Abstract
Objective
To assess the usefulness of radiographs alone to evaluate acute midfoot/forefoot injuries. We believe that foot injuries are often under-estimated and that CT scans should be routinely obtained to aid in their management and avoid additional morbidity for patients.
Materials & Methods
In 26 months, 255 patients had foot injuries requiring X-Rays. Of these patients, 94 (37%) had primary radiographs indicating midfoot or forefoot fractures, and 28 had subsequent CT scans. Radiographs were retrospectively re-evaluated with respect to fracture location, type, mechanism of injury and then compared with CT results.
Results
Of 255 patients, 213 (84%) had one or more fractures in their foot. A total of 397 fractures were seen with 105 patients having Os Calcis (41%) fractures. 94 patients (37%) had midfoot/forefoot fractures which included the 28 patients with subsequent CT scans. 56 patients (22%) had no injury. Of those patients with midfoot/forefoot injuries, 61 fractures were seen on plain radiographs and an additional 74 were identified on CT scanning.
The major mechanism of injury in these patients was Road Traffic Accident (26 patients [28%]). Commonly missed individual fractures on plain radiography were Metatarsal (29), Cuboid (12) and Cuneiform fractures (11). Nine of the 29 (31%) metatarsal bone fractures involved missed fracture-dislocations of the Lisfranc joint. Other new fractures included Talus (4), Navicular (3), Os Calcis (2) and Tibia (2).
48 required operative fixation, including 20 patients that underwent CT scanning.
We found that the sensitivity of radiographs in detection of midfoot fractures was low at 44%, and only 50% in forefoot injuries.
Conclusion
In patients with high energy foot injury, and those with suspected complex injury, the sensitivity of radiography is only moderate at best. We suggest that CT scanning as the primary imaging modality would lead to a decrease in their morbidity.
