header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

RELIABILITY OF IMAGE-FREE NAVIGATEDMONITORING OF THE MECHANICAL LEG AXIS



Abstract

Background: Navigation allows for determination of the mechanical axis of the lower extremity. We evaluated the intra- and inter-observer reliability with an image-free navigation system and determined the accuracy of the navigation system to monitor changes in lower limb alignment as compared to alignment measured with a novel 3D CT method.

Methods: A total of 13 cadaver legs were used to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer registration reliability by three observers. Navigated HTOs were then performed on all legs and pre/postoperative values of the varus-valgus angles were recorded. Data were compared to equivalent measures obtained by 3D CT using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: The ICCs for intra-observer varus-valgus reliability ranged from 0.756 to 0.922, inter-observer reliability was 0.644. ICCs for navigation-CT comparison were 0.784 for varus-valgus angle (pre-op), 0.846 (postop) and 0.873 (delta). Maximum differences in navigation-CT measurements in varus-valgus angle (delta) were 4.5° for all trials. There was poor reliability and accuracy in the axial plane (tibial rotation) as well as fair reliability and accuracy in the sagittal plane (tibial slope).

Conclusion: Image-free navigation is reliable for dynamic monitoring of coronal leg alignment but shows relevant limitations in determination of sagittal and axial plane alignment.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel: +41 44 448 44 00; Email: office@efort.org

Author: Daniel Kendoff, Germany

E-mail: daniel.kendoff@endo.de