header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

PATTERNS OF LOW BACK PAIN IN CHILDREN/ADOLESENTS

The 27th annual ACM SI/GUCCS conference



Abstract

Background

It is generally acknowledged that low back pain (LBP) is a common condition already in childhood. However, not many studies have looked at the way LBP tracks over age and how common it is until early adulthood.

Purposes

The purposes of this presentation are to show the prevalence estimates at three different ages (9,13,15) and how the LPB reporting tracks over these age groups.

Methods

A longitudinal cohort study was carried out from the years of 1997 till 2005, collecting interview data from children who were sampled to be representative of Danish schoolchildren. LBP was defined as having had reported pain in the lower back within the past month. The prevalence estimates and the various patterns of LBP reporting over time are presented as percentages.

Results

Of the 771 children sampled, 62%, 57%, and 58% participated in the three back surveys. The three prevalence estimates of LBP were 4%, 22% and 36%. In the youngest group LBP reporting was most common in boys whereas the opposite was the case in the two older groups. Longitudinal LBP data were available for 34%. Most children reported LBP only once over the six years and only one individual reported to have had LBP at all three surveys.

Conclusion

This study confirmed the rapid increase in the prevalence of LBP in children/adolescents. It also confirmed that during the years of growth spurt, this is more pronounced in girls than in boys. However, it is not the same individuals who report LBP all the time.

This abstract has not previously been published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented at any national meeting.

Conflicts of interest: None

Sources of funding: “Industriens Arbejdsskadeforsikring,” now “Topdanmark,” funded the study.