COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGICAL NAVIGATION DOES NOT IMPROVE THE ALIGNMENT AND ORIENTATION OF THE COMPONENTS IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract

Background: Whether total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted surgical navigation can improve the limb and component alignment is a matter of debate. We hypothesized that total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted surgical navigation is superior to the conventional total knee arthroplasty with regard to the precision of implant positioning.

Methods: Sequential simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasties were carried out in 160 patients (320 knees). One knee was replaced using a computer-assisted surgical navigation system and the other conventionally without using computer-assisted surgical navigation. The two methods were compared for accuracy of orientation and alignment of the components determined by radiographs and computed tomographs. The mean follow-up was 3.4 years.

Results: The mean preoperative Knee Society score was 26 points in the computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty group, which was improved to 92 points postoperatively and it was 25 points, which improved to 93 points post-opertively in the conventional total knee arthroplasty group. Ranges of motion of the knees were similar in both groups. The operating and tourniquet times were significantly longer in the computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty group than in the conventional total knee arthroplasty group (P< 0.001). Accuracy and the number of outliers of component position between the two groups were not significantly different (P> 0.05).

Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted surgical navigation did not result in more accurate implant positioning than that achieved in conventional total knee arthroplasty, determined by both radiographs and computed tomographs.