Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

KNEE RANGE OF MOTION DEPENDING ON DIFFERENT FEMORAL COMPONENT DESIGN: ELVALUATED IN VIVO BY A NAVIGATION SYSTEM



Abstract

Introduction: ROM after TKA can be influenced by multi-factors such as preoperative range of motion, body habitus, implant design, intraoperative surgical technique, and postoperative rehabilitation. Recently many implant manufacturers have made modifications to traditional total knee designs to improved maximal knee flexion and range of motion. Some posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) stabilized total knee prostheses that incorporate design features intended to improve knee kinematics in high flexion were introduced and the use of these prostheses has attracted attention. Recently in the cruciate retaining (CR) prosthesis, high-flexion knee (CR-Flex) and gender-specified prosthesis were designed to allow a greater and safer flexion after TKA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cruciate retaining typed different femoral component design on knee range of motion using a computerized navigation system.

Materials & method: 30 patients who underwent primary TKA because of primary osteoarthritis were included. EM navigation system was used in all cases. After tibia and femoral cutting using standard CR cutting block, standard fixed bearing CR knee (NexGen CR, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) trial was inserted. If surgeon is satisfactory with alignment, stability and ligament balancing, the maximal knee extension and flexion was recorded using gravity by navigation system. Then, high-flexion fixed bearing CR knees(NexGen CR-Flex and Gender solution NexGen CR-Flex knee, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) trial was inserted after additional posterior cutting. The maximal knee extension and flexion was evaluated exactly same way.

Results: Preoperative mean varus deformity was 10.52°. The mean flexion contracture was 7.52±6.81° and further flexion 129.9±7.94°. The average intraoperative maximal flexion of NexGen CR was 133.5±5.35° (125–146°) and that of hyper-flexion design were 135.5±5.77°(125–147°) in Nexgen CR-Flex and 136.1±5.76°(126–146°) in Gender knee. All knees showed greater than 125° of flexion regardless of the implant design. All knees can achieve physiologic leg alignment and nearly full extension of the knee after operation.

Conclusion: Hyper flexion designs showed subtle increase in mean maximal flexion and overall range of motion of the knee compared with the standard design, when it measured using navigation system intraoperatively. But clinically, it is not certain that these differences can lead to significant improvement of range of motion.

Correspondence should be addressed to ISTA Secretariat, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Tel: 1-916-454-9884, Fax: 1-916-454-9882, Email: ista@pacbell.net