header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A COMPARISON OF DIGITAL AND MANUAL TEMPLATING USING PACS IMAGES



Abstract

Manual templating using transparencies allows preoperative visualisation of anatomy and prosthesis size, as well as ease of exchange from prosthesis type to another. Most UK hospitals have converted X-ray provision to Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS), necessitating the use of digital templating.

We assessed the accuracy and speed of templating for hip replacement on 36 occasions in 12 patients listed for hip replacement, using final component choice as an indicator of accuracy. Each hip was templated using, “Orthoview,” templating programme

  1. without initial scaling and

  2. following scaling and then

  3. manually scaled images on a computer screen superimposing acetate templates in the traditional fashion.

A two pence coin taped to the lateral aspect of the thigh at the level of the greater trochanter was used for scaling purposes.

Our results showed acetate templating to be most accurate, correlating identically with the prosthesis stem size in 9/12 cases, and with the acetabulum reamed size on 10/12 occasions. Acetate templating was also the most accurate method when allowing for +/− one size difference, being within +/− one size in all 12/12 cases for both stem size and acetabulum size. In comparison, both scaled and non scaled Orthoview templating correlated with the correct femoral prosthesis size in 5/12 patients. The acetabulum ream size was correctly templated in 10/12 patients using unscaled Orthoview, and 8/12 patients using scaled Orthoview. Additionally, Orthoview templating took a mean of 6 minutes, whereas manual templating can be achieved in under 30 seconds.

Manual templating of scaled PACS images using transparencies conferred considerable advantages in terms of accuracy and speed. Moreover, this method allows a hands-on assessment of the forthcoming surgical procedure immediately prior to the operation, as well as late changes in implant choice. We recommend the continuation of manual templating using modern scaled digital images.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr D J Bracey, Editorial Secretary. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Royal Cornwall Hospital, Treliske, Cornwall TR1 3LJ, England.