Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

DIAGNOSIS OF PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION IN REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY WITH A METAL-ON-METAL BEARING OR CORROSION

Current Concepts in Joint Replacement (CCJR) – Winter 2014



Abstract

Background:

Failed metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings and corrosion reactions are being increasingly encountered with little to guide evaluation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our purpose was to determine the utility of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and differential (%PMN) in diagnosing PJI in failed hips with a MOM bearing or corrosion.

Methods:

150 revision hips (92 MOM total hip arthroplasties, 19 MOM hip resurfacings, 30 non-MOM bearings with corrosion and 9 full-thickness bearing surface wear with metallosis) were retrospectively evaluated. Nineteen patients were diagnosed as infected using MSIS criteria. Mean laboratory values were compared between groups and receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC) generated with an area under the curve (AUC) to determine test performance and optimal cutoffs.

Results:

The synovial fluid WBC count was judged to be inaccurate secondary to cellular debris in 47 of the 141 patients where one was obtained (33.3%); a WBC count was still reported, however, in 35 hips, 11 of which were falsely positive. Infected patients had significantly higher mean serum ESR, CRP, synovial fluid WBC count, and differential (p < 0.0001, all). The best tests for diagnosis of PJI were the synovial fluid WBC count (AUC=98%, optimal cutoff 4350 WBC/μL), and differential (AUC = 90%, optimal cutoff 85% PMN). Diagnostic performance of the synovial fluid WBC count and differential improved with fewer false positives after excluding inaccurate samples. The ESR and CRP both had good sensitivity.

Conclusions:

The diagnosis of PJI is extremely difficult in patients with MOM bearings or corrosion and the synovial fluid WBC count can frequently be falsely positive and should be relied upon only if a manual count is done and if a differential can be performed. A more aggressive approach to preoperative evaluation for PJI is recommended in these patients to allow for careful evaluation of the synovial fluid specimen, the integration of synovial fluid culture results, and repeat aspiration if necessary.