Femorotibial malalignment exceeding ±3° is a recognised contributor of early mechanical failure after total knee replacement (TKR). The angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur remains the best guide to restore alignment. We investigated where the femoral head lies relative to the pelvis and how its position varies with respect to recognised demographic and anatomic parameters. We have tested the hypothesis of the senior author that the position of the centre of the femoral head varies very little, and if its location can be identified, it could serve to outline the mechanical axis of the femur without the need for sophisticated imaging. The anteroposterior standing, plain pelvic radiographs of 150 patients with unilateral total hip replacements were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had Tönnis grade 0 or 1 arthritis on the non-operated hip joint. All radiographs were obtained according to a standardised protocol. Using the known diameter of the prosthetic head for calibration, the perpendicular distance from the centre of the femoral head of the non-operated hip to the centre of pubic symphysis was measured with use of TraumaCad software. Anatomic parameters, including, but not limited to, the diameter of the intact femoral head, were also measured. Demographic data (gender, age, height, weight) were retrieved from our database.Introduction
Patients & Methods
To examine the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty with a pre-operative Oxford Knee Score >34 (‘good’/‘excellent’), and assess the appropriateness of surgical intervention for this group. In the current cost-constrained health economy, justification of surgical intervention is increasingly sought. As a validated disease-specific outcome measure, the pre-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) has been suggested as a possible threshold measurement in knee arthroplasty. However, contrary to expectations, analysis of pre-operative OKS in the joint registry population demonstrates a normal distribution curve with a sub-group of high-scoring patients. This suggests that either the baseline OKS does not accurately define surgical threshold, or that patients with a high OKS are inappropriately having knee replacements.Purpose
Background
The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a validated and widely used PROM that has been successfully used in assessing the outcome of knee arthroplasty (KA). It has been adopted as the nationally agreed outcome measure for this procedure and is now routinely collected. Increasingly, it is being used on an individual patient basis as a pre-operative measure of osteoarthritis and the need for joint replacement, despite not being validated for this use. The aim of this paper is to present evidence that challenges this new role for the OKS. We have analysed pre-operative and post-operative OKS data from 3 large cohorts all undergoing KA, totalling over 3000 patients. In addition we have correlated the OKS to patient satisfaction scores. We have validated our findings using data published from the UK NJR.Purpose
Method
The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a valid and reliable self-administered patient questionnaire that enables assessment of the outcome following total knee replacement (TKR). There is as yet no literature on the behavioral trends of the OKS over time. Our aim is to present a retrospective audit of the OKS for patients who have undergone TKR during the past ten years. We retrospectively analysed 3276 OKS of patients who had a primary TKR and had been registered as part of a multi-surgeon, outcome-monitoring program at St. Helier hospital. The OKS was gathered pre-operatively and post-operatively by means of postal questionnaires at annual intervals. Patients were grouped as per their age at operation into four groups: 60, 61-70, 71- 80 and >80. A cross-sectional analysis of OKS at different time points was performed. The numbers of OKS available for analysis were 504 pre-operatively, 589 at one-year, 512 at two-year and gradually decreasing numbers with 87 knees ten-year post-operatively. There was as expected a significant decrease (improvement) of the OKS between pre-operative and one-year post-operative period and then reached a plateau. Beyond eight years, there is a gradual rise in the score (deterioration). The younger patients (60) showed a significant increase in their average OKS between one and five-years post-operatively. However beyond five years, they followed the trend of their older counterparts. When the twelve questions in the OKS were analysed, certain components revealed greater improvement (e.g. description of knee pain and limping) than others (e.g. night pain). The OKS is seen to plateau a year after TKR. According to the OKS the outcome of the TKR is not as good in the younger age group as compared to the older age group. Further investigation is required to ascertain the cause of this observed difference.
The performance of total knee arthroplasty in deeply flexed postures is of increasing concern as the procedure is performed on younger, more physically active and more culturally diverse populations. Several implant design factors, including tibiofemoral conformity, tibial slope and posterior condylar geometry have been shown directly to affect deep flexion performance. The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of a fixed-bearing, asymmetric, medial rotation arthroplasty design during kneeling activities. Thirteen study participants (15 knees) with primary total knee arthroplasty (Medial Rotation Knee, Finsbury, Surrey, UK) were observed while doing a step activity and kneeling on a padded bench from 90° to maximum comfortable flexion using lateral fluoroscopy. Subjects averaged 74 years of age and nine were female. Subjects were an average of 17 months post-operative, and scored 94 points on the International Knee Score and 99 on the Functional Score. Digitised fluoroscopic images were corrected for geometric distortion and 3D models of the implant components were registered to determine the 3D position and orientation of the implants in each image. During the step activity, the medial and the lateral femoral contact point stayed fairly constant with no axial rotation from 0 to 100° of flexion. At maximum kneeling flexion, the knees exhibited 119° of implant flexion (101°-139°), 7° (-7° to 17°) tibial internal rotation, and the lateral condyle translated backwards by 11 mm. Patients with medial rotation knee arthroplasty exhibited medial pivot action with no paradoxical translation. The knees exhibited excellent kneeling flexion and posterior translation of the femur with respect to the tibia. The axial rotation in MRK was within the range of normal knee kinematics from -10 to 120 (perhaps 140).
