide as a topical agent for infected wound treatment

Aims

Hand trauma, consisting of injuries to both the hand and the wrist, are a common injury seen worldwide. The global age-standardized incidence of hand trauma exceeds 179 per 100,000. Hand trauma may require surgical management and therefore result in significant costs to both healthcare systems and society. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common following all surgical interventions, and within hand surgery the risk of SSI is at least 5%. SSI following hand trauma surgery results in significant costs to healthcare systems with estimations of over £450 per patient. The World Health Organization (WHO) have produced international guidelines to help prevent SSIs. However, it is unclear what variability exists in the adherence to these guidelines within hand trauma. The aim is to assess compliance to the WHO global guidelines in prevention of SSI in hand trauma.

Aims

Although low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) combined with disinfectants has been shown to effectively eliminate portions of biofilm in vitro, its efficacy in vivo remains uncertain. Our objective was to assess the antibiofilm potential and safety of LIPUS combined with 0.35% povidone-iodine (PI) in a rat debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) model of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Purpose: Operative wounds are commonly washed with a more or less diluted antiseptic solution to prevent infection or to treated overt infection. Chlorhexidine is widely used. We report the cases of nine patients who developed joint destruction attributed to peroperative irrigation with a chlorhexidine solution. Material and methods: Nine patients (three men and six women) who had undergone surgery in another facility were referred to our unit for unexplained postoperative chondrolysis. The joint localisations were: wrists (n=7) after surgery for a dorsal arthrosynovial cyst (mean age 37 years); elbow (n=1) after surgery for epicondylalgia (age 49 years); shoulder (n=1) after arthroscopy for sub-acromial impingement (age 51 years). The time between surgery and the first consultation in our unit varied from three to nine years (mean five years four months). Persistent stiffness had been noted in the postoperative period with pain at joint mobilisation which worsened progressively. For the patients with chondrolysis of the wrist: the x-rays demonstrated destruction of the radius-first ray joint in one, the medio-carpal joint in four and overall destruction in two. Overall joint destruction was also observed in the elbow and shoulder patients. Search for other causes of joint destruction was negative; infection and inflammatory rheumatoid disease were ruled out. The common feature identified in all patients was joint irrigation with a chlorhexidine solution (Biseptine®). Results: Four of the nine patients underwent surgical treatment: a four-bone arthrodesis with scaphoidectomy was used for the three patients with mediocarpal involvement and a shoulder arthrodesis was performed in one patient. The pathology study demonstrated cartilage defects filled with dense strongly hyalinised acellular tissue. Bacteriological specimens were all negative. Discussion: The chondrolytic effect of chlorhexidine, a member of the biguanide family, was first reported in 1986 with a few cases described with knee involvement. Experimentally, there would be a dose-dependent effect. The mechanism involves a disorganisation of the cell membrane with cartilaginous necrosis and ostocartilaginous resorption. Individual predisposition cannot be ruled out. Conclusion: In light of these observations, it would be advisable to avoid peroperative joint irrigation with chlorhexidine solution

Aims

There is increasing evidence to support the use of topical antibiotics to prevent surgical site infections. Although previous research suggests a minimal nephrotoxic risk with a single dose of vancomycin powder, fracture patients often require multiple procedures and receive additional doses of topical antibiotics. We aimed to determine if cumulative doses of intrawound vancomycin or tobramycin powder for infection prophylaxis increased the risk of drug-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) among fracture patients.

The June 2014 Research Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at:Intraoperative irrigation a balance of toxicities; Ibandronate effective in bone marrow oedema; Risk stratification in damage control surgery; Osteoblast like cells potentially safe; Better wear and antibacterial?; Assessing outcomes in hip fracture.

The April 2014 Research Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: scientific writing needed in orthopaedic papers; antiseptics and osteoblasts; thromboembolic management in orthopaedic patients; nicotine and obesity in post-operative complications; defining the “Patient Acceptable Symptom State”; and cheap and nasty implants of poor quality.

Blast and ballistic weapons used on the battlefield cause devastating injuries rarely seen outside armed conflict. These extremely high-energy injuries predominantly affect the limbs and are usually heavily contaminated with soil, foliage, clothing and even tissue from other casualties. Once life-threatening haemorrhage has been addressed, the military surgeon’s priority is to control infection.

Combining historical knowledge from previous conflicts with more recent experience has resulted in a systematic approach to these injuries. Urgent debridement of necrotic and severely contaminated tissue, irrigation and local and systemic antibiotics are the basis of management. These principles have resulted in successful healing of previously unsurvivable wounds. Healthy tissue must be retained for future reconstruction, vulnerable but viable tissue protected to allow survival and avascular tissue removed with all contamination.

While recent technological and scientific advances have offered some advantages, they must be judged in the context of a hard-won historical knowledge of these wounds. This approach is applicable to comparable civilian injury patterns. One of the few potential benefits of war is the associated improvement in our understanding of treating the severely injured; for this positive effect to be realised these experiences must be shared.