Aims

Wales in collaboration with the Welsh Assembly Government, has attempted to start a national ligament register.

Purpose: To review long-term outcome following knee arthrodesis, and compare this with patient outcome following revision knee arthroplasty.

Methods: Case notes and radiographs of patients who underwent arthrodesis using the Mayday nail were reviewed retrospectively for evidence of clinical and radiological union. Patients also completed an SF12 health survey and Oxford knee score in the form of postal questionnaires. Each patient was matched with patients who had undergone revision knee arthoplasty and the outcomes were compared.

Results: 19 patients were reviewed who underwent knee arthrodesis using a Mayday nail in two centres between 1993 and 2004. 18 cases had united clinically and radiologically with one case lost to follow-up. Mean SF12 scores of patients following knee arthrodesis indicated severe physical (28.8) but only mild mental (43.3) disabilities. The mean Oxford knee score in this group was 41.0. These results were comparable with matched patients following revision knee arthroplasty who scores 27.2 (physical) and 41.1 (mental) on the SF12, and a mean of 38.8 on the Oxford knee score.

Conclusion: Outcome scores following knee arthrodesis were similar to those following revision knee arthroplasty making it an option worth considering in selected patients requiring revision surgery.

Discussion: The Mayday nail provides a method of knee arthrodesis with a high union rate and an acceptable complication rate. Outcome scores following arthrod-esis were not dissimilar to those following revision total knee replacement. These results suggest that knee arthrodesis may be considered as an acceptable alternative to complex knee revision surgery.

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of a customised coupled arthrodesis nail.

Knee arthrodesis is now infrequently performed and is usually reserved as a salvage for infected Joint arthroplasty or occasionally for intractable pain. Many methods have been used. Recently locked intramedullary coupled nails have gained in popularity. To deal with all size combinations a large inventory is required. We wish to report our series using a customised implant and to compare the outcome with other methods of knee arthrodesis.

Nine patients underwent arthrodesis using this implant, six following infected arthroplasty, two for intractable anterior knee pain and following trauma. Comparison was made with 17 arthrodeses performed since 1993 using external fixation (8), plates (4), and long K-nails (5). Union was achieved in nine patients (100%) at a mean time of 10 months using the customised implant. There were no complications despite early weight-bearing. No further procedures were required. This contrasted with a union rate of 65% with a 76% complication rate using alternative techniques. Seventy six percent of this second group required a further operative procedure.

We conclude that a customised coupled intramedullary nail can give excellent stability allowing early weight-bearing, and results in a high union rate with minimal post-operative complications. The differences in need for further surgery and occurrence of complications were statistically significant (p< 0.001), and differences in in-patient stay and non-union rate were also significant (p< 0.05) using Fisher’s exact test.