header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DOUBLE-PLATING FOR SUBTROCHANTERIC NONUNIONS OF THE FEMUR



Abstract

Introduction: The subtrochanteric area of the femur is subject to large tensile and compressive forces. The rate of nonunion following operative fixation of such fractures is about 7–20%. Revision surgery to obtain union is difficult because of the small size of the proximal fragment, muscle forces acting in 2 planes, and bone loss.

We present the results of a series of 9 consecutive patients with subtrochanteric non-unions treated by double plates.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 9 consecutive subtrochanteric nonunions treated with double plates and additional osteoinduction (bone graft, or BG+BMP-7).

Results: There were 5 male and 4 female patients, with ages from 50–82 years (mean 65). All were treated in a single-stage procedure by implant removal, a lateral plate and a separate anterior plate. One patient had had a previous unsuccessful revision procedure with an intra-medullary device.

One patient with liver cirrhosis died 5 days postoperatively. Two patients are currently 8 weeks post surgery. All the others healed in a mean of 5.1 months (range 4–6 months).

Two patients underwent distal femoral lengthening to compensate for bone loss.

Discussion: The high muscle forces around the proximal femur require a sound mechanical environment for bone healing to occur. This is particularly marked in nonunions. The small size of the proximal fragment can result in suboptimal fixation. The addition of the anterior plate provides better fixation and also neutralizes the sagittal forces.

We believe that double plating neutralizes all the forces around the proximal femur, providing the best mechanical environment. Given the limits of the small numbers and the retrospective nature of the study, we believe that this method of treatment offers a sound surgical strategy, reflected by our success rate.

Correspondence should be addressed to BLRS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.