The main advantage of 3D-printed, off-the-shelf acetabular implants is the potential to promote enhanced bony fixation due to their controllable porous structure. In this study we investigated the extent of osseointegration in retrieved 3D-printed acetabular implants. We compared two groups, one made via 3D-printing (n = 7) and the other using conventional techniques (n = 7). We collected implant details, type of surgery and removal technique, patient demographics, and clinical history. Bone integration was assessed by macroscopic visual analysis, followed by sectioning to allow undecalcified histology on eight sections (~200 µm) for each implant. The outcome measures considered were area of bone attachment (%), extent of bone ingrowth (%), bone-implant contact (%), and depth of ingrowth (%), and these were quantified using a line-intercept method.Aims
Methods
The Kaplan-Meier estimation is widely used in orthopedics to
calculate the probability of revision surgery. Using data from a
long-term follow-up study, we aimed to assess the amount of bias
introduced by the Kaplan-Meier estimator in a competing risk setting. We describe both the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the competing
risk model, and explain why the competing risk model is a more appropriate
approach to estimate the probability of revision surgery when patients
die in a hip revision surgery cohort. In our study, a total of 62 acetabular
revisions were performed. After a mean of 25 years, no patients
were lost to follow-up, 13 patients had undergone revision surgery
and 33 patients died of causes unrelated to their hip.Objectives
Methods
