Patient-specific (PS) implantation surgical technology has been introduced in recent years and a gradual increase in the associated number of surgical cases has been observed. PS technology uses a patient’s own geometry in designing a medical device to provide minimal bone resection with improvement in the prosthetic bone coverage. However, whether PS unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) provides a better biomechanical effect than standard off-the-shelf prostheses for UKA has not yet been determined, and still remains controversial in both biomechanical and clinical fields. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical effect between PS and standard off-the-shelf prostheses for UKA. The contact stresses on the polyethylene (PE) insert, articular cartilage and lateral meniscus were evaluated in PS and standard off-the-shelf prostheses for UKA using a validated finite element model. Gait cycle loading was applied to evaluate the biomechanical effect in the PS and standard UKAs.Objectives
Methods
There remains a lack of data on the reliability of methods to
estimate tibial coverage achieved during total knee replacement.
In order to address this gap, the intra- and interobserver reliability
of a three-dimensional (3D) digital templating method was assessed
with one symmetric and one asymmetric prosthesis design. A total of 120 template procedures were performed according to
specific rotational and over-hang criteria by three observers at
time zero and again two weeks later. Total and sub-region coverage
were calculated and the reliability of the templating and measurement
method was evaluated.Objectives
Methods
