BIOMECHANICAL INFLUENCE OF SEMI-CONSTRAINT AND UN-CONSTRAINT TYPE OF ARTIFICIAL DISC ON CERVICAL SPINE

Abstract

Spinal fusion has been used as the gold standard to treat some spinal disorders such as degenerative disc or disc herniation of the cervical spine. However, some clinical complications have been reported caused by high stiffness of spinal fusion. Recently, total disc arthroplasty using motion preservation devices such as artificial discs (ADs) have been proposed as an alternative treatment technique. In current study, we analysed biomechanical influences including inter-segmental motion, facet joint forces, and ligament stresses of two different clinical available ADs and compared with those of intact cervical spine in various loading conditions using finite element analysis.

A three dimensional finite element model was developed for C2-C7 spinal motion segment based on CT images and previous anatomical literatures. The finite element models for two different types of ADs, semi-constraint (Prodisc-C^®, Synthes, U.S.A) and un-constraint (Mobi-C^®, LDR Spine, U.S.A), were developed. Each AD was inserted at C6–C7 segments. Superior and inferior plates of ADs were fixed on inferior plane of C6 and superior plane of C7 vertebrae, respectively. Based on the conventional surgical techniques, anterior longitudinal ligaments and some parts of intervertebral disc in C6–C7 motion segment were removed to insert ADs. Inferior plane of C7 vertebra was constrained in all directions and 1Nm of flexion, extension, lateral bending and torsion were applied on superior plane of C2 vertebra with 50N of compressive load along follower load direction.

Rotation angle in flexion of C5–C6 segment in cases of semi-constraint and un-constraint AD was 3.3° and 3.7°, respectively. Both values were greater than that in case of the intact cervical spine by 18% and 32%, respectively. Rotation angle in extension, lateral bending and torsion were greater than intact model by 45%, 26% and 43% for the case of semi-constraint AD and 55%, 35%, 100% for the case of un-constraint one, respectively. In extension, facet joint forces were about two times higher than intact model in cases of semi-constraint and un-constraint AD. Also in flexion, on average, ligament stresses in cases of semi-constraint and un-constraint AD were higher than intact model by 66% and 116%, respectively.

The results of this study showed that ADs were useful to generate inter-segmental motion at surgical level. And the un-constraint type of AD had higher mobility than semi-constraint one. However, high mobility of ADs would lead not only higher facet joint forces but also ligament stresses than intact cervical spine. Therefore, more careful care must be taken to choose surgical method of total disc arthroplasty.