Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

RESTORATION OF THORACIC KYPHOSIS IN ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF REDUCTION – CANTILEVER REDUCTION VS TWO RODS SIMULTANEOUS TRANSLATION



Abstract

Background: context: In Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), the correction of thoracic hypokyphosis with hooks instrumentation and also with pedicle screws system is moderate.

Purpose: To compare radiographic results between two instrumentations with thoracic screws using two different

Methods: of reduction: cantilever reduction (CR group– MOSS-MIAMI system) versus simultaneous translation on two rods (ST group – PASSMED system).

Study design: Retrospective comparative analysis of two consecutive cohorts of patients treated by the same surgeon at a single hospital.

Patient sample: Forty-two adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis (Lenke type 1, 2 and 3) underwent a posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation: 20 patients in CR group and 22 patients in the ST group. The minimum follow-up was two years (Mean follow-up: 71 months and 47 months).

Outcomes measures: Thoracic sagittal kyphosis between T4 and T12 and Cobb angle measurements of major and minor curves evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and the final visit, by an independent observer.

Methods: In CR group, we have used polyaxial pedicle screws and one or two monoaxial thoracic hooks. In ST group, we have used polyaxial pedicle screws and poly-axial claws which provide same stability than screws. Three groups of preoperative kyphosis were generated: 11 patients with severe hypokyphosis (T4–T12 < 10°) (5 in CR group and 6 in ST group); 11 patients with mild hypokyphosis (between 10 and 20°) (respectively 4° vs 7°) and 20 with normokyphosis (> 20°) (respectively 11 vs 9).

Results: At the final follow-up, for patients with a severe preoperative hypokyphosis, the mean gain was 14 degrees in the CR group (8° preop to 22° postop) and 25° in the ST group (6° preop to 31 postop) (p< 0.05). For patients xith mild hypokyphosis, te mean gains were respectively 7 degrees (16° preop to 23° postop) and 18° (16° preop to 34° postop) (p< 0.05). After surgery, 3 patients of CR group had hypokyphosis alors que all patients had normal kyphosis (> 20°) in the ST group. In the coronal plane, the mean correction of scoliosis are similar in the two groups (75% vs 69% p=NS)

Discussion and Conclusion: In posterior instrumentation for AIS, simultaneous reduction on two rods provides a better correction of the thoracic kyphosis than the cantilever reduction in patient with preoperative hypokyphosis. This surgical technique seems to restore thoracic normal kyphosis.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org