Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

HIP RESURFACING-RELATED PSEUDOTUMOURS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED WEAR: A RETRIEVAL STUDY USING AN ACCURATE 3D MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUE



Abstract

Introduction: Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty-induced pseudotumours are a serious complication, which occur in 1.8% of patients who undergo this procedure in our institution. The aim of this study was to measure the 3D in vivo wear on the surface of resurfacing components revised for pseudotumour, compared to a control group.

Method: Thirty-six hip resurfacing implants were divided into two groups; 18 patients with a clinical and histopathological diagnosis of pseudotumour and 18 controls (revised for femoral neck fracture and infection). Three dimensional contactless metrology (Redlux Ltd) was used to scan the surface of the femoral and acetabular components, to a resolution of 20 nanometers. The location, depth and area of the wear scar were determined for each component. A separate blinded analysis to determine the presence of absence of impingement was performed by one of the authors.

Results: The volumetric wear rate for femoral component of the pseudotumour group was 3.29 mm3/yr (SD5.7) and 0.79 mm3/yr (SD1.2) for the control group (p=0.005). In the pseudotumour group, the volumetric wear rate of the acetabular component was 2.5 mm3/yr (SD6.9) compared to 0.36 mm3/yr (SD0.80) for the control group (p=0.008). Edge-wear was detected in 89% of acetabular components in the pseudotumour group and 21% of those in the control group (p=0.01). Anterior or posterior edge-wear, consistent with impingement was present on the femoral components of 73% of patients in the pseudotumour group and 22% in the control group (p=0.01).

Discussion: This work demonstrates that implants revised for pseudotumour have significantly higher volumetric wear rates than controls. They also have a significantly higher incidence of edge-wear than controls. We suggest that a significant proportion of pseudotumours are associated with high concentrations of metal wear debris; however a minority may result from a hypersensitivity reaction to metal ions.

Correspondence should be addressed to: British Hip Society, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England. Email: c.wilson@boa.ac.uk