Abstract
Background
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of ambulatory disabilities. Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported as the most effective treatment for severe knee OA, quantitative evaluation of ambulatory function have not been well investigated.
We hypothesized that better functional recovery would result in better patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate ambulatory functional recovery and assess the influence on patient satisfaction after TKA.
Material and Methods
90 patients (80 females and 10 males) were involved in this study. The mean age at TKA was 75.2 ± 5.8 years. Patients were subjected to 3 meters timed up and go test (TUG) to evaluate ambulatory function. TUG was performed at 6 time periods; before surgery, 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. We also asked the patients to fill out the questionnaire of patient satisfaction category in the New Knee Society Score at 1 year after TKA.
The sequential changes in TUG were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA (p<0.05). The influences of each parameter (age, TUGs) on the patient satisfaction score were analyzed with simple regression analysis (p<0.05).
Results
The mean TUGs were 12.2, 16.7, 13.3, 11.1, 10.7, 10.4 seconds at before surgery, 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery respectively. TUG time significantly increased at 2 weeks after TKA and decreased afterward until 3 months. We found TUG significantly decreased at 3 months comparing to preoperative measurement. No significant changes in TUG were found from 3 months to 1 year after TKA. The mean patient satisfaction score was 29.2 ± 6.3 (12–40) points. There was a significant negative correlation between age and satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was negatively correlated to preoperative TUG and TUG at 1 year.
Discussion
In this study, we evaluated sequential changes of ambulatory function in detail using TUG test during 1 year after TKA. Ambulatory function significantly deteriorated at 2 weeks, followed by gradual improvement and reached to significantly better level at 3 months after TKA comparing to preoperative level. We also found that the patient satisfaction was affected equally by both preoperative and 1 year postoperative TUG time.
Although our patients' age was relatively elder than in the major literature, significant improvement in ambulatory function was observed as short as 3 months. This is shorter than previous reports. We provided a rehabilitation program in hospital for 3 weeks after TKA. This would be beneficial for early ambulatory functional recovery even with elder patients.
The ambulatory function generally deteriorates as patients get old. Therefore TKA should be considered before patients get too old.
Conclusion
Ambulatory function significantly improved at 3 months after TKA, and no more improvement was found afterward. The younger age and better preoperative ambulatory function would be beneficial for the patient satisfaction after TKA in elderly population.