To establish the cost of primary hip (THR) and knee (TKR) arthroplasty in an elective orthopaedic centre in the UK and to compare it with current government reimbursement to NHS hospitals and the costs in North America. In 2004 an elective orthopaedic centre was set up in South West London which performs mainly primary lower limb arthroplasty. We used a retrospective analysis of financial statements from September 2004-June 2005 inclusive to establish operative costs (including implant), perioperative costs and post-operative costs until discharge.Aims
Methods
Patient demographics were similar between both groups. There was no significant difference in intra-operative blood loss between both groups. The early post-operative blood loss and total blood loss were significantly less in the tranexamic acid group. This effect of tranexamic acid was more significant in females who showed a dose-related relationship between tranexamic acid dose and blood loss. Fewer patients in the tranexamic acid group required blood transfusion. There was no increased incidence of DVT in the tranexamic acid group. The use of a single pre-operative 1g bolus of tranexamic acid administered before surgery is a safe, cost-effective method of reducing post-operative blood loss following total hip arthroplasty. The effect is more significant in females at this dose.
The HA coated implants remained asymptomatic. Three uncoated components required revision for migration. No evidence of accelerated UHMWPE wear was seen on retrievals or radiographs. Histological analysis of the retrieved HA coated specimens showed excellent bony fixation, uncoated cups showed predominantly fibrous tissue.
Publication of normal and expected outcome scores is necessary to provide a benchmark for auditing purposes following arthroplasty surgery. We have used the Oxford knee score to monitor the progress of knee replacements undertaken since 1995, the start of our review programme. 4847 Oxford assessments were analysed over an 8 year follow-up period. The mean pre-operative Oxford knee score was 39.2, all post-operative reviews showed a significant improvement. Patients with a BMI >
40, and the under 50 age group showed early deterioration in outcome scores, returning to pre-operative levels by 5 and 7 years respectively. There was no significant difference in outcome between surgeons performing <
20 knee replacements a year and those performing >
100 / year. The age of the patient at the time of surgery and the pre-operative body habitus have been identified as factors affecting long term outcome of total knee replacement surgery. Awareness of these factors may assist surgeons in advising patients of their expected outcomes following surgery.
Sectioned femoral components retrieved from failed hip resurfacing arthroplasties show resorption of proximal femoral bone or formation of a fibrous membrane at the bone cement interface. Our study uses Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to examine the effects of the implant orientation on bone remodelling following hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A radiographic analysis of the proximal femur following hip resurfacing was conducted in order to draw a comparison to the FEA findings. A 3D FEA model of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) was created based on the geometry and material properties of a 45 year-old female donor hip. Hip joint and muscle loads were applied. Bone remodelling stimuli was determined using changes in strain energy. A range of implant orientations were compared to study the affect on bone remodelling. A retrospective radiological analysis was undertaken on 100 hips with a minimum of 5 years follow up. Femoral neck diameter was measured at post-op, 2 and 5 years, as well as neck and stem shaft angles. FEA showed that valgus orientation was associated with increased resorption underneath the shell. Varus orientation showed increased bone formation at the stem tip. The radiological analysis identified 2 distinct patterns of neck thinning. Slow thinners (76%) had <
5% reduction in neck diameter at 2 years and <
10% at 5 years. Rapid thinner (24%) had >
5% thinning at 2 years and >
10% at 5 years. The mean percentage reduction in neck diameter was significantly different between the two groups at the two time points (p<
0.01). The rapid group had a higher proportion of valgus aligned implants (88%) and a significant decrease in reconstructed offset (p=0.0023). The FEA results have shown that stem alignment can affect bone resorption resurfacing. FEA results were consistent with the radiological findings. Additional retrieval studies are necessary to help understand aetiology of implant failures.
Adverse bone remodeling in the proximal femur may be detrimental to the long term survival of resurfacing prosthesis. Bone resorption beneath the femoral shell and thinning of the femoral neck have been observed. We present a radiological analysis of the incidence, rate, site of neck thinning and changes observed within the femoral neck, in 100 cases, with a minimum of five years follow-up. Femoral neck diameter was measured at zero, two and five years post-operatively, at the head neck junction and five mm distally. Pre and post-operative head to neck ratios, natural and reconstructed offset, femoral neck-shaft and stem-shaft angles and cup inclination angle were measured. Two distinct patterns of neck thinning were observed. In 76 cases (slow thinning group), we observed a reduction of <
5% of original neck diameter at two years and <
10 % at five years (mean 1.5%, sd+/− 1.5). In 24 cases (rapid thinning group), a reduction of >
5% of original neck diameter at two years and >
10% at five years (mean 10.4%, sd+/− 4.8) was observed. The difference in the percentage reduction in neck diameter was significantly different between the two groups at both time points (p<
0.01). Larger head-neck ratios were observed in the rapid thinning group, both pre and post operatively (p<
0.01). The viability of bone underneath the femoral head may be compromised as a consequence of a non-physiological bone loading mechanism. FEA has predicted stress shielding underneath the femoral head and loading of the mini stem. Compromised blood supply of the retained epiphyseal remnant may play a part in femoral head resorption. Femoral neck thinning is a phenomenon of unproven aetiology which affects almost 25% of our resurfacing cases.
