Abstract
Cell-based tissue engineering strategies for tendon repair have limited clinical applicability due to delayed extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and subsequent prolonged culture periods, which lead to tenogenic phenotypic drift. Deposition of ECM in vitrocan be enhanced by macromolecular crowding (MMC), a biophysical phenomenon that governs the intra- and extra-cellular milieu of multicellular organisms2, which has been described to accelerate ECM deposition in human tenocytes1. A variety of cell sources have been studied for tendon repair including tenocytes, dermal fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)3and various biophysical, biochemical and biological tools have been used to mimic tendon microenvironment and induce phenotype maintenance in long term cultures or differentiation4. Therefore, we propose to assess the combined effect of macromolecular crowding and mechanical loading on different cell sources to determine their suitability for the in vitro fabrication of tendon-like tissue.
Human dermal fibroblasts, tenocytes and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were cultured for 3 days with 100 µg/ml of carrageenan (MMC) under static and dynamic culture conditions. Cyclic uniaxial strain was applied using a MechanoCulture FX (CellScale) at 1 Hz and 10% strain for 12 hours a day. Cell morphology and alignment were evaluated by fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labelled phalloidin and 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. Extracellular matrix composition was evaluated by immunocytochemistry. Cell phenotype maintenance/differentiation (tenogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages) were assessed by gene and protein analysis.
After 12 hours of exposure to the uniaxial load, permanently differentiated cells are strictly aligned in the direction perpendicular to the load while the MSCs do not show preferential alignment. ECM deposition (e.g. collagens type I, III, V, VI) is increased in the presence of MMC and this effect is maintained under mechanical loading. ECM deposited under mechanical loading is also aligned in the direction perpendicular to the load. Tenogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic markers are being tested to assess cell phenotype.
Mechanical loading and macromolecular crowding can induce cell and ECM alignment and increased ECM deposition without affecting cell metabolic activity or viability. Cell and ECM alignment alongside ECM composition and tenogenic marker expression suggest this approach might be suitable to maintain or differentiate towards tenogenic lineage.
