The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis. A cost-utility analysis was performed alongside a randomized controlled trial. A total of 50 patients were randomized to each group. We prospectively collected data on resource use during the first year post-fracture, and estimated costs of initial treatment, further operations, physiotherapy, home nursing, and production loss. Health-related quality of life was based on the Euro-QoL five-dimension, five-level (EQ-5D-5L) utility index, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated.Aims
Methods
To investigate the differences of open reduction and internal
fixation (ORIF) of complex AO Type C distal radius fractures between
two different models of a single implant type. A total of 136 patients who received either a 2.4 mm (n = 61)
or 3.5 mm (n = 75) distal radius locking compression plate (LCP
DR) using a volar approach were followed over two years. The main
outcome measurements included motion, grip strength, pain, and the
scores of Gartland and Werley, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). Differences
between the treatment groups were evaluated using regression analysis
and the likelihood ratio test with significance based on the Bonferroni
corrected p-value of <
0.003.Objectives
Methods
