Our study aimed to examine if a mobile-bearing total knee replacement
(TKR) offered an advantage over fixed-bearing designs with respect
to rates of secondary resurfacing of the patella in knees in which
it was initially left unresurfaced. We examined the 11-year report of the New Zealand Joint Registry
and identified all primary TKR designs that had been implanted in
>
500 knees without primary resurfacing of the patella. We examined
how many of these were mobile-bearing, fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining
and fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised designs. We assessed the rates
of secondary resurfacing of the patella for each group and constructed
Kaplan-Meier survival curves.Objectives
Methods
The clinical diagnosis of an acute compartment syndrome is most reliably based on increasing pain and pain on stretching the affected muscle groups. These signs cannot be elicited in the presence of epidural or regional blocks, or if the patient is unconscious. We present a national audit of consultant trauma and orthopaedic surgeons on the use of compartmental pressure monitoring in such patients. The postal questionnaire also asked whether a departmental protocol was in use and whether regional and epidural blocks were withheld in patients at risk of developing an acute compartment syndrome. 17% of consultants had such an agreed protocol, 53% did not have access to a continuous pressure monitoring device, 58% would request for an epidural/regional block to be withheld with only 2% routinely measuring compartment pressures in the presence of such a block. This study highlights a major deficiency in the clinical approach to a relatively common condition that may result in limb and life threatening complications and supports the recommendation for compartmental monitoring equipment to be made available.
