Abstract
Purpose of study
Computerised Tomographic Angiography (CTA) is less invasive than conventional angiography. It is our perception that CTAs are being requested and performed too frequently at our institution without correct indications. We assessed the number of CTAs that were done, the percentage of vascular injuries sustained and whether correct indications were followed when requesting CTAs.
Methodology
A review of records of the radiology department to determine the number of CTAs done for suspected extremity vascular injuries from January to December 2012. Inclusion criteria were CTAs performed during this period for suspected vascular injuries in fractures and dislocations and extremity gunshot wounds.
A retrospective chart review was performed to determine the mechanism of injury, clinical picture (pulses, temperature, capillary refill and neurology), indications for and results of the CTA.
Results
During this time 285 CTAs were performed of which 137 were suitable for analysis. One hundred and fifteen were males. The average age was 30.25 (range 14 to 86) years. Eighty six (62.77%) of the CTAs were normal. A further 4 patients showed no vascular injury, but with external compression of the vessels. The mechanism of injury was gunshot wounds in 58% of cases, motor vehicle accidents in 16.8% and pedestrian-motor vehicle accidents in 15%. 58.5% of cases with abnormal pulses had normal CTAs. Twenty one patients had normal pulses, but 5 of these had abnormal CTAs. Clinical assessment of peripheral pulse had a sensitivity of 81.5%, specificity of 34%, positive predictive value of 41.5% and negative predictive value of 76%.
Conclusion
Thirty one (58.5%) of cases with abnormal pulses had normal CTAs, indicating that clinical examination is unreliable. Twenty one (15.3%) patients with normal pulses on clinical examination had CTAs performed. We believe CTAs are over-utilised due to availability rather than relying on serial clinical examination and non invasive testing.
NO DISCLOSURES
