The aim of this retrospective study was to determine if there are differences in short-term clinical outcomes among four different types of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT). A total of 88 patients (mean age 34 years (SD 10.03), mean BMI 25 kg/m2 (SD 3.51)) with full-thickness chondral lesions of the tibiofemoral joint who underwent MACT were included in this study. Clinical examinations were performed preoperatively and 24 months after transplantation. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, the Brittberg score, the Tegner Activity Scale, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. The Kruskal-Wallis test by ranks was used to compare the clinical scores of the different transplant types.Aims
Methods
Matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT)
has been developed and applied in the clinical practice in the last
decade to overcome most of the disadvantages of the first generation
procedures. The purpose of this systematic review is to document
and analyse the available literature on the results of MACT in the
treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee. All studies published in English addressing MACT procedures were
identified, including those that fulfilled the following criteria:
1) level I-IV evidence, 2) measures of functional or clinical outcome,
3) outcome related to cartilage lesions of the knee cartilage.Objectives
Methods
