Abstract
INTRODUCTION
In the treatment of nonunions, and other complications of bone repair, an attractive alternative to bone autografts would be the use of a combination of autologous mesenchymal progenitors cells (MSCs), biomaterials and growth factors. Our goal was to determine the therapeutic potential and contribution to the repair process of different sources of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of nonunions.
METHODS
The right femur of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats was stabilized with an aluminum plate (20 mm long, 4 mm wide, 2 mm thick) and four screws (1.5 mm diameter, 8 mm long). A diaphyseal critical size defect was performed (5 mm). Six groups (n=6–8 animals each) were created. A nonunion group (Control group, empty defect); LBA group, live bone allograft; BMP2 group, rhBMP-2 (2 μg) in collagen sponge; PCL group, polycaprolactone scaffold; PMSCs group, PCL scaffold loaded with 5×106 periosteum-derived MSCs; and BMSCs group, PCL scaffold loaded with 5×106 bone marrow-derived MSCs. For cell tracking purposes, LBA and MSCs were derived from SD-GFP transgenic rats. The repair process was followed up by x-rays up to sacrifice, week 10. After sacrifice, femurs were analyzed by micro computed tomography (μCT), histology and immunohistochemistry. For multiple comparisons one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett”s test for single comparisons was used. Statistical significance was established for p<0.05.
RESULTS
Control group did not show healing during follow up or by μCT and histological analysis. Treatment groups BLA and BMP2 showed full healing by week 10 (LBA, 6 out of 6 animals; BMP2, 4 out of 6 animals). The repair callus was quantified by mCT, Control group showed limited formation of bone (11.47±2.01 mm3) while both LBA and BMP2 groups showed increased bone formation by week 10 when compared with control group (LBA, 35.36±2.24 mm3, p=0.0022; BMP2, 33.32±1.84 mm3, p=0.0022). Histological and μCT analysis confirmed the experimental nonunion model.
In PCL treated groups a low number of animals showed radiographic healing: PCL group 1 out of 8 animals; PMSCs group, 2 out of 6 animals; BMSCs group, 0 out of 6 animals. Interestingly, quantification of the repaired callus showed that only PMSCs group produced a significant volume of bone when compared with the Control group (PMSCs, 24.97±6.03 mm3, p=0.0411). PCL and BMSCs groups do not produced significant amount of bone in the repair callus (PCL, 19.00±4.25 mm3, p=0.3095; BMSCs, 12.88±2.38 mm3, p=0.9372). Healing was confirmed by histology and μCT analysis.
Finally, the engraftment of transplanted cells was analysed by immunohistochemistry (anti-GFP antibody). Of the three groups receiving cells only the LBA group showed positive signal for GFP at week 10-post surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, periosteum-derived progenitor cells are suitable for mimetic autograft design although integration is not yet achieved.
