14 – MECHANICAL STIMULI DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE HIP JOINT DUE TO CAM IMPINGEMENT AND ITS RELATION WITH THE PROGRESSION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS

Abstract

Purpose: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is recognized as a pathomechanical process that leads to hip osteoarthritis (OA). Past research has been focused on treatments for FAI; however, few studies have been done to link FAI with the progression of OA. It is hypothesized that elevated mechanical stimuli could provoke bone remodeling in the subchondral bone and articulating surfaces due to cam FAI (aspherical head-neck deformity), which would accelerate the progression of OA. Using finite element analysis (FEA), the aim is to compare healthy hips to hips with cam FAI – investigating the mechanical stimuli effect of FAI towards OA.

Method: Net joint reaction forces were obtained from joint kinematics, kinetics, and by inverse dynamics calculation for a dynamic squat motion of a control subject and a cam FAI patient (both males with comparable age, BMI, and femur lengths). CT scans were acquired from both subjects. Data slices were compiled using 3D-DOCTOR (Able Software Corp, MA) to form a 3D model with slice thickness calibrated at 1.25mm in the superior-inferior axis. ANSYS (ANSYS, PA) software was used for FEA. The femur models were given quadrilateral shell elements and modeled as linear elastic orthotropic materials. The ground reaction forces were applied to the femur models, simulating dynamic loads, using boundary conditions specific to hip loading. Von Mises stresses were determined to examine stress concentrations and adverse loading conditions. Strain energy distributions were determined to examine the effect of stimuli on the initiation and rate of bone remodeling.

Results: At the maximum squat-depth, the FEA results demonstrated that the net forces acting on the FAI hip produced high mechanical stimuli regions around the head and neck. The highest stress concentration (590 MPa) was located at the anterosuperior head-neck junction, where cam FAI is most prominent. For the control hip, stresses were significantly lower (maximum of 151 MPa) and dissipated around the head. For both the FAI and the control hip, the maximum strain energy concentrations were seen at the superior portion of the head (4.725 kJ vs. 2.192 kJ for FAI vs. control hip respectively).

Conclusion: The increase in mechanical stimuli can be due to the loading configurations as well as to the abnormal geometry of the cam deformity. Assuming that the strain energy density (SED) and its rate is linearly proportional to the rate of bone turnover, based on a recent semi-mechanistic bone remodeling theory, a higher rate of bone turnover is expected in the FAI than in a normal hip. Depending on the level and rate of SED, the rate of bone remodeling will vary in order to provide a new homeostatic configuration. The next-step analysis, examining the mechanical stimuli in the acetabulum and its cartilage, is currently in progress. This would provide useful information about the possible locations of OA initiation and establish a link between FAI with cartilage degeneration.