The patients were divided into 5 groups based on their BMI, BMI<
25(normal), 25–29.9(overweight), 30–34.9(obese), 35–39.9(moderately obese), 40 or more(morbidly obese). BMI <
25 was treated as a control group for comparison. Statistical analysis was done using t test.
The potential for bone remodeling in the proximal femur may be detrimental to the long term survival of resurfacing prosthesis. A retrospective analysis of radiological changes in the femoral neck was undertaken for 96 patients (100 hips, 76 males and 24 females), with a minimum of 5 years following hip resurfacing. The mean age at surgery was 53.8 years. Femoral neck diameter was measured post-operatively, at 2 and 5 years. Pre and post-operative head to neck ratios, femoral head-shaft offset, femoral neck and implant stem-shaft angles were also measured. Two groups of patients were identified with differing rates of reduction in their femoral neck diameter. Over the first 2 years, Group A (24%) mean reduction was 2.02mm/year while Group B (76%) mean reduction was 0.33 mm/year. At 5 years, the Group A mean reduction was 5.64mm (sd±2.03mm) while Group B reduction was 1.16mm, (sd±0.97mm). The difference was significant at both time points (p<
0.01). Larger head-neck ratios were observed in the group A, both pre and post operatively (p<
0.01). Finite Element Analysis has predicted stress shielding underneath the femoral head and loading of the mini stem. This may explain bone resorption underneath the shell and remodeling around the mini stem. Compromised blood supply of the retained epiphyseal remnant may also play a part in femoral head resorption. Group A with a larger proportion of females and femoral heads will potentially have a larger proportion of epiphyseal remnant retained. A further mechanism that could be influential in the development of neck thinning and bone resorption may be due to fluid pumping mechanism causing osteolytic erosion at the bone cement interface. In conclusion, femoral neck thinning is a phenomenon of unproven aetiology which is affecting almost 25% of our resurfacing cases. Further investigations are needed to determine its aetiology and remedy.
As there had been no previous studies correlating the two scoring systems, we investigated whether a correlation exists between the two scores at 2, 5 and 10 year periods. A correlation would allow us to determine what OKS value would achieve 90% sensitivity in identifying patients requiring clinical review at the above time points. This strategy would reduce the number of clinical visits required and its associated cost.
We recommend that at 2 years, all patients complete an OKS questionnaire and if this is above 24, a clinical evaluation maybe required. Using this OKS value as a screening technique would allow a reduction of up to 50% in clinic visits and outpatient costs at the 2 year follow-up. This reduction is not as great at the 5 and 10 year periods. At these time periods, we recommend a clinical follow-up.
Computer navigation assistance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in more consistently accurate postoperative alignment of the knee prostheses. However the medium and long term clinical outcomes of computer-navigated TKA are not widely published. Our aim was to compare patient perceived outcomes between computer navigation assisted and conventional TKA using the Oxford knee score (OKS). We retrospectively collected data on 441 primary TKA carried out by a single surgeon in a dedicated arthroplasty centre over a period of four years. These were divided according to use of computer navigation (group A) or standard instrumentation (group B). There were no statistical differences in baseline Oxford knee score (OKS) and demographic data between the groups. 238 of these had at least a one-year follow-up with 109 in group A and 129 in group B. Two year follow-up data was available for 105 knees with 48 in group A and 57 in group B and a three year follow-up for 45 with 21 and 24 in groups A and B respectively. 12 patients had completed four year follow-up with seven and five knees in groups A and B respectively. The mean OKS at 1-year follow up was 24.98 (range 12– 54, SD 9.34) for group A and 26.54 (range 12– 51, SD 10.18) for group B (p = 0.25). Similarly at 2-years the mean OKS was 25.40 (range 12– 53, SD 9.51) for group A and 25.56 (range 12– 46, SD 9.67) for group B (p = 0.94). The results were similar for three and four-year follow ups with p values not significant. This study thus revealed that computer assisted TKA does not appear to result in better patient satisfaction when compared to standard instrumentation at midterm follow up. It is known from long term analysis of conventional TKA that mal-aligned implants have significantly higher failure rates beyond eight to ten years. As use of computer navigation assistance results in a less number of mal-aligned knee prostheses, we believe that these knees will have improved survivorship. The differences in OKS between the two groups should therefore be evident after eight to ten years.