header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Open access content

Bone & Joint Research
Dates
Year From

Year To
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 126 - 135
1 Mar 2019
Sekiguchi K Nakamura S Kuriyama S Nishitani K Ito H Tanaka Y Watanabe M Matsuda S

Objectives

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is one surgical option for treating symptomatic medial osteoarthritis. Clinical studies have shown the functional benefits of UKA; however, the optimal alignment of the tibial component is still debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of tibial coronal and sagittal plane alignment in UKA on knee kinematics and cruciate ligament tension, using a musculoskeletal computer simulation.

Methods

The tibial component was first aligned perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia, with a 7° posterior slope (basic model). Subsequently, coronal and sagittal plane alignments were changed in a simulation programme. Kinematics and cruciate ligament tensions were simulated during weight-bearing deep knee bend and gait motions. Translation was defined as the distance between the most medial and the most lateral femoral positions throughout the cycle.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 3, Issue 10 | Pages 289 - 296
1 Oct 2014
van IJsseldijk EA Harman MK Luetzner J Valstar ER Stoel BC Nelissen RGHH Kaptein BL

Introduction

Wear of polyethylene inserts plays an important role in failure of total knee replacement and can be monitored in vivo by measuring the minimum joint space width in anteroposterior radiographs. The objective of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to compare the accuracy and precision of a new model-based method with the conventional method by analysing the difference between the minimum joint space width measurements and the actual thickness of retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts.

Method

Before revision, the minimum joint space width values and their locations on the insert were measured in 15 fully weight-bearing radiographs. These measurements were compared with the actual minimum thickness values and locations of the retrieved tibial inserts after revision.