Spinal deformations are posture dependent. Official data from the Netherlands show that youth are encountering increasing problems with the musculoskeletal system (>40% back pain, and sport injury proneness). Prolonged sloth and slumped sitting postures are causative factors. Dutch youth are “champion sitting” in Europe. The effects of sitting on the development of posture and function of locomotion (stiffness) during growth have only been reported clearly in classic textbooks (in German) of practical anatomy and orthopaedics. Research with relevant clinical examinations is being done to understand epidemiological data on the increasing posture-dependent problems. A cohort of adolescents (15–18 years) in secondary school was assessed for sagittal postural deviations while bending. 248 children completed a questionnaire, and tests were done on neuromuscular tightness. The femorotibial angle was used to measure hamstring tightness. Measurement of the dorsiflexion of the foot was used to assess the tightness of calf muscles and Achilles tendons. All adolescents were photographed laterally while performing the finger–floor test (used to test flexibility), assessed as a knockout test: “Can you reach the floor or not?” The spinal profiles while bending were classified as abnormal arcuate or
Background. High velocity vertical aircraft ejection seat systems are credited with aircrew survival of 80-95% in modern times. Use of these systems is associated with exposure of the aircrew to vertical acceleration forces in the order of 15-25G. The rate of application of these forces may be up to 250G per sceond. Up to 85% of crew ejecting suffer skeletal injury and vertebral fracture is relatively common (20-30%) when diagnosed by plain radiograph. The incidence of subtle spinal injury may not be as apparent. Aim. A prospective study to evaluate spinal injury following high velocity aircraft ejection. Methods. A prospective case series from 1996 to 2006 was evaluated. During this interval 26 ejectees from 20 aircraft were admitted to the spinal studies unit for comprehensive examination, evaluation and management. The investigations included radiographs of the whole spine and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (incorporating T1, T2 weighted and STIR sagittal sequences). All ejections occurred within the ejection envelope and occurred at an altitude under 2000 feet (mean 460 feet) and at an airspeed less than 500 knots (mean 275 knots). Results. in this series 6 ejectees (24%) had clinical and radiographic evidence of vetebral compression fractures. These injuries were located in the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine. 4 cases required surgery (indicated for
Introduction: The use of an ejection seat to escape from a stricken aircraft is associated with the exposure of significant forces. These vertical accelerative forces on the body are in the order of 15–25G with rates of onset of up to 250G per second. Therefore, it is common to see vertical compression fractures, mainly in the thoracolumbar region. Although most vertebral fractures are evident on plain radiographs, subtle spinal injuries elsewhere may not be immediately apparent. Aim: A prospective study to evaluate for the presence of occult spinal injuries using MRI following aircraft ejection. Methods: Between 1996 and 2003, 22 ejectees from 18 aircrafts, mean age 32 years (range 24 to 48), were admitted to a regional spinal unit for comprehensive evaluation of their injuries that included whole spine radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (T1, T2 weighted and STIR sagittal sequences). All ejections occurred within the ejection envelope and were flying below 2000 ft (mean 460 feet) and below 500 knots airspeed (mean 275 knots). Results: All 5 ejectees (23%) with vertebral compression fractures, one at T6 and 4 in thoracolumbar region, had pain and tenderness in the appropriate area of the spine that was evidently detected on plain radiographs. 3 of these patients with a thoracolumbar fracture (AO A3.3) had more than 50% canal compromise and more than 30 degrees
High velocity vertical aircraft ejection seat systems are credited with aircrew survival of 80–95% in modern times. Use of these systems is associated with exposure of the aircrew to vertical acceleeration forces in the order of 15–25G. The rate of application of these forces maybe upto 250G per sceond. Upto 85% of crew ejecting suffer skeletal injury and vertebral fracture is relatively common (20–30%) when diagnosed by plain radiograph. The incidence of subtle spinal injury may not be as apparent. A prospective case series, admitted to QMC Nottingham, from 1996 to 2006 was evaluated. During this interval 26 ejectees from 20 aircraft were admitted to the spinal studies unit for comprehensive examination, evaluation and management. The investigations included radiographs of the whole spine and magnetic resonance Imaging (incorporating T1, T2 weighted and STIR saggital sequences). All ejections occurred within the ejection envelope and occurred at an altitude under 2000 feet (mean 460 feet) and at an airspeed less than 500 knots (mean 275 knots). In this series 6 ejectees (24%) had clinical and radiographic evidence of vetebral compression fractures. These injuries were located in the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine. 4 cases required surgery ( indicated for
Study Design: Retrospective review. Objective: A prospective study to evaluate for the presence of occult spinal injuries using MRI following aircraft ejection. Summary of Background Data: The use of an ejection seat in order to escape from a stricken aircraft is associated with the exposure of significant forces. These vertical accelerative forces on the body are in the order of 15 – 25G with rates of onset of up to 250G per second. Therefore, it is common to see vertical compression fractures, mainly in the thoraco-lumbar region. Although most vertebral fractures are evident on plain radiographs, other subtle spinal injuries elsewhere may not be immediately apparent. Methods: Between 1996 and 2003, 22 ejectees from 18 aircrafts, mean age 32 years (range 24 to 48), were admitted to a regional spinal unit for comprehensive evaluation of their injuries that included whole spine radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (T1, T2 weighted and STIR sagittal sequences). All ejections occurred within the ejection envelope and were flying below 2000 ft (mean 460 feet) and below 500 knots airspeed (mean 275 knots). Results: All 5 ejectees (23%) with vertebral compression fractures (one at T6 and 4 in thoraco-lumbar region) had pain and tenderness in the appropriate area of the spine that was evidently detected on plain radiographs. 3 of these patients with a thoraco-lumbar fracture (AO A3.3) had more than 50% canal compromise and more than 30 degrees
The development of spinal deformity in children with underlying neurodisability can affect their ability to function and impact on their quality of life, as well as compromise provision of nursing care. Patients with neuromuscular spinal deformity are among the most challenging due to the number and complexity of medical comorbidities that increase the risk for severe intraoperative or postoperative complications. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory at every stage to ensure that all nonoperative measures have been applied, and that the treatment goals have been clearly defined and agreed with the family. This will involve input from multiple specialities, including allied healthcare professionals, such as physiotherapists and wheelchair services. Surgery should be considered when there is significant impact on the patients’ quality of life, which is usually due to poor sitting balance, back or costo-pelvic pain, respiratory complications, or problems with self-care and feeding. Meticulous preoperative assessment is required, along with careful consideration of the nature of the deformity and the problems that it is causing. Surgery can achieve good curve correction and results in high levels of satisfaction from the patients and their caregivers. Modern modular posterior instrumentation systems allow an effective deformity correction. However, the risks of surgery remain high, and involvement of the family at all stages of decision-making is required in order to balance the risks and anticipated gains of the procedure, and to select those patients who can mostly benefit from spinal correction.