header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

TOPAZ RADIOFREQUENCY MICRO-DEBRIDEMENT FOR ACHILLES TENDINOSIS

The Indian Orthopaedic Society (UK) (IOSUK)



Abstract

Introduction

Achilles tendinosis results from a chronic degenerative process within the tendon. Topaz micro-debridement aims to restore the degenerate micro-architecture within the tendon reducing painful symptoms experienced by patients. Topaz micro-debridement has been used to successfully treat upper limb tendinopathies but its application to tendinopathies of the foot and ankle is relatively new. This study aims to assess the functional outcomes following topaz radiofrequency micro-debridement for Achilles tendinosis.

Materials/Methods

All cases of topaz micro-debridement for Achilles tendinosis were identified from hospital records spanning a five year period. VISA-A assessment questionnaires were sent to these patients to assess the patients functional status pre and post-surgery. Patients were asked to comment on their overall satisfaction and to report any complications they had experienced. Eight responses were received and included in analysis. Hospital records and imaging results were investigated for those that responded.

Results

Average VISA-A scores improved from 18/100 to 63/100. The difference between the pre and post-surgery group was significant at the 0.02% level. All cases demonstrated objective improvement in functional outcome. Seven cases reported overall satisfaction but one was complicated by Achilles tendon rupture seven weeks following the procedure. This is the second reported case of rupture noted in current literature.

Conclusion

This study confirms topaz micro-debridement is an excellent treatment for Achilles tendinosis, but that rupture is a real risk which persists for at least two months following the procedure. We would therefore recommend the procedure with a suitable period of rehabilitation to ensure full recovery.