Abstract
Introduction
The education of residents in the proper placement of pedicle screws is key to the safety of the surgery. The more experienced the surgeon, the more accurately the pedicle screws tend to be placed. A physical bone model, with properties and tactile feel similar to human bone, was developed with the intention of using the bone model to train residents in pedicle screw placement. The purpose of this study was to test whether the model improves the performance of orthopaedic residents when cannulating spinal pedicles, as judged by the number of breaches, and to gain feedback from the residents on their experiences.
Materials and Methods
Six orthopaedic residents were recruited, with ethics approval. Prior to testing, the residents were given an instructional video describing the correct cannulation of a lumbar vertebra. The residents were each provided with 12 bones mounted in holders: 3 for initial skills assessment, 6 for free practice, and 3 for final skills assessment. In the pre- and post-practice sets, the 3 bone models had different properties: weak, normal and strong. The residents were asked to complete both pre and post-testing questionnaires. The number of breaches was counted in initial and final bone testing. The forces for each bone model were compared using an ANOVA; these were followed by post-hoc t-tests if significant (p<0.05).
Results
All but one of the residents improved the number of breaches with practice, and the one that did not improve did not make the same breaches twice. The total number of breaches in the final testing (14) was lower than in the initial testing (31). The entry points chosen by the residents were all deemed appropriate as per the video instruction. The resident with the most experience had the least number of breaches; the resident with the least amount of experience had the most breaches.
Discussion
The reduction of the number of breaches between the initial and final testing indicates that the residents did learn. Overall the response from the residents was positive; they all indicated they would like to have the simulator as part of their training; most even indicated an interest to use them outside of training hours. Almost all indicated that the bones felt more realistic than those currently available (if they were aware of them). Positively, the more surgical experience the resident had, the more their survey responses indicated a positive impression of the bones.
